Audio Terminology Help

Jan 31, 2008 at 2:52 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 4

cosmotron

Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Posts
77
Likes
0
I have been trying to learn more about digital audio and I have a question.

I know about sample rates and bit rate depth/resolution and how they work together (the best analogy that I found describing them and how they relate to each other said that "imagine that you are looking at your backyard, a digital version would be like you are looking at it though a screen. If you had a sample rate of 44.1 kHz, then you would be looking at your backyard through a screen with 44100 holes in it. If you also had a bit depth of 16 bit, then each of the 44100 holes in the screen would have 65535 colors that could be represented.")

Now, I don't understand how bit rate comes into play (not bit rate depth/resolution). Like, if I have a 44.1kHz, 16bit, 320kbps song, how would the 320kbps fall into the backyard screen example?

Thanks for any help!
 
Jan 31, 2008 at 3:35 AM Post #2 of 4
To be completely accurate, you should say COMPRESSION BITRATE. Because that's what it is.

People concerned about bitrate are asking, OK, I know I am using a lossy compression (MP3, AAC) to represent the original WAV, so how many bits/s do I use for the compression? that is good enuff so I can't tell the difference/or not enuff difference to bother me, between the compressed MP3 versus original WAV?

More bits = more accurate representation of original WAV.

Sorry, I don't have a backyard analogy for you.
 
Jan 31, 2008 at 3:44 AM Post #3 of 4
a 44100 sample/sec X 16 Bits x 2(stereo) = 1 411 200 bits/sec =1411,2 Kbits/sec

That the size of a raw PCM.

Now when you compress it with mp3 you apply a mathematical formula and reduce the size to 320 Kbits /sec Since the compression is lossy you lose some of the original information in this conversion.

I'm not very familiar with compression methodology so that a very gross explanation.

If you want an image analogy it's like a jpeg compression. If you use BMP it's the raw image so every pixel is describe pixel by pixel. Now a jpeg by some mean discard some information and approximate others so you can store the image in a much smaller size. In jpeg when you save you can tell it how much compression to apply and how much information is discard.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top