Beyer DT770 Premium 32Ω vs AKG K271 MKII impression
Jan 22, 2011 at 8:37 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 6

terrymx

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Posts
4,759
Likes
12
I needed to buy a decent closed headphone for music, movie and fps gaming. I bought these two to compare, but decided to keep the AKG K271 and return the Beyer DT770. Here are some of my impressions of the two. My sources: ripped FLAC or purchased MP3 320kbs -> E-MU Tracker Pre (same as 0202USB).
 
What follows are entirely subjective, also I don't believe in burn in, only that the ears get used to the sound overtime. Skip to the bottom to get the bullet points and avoid the ramblings.
 

Beyer Dynamic DT770 Premium 32Ω (bought used $180)

I prefer light and tightly wrapped bass with some punch. The DT770 has overblown and bombastic bass, mostly upper bass (150-300hz). I am incapable of listening to it without EQing the bass down. The abundance of bass sometimes drown out important details of the music on the upper ranges. The bass however packed a more satisfying punch than the AKG.
 
The midrange and upper frequencies are really beautiful and refined (when they are not muddled up by the bass), this is an incredibly detailed phones for the price. The mids are really smooth which works absolutely beautiful with female voices and strings. However, it does suffer from being too laid back, not upfront and as much body like AKG headphones. The highs are very clear, but maybe not very sweet sounding (I prefer a little coloring). It does not suffer from any sibilance.
 
I think the DT770 is not perfect for heavy rock and metal as far as electronic guitars, sure it will be very clear, but it will lack some aggressiveness due to laid back mids. The DT770 has a big soundstage and realistic layering. Its very comfy with the velour pads. It clamps tight and isolates well, but some people might get the suction feeling to their ears, but its not too bad and can get used to.
 
 
AKG K271 MKII 55Ω (bought new $150)
 
The bass amount for the K271 is just right for me. The bass is tight and can be punchy, but doesn't pack the power the DT770 can deliver. However, it goes low and gives satisfying drone or rumble which is good for movies and symphony music. If you need a lot of bass, these might deliver just barely enough unless you have a quality amp or a bassy source.
 
The mids are upfront, good for rock and metal. The highs are a bit sweeter sounding than the DT770, but it doesn't soar and less refined, and maybe a bit rolled off. The upper ranges overall are dryer sounding compared to the smoother DT770. Clearly the DT770 has more refinement and clarity. The soundstage and layering is clearly not impressive as the DT770 either. However, the K271 is just more present and sometimes more fun to listen to.
 
One of the important reason I prefer the K271 is that it doesn't feel and sound "closed" like the DT770. For one the headphone is lighter, it doesn't clamp as hard so no suction feeling, though that means it isolates a few decibel less. It's more comfortable to wear and I prefer balanced sound. That is not to say the DT770 is not as comfortable, as Beyer velour earpads are much nicer than the AKG velour pads, I just dislike the DT770 suction feeling.
 
 
Gaming: I think the DT770 is a poor candidate due to the bass muddling up the frequency range, unless your meaning of gaming is more bass = better. I play online fps games where I need to hear enemy footsteps, microphone voice over from teammates, all of the tiniest details, so I need a headphone with clarity across the whole range, not a bassy headphone. My games don't have EQing features and I'm not willing to buy a mixer for the DT770, therefore I have to go with the K271 for its versatility.
 
 
Summary:
It is clear the Beyer DT770 has better build quality and more refined sound (after tuning) compared to the AKG K271. However, the K271 is more balanced across the freq chart and easier on my ears which is why I prefer it. I will miss most from the DT770 its larger soundstage and more realistic layering.
 
 
DT770:
-powerful and too much upper bass, causes muddiness without EQing
-incredibly detailed, refined and clean mids and high, no sibilance ( + female voices, classical, ambient)
-mids are laid back ( - rock/metal)
-large soundstage and good layering
-very comfortable, nice velour pads
-good clamping force and decent isolation, but causes suction feeling to the ears
-good build quality, nice looking
-comes with 32ohms version which is easy driven by portables
 
K271:
-clean bass, can go low and gives satisfying drone/rumble ( + classical/movies)
-bass probably won't deliver a powerful punch without a good amp and/or source
-upfront and present mids ( + rock/metal)
-dryer upper ranges compared to smoother DT770
-overall balanced sound, not too much or little of anything, no sibilance
-soundstage and layering are ordinary, not impressive as DT770
-light in weight and doesn't clamp hard, can be worn for a long time
-might be driven loud by portable, but will need a good amp to achieve its potential
 
Jan 25, 2011 at 8:57 PM Post #2 of 6
do you consider the k271 warmer sounding than the dt770? I find even the 600ohm 770 is still very bright. I think it has a tendency to make brass instruments a little shrill.
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 3:14 AM Post #3 of 6
 
[size=medium]
I think the K271 is very neutral sounding, although I do feel the range from 4-8khz (upper mids/lower highs) might be a bit lean since the mid are quite present, such as opera with higher vocal ranges. But actually I only notice it much listening to lower quality recordings. The thing about the K271 was that there is less sound pressure pushing against your ears so its much easier on the ears over lengthy listening. (With that said I ordered some Beyer velour pads for my AKG which are more comfy than the cheaper velour by AKG.)
 
The DT770 might be a bit sharp, I didn't notice it much, but the 32ohms version was very easy to drive. When I bought it, I had doubt the 250ohms version would even be drivable with my E-MU. I have to say I prefer to deal with AKG upfront mids than the sharpness of Beyers which seems to be present in many of their phones. The cheaper DT660 was the third worse headphone I ever owned because it was so sharp. I am more careful about listening volume with high frequencies since it's an easy way to damage your hearing. I rather EQ the highs down if I have to.
[/size]

 
Feb 14, 2011 at 3:15 AM Post #4 of 6
Close (partially or completely)  the bass reflex holes near the yokes on the DT770 and try them again.
 
I have the MMX300 and the bass reflex are partially closed with a mesh inside of the headphone ... it's  bass light.
 
Feb 14, 2011 at 3:29 AM Post #5 of 6
Exactly. Closing the holes (or better yet partially closing) will reduce the bass of the DT770 making them stellar gaming cans. The accuracy and sound placement is god tier, IMHO.
 
May 2, 2011 at 5:59 AM Post #6 of 6

Close (partially or completely)  the bass reflex holes near the yokes on the DT770 and try them again.
 
I have the MMX300 and the bass reflex are partially closed with a mesh inside of the headphone ... it's  bass light.

 
Quote:
Exactly. Closing the holes (or better yet partially closing) will reduce the bass of the DT770 making them stellar gaming cans. The accuracy and sound placement is god tier, IMHO.

 


I'm skeptical because one of you is selling his beyer headset, and the other has a bunch of OTHER headsets listed in his signature instead. :)  If it works so well, where's the real love :)
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top