Originally Posted by SpaceMonkey /img/forum/go_quote.gif Can someone please elaborate, thanks
Not really, no. What I can say is that most of the terms being used by reviewers do not have an absolute definition, nor is there any frame of reference. These terms are used to translate feelings- not specifics. Think of them as being used to create an abstract form- something you might associate with a certain emotion. In defense of the reviewers, it is very hard to put into words something you hear and feel. They have to say something!
All that aside, I think "warm" is a general term used to describe an inflated sound- or something rich in even order harmonics (some tubes, eg). It is not displeasing to hear- yet not totally accurate either. If you have had an integrated amp/pre with a "loudness" button- you experienced a "warm" sound when engaged.
"Cold" is a term that was first used to describe early solid state gear, and that term is quite appropriate, IMO. Think of "cold" as a sound lacking any "nurturing" benefit. Some digital gear fails to convey the rich, harmonic content of music and is said to be "cold", or even "sterile". You won't find many turntables with "cold" being used in their description, but lot of CD players (and digital source files) are adequatley described as being "cold". Most- not all.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.