Bang & Olufsen U70 B50 Headphones
- Thread starter jayzjayz
- Start date
DefectiveAudioComponent
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 3,011
- Reaction score
- 83
Yes, about 400 swedish crowns in 1977. (I have no idea what you mean by B50).
Bullseye
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 2,075
- Reaction score
- 13
Isn't B&O extremely expensive and not as good as other less expensive brands?
DefectiveAudioComponent
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 3,011
- Reaction score
- 83
The famous Danish design is going to cost you more than some alternatives, but if you think that's better than other brands is up to you.
DefectiveAudioComponent
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 3,011
- Reaction score
- 83
About the U70, Peerless used unusually crappy pleather for the pads, so you will either have to be really lucky to find a NOS pair, or have to replace/repair the (then white) pads. (Although, it was not unusuall for Peerless to use crappy pleather, they apparently used it for all their (known) cans. ) According to people who have heard the U70 (not me) the rumor is that the bass is weak.
tympani1d
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2009
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
NOPE! Bass is NOT weak. Just realistic. Very similar to the much vaunted Yamaha HP-1's of the same vintage. These both were AKG killers in their day, and darn respectable now for Opera and Classical music. I own them both and STAX Lamda Pros as well as a few odd AKG pro. monitor phones.
Anybody remember the Jacklin Floats (electrostatics)? Or the superb Sonnus over ear sets?
Quote:
About the U70, Peerless used unusually crappy pleather for the pads, so you will either have to be really lucky to find a NOS pair, or have to replace/repair the (then white) pads. (Although, it was not unusuall for Peerless to use crappy pleather, they apparently used it for all their (known) cans. ) According to people who have heard the U70 (not me) the rumor is that the bass is weak.