No problem
@Pictograms . My pleasure in fact. I was not expecting the results I've gotten here. Cascades without that stock filter are very clear sounding. By clear I mean lack of veil, transparency could be a fitting term.
TH900 does well for a bassy can, it's out there allmost hd800 level and on par with focal clear and hifiman ananda. Cascades however fill the gap, I think Cascades are the missing link between TH900 and HD800. It's just that good.
I'ts quite crazy considering these are closed back, quite compact form headphones. I will propably blow out any credibility I have out of the window but without hesitation
I can say these are the best headphones I have ever heard. (HD800, TH900, Ananda, LCD-3f, Clear, being the references).
To explain my reasoning:
Cascade vs HD800
These don't have the soundstage of HD800, nothing has. However soundstage is excellent for a closed back. Soundstage presentation is bit different. Hd800 is more diffuse and closer and cascades place the listener further back.
HD800 however has no bass worth mentioning. HD800 can barely win out on most things despite differences in tonality. For all the clarity and detail, Cascades are very, very close to HD800. HD800 is still more impressive headphone, unless you listen to music that has any bass. Which is pretty much anything except classical without cello, organ or drums.
People who find treble peak on hd800 problematic might have issues with cascades too. Treble peak is not my major problem with hd800. It's the unnatural lightness of the presentation that bugs me more.
Cascade vs Focal Clear
Clears are damn good headphones and tonally more agreeable than cascades. However because of that tiny soundstage it's no comparison. I'm not going to spend over $1000 for a headphone that has no soundstage. Especially for open headphone. This is the main reason I originally went with th900 instead Clear.
Cascade vs Hifiman Ananda
I'm a big fan of Ananda. However it has this thin non visceral bass. Compared to Audeze Hifiman bass is quite non existent. It's there for sure. But it does not have the impact it should have. Cascades have soundstage about as large and the bass is exceptional. I also think cascades are better in bringing out small nyances in music. I think Ananda is step back in that regard from cascades,th900,hd800 and clear.
Cascade VS LCD-3f
I'm quite biased as I think LCD-3f sounds like an ass. On a first listen it't is impressive but on a longer listen it's just a mess that lacks upper midrange and overeall presentation has this weird nasal tone to it.
Cascade VS TH900
This is the most important comparison. Cascades can't match the bass on TH900. Nothing can. Way TH900 does bass is truly special. Not talking about quantity but the grip, the balls, how deep it goes, viscerality. Clean undistorted bass and gobs of it. However Cascades come close, not too close to compare though. Cascades however have a better and more proportioned soundstage and the more exact imaging. With TH900 vocals kind of blur with instruments that function on same frequency. Cascades sound kind of like evolved TH900. And why should not them, there is 10 years between them.
If I could I would tone down the treble a bit and midbass is still bit excessive. Those are my only small complaints with cascades.