Biased much?

Dec 22, 2007 at 2:56 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 15
srozzman

srozzman

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Posts
576
Likes
11
Dec 22, 2007 at 4:22 AM Post #2 of 15
Wow, he put it being cheaper as a con...

And during the entire 3 part review of two MP3 players he failed to mention sound quality once. Why would anybody waste so much time recording, editing and uploading such rubbish?
 
Dec 22, 2007 at 6:17 AM Post #3 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raikiri /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Wow, he put it being cheaper as a con...

And during the entire 3 part review of two MP3 players he failed to mention sound quality once. Why would anybody waste so much time recording, editing and uploading such rubbish?


Mostly because Nano sounds better then the Zen.
 
Dec 22, 2007 at 7:10 AM Post #4 of 15
Well at least he had them both in hand to review, he may be biased, but he's the one with both in his hand. I sure wouldn't be able to say the same. I haven't seen an Mp3 player made by Creative since probably 2003-2004, they seem to pick up on the market trends pretty well though...
 
Dec 22, 2007 at 1:53 PM Post #5 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by sigsegv0x0B /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Mostly because Nano sounds better then the Zen.


What does it matter which sounds better if he hasn't tested at all?

If he had tested and then said the Nano was better (after trying both I found the Zen to be better for me, personally) then fair enough.
 
Dec 22, 2007 at 4:33 PM Post #7 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raikiri /img/forum/go_quote.gif
What does it matter which sounds better if he hasn't tested at all?

If he had tested and then said the Nano was better (after trying both I found the Zen to be better for me, personally) then fair enough.


I did test the Zen and it doesn't sound as good as the Nano.
 
Dec 23, 2007 at 12:42 AM Post #8 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by sigsegv0x0B /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Mostly because Nano sounds better then the Zen.


Quote:

Originally Posted by sigsegv0x0B /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I did test the Zen and it doesn't sound as good as the Nano.


that's not the point, no one here is arguing which sounds better... read the posts before you reply, it's not that difficult to do!
 
Dec 23, 2007 at 10:59 AM Post #9 of 15
"Very Nice and brilliant, very stylish"

"Very boring, not going to win any awards, a bit plasticy"

Woah, this guy is full of facts. I bet he did a thorough comparison before deciding on making these videos.

/sarcasm


In all seriousness though, he has been treated fairly on YouTube, 1 / 5 star rating with only 664 views. Read the comments and they all complain about his biased opinions. Thank god for the public
 
Dec 24, 2007 at 3:17 PM Post #11 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by sigsegv0x0B /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I did test the Zen and it doesn't sound as good as the Nano.


I'm not arguing which is better because that is purely subjective. I prefer the sound of the Zen, you don't which is fine.

What I was annoyed about is the fact someone reviewing an MP3 player ignored the most important factor completely as well as being very biased.
 
Dec 24, 2007 at 4:57 PM Post #13 of 15
Does anyone else feel sorry for whoever has to hear his voice, and annoying ummmmmm *smacks lips* habit?
 
Dec 24, 2007 at 6:23 PM Post #14 of 15
Quote:

Originally Posted by srozzman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Does anyone else feel sorry for whoever has to hear his voice, and annoying ummmmmm *smacks lips* habit?


Couldn't watch it because of that. So, which one does he prefer? The iPod, probably?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top