nullPointerException
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Posts
- 121
- Likes
- 12
in terms of comfort and sound quality, which would you recommend? what are their ups and downs? any information on the subject would be greatly apreciated.
Originally Posted by 1Time /img/forum/go_quote.gif FWIR... The A700 will be easier to drive than the M50. You may want an amp with the M50. The M50 comes in a straight cable version, the M50S. The bass of the M50 will be better than the A700. The A700 will be more comfortable with a looser fit; the M50 clamps tighter. Headroom's M50S review I have not read any disapproving posts or reviews of the M50, but I have of the A700. |
Originally Posted by WittyzTH /img/forum/go_quote.gif You can't go wrong with M50. I own it for long time and would used it constantly if I didn't buy ESW9. |
Originally Posted by WittyzTH /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think they are quite on par in the term of SQ, but I prefer the sound sig of ESW9 - smoother mid and bigger bass although it has the smaller sound stage (L/R). (I don't care about it much since I listen to pop and rock music the most when I use either of them.) M50 has more focus on high and tighter bass, but the mid is a bit roll off which makes me choose ESW9. Overall sound sig leans toward the cold side. Detail and separation are about on par but M50 seems taking the place because of its sound signature - more clinical than the smooth as silk ESW9. Isolation is on par - quite bad comparing with Senn HD25-1 and HD280. Actually, I bought M50 to replace my broken HD25-1 and really like them for SQ. Overall SQ, M50 blows HD25-1 (even with the after market cables) out of a water, but only thing I prefer HD25-1 is the isolation. Another reason I prefer ESW9 over M50 is portability. Hope this help. |
Specifications Acoustic Seal: Sealed Driver Type: Dynamic Ear Coupler Type: Full-Size Coupler Size: Large Cord Type: Coiled Left-Side Cord Length: 8ft Detachable Cable: No Impedance @ 1kHz: 38 Isolation: -12dB Weight: 10 oz w/o cord. Connector Type: 1/8 Headphone Type: Head Set Manufacturer Warranty: 1 year Warranty: 1 year |
Originally Posted by WittyzTH /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think they are quite on par in the term of SQ, but I prefer the sound sig of ESW9 - smoother mid and bigger bass although it has the smaller sound stage (L/R). (I don't care about it much since I listen to pop and rock music the most when I use either of them.) M50 has more focus on high and tighter bass, but the mid is a bit roll off which makes me choose ESW9. Overall sound sig leans toward the cold side. Detail and separation are about on par but M50 seems taking the place because of its sound signature - more clinical than the smooth as silk ESW9. Isolation is on par - quite bad comparing with Senn HD25-1 and HD280. Actually, I bought M50 to replace my broken HD25-1 and really like them for SQ. Overall SQ, M50 blows HD25-1 (even with the after market cables) out of a water, but only thing I prefer HD25-1 is the isolation. Another reason I prefer ESW9 over M50 is portability. Hope this help. |
Originally Posted by WittyzTH /img/forum/go_quote.gif I guess it's because of portability and looks. To me, ESW9 still beats M50 for SQ, but the different is not that much as the price. I'd said it's quite on par because they have different sound sigs. M50 has something that ESW9 doesn't and vice versa. and the biggest difference is the mid range that ESW9 has really good one while M50 is a bit roll-off. sounds vague huh? ^^" |