Bass-off part 1: DT770 x DT250 x HP910

Feb 9, 2003 at 6:28 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 28

gerG

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
2,374
Likes
15
Location
Arizona/Michigan
I really want to collect more data on this, but I thought that I would drop my notes from round one on you guys. Contestants were the Beyer DT770 pros (without many hours on them), Beyer DT250-250, and the Philips HP910. So far the DT250-250 are trouncing the competition with their balance between bass power and the rest of the spectrum (which cannot be forsaken, in my opinion). For full assault bass energy, however, the DT770s are the winner. My raw notes from this evening:

Flim & the BBs: Tricycle
T1
DT770: good piano depth. Decent dynamics, but tubby. Bass kicks have nice punch, but heavy mid bass and overhang. Nice soundstage. Very bass heavy and ponderous. Listening at low to moderate level. Band hits are blurry. Impact is amazing. Cymbals sound blurry, not clear or distinct. Impression of monobass. Kicks have impact, but hang around too long.

DT250: more depth to piano. Kicks are tighter, with no overhang. Treble is subdued. ****ing cord keeps snagging on my collar. Percussion is still a bit fuzzy, but better than 770. Cymbals sound like cymbals now, although level is low. Bass starts and stops better. Bass is well balanced.

HP910: very nice bass. Band hits are not distinct, but kicks are wonderful. Treble range is just goofy. There is a big hole up there that makes it sound like half of the trap cymbal has been sawn off. Kicks are slow to decay. Treble level is nice, but not very uniform at all. Pieces of treble missing. More comfortable after a couple of drinks. Tipping forward is a big help to treble, but still funky, and the headband is almost on my forehead.

T3
HP910: Nice uniformity in the bass. Fundamental at 1:25 (18 hz) is there, but dim. Kicks at 2:55 are thin/flat. Kind of a pop with the bass guitar in sync. Something is missing up in the mid/treble transition range. Deepnote @ 5:35 was there, but fading. These cans have amazing bass, wonderful efficiency, and a great fun factor for $50. I would not give a lot more than that for them. There is something very funky in the treble range. I do not consider these serious listening phones. I do consider them a lot of fun, especially with a portable source like the ipod.

DT250: more detail already. Holy****bass! These little bastards can generate pressure! 1:25 is a note! The rest of the music is important as well, and it is all there. Synth is very uniform, even at the very deep tones. Kick drum and bass guitar are very balanced. Very nice match between punch and musicality. Mid is a nice match to bass. Treble is recessed, but uniform and detailed. These cans do not get the recognition that they deserve. 5:35 just shook my shoes off (18 hz fundamental). ****ing coiled cord snags on everything. This must be corrected!

DT770: more treble in intro. Bass is ponderous and dominant. 1:25 was easy! These could go deeper. Bass goes deep. But overhang is obvious. Slightly nonuniform bass. Impact of kick is dimished, but tone remains. Bass guitar remains apparent. Mid and high are nice, with no obvious problems. Again, 5:35 sounds easy for these cans. Funny whistle at end. Very listenable, but sibilance and heavy bass make me want to turn the volume down. Good isolation.

Four Play
T1:
DT880 (just for variety): Delicate and powerful! Kicks are just wonderful tight, while cymbal shimmers. Very musical and detailed. I can hear flaws in my CDs with these cans like no others save the K1000s. Good tight bass, but the air is not shaking. Guitar has great attack and warm uniform sound. Not bass monsters, but a wonderful compromise. Kicking up the deep bass w/eq makes a big difference. Snare at end sounds like, well. a snare. I want to get up and dance with these phones.

HP910: Imbalanced and fuzzy. Serious bass, but I feel like I have water in my ears. Very dynamic and punchy. The air is starting to move. These would be amazing if I could fix that hole in the treble. I wish that I could graft this bass and upper treble onto the HD600s. Upper mid is honky and annoying. Turned volume down. Bass is still there, but mid/treb range still painful. At very low levels they get better (in a quiet area) but the treble hole is still there.

DT770: treble detail obvious in intro. Bass line comes in with a vengeance. My head hurts. Kick drum and bg are entirely separate. Bass has enormous impact, but decay is slow. Uniform bass. Mid to treble balance is nice, but bass is over the top. Treble has hiss/sibilance which is initially masked by ponderous bass.

Sen HD600: I can’t even make out the faint background in the intro (sounds like a distant trap set on some other cans). Bass is tight, but lacks depth. Midrange has beautiful clarity. Cymbal is in the background. Where’s the bass?

DT250: similar detail in intro to Sens (good, but missing things). Bass is back again. Very nice! Kicks are tight and deep. Bass drum and bg are distinct. Very nice mids and highs. A bit of ring on the guitar. Dynamic and nicely balanced. Threshold audiophile grade, and killer bang for the buck.

Paula Cole: This Fire
T1
DT250: Nice presence and air. Then the air moves. I can feel the bass out of these cans! Voice, synth, percussion are all clear and distinctly localized. Voice seems biased to upper-mid. Damn, I just want to kick back and listen to music with these, however…

Sony V6 (just because they fell off the shelf and volunteered): my poor old friends. They do not belong in this comparison, and I will not embarrass them with comments. They served me well for many years, but my ears have learned much since those days.

DT770 (hold me, I am frightened of this combination): prevalent overtone on intro vocal. Is it supposed to be there? Sibilance right through the brain. Retained bladder control when the bass hit the fan, but oh just barely. Sibilant and unbalanced treble. Mids are quite pleasant, but are lost in the battle between the hiss and boom. Lets turn these waaaay down. There we go, 3 notches off zero (out of 23, with gain switch on high) on the volume control seems about right, and quite pleasant.

HP910 (oh man, do I have to?): nice intro. Bit of sib. Bass has a looseness (boom), and the treble hole becomes immediately apparent. Mids are still nice. Great cans for portable, but outclassed at home. Shut the track off early.

DT931: bright and edgy, but treble is not uniform. Some sib. Great bass, but hissy treble.

Track 2: “Where Have All the Cowboys Gone”:
DT250-250: Organic. No sibilance, great bass. Small, but very very position stable.
Btw, the comparison testing has ended. I grabbed the most pleasant phones of the bass monsters, and am just goofing off now!

Round 1 goes to the DT250-250.

gerG
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 6:43 AM Post #2 of 28
LOVED IT! NOW THAT"S A REVIEW!!!

I took the cover off the DT831. Panty hosed it. nice. even more bass. treble is tamed. (in fact too much lower bass (100-300 Hz). VERY SMOOTH.being driven off Denon 810 while burning DT931 off Technics amp). will have to do the same to the DT931. see you tomorrow. Grado wire coming off SR80 and being put on DT831 tonight.

am making passive preamp for SM70. prepare to be blown away. the DT880s will fly! Jan, the payment is on the way!
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 6:45 AM Post #3 of 28
Very nice "preview". I can't wait to hear more.

I toyed with the idea of trying the Beyer DT770 pros but was afraid the bass would be to heavy - I'm not really a bass head. From your comments it looks like the DT250-250's are the cans I should try.
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 7:03 AM Post #4 of 28
Gallaine,

DT880 is all you should be thinking of. trust me. $215 Meier special. I will be selling my K401, DT931 soon. (my brother returned the SR80).
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 7:11 AM Post #5 of 28
I was mainly thinking of the DT770pro's or DT250-250 for work where I need some isolation. Aren't the DT880's semi-open?

Now, I might think about replacing my HD580's at home with the DT880's
biggrin.gif
.
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 7:16 AM Post #6 of 28
Hmm.. glad I read this, because I was going to buy the DT770s to get rid of the sibilance.

Damn.
So, the DT250-250s, eh?
Sounds like a date!
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 7:18 AM Post #7 of 28
Hi Gallaine. The DT770 have better isolation than the DT250, but neither will impede low frequency noise. I like the DT770 better for very low level listening.

The DT880 are quite open, and leak sound both ways. Not good for work, but just splendid at home.


gerG
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 9:35 AM Post #8 of 28
I'm willing to give up some isolation for sound closer to what I find enjoyable. I tend to be super sensitive to sibilance and, as I said earlier, am definitely not a bass head. From your initial review it sounds like the DT770pro's might be prone to the two things I would rather not have in a pair of cans.

That said though, I realize that these are just your initial impressions. I'll wait to hear more before making any decisions.

Maybe it's just cause I'm tired right now, but dang, those DT880's sure look pretty
biggrin.gif
. I can hear them calling my name...
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 1:38 PM Post #9 of 28
Quote:

Originally posted by wallijonn
LOVED IT! NOW THAT"S A REVIEW!!!

I took the cover off the DT831. Panty hosed it. nice. even more bass. treble is tamed. (in fact too much lower bass (100-300 Hz). VERY SMOOTH.being driven off Denon 810 while burning DT931 off Technics amp). will have to do the same to the DT931. see you tomorrow. Grado wire coming off SR80 and being put on DT831 tonight.

am making passive preamp for SM70. prepare to be blown away. the DT880s will fly! Jan, the payment is on the way!


Any particular brand or guage of "Panty hose" you are using wallijohn? I will be receiving my DT931's on Tuesday and may try your "hosed phones" tweak but will get my girlfriend to buy the relevant brand etc. and will then cut the foot out to perform the tweak
very_evil_smiley.gif
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 5:41 PM Post #10 of 28
I remember reading that someone was very impressed with the dt770's soundstage, and said that the dt250's were lacking in that area. I think they were comparing with the dt250-80's, so could that account for the difference? What would you say about this area, gerG?

In general I have this feeling that soundstage would have more to do with the amp used. Am I right, or completely off base here?

Chris.
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 7:00 PM Post #12 of 28
Quote:

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
Any particular brand or guage of "Panty hose" you are using wallijohn? I will be receiving my DT931's on Tuesday and may try your "hosed phones" tweak but will get my girlfriend to buy the relevant brand etc. and will then cut the foot out to perform the tweak
very_evil_smiley.gif



I've been reading wallijonn's posts for a while now, and he really scares me...
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 8:19 PM Post #13 of 28
Quote:

Originally posted by bangraman
I've been reading wallijonn's posts for a while now, and he really scares me...


LOL seems to make more sense than wearing purple tights over your head?
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 9:07 PM Post #14 of 28
Many people want to know how headphones look on heads. seems to make more sense than dressig up a Flat Eric doll with a pair of phones...
evil_smiley.gif







Whatever happend to Flat Eric anyway?
 
Feb 9, 2003 at 9:32 PM Post #15 of 28
Wallijonn,

I just noticed that you said the price of the DT880's is $215. Jan's web-site has $235 as the retail. Is there a sales-action on the cans?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top