[Draca]

Quote:

well, even that very VST plugin sounds horrid in foobar using George's wrapper...anyways

Answer regal's question pl0x.

 

[Hybrys]

Quote:

well, even that very VST plugin sounds horrid in foobar using George's wrapper...anyways

Someone really should rewrite the VST implementation...  Meh, I don't use VSTs.

 

[ROBSCIX]

The DirectX and VST based effects were originally meant for studio applications.  They are used with wrappers to use with music players...

 

[regal]

He won't because he is full of BS and knows very very little about computer audio,  other than regurgitated hydrogenaudio posts he is pretty useless for information.
My guess is he is a shill for this "free" player he likes so much that shows trojans with my virus scanner,  probably getting kickbacks.
Quote:

Answer regal's question pl0x.

 

[leeperry]

Michel Audiard said "I don't talk to ********, it instructs them"...It's a damn shame you guys can't hear differences though, better luck next time

 

[thuantran]

You know, it must be placebo but I think threads with leeperry in it are much more informative.

 

[Draca]

Quote:

You know, it must be placebo but I think threads with leeperry in it are much more informative.

I think it's the rational, informative reaction to his intellectually dishonest idiocy that results in such an observation being made.

 

[shimm]

I've been trying Win7 (i have to because of bitstream with ATI 5).
I don't need my Essence ST anymore cause it does sound as bad as everything else here. Even HDMI audio has same sound that i can't say about XP. I didn't expect it will be so bad.

 

[Mad Max]

 

[doctorcilantro]

http://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_abx
 
Quote:

I've been thinking of trying to build a kind of DirectShow wrapper for Foobar.  If someone can definitively prove that Reclock has a positive effect on audio (or wants to pay a 'wage' for the finished working product), I'll get to work on it.

 

[doctorcilantro]

I'm not clear what you mean by digitally isolated?
 
If I clock my DAC to my dedicated word clock, and my Lynx AES16 (transport) to the same clock, of course I still have to pass the bitstreamed digital audio data (via AES) to the DAC.
 
I assume you just meant the clock being isolated?
 
Quote:

 
Agreed. This is one of the easier audio questions to resolve. All it would take is someone with a DAC where the clock is generated at the DAC end rather than the PC end, and which is digitally isolated from the PC. Such a DAC would be impervious to any possible software, PC or transport related effects. If someone using such a DAC thought software players sounded different, we'd know it was placebo.

 

[JohnHype]

Done by a Romanian, nice

 

[theveterans]

Check the date. You're necro posting.

 

[Schonen]

Can't download it cos google. I block most google domains with the Hosts file. Will get it later in Linux, thx. If it doesn't have library support then I won't use it much.