More lows, less treble, so kinda step from that neutral/dry focused tuning towards more "popular" signature
i have a unit coming, can't wait to try it out
More lows, less treble, so kinda step from that neutral/dry focused tuning towards more "popular" signature
Thank you!$25 off coupon for the BQEYZ K2 on Amazon, go get’em
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07FSLYS34/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Oh yeah, happy Canada Day!Thank you!
Ordered (only ~$15 with shipping to Canada)
That's a perfect impulse shopping, especially on a Canada Day
Finally finished my review of the KBEAR TRI i3... took me the longest. I wasn't disappointed, though I wish it had the sparkle and better punch + weight for mid-bass. Even though it's $70 above the budget of this thread, I think it's fair to let everyone know how I feel about them, because I did say that I was amazed by them based on my first (20 minute) impressions. This being said, I appreciate that I took my time with the it, and that I didn't rush in finishing the review but rather took my time to pick out all the details and impressions from the.
Soundstage and imaging are the weapon of the TRI i3, I think few will be able to compete with it. Treble is clean, sub-bass is more prominent than mid-bass, and mids are leaning towards the warmer sound signature. I think the TRI i3 is an IEM more people should pay attention to, I find it far superior to some other IEM's I tried. It all depends on what you are looking for.
For anyone interested in a slightly longer and more detailed review, you can read it here: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/tri-i3.24171/reviews#item-review-23896
P.S. feedback is always welcome, critics too!
... I also wonder why MMCX is often considered a con, but I assume it requires much tighter tolerances than 2 pin.
I wonder. Is it currently impossible to make a planar magnetic IEM that sells in the double digit range? I think I've seen exactly one on ear headphone pull that off, the Gold Planar GL400. Or is there just no interest in the market for such thing to research it?
... I also wonder why MMCX is often considered a con, but I assume it requires much tighter tolerances than 2 pin.
I've seen Monoprice planars (I think it was the M300) at $100.
In my experience, MMCX generally has shorten lifespan than 2 pin connectors, if you are the kind that frequently disconnects and connects cables on. I generally try to leave a single cable on these MMCX type gear and not change it.
I haven't had an issue with 2 pin type IEMs dying on me so far with frequent disconnecting/connecting, but I had a friend snap off his 2 pin cable and get the pin embedded in the IEM when accidentally knocking it against an object. Some companies try to be clever and use propietiary MMCX connectors, but in general they are quite standard. Whereas 2 pin connectors bring a dizzying amount of variations to the table eg para A/B/C, recessed/protruding, QDC, angled, straight connectors, so aftermarket cables for them is not so straight forward.
Has anyone ever gotten any mmcx (Female) to 2pin (Male) adapters?
I found some but they were all exceedingly expensive. Does anyone know any reasonably priced ones?
Not 2-pin, but I have mmcx to QDC adapters. They work great.
They were like $10. I don’t consider that expensive, but I guess some people may. It’s about the cost of a typical budget cable, so for me it made sense to have a pair.
They look like this: