Audeze LCD i4 TOTL In-Ear Monitor Discussion
Nov 14, 2020 at 10:24 PM Post #3,706 of 4,795
Anybody using either the Reveal or Reveal+ plugin system wide on Windows (for example, via Equalizer APO)?

I had been using the old Reveal plugin on my main computer. I got a new laptop and installed the Reveal+ plugin since it's the easier one to get now.
I am confuse with the settings.

Equalizer APO shows the EQ applied system wide so I can see what Reveal's plugin actual does.

For reference, the old Reveal plugin doesn't have filter type setting, only "Mix" (dry <> wet) which controls the amplitude of the EQ, and a "Gain" setting:

1605408547309.png
At 55% (and gain adjusted for -3dB peak), I get this:
1605408618693.png

At 100%:
1605408762575.png

The filter looks smooth and doesn't have noticeable delay when watching videos.

This last point is where I have problem with the new Reveal+ plugin.

The plugin looks like this:
1605408893776.png
Linear Phase - High Quality
1605408942402.png


At 100%, the filter looks more like 55% for the old Reveal plugin:
The latency seems like it's > 500 ms, which is way too high for lip-sync.

The other filters look pretty ugly. I get that the comb is probably not audible, but it's still a weird looking filter.
Could be APO not interpreting the filter correctly?

Linear Phase - Medium Latency
1605409273455.png

Latency isn't that much better than High Quality. It doesn't sound nearly as bad as it looks.

Linear Phase - Low Latency
1605409391501.png
Latency is better but it's still >200 ms, so way too high for lip-sync

Minimum Phase - Zero Latency
1605410464801.png

They should call this one "zero filter". It's definitely applying an EQ so I can confirm that APO is thrown off by the Reveal+ filter somehow.
The latency is very low with this one.

In general, the Reveal+ does sound better to my ears. More open, less congested and overall more refined. Even with Minimum Phase.

@Audeze : can you think of a reason why APO would not show the EQ correctly, when it seems to work fine with the old Reveal plugin?
 
Nov 15, 2020 at 6:11 PM Post #3,707 of 4,795
Hm, weird. Just installed the legacy version of the Reveal plugin on my Windows 10 PC and the folder in Program Files doesn't contain a file to open the app..
Am I missing something here? Thanks!

EDIT: it was in a folder called "Steinberg"; I was able to set it up for use in JRiver- any way to have it applied system wide?
 
Last edited:
Nov 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Post #3,709 of 4,795
What are the benefits to using the i4 with Equilizer APO+Reveal over an M15 using Toneboosters PEQ through UAPP?

Would I get better quality using the M15 as a USB DAC and Reveal and disable The Toneboosters PEQ?
 
Nov 17, 2020 at 10:11 PM Post #3,711 of 4,795
Just use the graphic or parametric EQ. You can find on github the AutoEQ settings for i4. It serves as a good starting point, and you can adjust to your taste accordingly.

2844C5B8-3650-4B4B-A9C6-8072A52F407A.png

Is this the closest to Reveal?
How does this translate to Toneboosters 10 band PEQ? Do I just copy the values and put -7.6 in the gain field?
I have been using KMann's 6 band in Toneboosters, but am wondering if there is a better one for 10 band PEQ.
 
Nov 17, 2020 at 10:34 PM Post #3,712 of 4,795
Is this the closest to Reveal?
How does this translate to Toneboosters 10 band PEQ? Do I just copy the values and put -7.6 in the gain field?
I have been using KMann's 6 band in Toneboosters, but am wondering if there is a better one for 10 band PEQ.

I have no experience with Toneboosters. But I assume you can adjust the individual band in the PEQ using values from Github. The -7.6 is for the pre-amp gain.
 
Nov 18, 2020 at 1:01 AM Post #3,713 of 4,795
I have no experience with Toneboosters. But I assume you can adjust the individual band in the PEQ using values from Github. The -7.6 is for the pre-amp gain.

This is what I see. Can anyone advise if the pre amp gain goes in output level?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20201117-235847_USB Audio Player PRO.jpg
    Screenshot_20201117-235847_USB Audio Player PRO.jpg
    281.6 KB · Views: 0
Nov 18, 2020 at 1:42 AM Post #3,714 of 4,795
Nov 23, 2020 at 2:18 PM Post #3,716 of 4,795
I regrettably missed my chance to purchase an i4 this year. I picked up an i3 as a consolation prize though. Is the i3 anywhere near the quality of the i4 or should I just wait until next year to pick up the i4? I'm really disappointed there wasn't more of a heads up for the Audeze sale. The timing from year to year is so inconsistent.
 
Nov 24, 2020 at 4:29 AM Post #3,719 of 4,795

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top