skamp
Aka: HeadFiend, BatFi
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2008
- Posts
- 1,334
- Likes
- 94
I am curious as to how the "original" sample was created.
Nothing special: I extracted a 30 seconds sample from a 16 bit / 44.1 kHz track that was ripped from a CD.
I am curious as to how the "original" sample was created.
Nothing special: I extracted a 30 seconds sample from a 16 bit / 44.1 kHz track that was ripped from a CD.
So six of the samples were recorded with the EMU 0204 USB, and all seven were edited with Audacity. Did you use the identical Audacity preference settings for all edits?
Seems it would be difficult to unequivocally rule out potential effects from the EMU 0204 USB or Audacity.
Why would that be difficult?
How would one conclusively test it?
Seems it would be difficult to unequivocally rule out potential effects from the EMU 0204 USB or Audacity.
As for making sure Audacity isn't adding any effects... Just don't turn on any effects...
As for the recording device(this goes for Audacity as well), if you can't pick out the original sample it's obviously not a problem.
You're welcome to provide ABX logs demonstrating that the samples are audibly different.
With any digital editor, even adjusting the volume levels requires bit manipulation and dithering.
But the original sample was edited with Audacity....
With any digital editor, even adjusting the volume levels requires bit manipulation and dithering.
But the original sample was edited with Audacity....
Why would he even adjust anything like that?
And why would it matter if the original sample had any alterations, if the others were recorded from it being played?
Just to be clear, you are worried about inconsistencies causing audible differences that shouldn't be there, right?