Audio-Gd Master 7 - Discrete Fully Balanced DAC (PCM1704)

May 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM Post #2,791 of 4,475
Thanks drheadphone, I did not know I could do that. What is the difference of using the Audio gd driver as default sound driver to just using it as an output from foobar but not the default sound driver? Or is there any?
 
May 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM Post #2,792 of 4,475
Thanks drheadphone, I did not know I could do that. What is the difference of using the Audio gd driver as default sound driver to just using it as an output from foobar but not the default sound driver? Or is there any?

Making Audio gd driver the default Windows sound driver makes it the default driver for all applications, as oppose to setting it in foobar only.
 
May 26, 2015 at 11:33 PM Post #2,793 of 4,475
Sorry I made my question too simple. I noticed that while using Audio gd driver as the default Windows driver, there is no popping sound when skipping tracks with foobar. But when using it on foobar only, there is. I was just wondering what might cause this.
 
May 27, 2015 at 2:59 PM Post #2,794 of 4,475
@r one, certainly a tube amp would help. I have mine running through a Ragnarok so the highs are very extended. My ears have to take break sometime, even listening through darker headphone like the LCD3F.


Someone use a Master7 with a TH900 headphone ?
 
May 29, 2015 at 10:32 AM Post #2,795 of 4,475
  If I recall correctly, Pink Faun card lacks official support for ASIO, which is quite important for extracting SQ out of a soundcard.

I reached out to PinkFaun and they said this: 
 
The Pink Faun I2S-bridge runs on the standard Windows HDA drivers, though you can select diffent outputdrivers in the playback software you use, for example in the Jriver media center software you can select WASAPI or ASIO4ALL as the output driver for the I2S-bridge.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM Post #2,797 of 4,475
I recently acquired a Master 7, and it's great. Couple questions for the group:
 
1) Do people have a general preference for dacladder's HDMI board vs. AGD's? I have both, and I'm having a hard time hearing a difference. 
 
2) Any general consensus on jumper pin settings? I've read through this whole thread and it seems to be varied. Right now I'm running as raw as possible and loving the sound. By "raw" I mean: dither disabled, pll disabled, 1x oversample, and 50db stopband. Massively more realistic sounding than the stock settings.
 
BTW I'm running a DI-2014 via HDMI out. 
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM Post #2,798 of 4,475
  I recently acquired a Master 7, and it's great. Couple questions for the group:
 
1) Do people have a general preference for dacladder's HDMI board vs. AGD's? I have both, and I'm having a hard time hearing a difference. 
 
2) Any general consensus on jumper pin settings? I've read through this whole thread and it seems to be varied. Right now I'm running as raw as possible and loving the sound. By "raw" I mean: dither disabled, pll disabled, 1x oversample, and 50db stopband. Massively more realistic sounding than the stock settings.
 
BTW I'm running a DI-2014 via HDMI out. 

 

Congrats!

 

1. I don’t know have only had the AGD.

2. I liked PLL disabled, 1x oversample and 90db stopband the best. 

 
Jun 3, 2015 at 6:15 PM Post #2,800 of 4,475
I recently acquired a Master 7, and it's great. Couple questions for the group:

1) Do people have a general preference for dacladder's HDMI board vs. AGD's? I have both, and I'm having a hard time hearing a difference. 

2) Any general consensus on jumper pin settings? I've read through this whole thread and it seems to be varied. Right now I'm running as raw as possible and loving the sound. By "raw" I mean: dither disabled, pll disabled, 1x oversample, and 50db stopband. Massively more realistic sounding than the stock settings.

BTW I'm running a DI-2014 via HDMI out. 


For true NOS remove the bypass jumper. I recently asked Kingwa re this jumper and his response was: "Yes this will bypass the DSP and filter and the PLL, so the source must had enough low jitter and good cable for transmit the signal."

I recommend up sampling your music via HQPlayer or equivalent - The filters available in these players are significantly more tuned/better than those in the M7 DSP.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 6:18 PM Post #2,801 of 4,475
For true NOS remove the bypass jumper. I recently asked Kingwa re this jumper and his response was: "Yes this will bypass the DSP and filter and the PLL, so the source must had enough low jitter and good cable for transmit the signal."

I recommend up sampling your music via HQPlayer or equivalent - The filters available in these players are significantly more tuned/better than those in the M7 DSP.

 
Very good info. I wondered if that's what that jumper did, even though the website doesn't mention it. So if you remove that jumper, then do any of the other jumpers matter? I'm assuming not...
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 6:42 PM Post #2,802 of 4,475
I presume not. I'm waiting to receive my I2S transport before I try it. Planning to confirm NOS by confirming output waveforms via my DSO.
 
Jun 3, 2015 at 6:53 PM Post #2,803 of 4,475
For me, I still prefer 1x with DSP On and Dither ON and PLL OFF. This is in conjunction with Audiobyte Hydra X Usb converter as I2S source. Total bypass of DSP results in a way laid back sound that doesn't suit my listening taste(although some may like the clean and neutral sound DSP OFF offers).
 
PLL ON seems to have a mid bass bloat, switching PLL Off removes the bloat.
 
1x NOS is pretty important if you want the wider and deeper soundstage with enhanced stereo cue/panning presentation. A trade off as 8x has a more crystaline sound.
 
As for Dither settings,it's a subtle difference. Leaving it on seems make things less grainy.
 
Jun 4, 2015 at 3:14 AM Post #2,804 of 4,475
Interesting to read. So far I have been playing with stopband filter & oversampling only and differences were very little. Right now I use default settings. I will confirm the other settings later and am curious what DSP and PLL will change. Using Bluesound Node I2S streamer (modded by Magna Hifi) with Tentlabs XO.
 
Jun 4, 2015 at 3:17 AM Post #2,805 of 4,475
NOS at 44.1 kHz results in significant attenuationin the treble region as a result of zero hold sinc roll off at the output. My aim is to run the DAC in NOS but feed it at a higher sample rate eg. 192 kHz.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top