Comparing the Radius to other triple balanced armatures (Westone 3, Shure SE535), the armatures seem to have one note bass, and terrible treble cohesion, especially to the mid-range part of vocals. The Radius DDM seems to have the resolving power of armatures, coupled with a full and musical frequency response, foregoing the plainness or sterility sometimes found in highly resolving phones. Just because the TF10 has less bass doesn't mean it has a better SQ. If the DDM sounds great high to mid to low, which I think it does, then how can the TF10 sound better if it takes away from the bass that the DDM does so well; if it only does 2/3 frequency ranges particularly well, how does that equate to better SQ? I have not personally listened to the TF10, but my assumptions are based on my experience with the JH16 and the DDM. If the Radius DDM sounds great with 2 dynamic drivers, why does it take JH 8 balanced armatures per ear to stand up to it, because right now, the only thing the JH16 has going, for me anyway, is comfort due to the custom molds, as I can get just as pleasing a sound out of a $170 DDM.
