jbarbier
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2009
- Posts
- 69
- Likes
- 10
please forgive me for starting what i think is an interesting, and speculative, conversation about the myriad possibilities of this "hobby" of ours when it comes time to choose wire/cable/IC/et cetera material types. i'm a newb, but i can't help but realize the futility of it all after i've spent hundreds of dollars (and hours) soldering, twisting, braiding wires and cables in order to find that auditory nirvana that we seek.
we all know that different materials conduct/resist current in different ways. and we know that these differences affect sound -- for better or worse. BUT, let's say one's total budget for a system is, hypothetically, $1000. how then do we realize the potential of modifications and upgrades? i mean, if our amp's internals are inferior to the point that pure silver (theoretical) wires won't make a difference at all -- it's simply revealing the "bad" aspects of the amp's materials -- what good is it, then? garbage in, garbage out.
and, don't get me wrong, i am DEFINITELY a believer in the FACT that cables/materials affect sound. but with a mid-level system, would our ears even be able to discern a difference at all?
i know that there are ratios that some people go by when building a system, i.e. 50 percent for amplification, 20 percent for source, 20 percent for drivers, 10 percent for cables/interconnects, etc. i'm just throwing those figures out there, that's not what i go by, but anyway, where does that leave us when it comes time to modify capacitors or tubes in our amps, or the circuit board, solder, electronic components (because ALL of these will effect the current and "noise")?
this is all fun to be sure, but what is the point when you say enough is enough, this system is good enough? i know a lot of people NEVER reach that point -- and i guess that is their point since it is a hobby...
but for the more sane, and realistic folks, when is enough enough? and is it even worth spending hundreds of dollars for theories backed by science when lesser materials (with all of their inferiorities) still sound DAMN GOOD? lol
we all know that different materials conduct/resist current in different ways. and we know that these differences affect sound -- for better or worse. BUT, let's say one's total budget for a system is, hypothetically, $1000. how then do we realize the potential of modifications and upgrades? i mean, if our amp's internals are inferior to the point that pure silver (theoretical) wires won't make a difference at all -- it's simply revealing the "bad" aspects of the amp's materials -- what good is it, then? garbage in, garbage out.
and, don't get me wrong, i am DEFINITELY a believer in the FACT that cables/materials affect sound. but with a mid-level system, would our ears even be able to discern a difference at all?
i know that there are ratios that some people go by when building a system, i.e. 50 percent for amplification, 20 percent for source, 20 percent for drivers, 10 percent for cables/interconnects, etc. i'm just throwing those figures out there, that's not what i go by, but anyway, where does that leave us when it comes time to modify capacitors or tubes in our amps, or the circuit board, solder, electronic components (because ALL of these will effect the current and "noise")?
this is all fun to be sure, but what is the point when you say enough is enough, this system is good enough? i know a lot of people NEVER reach that point -- and i guess that is their point since it is a hobby...
but for the more sane, and realistic folks, when is enough enough? and is it even worth spending hundreds of dollars for theories backed by science when lesser materials (with all of their inferiorities) still sound DAMN GOOD? lol