You'd stand a better chance of getting "crisp" headphones by dunking them in an egg-potato starch batter then frying it at 100C and then at 250C than considering #1 and #3 as something only a "crisp" headphone can have. Jokes aside, any decent headphone should have those regardless of the treble characteristics (more on this below).
There are numerous factors and problems you're not taking into account here.
First off, the response curves on those headphones aren't exactly emphasizing the treble. The EL-8 AFAIK has an overall smoother curve but with a slighlty rolled off treble. The HE400i has two short peaks above where 1000hz is (and it's ruler flat from there down to 10hz), but it does take a nose dive between 1000hz and the first peak and a slight dip between the two peaks. And again the peaks aren't all that tall.
Second, these are fullrange drivers, and just like with single FR driver speakers, given current technological limitations they're either too far from linear between 20hz to 20000hz, or they can be relatively smooth but take a nose dive earlier at either end. Add to the range width and curve shape other considerations like sensitivity and impedance, and driver design ultimately isn't as easy as it can be, especially vs speakers that can have more than one driver.
Third, while I might hazard a guess that you could have high frequency hearing loss and thus would be better served by a headphone with treble peaks, I'd have to clear up that this isn't a clear path to getting what you want. The peak/s can have the exact opposite effect rather than basically cancel out what you're missing, and worse, often it can impact the imaging. Boosting the treble for example pushes the cymbals forward, like on Grados. AKG's K7-- series has treble peaks as well however the K701, K702, and Q701 mitigate that consequence with angled headphone pads. These mimic the toe in of speakers (ie, put zero toe-in on your speakers and you get a very forward sound with no depth in the image), taking the drivers off-axis relative to your ear canals. I even wear these pushed forward to take the drivers even farther out from my ear canals rather than just have good depth but leave the cymbals crashing loudly just by my temples.
Fourth, and this is related to the previous points, you can't just compare speakers to headphones as it's a totally different acoustic situation. The first point is favored by engineers and consumers in dealing with the second point precisely because of the ones in the third point. Also, that cymbals-forward for outflanking double-pincer crushing envelopment cavalry charge effect on headphones is enhanced precisely because of the differences in how the sound is treated: the drivers are right outside your ears plus left ear can't hear right ear and vice versa (thereby making for less cross-channel spatial cues that position the cymbals toward the center). By contrast, with speakers you deal with reflections (something you can reduce by just moving the speakers and chair farther from the surrounding walls, if not treating the entire room) and toe-in angles to match the dispersion angles. Coupled with specialized drivers with crossovers that counter the higher sensitivity of tweeters, the risk of getting peaks is a lot lower on speakers also barring reflections, while the tweeters remain comparatively flatter farther up the range. And then you have an entire room to work with where reflections or at least a reverb throughout the room helps in what you perceive, kind of like how people have similar issues at the low freqs without taking into account that drivers right by your ears or inside your ear canals aren't exactly going to give the chest-thumping bass of a subwoofer or large towers driven by powerful amps at high volume.
Fifth, that doesn't even take into account what specific speakers you're comparing those specific headphones to. If you were using Aurum Cantus or Magnepans, the only way to match the treble with Stax. It won't necessarily do as well with the way Aurum Cantus handles the low mids and lows though, or a Magnepan with more of the bass modules.
Basically...
...I'd rather accept that headphones are different, but if you're really willing to experiment with different headphones, I'd recommend you try Beyer's T90 for just the treble bumps and see if the issue could partly be high frequency hearing loss or plain preference. Alternately, you can save up and get the LCD-3 or go all the way and get Stax.
As for the ones in your list, the Elear might not be that much of an improvement for the specific problem you're trying to tackle, ditto the PM-2. Maybe the HD600 and the newer LCD-2F, but again, you might as well try the LCD-3 or Stax.
