Well all these headphones are 'well regarded', what I'm getting at is how well they are regarded vs each other. I mean a dodge caliber is a great car, but compared to anything else in it's price it's a piece of junk. From what I understand a lot of people dislike the sound profile and quality compared to more balanced headphones (but on it's own, sure, it's great).
The JVC HA400, 500, monoprice 8230, mdr-1r, I've never really heard of these being recommended, I'll look into them. I see mostly the 558 being recommended by people who've done direct comparisons.
It seems to me that there is a best, it seems like some headphones have better sound stage, better sound quality, better comfort. There's varying sound profiles, and that's a preferential thing, but even then it seems certain profiles are more preferable to others (ie balanced vs not-balanced, bright vs warm). There are lots of good headphones but it seems you can really slim down the choices if you have certain needs, ie if you don't need closed, then there's not many open to choose from (pretty much the 558 really). If you want a certain sound profile, etc.
MDR-1R I can only find for like $200+, seems a bit out of my price range.
depends what you mean by better sound stage. in terms of instrument placement? width? depth?
for example i have the most experience with iems, the vsonic gr07 have a wide soundstage for an iem but its rather thin and does not have the greatest depth in terms of layering
while listening to the re400 which is a smaller soundstage, instrument placement is more precise and theres better layering in the music
lemme give you some insight on my little journey into headphones, i thought i wanted a more neutral headphone, so i went for the noontec zoro (another well regarded headphone here on headfi, for their price to performance ratio)
they are really good but i found that the treble was not as well extended enough for my taste
then i tried for the neutral profile again with the re400, the bass was not really enough for me, it was fantastic in terms of clarity and performance
which is why i went for the vsonic gr07 be, which i find the amazing, but even then i would like maybe 1-2 db more bass.
but i find myself going back to the noontec zoro sometimes due to the lack of listening fatigue because of the rolled off treble ,
but i then wanted to try i like a brighter sound signature (which is why i own the jvc fxd80)
but after owning the jvc fxd80 which has tremendous bass performance (not muddy at all, but elevated) and fantastic and well extended treble (but there is a mid range suck out, and the mids are rather unnatural for voices) i still prefered the darker signature of the monster turbines (because of the thicker mids and its sounds more natural)
what i'm saying is what you think you want, might not be actually what you want. as bad as this sound sometimes you just have to pull the trigger and try it.
like even now for me i like all kinds of sound signatures, i thought i wanted neutral but i guess not! even the gr07 be which is my favorite at the moment has some glaring flaws as well, that i find some other iems exceeding them.
similar in terms of women/ or men (whatever your preferences is) your ideal in this cause sound sig might not actually be for you.
sometimes the right combination of bass,mid and treble sound stage, comfort etc could lead you to music enjoyment. i find that these forum are informative but too many people use the word "best" and "greatest". and if you noticed many people above my posts agree that there is no best really. thats too misleading
also theres so many thread out there i'm not surprised you haven't heard of the ones i listed, and i'm not surprised i didn't hear about the 558, you can only go though so much.
sorry these post are off topic from the cal posting. my apologies. (on an off note, i really want to try these babies out, i have never heard of the original cal) and for 129$ these seem like too much value for that price =) their a bit bulky (on the head) mind you but oh wellz