[blazinblazin]

Hihi, I am here in Singapore too. Can I know where did you get your iem?

You can try or get them at Zepplin and Co.
I think they have full range of Acoustune for testing and local distributor. It comes with default 3.5mm cable, you can try/buy extra balanced cable from them too.
I would suggest you try different songs and song type.
The soundstage might be big or small depending on songs and recording.
Generally the vocal is more forward.
Its highly detailed on my setup with WM1A.

 

[Blackknightcm5]

You can try or get them at Zepplin and Co.
I think they have full range of Acoustune for testing and local distributor. It comes with default 3.5mm cable, you can try/buy extra balanced cable from them too.
I would suggest you try different songs and song type.
The soundstage might be big or small depending on songs and recording.
Generally the vocal is more forward.
Its highly detailed on my setup with WM1A.

OK thanks. I just ordered one from local distributor wired for sound.

 

[blazinblazin]

OK thanks. I just ordered one from local distributor wired for sound.

Let it burn in. I needs it.

 

[headphonesaddict123]

1695 is currently my favourite.

I somehow still prefer my old 1551 but i have to say 1695 hits close to me ending my IEM journey with a smile on my face .

Great IEM , indeed!

 

[blazinblazin]

I somehow still prefer my old 1551 but i have to say 1695 hits close to me ending my IEM journey with a smile on my face .

Great IEM , indeed!

I have 3 Acoustune, 1551, 1650, 1695.

I was using CA Andromeda, 1551 is what gets me in to Acoustune, love the tonality and bass.
Then i went to 1650 which i still crave my 1551 tonality but here i got more details.
Then when my 1650 sent for repair i tried 1695 and i got hooked, it has the lows, good speed, great details and highs. It somehow stopped my craving for IEMS.

 

[headphonesaddict123]

I have 3 Acoustune, 1551, 1650, 1695.

I was using CA Andromeda, 1551 is what gets me in to Acoustune, love the tonality and bass.
Then i went to 1650 which i still crave my 1551 tonality but here i got more details.
Then when my 1650 sent for repair i tried 1695 and i got hooked, it has the lows, good speed, great details and highs. It somehow stopped my craving for IEMS.

same man , i had doubts about acoustune's newest releases after i tried 1670 , which was a bit shrill and leaner than what i expected .
But then my friend bought this yellow titanium friendo and i tried it....it really grew on me . Funny thing is we hosted a local IEM meeting but my friend and i were the only persons enjoyed this IEM.

I guess we got *acoustuned* to the sound , hehe

 

[darkxvx]

Looks like the release date for the 1657, 1677, and 1697 is July 3 https://twitter.com/acoustune_jp/status/1275609708498259968

 

[blazinblazin]

Some online impressions 1695 vs 1697 according some audio facebook page.
1697 is more refined, better resolution, layering and width than 1695
1697 has lesser low mids than 1695
1697 sounds thinner than 1695.
1697 is extremely neutral and balanced.

 

[headphonesaddict123]

well...95 to me is already pretty balanced and probably the most neutral acoustune i've had.
wonder if they can do an even better job this time .

 

[RSC08]

At least on the look front, they are much more subtle than the previous range:

 

[Xinlisupreme]

I’d like listen to 1677SS

 

[audio123]

Acoustune has a new winner in the HS1677 SS. Brilliant revision.

 

[headphonesaddict123]

Acoustune has a new winner in the HS1677 SS. Brilliant revision.

Hey man , how was the 1677 , especially when compared to the original 1670?
To me , 1670 was a good iem , but a bit sharp and shrill in the upper frequency range.

 

[audio123]

Hey man , how was the 1677 , especially when compared to the original 1670?
To me , 1670 was a good iem , but a bit sharp and shrill in the upper frequency range.

Quicker bass decay, more forward upper midrange and airier treble, wider stage. The 1677 is not shrill at all, just bright & crisp.

 

[Xinlisupreme]

Where can I buy in EU?