Here's what I think so far (biggest differences):
1. Detail
I am noticing even more stuff than I heard through my previous setup; the NS500V that I use is notoriously bright. The Meridian is actually significantly less bright but still more detailed.
2. Soundstage
Huge. Cavernous. Pretty darned realistic, it's most appreciated when listening to classical music (Deutsche-Grammophon's recording of Perlman playing the Mozart 3rd and 5th violin concertos).
It's actually there now! I didn't really realize it but I didn't have much of a soundstage with my previous player.
3. Pace, attack
Wow, the attack really took a step up with these two components: The pluck of a guitar happens very quickly now. Also, decay is excellent, much better than with the NS500V. When a note stops, you KNOW it stops. You can hear it resonate beautifully in the recording venue up until that point, and you can tell where it resonates. The sound is FAST.
4. Channel balance
This is really interesting: I can better hear the separation of front / left / right. It's to the point where a poor recording is revealed as such because of a channel imbalance that I never heard before. I can hear it when an effect moves the sound of an instrument from left to right or vice versa.
5. Vocals
Disclaimer: I have lots of bad recordings. On bad recordings, grainy poorly recorded vocals come out as such. Lots of my recordings sounded slightly worse due to this.
However, I really liked the sound from the Riverdance CD that I have; vocals were much better than before - detailed, presented better, and not harsh in any sort of way. I don't have any purist audiophile reocordings of light jazz/vocal music. . .recommendations anyone?
Anyways, that's all so far. Keep in mind that I am still burning in the cardas cable and the sound was quite grainy for the first few hours; it's still burning in I think. The differences were obvious though.
More to come.
Cheers,
Geek