Peter Hyatt
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2015
- Posts
- 1,989
- Likes
- 1,921
I had a similar experience with Hugo - in that I found I was listening to much more music in general. Also, the really odd thing was that I found I could enjoy really bad 1930's recordings - now you can hear all the EQ problems and the distortion, but Hugo/Mojo allowed me to connect to the music in a profoundly different way than before.
Technically, it caused me big headaches, as I could not understand why it had this quality. I managed to fully understand it with the Dave project. It turned out to be the timing errors that digital recordings introduced - or rather the timing errors that DAC's create when it goes from sampled data back to the original continuous analogue signal. What was strange is that extremely small timing errors have a very big impact to how our brains makes sense of the music - and reducing these very small timing errors allowed me to connect with the music.
Rob
I also went to the 30's material to see how Mojo would handle them: Mississippi John Hurt's early recordings and Bing Crosby's complete set, particularly the early recordings. Blind Blake, and a few others. I thought of this when one reviewer referenced a 57 recording of Elvis and how Mojo brought it to life. The 30's recordings are more enjoyable now.
Mojo expands my hobby greatly, both in brining back old material while being inspired to listen to new.