Separate names with a comma.
There is a nice Irish Pub directly across the street...
The specs say the 97 is 'voltage' and 99 is 'current' wonder what the difference is...
Did AK really need to design a new chassis for the SP2K? The cost of the new tooling and scale surely adds up to a good chunk of the overall cost which of course gets passed on to the consumer. Anybody else want an SP2K in a SP1K chassis but priced at $2999?
It's a luxury item... No one has a gun to your head...
No doubt that would be the answer if I asked an AK rep. Well, except the gun part.
Wife's off clothes and bag shopping tomorrow, looks like a good time to hit the hifi shops in her absence !
Don't forget, the beauty of buying from a physical store and salesperson is that everything is negotiable! It's a miracle how "open box" discounted items magically appear exactly when you need them.
If i was rich I would buy 1000 sp2000 and distribute them on the sidewalk... alas...
Glad to see someone hear still has a sense of humor...
I’m not sure where you read that, but here’s the spec from A&K’s main site:
Output level on SP2000: Unbalance 3.0Vrms / Balance 6.0Vrms (Condition No Load); SP1000 output: 2.2Vrms / Balance 3.9Vrms (Condition No Load).
This my earlier post... see link
Looking at the specs between DACS 99 and 97, it says the 97 'output architecture' is voltage, and on the 99 current. Anyone knows what this means exactly?
Current output on amplifiers is viewed by many in the field to be a superior method of amplification. If my memory is correct, there is one less conversion from voltage to current in the signal path, providing lower distortion and greater resolution. Please chime in if my memory is off.
Mm....makes sense to introduce the amp for SP 1000. Allows existing owners to keep their SP1K competitive (extend life cycle).
Re: 4.4 vs. 2.5, just buy an adaptor. Have one from Personal Audio SG to port my many 2.5 mm cables to my Sony machines (WM1A and DMP Z1).