Fish tank x
Where do come up with these premises?
Now that Aiwa is part of sony, I would expect them to share designs/chips due to cost savings. Aiwa is Sony's 'Low end', now. A value brand. Sort of like the Celeron Versus the Pentium 4. Except the compromises aren't performance, just weight and battery life, perhaps, if that. I'd imagine it wouldn't sound that much different than your typical E-707.
and
If the NX9 is the recorder, and not the player, it's an MZ-NE410 with an AC jack.
Opinion and pure tripe.
Let's have some FACTS.
Aiwa still maintains its own seperate audio R&D division.
Long before the merger with Sony Corp., Aiwa and Sony have used the same identical ATRAC decoding chips for years starting with the Aiwa AM-F1 using ATRAC 2.
However, even though using the same ATRAC decoding chip, Aiwa and Sony units sound very much different from each other due to different board implementations and firmware.
The only exception to this rule is the Aiwa AM-F90 which is an IDENTICAL CLONE of the SONY MZR-900 except for the outer casing.
This unit was sold as an interrim product duing the Aiwa/Sony merger.
Since that time, Aiwa has designed a new NETMD recorder and that is the AM-N1.
The BUDGET model of the N1 is the N9.
And the N9 is a EU only Net MD recorder.
The laser assemblies are different for both the N9 and the Sony 410 among other major differences noted.
So, I'd have to say that they arent the same unit.
Not by a longshot.
Do you own or have ANY experience with either the Aiwa NX1/NX9 net MD recorders?
Because I do and that is why I'm posting on this subject.
It's one thing to SPECULATE or OPINIONATE about something.
It's another entirely different matter when it seems your opinion is being taken as advice, which to me is akin to the blind leading the blind as it is painfully obvious that you are speculating with out benefit of experience in this matter.
Not a good thing, unless you want this persons wallet to suffer.