Between the Somic V2 and the ISK MDH9000, which one should I get? Total newbie here.
Thanks in advance.
It probably comes down to whether you want an open-backed design (V2) vs a closed-back design (ISK MDH9000). You should always start by finding reviews anywhere/everywhere:
Somic V2:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/809323/somic-v2-headphone-review-by-mark2410
https://www.reddit.com/r/headphones/comments/4nqyoj/review_of_the_somic_v2_my_favorite_sub50/
http://mammoth1.co.uk/index.php/2016/05/somic-v2-review-an-outstanding-build-with-an-impressive-sound/
And a video review of 2 Status Audio headphones, 1 of which is a re-badge of the Somic V2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WRSv_4ylVI
ISK MDH9000:
Much harder to find reviews for this closed back design, which apparently is the source for up to 5 different re-badges (ie,identical headphones w/different brandname). I own 2 of those, the LyxPro HAS-30's and the Marantz MPH-2's, both of which I've commented on extensively in this thread.
I've never heard the Somic V2 or its clone, the Status Audio OB-1. However, I am very impressed with the ISK MDH9000 design, both for its balanced, competent sonics--with lots of quality bass; and for its above average comfort. The Marantz' have become my default daily headphone, despite being 1/4 the cost of the really wonderful, semi-open back Fidelio X2's (which I do love and listen to occasionally).
My vote would be the ISK just based on my own positive experience. But admittedly, I've never heard the Somic V2.