Huck
100+ Head-Fier
Hi: Anyone here using the CIAudio VHP-2 Head amp with the VAC.1 power supply with the Senn HD-600's?. Wonderin if it is worth looking into for my first solid-state amp.Any comments good or bad? Thanks, Keith
Originally Posted by tfarney /img/forum/go_quote.gif I believe greggf uses just that combination. Tim |
Originally Posted by Patu /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well let's hope he spots this thread. |
I have a CIAudio VHP-2 and VAC-1 power supply combo, and have used it with an AKG K701 and use it with a Beyerdynamic DT770Pro80 and Sennheiser HD600 and HD650... ...and... it's 95% + of what these same headphones were with my Zana Deux (and vastly better than anything else I've had or used otherwise, including a PS Audio GCHA and a Naim Headline2). |
Originally Posted by robinje /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm using the VHP2/VAC1 combo with both HD650's and RS1's. It sounds great! But, I ordered a Woo tube amp because I am infatuated with tubes and want to try something different. I am planning to sell my VHP2/VAC1 combo with upgraded RAL Parable power supply umbilical cable. PM me if interested... |
Originally Posted by greggf /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yep, the VAC-1/VHP-2 with Senn 600 & 650 is what I've settled on after trying all the stuff in my sig. Unless there's something terribly wrong with me - and this is Head-Fi, so someone is sure to come along and tell me that everything that I cherish is utter crap, and therefore I can't hear - the VHP and Senns is a great combo. World-class and a great value. If the VHP came in a nicer case and cost $1100, it would probably be a bestseller here at Head-Fi. As it stands now, it simply does its job too well at too good a price. I would have tried the GLite or GS-1, but have never wanted to wait for the build......... |
Originally Posted by Patu /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks for the offer but I live in Finland so it should be 230V. |
Originally Posted by jpelg /img/forum/go_quote.gif Maza, how do you like the VHP-2 with your Ultrasones & other low-impedance cans? I recently purchased the VHP-2 with the VAC-1 for use with my Proline 750's. I was looking for a solid-state amp that had sufficient current reserves for low-impedance headphones. The VHP-2 is advertised as being able to handle low-impedance headphones equally as well as those of higher impedance. I also liked the idea of an easy-to-access gain switch on the front panel, as I listen at moderate levels & don't need much gain. The many positive reviews here on Head-Fi were instrumental as well. I ended up returning the CIAudio combo for a few reasons: 1. The gain settings were wrong for my Ultrasones. The low-gain setting lacked dynamics, while the high setting was too forward sounding, as well as a bit hissy, with my Prolines (they are very resolving of anything coming down the audio pike). Sort of a "Goldilocks" thing. 2. The umbilicle between the amp & PS would often generate a feedback hum depending on its position. Hold the cable with my hand, or sometimes just reposition it, and it would stop. I've never had any feedback issues with even unshielded silver IC's, so I don't understand what problem was. Funny how greggf found the Zana Deux forward sounding in comparison. Based on my experiences listening to the Zana many times, and owning an EC/SS for a time, I find the Eddie Current signature to be quite laid back (too much so for me, frankly). I found the VHP-2 to be too forward sounding with my headphones, while he thinks it imparts no signature of its own. Interesting... Keep in mind that my headphones are very different than the Sennheisers that most of you are using with the CIAudio. Despite the advertising, I feel that the VHP-2 may be more suited toward higher-impedance Senns. |
Originally Posted by jpelg /img/forum/go_quote.gif 2. The umbilicle between the amp & PS would often generate a feedback hum depending on its position. Hold the cable with my hand, or sometimes just reposition it, and it would stop. I've never had any feedback issues with even unshielded silver IC's, so I don't understand what problem was. |