AK240 Pros: Excellent all rounder in terms of SQ and ease of use, handle most file types, neutral signature, details and clarity is excellent, if song calls for Bass and treble then it will be heard for sure else it will not add anything on its own to the sound, coming from other lesser DAPs like DX90/Fiio then it will wow the listener , very capable of deep low extensions and sparkly extended highs without roll offs in either spectrum but again only if the song is recorded that way
AK240 Cons: EQ is there but not practical to use as it will mess the SQ like muffling it,reduce volume levels etc. , this means songs cannot be altered say.. increasing the bass for a bass shy song, can only drive easy to drive IEMs and considering the price range it is disappointing, not as musical sounding like some e.g. HM901(s) but towards more analytical sound but it does not mean that it is less engaging or flat/cold sounding, very small previous/next song button in the left side, slower boot up
I wanted to choose between AK240 and HM901 but finally went towards AK240 because HM901 had an awful interface but from last year onwards HM901s is is in production with a bit better interface .. Lotto paw gold was another contender before i bought AK240 but it was more transparent so thought it may not be very tolerant to my low res MP3s. So finally chose AK240 and no major complaints so far
I had tried AK240 + Amp + HE1000 combination, it is jolly good fun mainly due to HE1000 abilities. HE1000 sounded great with anything thrown at it including even poor recordings ! HP1000 had a nice ever present sub bass but compared to many other bassy HPs had a lesser mid bass punch but i liked it that way as the bass sounded very luxurious. It is the best HP i have auditioned IMO even better than HD800 or LCDs . Stax009 can give HE1000 a run for the money but comparatively it had lesser bass quantity, thinner sound and unforgiving for low res music . I am planning to get HE1000 myself, you have made a great choice.