This comparison is already posted in german "hifi-forum", but I thought you might be interested, too, so you'll get a translated version of more or less the same text.
So, I started a while ago with the search for some nice IEMs for metal. I already have the ATH-M50X which I really like (except the ear pads, which totally suck), so I thought, well, maybe something in that style would be cool. I was told, that KZ IEMs are often quiet nice for the money, I had 2 pairs of Philips SHE IEMs and I bought one used pair of Havi B3 Pro1s. At the end, the test was ATH-M50X VS:
- Havi B3 Pro1
- Philips SHE8000
- Philips SHE8100 (an old version. They still excist but look a bit different now)
- KZ ATE
- KZ ZST
- KZ ED16/ZS7
To make it more short, as it is in the german version, here are the songs I've used. All tracks are in MP3 320kbit format, some of them are played with an Acer Notebook and some of them with my Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. No DAC or anything else, no EQ, but the Xiaomi with the built-in "Mi Sound Enhacer" and the setting "general in-ear".
The tracks:
Gojira - Where Dragons Dwell (notebook)
Elder - Compendium (notebook)
Moanaa - Sunset Growing Old (notebook)
Kauan - IV (from the Pirut album) (phone)
Devin Townsend Project - Grace (phone)
Rainbow - Stargazer (phone)
The Philips SHE8000 made horrible sibilants, so they were out after the first song.
Havi B3 Pro1 and SHE8100 are more on the neutral side, both with nice details, but I have the feeling that the Havi IEMs "show" more details, but that's more a feeling than something, that I really can describe. They sound very nice in every song and don't give the feeling of having "too much" or "too less" of anything. Nothing is missing, so I'm quiet happy. We are speaking about the first 5 tracks, Rainbow's Stargazer will get an extra point.
ATE and ZST are one the same level soundwise. Sometimes the ATE has a bit more "bottom", but they both have the problem, that it feels, like they have a pronounced subbass, but just to a deep point and everything else is quiet flat, where I always miss something. There is a dark grumble, but instead of having all the depths a bit on the plus side, its just a small area... and I have a problem with it. Not when listening to the IEMs on their own, but when comparing them to others, it is quiet noticeable.
The ED16 are quiet one the same stage like the M50X. They both have a little pronounced bass, very detailed sounding and I really like it, but when you want something neutral, they won't be the best choice. Everything the M50X does, is the same way at the ED16, very impressive, like the Havi B3 Pro, but with are different type of sounding. The ED16 more on the fun side, the B3 Pro more on the neutral side. Damn cool!
But then I played Stargazer and I have to tell you, I was a bit shocked, because the M50X and the ED16 failed. Why? Well, the Bass "plus" is a bit too much for my taste and both headphones have also a plus on the cymbals, which is annoying. The ATE/KST are less on the bottom-plus, but even more peaks at the cymbals, which really hurts. At that song the Havi B3 Pro1 and the SHE8100 made the best job by far. This song changed the results for me a lot... For me, the best "working horse" are the Havi B3 Pro1, the SHE8100 comes on 2nd place, a bit less detailed (maybe just a feeling...) and on 3rd place the ED16, which are perfect for modern produced metal, but for more vintage recordings, I guess you can't do anything wrong with the B3 Pro1s.
So at all, I'm very happy with these IEMs, when you have some IEMs in mind, that will do a nice job in playing metal and don't cost more than let's say 50-60€, maybe I'll check them out, but not against all the IEMs on the list. I guess a comparison against the Havi B3 Pro 1 and the ED16 will do the job. The SHE don't make sense, because they sound very much the same like the Havi, but a bit less detailed (which is maybe something my brain is telling me).
So, that's my first test here on head-fi and I hope, you'll like it or/and it helps you.
Cheers
Chris
So, I started a while ago with the search for some nice IEMs for metal. I already have the ATH-M50X which I really like (except the ear pads, which totally suck), so I thought, well, maybe something in that style would be cool. I was told, that KZ IEMs are often quiet nice for the money, I had 2 pairs of Philips SHE IEMs and I bought one used pair of Havi B3 Pro1s. At the end, the test was ATH-M50X VS:
- Havi B3 Pro1
- Philips SHE8000
- Philips SHE8100 (an old version. They still excist but look a bit different now)
- KZ ATE
- KZ ZST
- KZ ED16/ZS7
To make it more short, as it is in the german version, here are the songs I've used. All tracks are in MP3 320kbit format, some of them are played with an Acer Notebook and some of them with my Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. No DAC or anything else, no EQ, but the Xiaomi with the built-in "Mi Sound Enhacer" and the setting "general in-ear".
The tracks:
Gojira - Where Dragons Dwell (notebook)
Elder - Compendium (notebook)
Moanaa - Sunset Growing Old (notebook)
Kauan - IV (from the Pirut album) (phone)
Devin Townsend Project - Grace (phone)
Rainbow - Stargazer (phone)
The Philips SHE8000 made horrible sibilants, so they were out after the first song.
Havi B3 Pro1 and SHE8100 are more on the neutral side, both with nice details, but I have the feeling that the Havi IEMs "show" more details, but that's more a feeling than something, that I really can describe. They sound very nice in every song and don't give the feeling of having "too much" or "too less" of anything. Nothing is missing, so I'm quiet happy. We are speaking about the first 5 tracks, Rainbow's Stargazer will get an extra point.
ATE and ZST are one the same level soundwise. Sometimes the ATE has a bit more "bottom", but they both have the problem, that it feels, like they have a pronounced subbass, but just to a deep point and everything else is quiet flat, where I always miss something. There is a dark grumble, but instead of having all the depths a bit on the plus side, its just a small area... and I have a problem with it. Not when listening to the IEMs on their own, but when comparing them to others, it is quiet noticeable.
The ED16 are quiet one the same stage like the M50X. They both have a little pronounced bass, very detailed sounding and I really like it, but when you want something neutral, they won't be the best choice. Everything the M50X does, is the same way at the ED16, very impressive, like the Havi B3 Pro, but with are different type of sounding. The ED16 more on the fun side, the B3 Pro more on the neutral side. Damn cool!
But then I played Stargazer and I have to tell you, I was a bit shocked, because the M50X and the ED16 failed. Why? Well, the Bass "plus" is a bit too much for my taste and both headphones have also a plus on the cymbals, which is annoying. The ATE/KST are less on the bottom-plus, but even more peaks at the cymbals, which really hurts. At that song the Havi B3 Pro1 and the SHE8100 made the best job by far. This song changed the results for me a lot... For me, the best "working horse" are the Havi B3 Pro1, the SHE8100 comes on 2nd place, a bit less detailed (maybe just a feeling...) and on 3rd place the ED16, which are perfect for modern produced metal, but for more vintage recordings, I guess you can't do anything wrong with the B3 Pro1s.
So at all, I'm very happy with these IEMs, when you have some IEMs in mind, that will do a nice job in playing metal and don't cost more than let's say 50-60€, maybe I'll check them out, but not against all the IEMs on the list. I guess a comparison against the Havi B3 Pro 1 and the ED16 will do the job. The SHE don't make sense, because they sound very much the same like the Havi, but a bit less detailed (which is maybe something my brain is telling me).
So, that's my first test here on head-fi and I hope, you'll like it or/and it helps you.
Cheers
Chris