CD780 vs Audio Technica ATH-A500/A900?
- Thread starter marvie
- Start date
Superbaldguy
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2002
- Messages
- 1,190
- Reaction score
- 10
I have both and, TBH, both are equally comfortable. Sorry I wasn't very decisive.
some1x
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 20, 2003
- Messages
- 2,186
- Reaction score
- 58
If the CD780 felt warm to you, then you should look at getting open-air headphones (i.e. not A500/900).
marvie
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2003
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 0
Quote:
Aww man. The quest for the perfect cans continues yet again.
Originally posted by some1x If the CD780 felt warm to you, then you should look at getting open-air headphones (i.e. not A500/900). |
Aww man. The quest for the perfect cans continues yet again.

TheMuffinMan_01
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2003
- Messages
- 940
- Reaction score
- 10
lindrone has all of these phones and will be able to give you a really good idea of what to get. some of the trained ears around here hate the cd780's, and lindrone has compared the a500's and a900's and said that there is very little difference in sound quality. and everybody loves the a900's, if i were you i would get whichever one of those 2 i could afford.
lindrone
King Canaling
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2003
- Messages
- 3,887
- Reaction score
- 26
You guys have got to stop misquoting me.. I said there's very little difference if your ears aren't trained to understand and notice these differences. After owning a couple of different headphones and becoming more experienced, the difference in quality between A500 and A900 is obviously and blatant..
A500/A900 actually doesn't build up as much heat as the CD780. Even though CD780 is open, the padding of the CD780 covers your ear completely, doesn't allow much air circulation.. it doesn't have a "hole" in the middle as most headphone padding, it's a flat pad.
So even though A500/A900 is closed, they build up heat slower (still builds up nevertheless) than the CD780. CD780 is like having a blanket & pillow on your ears.
Sound-wise, A500 will sound more spacious, the soundstage is larger, and the sound imaging is more accurate. The sound itself will be a little less warm, but a little more detailed. Everything will sound just a bit clearer and defined in comparison to CD780.
A900 is like A500, except everything is a step up... sound is more detailed, sound extension is more in both direction (highs and lows), soundstage and imaging are both improved.
A500/A900 actually doesn't build up as much heat as the CD780. Even though CD780 is open, the padding of the CD780 covers your ear completely, doesn't allow much air circulation.. it doesn't have a "hole" in the middle as most headphone padding, it's a flat pad.
So even though A500/A900 is closed, they build up heat slower (still builds up nevertheless) than the CD780. CD780 is like having a blanket & pillow on your ears.
Sound-wise, A500 will sound more spacious, the soundstage is larger, and the sound imaging is more accurate. The sound itself will be a little less warm, but a little more detailed. Everything will sound just a bit clearer and defined in comparison to CD780.
A900 is like A500, except everything is a step up... sound is more detailed, sound extension is more in both direction (highs and lows), soundstage and imaging are both improved.
GanChan
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2002
- Messages
- 758
- Reaction score
- 10
Quote:
To save a hundred bucks, i think this semi-trained listener could be persuaded to listen to the A500 while pretending the A900 doesn't exist.
To save even more money, I might hang onto my 280 Pro, but that might be more thriftiness than is good for me. People criticize the 280 Pro, but i think it goes pretty well with classical. How's the A500 for classical (on its own merits, as opposed to comparison with the A900)?
Originally posted by lindrone You guys have got to stop misquoting me.. I said there's very little difference if your ears aren't trained to understand and notice these differences. After owning a couple of different headphones and becoming more experienced, the difference in quality between A500 and A900 is obviously and blatant.. |
To save a hundred bucks, i think this semi-trained listener could be persuaded to listen to the A500 while pretending the A900 doesn't exist.

To save even more money, I might hang onto my 280 Pro, but that might be more thriftiness than is good for me. People criticize the 280 Pro, but i think it goes pretty well with classical. How's the A500 for classical (on its own merits, as opposed to comparison with the A900)?
marvie
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2003
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 0
So there are no difference between A500 and A900 comfort-wise?
lindrone
King Canaling
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2003
- Messages
- 3,887
- Reaction score
- 26
A900 is a little better due to the slightly firmer padding. There's no huge difference, the design are pretty much the same otherwise.
ch1nkster
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
- Messages
- 299
- Reaction score
- 0
Yep other than the aluminum/ metal housing on the A900's, the A500 are pretty much the same thing as the A900's except for the sound. A500's are probably a considerable step down from the A900's as I would like to imagine.
MuZI
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2004
- Messages
- 1,530
- Reaction score
- 11
I wana get the A500 but i`m worried about the pads, what happens if i need replacements, how log do the pads last ussually?
marvie
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2003
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 0