A good SACD player
Jun 10, 2004 at 9:56 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 13

ampgalore

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
2,739
Likes
10
What is a good SACD player in the ~$300-500 range? I just purchased a Benchmark and already have a Grace, so I am not worried about CD playback. I am mainly concerned about SACD playback.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 4:24 AM Post #3 of 13

m0nKeY bUsiNeSs

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 29, 2004
Posts
346
Likes
10
I haven't heard it but the Marantz DV6400 got a good reveiw from Home Theater magazine about a month or two ago.
Its street price is near the top of you budget about $450-500.
If you take a listen to it i'd love to hear what you think about it as ive been thinking about jumping on the SACD boat myself.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 4:30 AM Post #4 of 13

go_vtec

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Posts
1,736
Likes
79
Location
US
How about Pioneer DV-45A? It's a very smooth sounding for SACD play back. Redbook is OK too. You can probably find one under $350, it uses 6 highspeed Burr-Brown DACs.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 4:36 AM Post #5 of 13

ampgalore

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
2,739
Likes
10
How are the SACD DAC's?

Redbook CD DAC's quickly become obsolete in a couple of years. Does the same thing happen to SACD DAC's?

This brings me to question the wisdom of investing in the older Sony ES SACD players like the 777, 555. Those models are at least a couple of years old already.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 4:40 AM Post #6 of 13

taylor

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Posts
1,089
Likes
10
Quote:

Originally Posted by ampgalore
How are the SACD DAC's?

Redbook CD DAC's quickly become obsolete in a couple of years. Does the same thing happen to SACD DAC's?

This brings me to question the wisdom of investing in the older Sony ES SACD players like the 777, 555. Those models are at least a couple of years old already.



Well, newer technology does not always mean that it will sound better, the analog section, power supply, and clock affect the sound as much as the DAC.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 4:48 AM Post #7 of 13

purk

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 26, 2001
Posts
10,461
Likes
2,635
I would recommend the C333ES. This is an amazing machine and it sound better than the C555ES stock. I have both and C333ES really come out on top. C333ES excels as redbook and SACD player according to Stereophile with both A ratings. C333ES also come with digital filter and tank-like construction. It weigh in at the same amount as the C555ES, but only equip with 2 channels system. You will lose the some of feature from the C555ES, namely multi-channel system.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 10:55 PM Post #8 of 13

darkclouds

Particular about his Sméagol Grammar we thinks he is.
Joined
Sep 27, 2001
Posts
1,988
Likes
11
Quote:

Originally Posted by ampgalore
How are the SACD DAC's?

Redbook CD DAC's quickly become obsolete in a couple of years. Does the same thing happen to SACD DAC's?

This brings me to question the wisdom of investing in the older Sony ES SACD players like the 777, 555. Those models are at least a couple of years old already.



Well, I love my old and outdated SCD-1 and will more than likely invest a nice sum of money into it in the future. The mod I'm looking at are going for 1-2k. None of the mods change the DAC in the unit.
 
Jun 12, 2004 at 11:44 PM Post #9 of 13

ampgalore

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
2,739
Likes
10
I don't doubt SCD-1 sounds great. But look at it this way, Sony, Pioneer, and other companies are already implementing digital outs for SACD and DVD-A. Sooner or later, we will have standalone SACD DAC's. And sooner or later we will have next generation SACD DAC's that are superior to the SACD DAC in the SCD-1. What then?

I know there are always going to be better sources down the road. But the older Sony ES SACD players only have analog outs for SACD playback, not digital outs, this means these players are stock with onboard SACD DAC.
 
Jun 13, 2004 at 12:01 AM Post #10 of 13

darkclouds

Particular about his Sméagol Grammar we thinks he is.
Joined
Sep 27, 2001
Posts
1,988
Likes
11
Quote:

Originally Posted by ampgalore
I don't doubt SCD-1 sounds great. But look at it this way, Sony, Pioneer, and other companies are already implementing digital outs for SACD and DVD-A. Sooner or later, we will have standalone SACD DAC's. And sooner or later we will have next generation SACD DAC's that are superior to the SACD DAC in the SCD-1. What then?

I know there are always going to be better sources down the road. But the older Sony ES SACD players only have analog outs for SACD playback, not digital outs, this means these players are stock with onboard SACD DAC.



You can't live by "sooner or later". It's about now, what you can get now. There's no point in trying to predict what's going to happen miles down the road. And that's with every component that you buy. I do understand obsolesence. But that's not something you can really worry about here. The only way to get out of it is to skip digital all together and go with a vinyl.

By the way, I just saw this at audiomod.com :

"Flash! Audiomod has modified the Sony SCD-1/SCD-777ES players to equal our modified Meitner DAC 6/Philips Transport. If you have been waiting for an SACD player to beat the stock Meitner, your wait is over. Contact me for more details."

I'm definitely excited. All I need now is the dinero.
 
Jun 13, 2004 at 12:15 AM Post #12 of 13

darkclouds

Particular about his Sméagol Grammar we thinks he is.
Joined
Sep 27, 2001
Posts
1,988
Likes
11
Quote:

Originally Posted by ampgalore
Philips transport? I thought the quality of the Sony ES transport is way better than what Philips has.


He's not talking about using the Sony as a transport. It's about modding the sony to beat the phillip and meitner combo.
 
Jun 13, 2004 at 2:15 AM Post #13 of 13

taylor

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Posts
1,089
Likes
10
Everything becomes obsolete. By your thinking, why ever buy anything because it will become obselete sooner or later.

Besides, newer does not mean better in many cases. Take for example tubes, PCDPs, wine, et cetera. Just because a DAC is not bleeding edge does not mean that it does not sound good.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top