Craftsman
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
- Posts
- 50
- Likes
- 19
I am not sure if the mini cup over the driver in the 25 is an attempt to improve the sound, though. The driver cup could just be for cost saving (simple outer cup and simple inner cup, instead of a single complex shape with a partition wall in the middle. I suppose it is more difficult to add the partition wall in a metal mold).
Is there any damping material under the 25's driver cup?
If you look at some teardowns of the QC25, you'll quickly realize that adding a minicup over the driver and then gluing the minicup in place is not a cost savings as it would be very labour intensive just to glue the additional part in place... not to mention you need an additional part. They don't have to add a partitioning wall to the metal side of things... they could have molded a plastic partitioning wall to the chassis of the headphones and then add a bit of thin foam padding to the metal cup at the interface just like they did in the QC15 but in reverse (ie the plastic partitioning wall is on the cup and the foam on the chassis).
The reasons for the minicup is something that only Bose knows for sure but the results to the sound according to comparison testing by many online reviewers basically mirror the comparison between a sealed box speaker and one that is vented - ie Bose went from their Triport design (which basically has 3 vented ports) to a sealed box
There is no dampening material reported under the QC25's minicup.
And by the way, there's really nothing that is too simple with the QC15's cup if you look at it closely - it's a two piece mated cup with a thin partitioning wall and a metal mesh vented port. The assembly cost is up there.