Chord Mojo DAC-amp ☆★►FAQ in 3rd post!◄★☆
post-13992701
Post #35,221 of 40,464

Mython

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
8,760
Reaction score
3,383
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
8,760
Likes
3,383
Sorry. I was trying to say that the charging circuit had sensed a fault rather than imply that it had a fault.
Yes, I interpreted your comment to mean that the charging circuit was not charging as intended (as would be the case, if insufficient charging current was being supplied to Mojo), rather than the circuit actually having a technical hardware fault.

However, others, less familiar with Mojo, might misconstrue your intended meaning.

Semantics can be a fickle mistress!


Therefore, not to reduce the legitimacy of Greenbow's later clarification, but, purely to avoid any confusion to new Mojo owners who may read your original remark, it might be helpful to go back and edit your original post, in order to make your intended meaning clearer to anyone newcomers reading it.
cheers beerchug EMOTICON.gif
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13993682
Post #35,223 of 40,464

Trapok

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
224
Reaction score
55
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Posts
224
Likes
55
The whole point of Mojo is that there are actually no good dac/amp chips available; they all, by comparison to Mojo, perform poorly both measurement and sound quality wise. No other non Chord DAC reconstructs transients as accurately as Mojo - and that's down to Mojo's processing power (500x more powerful) and the use of the WTA algorithm. Also, no other non Chord DAC (at any price) has Mojo's zero measured noise floor modulation (and this is the reason for Mojo's natural warmth and refinement). No other non Chord DAC has the analogue simplicity of a single high power discrete OP stage with only one amplifier in the signal path - and this single amp topology gives Mojo's transparency.

Rob
Thanks for your answer.

What i understand is is that buying an hi-end DAP and pairing it with a MOJO is a nonsens as the DAP will be used as transport only.
Am i right?
(Unless you already have it)
 
     Share This Post       
post-13993709
Post #35,224 of 40,464

earwego

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Messages
36
Reaction score
7
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Posts
36
Likes
7
Am I right in saying that the Chord Mojo is totally immune to the quality of the source/transport (if at least half-decent) - like for instance - if I use the simple little Google Chromecast Audio via its toslink? I am close to spending good money on an sMS-200 Ultra which is renowned as an excellent source (a 'game changer' some say) - but if Chord DACs do not respond (due to they way they are specifically designed) to the higher end quality transport with femto clocks then I may as well stick with the CCA! (Or perhaps I 'may' upgrade to the Aries Mini simply because of the UI).

Additional do this, does the Mojo respond to high quality linear power supplies?

There's so much talk about money spent upstream of the DAC int terms of transport and PSU, if however this is certainly unnecessary "for sure", the CCA does everything I need it to.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13993714
Post #35,225 of 40,464

musickid

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
3,948
Reaction score
1,842
Location
U.K.
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Location
U.K.
Posts
3,948
Likes
1,842
with optical does mojo fully reclock the incoming signal so it is in effect in full control of timing as if you were using the usb input? i know other dacs can become slave to the sources clock if not using asynchrous usb input. i think dave does reclock all incoming signals regardless of input type using DPLL as far as i understand? is mojo the same?
 
     Share This Post       
post-13993778
Post #35,226 of 40,464

Rob Watts

Member of the Trade: Chord Electronics
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
2,412
Reaction score
6,569
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Posts
2,412
Likes
6,569
Yes Mojo is the same as Dave and Hugo 2 - they all have the identical DPLL.

As far as linear PSU's go, when I plug in Mojo's charger, I can measure absolutely no change - but much more importantly (as we can hear what can't be measured) I can't hear any change. Of course, if you are using Mojo as a DAC feeding a power amp, you may hear differently, as some power amps are very sensitive to other PSU's, and the mains power in general.

As far as sources go, if it is bit perfect, than Mojo is pretty much insensitive to the quality of the source - certainly completely insensitive to source jitter. Optical will be the best SQ, and with a good source USB will match optical sound quality.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Syros
post-13993781
Post #35,227 of 40,464

earwego

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Messages
36
Reaction score
7
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Posts
36
Likes
7
Yes Mojo is the same as Dave and Hugo 2 - they all have the identical DPLL.

As far as linear PSU's go, when I plug in Mojo's charger, I can measure absolutely no change - but much more importantly (as we can hear what can't be measured) I can't hear any change. Of course, if you are using Mojo as a DAC feeding a power amp, you may hear differently, as some power amps are very sensitive to other PSU's, and the mains power in general.

As far as sources go, if it is bit perfect, than Mojo is pretty much insensitive to the quality of the source - certainly completely insensitive to source jitter. Optical will be the best SQ, and with a good source USB will match optical sound quality.
Well this is VERY important to me. I've been chasing the idea that a high quality transport such as the sMS-200 Ultra's are "superb" - but why spend money on one when - in terms of the Chord Mojo at least - it won't make a blind bit of difference between using a lowly (but competent) CCA or a souped up sMS-200.

However if this is true (which is excellent btw) then I will be locked into using Chord DACs because these are perhaps the only DACs on the market that do not upgrade their performance with better upstream foundation. I would like the Chord 2Qute, but 3V output just seems a little high - I can of course see if that is the case.

Point is conclusively - the CCA is as good as any front end transport 'irrespective of price' when tethered to a Chord!!
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13993785
Post #35,228 of 40,464

musickid

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
3,948
Reaction score
1,842
Location
U.K.
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Location
U.K.
Posts
3,948
Likes
1,842
thanks for the clarification there. mk
 
     Share This Post       
post-13993843
Post #35,229 of 40,464

miketlse

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 8, 2016
Messages
4,566
Reaction score
2,611
Joined
May 8, 2016
Posts
4,566
Likes
2,611
Well this is VERY important to me. I've been chasing the idea that a high quality transport such as the sMS-200 Ultra's are "superb" - but why spend money on one when - in terms of the Chord Mojo at least - it won't make a blind bit of difference between using a lowly (but competent) CCA or a souped up sMS-200.

However if this is true (which is excellent btw) then I will be locked into using Chord DACs because these are perhaps the only DACs on the market that do not upgrade their performance with better upstream foundation. I would like the Chord 2Qute, but 3V output just seems a little high - I can of course see if that is the case.

Point is conclusively - the CCA is as good as any front end transport 'irrespective of price' when tethered to a Chord!!
Mojo is not entirely immune to source quality, see post https://www.head-fi.org/threads/cho...n-3rd-post-◄★☆.784602/page-2238#post-13681386
Optical will produce a very clear sound output, but usb can be impacted by RFI or electrical noise generated internally by the source phone, laptop etc. Even a cheap DAP like a shanling, produces a good quality usb source. I have not heard poly, so cannot say if it is much better, although there are a number of owners posting that the sound quality is outstanding.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13993939
Post #35,230 of 40,464

jarnopp

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
1,544
Reaction score
763
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Posts
1,544
Likes
763
Well this is VERY important to me. I've been chasing the idea that a high quality transport such as the sMS-200 Ultra's are "superb" - but why spend money on one when - in terms of the Chord Mojo at least - it won't make a blind bit of difference between using a lowly (but competent) CCA or a souped up sMS-200.

However if this is true (which is excellent btw) then I will be locked into using Chord DACs because these are perhaps the only DACs on the market that do not upgrade their performance with better upstream foundation. I would like the Chord, but 3V output just seems a little high - I can of course see if that is the case.

Point is conclusively - the CCA is as good as any front end transport 'irrespective of price' when tethered to a Chord!!
I would agree that bit perfect sources probably don’t matter or affect the Mojo, but that is not to say that different DACs will all sound the same. There is the very real problem of getting the bit perfect stream from device A to Mojo, and RFI and other noise transmitted by the connection can be (very) detrimental. That is why optical is suggested as the best input, because it doesn’t transmit any of this noise. But it had to support your use case, which would be mostly desktop use and l8mited sample rates. The Chord Poly, although USB, does not seem to suffer these noises either and many Poly owners, myself included, feel it’s the best way to feed Mojo, especially if you are streaming from Roon. It’s also quite portable.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13993980
Post #35,231 of 40,464

earwego

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Messages
36
Reaction score
7
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Posts
36
Likes
7
I would agree that bit perfect sources probably don’t matter or affect the Mojo, but that is not to say that different DACs will all sound the same. There is the very real problem of getting the bit perfect stream from device A to Mojo, and RFI and other noise transmitted by the connection can be (very) detrimental. That is why optical is suggested as the best input, because it doesn’t transmit any of this noise. But it had to support your use case, which would be mostly desktop use and l8mited sample rates. The Chord Poly, although USB, does not seem to suffer these noises either and many Poly owners, myself included, feel it’s the best way to feed Mojo, especially if you are streaming from Roon. It’s also quite portable.
Yes I was looking at that combo (Mojo+Poly) for the ultimate streaming solution for Tidal - the other alternative is Aries Mini (or full blown Aries) to the Chord Mojo - because at least you have Tidal built into the AURALiC products. Introducing Roon means adding expense on the software and also needing to optimise the computer that Roon is running from.

Actually come to think of it, why would I need the Chord Poly if the CCA is already streaming Tidal just fine, without the CCA influencing the SQ in a negative way on the Mojo? If all I do is stream Tidal - surely it's a waste of money for me (as I don't stream over UPnP for example). Looking online - Chromecast Audio will be supported soon - but I already have the casting function on the CCA. So in conclusion, no benefit for me bolting on a Poly!?
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13994011
Post #35,232 of 40,464

jarnopp

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
1,544
Reaction score
763
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Posts
1,544
Likes
763
Yes I was looking at that combo (Mojo+Poly) for the ultimate streaming solution for Tidal - the other alternative is Aries Mini (or full blown Aries) to the Chord Mojo - because at least you have Tidal built into the AURALiC products. Introducing Roon means adding expense on the software and also needing to optimise the computer that Roon is running from.

Actually come to think of it, why would I need the Chord Poly if the CCA is already streaming Tidal just fine, without the CCA influencing the SQ in a negative way on the Mojo? If all I do is stream Tidal - surely it's a waste of money for me (as I don't stream over UPnP for example). Looking online - Chromecast Audio will be supported soon - but I already have the casting function on the CCA. So in conclusion, no benefit for me bolting on a Poly!?
The phone introduces quite a bit of noise via the CCK/USB cable connection. Also, it may not be worth it just for form factor, but freeing the phone from the Mojo has been life-changing for me in terms of convenience.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13994056
Post #35,233 of 40,464

jooonnn

New Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
49
Reaction score
29
Location
Washington, USA
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Location
Washington, USA
Posts
49
Likes
29
I'm still having a ton of issues with iOS 11 with the chord mojo on my iPhone X. I keep getting a 'accessory not supported by this iphone' error. It happens when the CCK alone is plugged in, even without my mojo OR my dragonfly red.

I am pretty certain the latest update nuked the apple CCK if you look at the reviews of the cable currently.

Oh apple
 
     Share This Post       
post-13994076
Post #35,234 of 40,464

Light - Man

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Messages
6,045
Reaction score
5,989
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Joined
Mar 23, 2015
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Posts
6,045
Likes
5,989
Age
120
I'm still having a ton of issues with iOS 11 with the chord mojo on my iPhone X. I keep getting a 'accessory not supported by this iphone' error. It happens when the CCK alone is plugged in, even without my mojo OR my dragonfly red.

I am pretty certain the latest update nuked the apple CCK if you look at the reviews of the cable currently.

Oh apple
Can you Apple dudes not go back to factory settings or is something so simple and straightforward not available?

Of course back up all data before trying anything (especially old girlfriend phone numbers - just in case :ksc75smile: )
 
     Share This Post       
post-13994088
Post #35,235 of 40,464

musickid

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
3,948
Reaction score
1,842
Location
U.K.
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Location
U.K.
Posts
3,948
Likes
1,842
earwego i personally would not use an aries mini or aries as a source as its connected to the mains and can cause trouble. as reiterated optical is best followed by a battery powered laptop next for usb. remember the money needs to go on good cables/high quality headphone after mojo. the headphone will make the biggest difference not all this other nonsense. i'm using flagship oppo pm1 with mojo with stunning results and optical to imac/roon. keep it simple. mr speaker aeon highly recommended too.

its apple hardware lightman AFAIK.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 7)

  • Top