Cheap, but good balanced amp.
Apr 26, 2007 at 9:13 AM Post #31 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by cotdt /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Balanced has:

Double the voltage swing
Double the current
Four times output power
Much higher power supply rejection ratio
Much higher common mode rejection ratio
Double the dampening factor, better control over the drivers
Less noise
Lower distortion
Solves ground loop issues (from personal experience)
More electrons for a smoother sound (some say this is why tubes sound smoother than solid state)

In short, buying two cheap amps and balancing them would definately be worth it.



Aren't you generalizing a bit? Go build a balanced basic cMoy and tell me that it sounds better than a single-ended Dynalo.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 9:46 AM Post #32 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by Roam /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Cheap, good, balanced. Pick two.


haha, that was clever
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 3:05 PM Post #33 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by humanflyz /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Aren't you generalizing a bit? Go build a balanced basic cMoy and tell me that it sounds better than a single-ended Dynalo.


What I listed is based on exact math: relative to the unbalanced version of the amp. Read that again: relative to the unbalanced version of the same amp. This means all else equal. So a balanced CMoy should be better than the single ended version using the same parts. I can say nothing about how it compares to other amps. Indeed, I've compared the balanced Dynalo to the unbalanced Dynahi, and the unbalanced Dynahi was better. I agree with you that a good single-ended amp will be better than a cheap balanced amp. But what if you already have an amp that you like, and there is no balanced version? Then I claim, based on math and scientific deduction, that there would be an improvement if that person bought another identical amp for balanced operation.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 5:44 PM Post #34 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kees /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I think that can only work if you have a balanced source, right?


Why, yes of course
biggrin.gif
~!
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 6:11 PM Post #35 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by vcoheda /img/forum/go_quote.gif
HR desktop balanced or Rudistor nx-33, but even those will cost you around $1000-1250, or more. the SP Sqaure Wave is $1699, but maybe there is an introductory offer making it less. i dont know. the GSX is another one, but that is $1800. Then there is the Apache (around $3000), the B-52 (around $5000), and other rudistor amps over $2000.

balanced amps, unfortunately, are not cheap.



How do you like the sound of that Apogee Mini-DAC driving HD650s? Does it work well?
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 6:31 PM Post #36 of 50
http://www.sft-audio.url.tw/GXLR/GXLR.html

.Full balanced Gilmore headphone amplifier
.Two Dynahi power supplies
.Dynahi output stage
.Single 4-channel stepped attenuator
.Silver solder
.Milled Volume Knob
.430mm x 305mm x 67mm
.Weight : 7Kg


this looks pretty good. do the specs above make this a dynamight?
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 6:32 PM Post #37 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by choariwap /img/forum/go_quote.gif
http://www.sft-audio.url.tw/GXLR/GXLR.html

.Full balanced Gilmore headphone amplifier
.Two Dynahi power supplies
.Dynahi output stage
.Single 4-channel stepped attenuator
.Silver solder
.Milled Volume Knob
.430mm x 305mm x 67mm
.Weight : 7Kg


this looks pretty good. do the specs above make this a dynamight?



Nope, it is not a full Dynahi, only uses the power supply and output stage.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 6:59 PM Post #38 of 50
I'm new to balanced, but it seems to me that if one had two closely-matched stereo amps (for example my two Gilmore Lite V2's) then with appropriate custom cabling one would have the equivalent of a balanced amp (using one stereo amp per channel), though with separate volume knobs for left and right.

Anything wrong with my logic? I have been thinking of ordering just such a set of custom cables so that I can try out balanced for a while on the cheap before taking the plunge on a GS-X.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 7:10 PM Post #39 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lockout /img/forum/go_quote.gif
How do you like the sound of that Apogee Mini-DAC driving HD650s? Does it work well?


it sounds amazing. i'm almost tempted to not buy a balanced amp because of how good it sounds.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 7:15 PM Post #41 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by episiarch /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'm new to balanced, but it seems to me that if one had two closely-matched stereo amps (for example my two Gilmore Lite V2's) then with appropriate custom cabling one would have the equivalent of a balanced amp (using one stereo amp per channel), though with separate volume knobs for left and right.

Anything wrong with my logic? I have been thinking of ordering just such a set of custom cables so that I can try out balanced for a while on the cheap before taking the plunge on a GS-X.



Done.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 7:32 PM Post #42 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kees /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Done.


that's pretty cool. getting two matching amps and a balanced source isn't too difficult, but getting a balanced senn cable cable terminated with 2 1/4 inch connectors is not very practical (unless you build one yourself), and even less so for other headphones where the cables are not detachable.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 7:42 PM Post #43 of 50
Kees, thanks for the link! Very helpful.

vicoheda, what I thought I'd do on the output side is get a pair of 1/4" stereo to XLR adaptor cables made, so that I could adapt regular balanced headphone cables to this rig rather than get a special cable for each headphone.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 7:52 PM Post #44 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by episiarch /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Kees, thanks for the link! Very helpful.

vicoheda, what I thought I'd do on the output side is get a pair of 1/4" stereo to XLR adaptor cables made, so that I could adapt regular balanced headphone cables to this rig rather than get a special cable for each headphone.



that would certainly be preferable, but it still seems like a lot of work. i wonder how this thing really sounds. seems more like an interesting experiment than a real solution for going balanced. and two good amps may be as much as, or more than, a balanced one.
 
Apr 26, 2007 at 7:59 PM Post #45 of 50
Quote:

Originally Posted by vcoheda /img/forum/go_quote.gif
that would certainly be preferable, but it still seems like a lot of work. i wonder how this thing really sounds. seems more like an interesting experiment than a real solution for going balanced. and two good amps may be as much as, or more than, a balanced one.


how come you're using a balanced headphone cable but no balanced amp? you owe it to yourself to try balanced.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top