My experience with audiobudget (and I'm not the only one to mention this) is that Igor prefers BOOM BOOM BOOM bass, which seems to color/influence a lot of his opinions of gear. That's not necessarily a negative thing, it's more just something people should be aware of as it pertains to reviews.
It's helpful to know (and thus keep in context) the sound preferences of ANY reviewer. For example,
@Vidal loves bright treble, and that often factors into his recommendations and opinions. Again, nothing wrong with that, it's his style and he mentions it throughout his site.
But it highlights an important point that I've learned. You generally have a much better chance of getting gear you actually like if you figure out 2-5 people (reviewers, HF members, etc) that have your same basic basic tastes (in music genre, same bands, headphone sound profile etc).
Even if those handful of people don't have large review sites/blogs. If they post on HF and say "OMG, I LOVE this; it makes X band sound like heaven" or "don't bother with this, I don't like it at all", then you know there's a high likelihood that you'd feel the same way too. That person doesn't have to go into fancy technical descriptions, supported by calibrated frequency graphs and whatnot. That level of detail isn't for everyone, and often confuses people.
What good is someone who makes a glowing review of particular gear on a flashy blog/website, when (unbeknownst to you) all they exclusively listen to is harpsichord solos, while you listen to nothing but rap?
And yes, I know we all hear things differently and blah blah blah. But that just backs up my point. If you find that you and your "few other people" are always spot on with one another's recommendations, then that means you DO hear things the same as those people. Maybe it's a perfect combination of ear canal structure, genres, and frequency range due to age or something - who knows, who cares - in the end if you like the gear they do that's the important thing right?