A "Cautionary Tale"
Jan 3, 2010 at 8:07 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 3

Lazarus Short

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 23, 2003
Posts
3,366
Likes
16
Copied from a UK publication:


Apple is not to blame for hearing loss caused by iPods, rules U.S. appeal court

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

High volume: Apple iPods can reach up to 115 decibels
A U.S. judge has ruled that Apple is not responsible for hearing loss caused by music played too loud on iPods.
The San Francisco appeal court upheld a 2008 ruling, as the company warns users of the dangers of playing music too loud.
It also reasoned that iPod users had the option to choose how loud they raise the volume.
Joseph Birdsong and Bruce Waggoner had claimed that the popular music devices were defective because they could reach 115 decibels - the equivalent volume to a helicopter.
But Senior Judge David Thompson said: 'The plaintiffs simply do not plead facts showing that hearing loss from iPod use is actual or imminent.
'The plaintiffs do not allege the iPods failed to do anything they were designed to do nor do they allege that they, or any others, have suffered or are substantially certain to suffer inevitable hearing loss or other injury from iPod use,' he said.
'At most, the plaintiffs plead a potential risk of hearing loss not to themselves, but to other unidentified iPod users.'

More...
Apple blocks Dalai Lama iPhone app in China
At last! Apple tablet is slated for launch in January
The decision comes as Brussels prepares to impose a volume limit on all personal music players.
Since its launch in 2001, Apple has sole more than 220million iPods.
This week, rumours that chief executive Steve Jobs is planning to unveil a touch screen computer at the end of next month, reached fever pitch.
Details about the iSlate are top secret, but expectations are high that it will be a one-piece touch screen computer that will look like a cross between an iPhone and a laptop computer.
Apple's shares have risen 145 per cent this year. Although Jobs's pay remained a token $1 last year, he owns more than five million shares, worth more than $1.1 billion (£600million).



Read more: Apple is not to blame for hearing loss caused by iPods, rules U.S. appeal court | Mail Online
 
Jan 3, 2010 at 10:42 PM Post #2 of 3
While this sort of article is cleverly timed, it is a laugh. Apple having been pinned by suits regarding volume is as stupid a proof as necessary to show the legal system dumb by its own loopholes. Of course users are not 'forced' to listen at 115 decibels. Apple, Sony, Cowon - every player have hit that volume for a long time and only when the iPod sells a lot due users finally show their own stupidity by blasting their eardrums as blithely as a shyte about to be wiped.

There is no story here nor anywhere where a suit is placed against a corporation when a user fails the brain test. oh well...
 
Jan 4, 2010 at 5:03 AM Post #3 of 3
Where was it lately that I read that upper decibel limits are being sought in the EU? Even their power cords are designed so that it is nearly impossible for a stupid person to zap themselves. I'm not sure which approach I like least. Imagine a world where each set of headphones carried a warning from the Surgeon General to the effect that this device may cause tinnitus and/or hearing loss. Naderphones?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top