mikeaj
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
- Posts
- 1,639
- Likes
- 110
Quote:
Yeah, there are differences, but these days, probably not much. Some of the older mp3 encoders are terrible compared to modern ones.
LAME is the best for MP3, and Nero is supposedly the best for higher variable bitrate AAC (probably what you want to use anyway). But I don't think Foobar actually comes with those encoders? You need to already have the command-line executables on your computer for the encoders you want to use and direct foobar to their locations.
Are there quality differences between various encoders? Are the encoders that come with Foobar decent quality? My Foobar shows MP3 (LAME) and AAC (Nero), among others. Would these be satisfactory or would I need to look for something else?
Yeah, there are differences, but these days, probably not much. Some of the older mp3 encoders are terrible compared to modern ones.
LAME is the best for MP3, and Nero is supposedly the best for higher variable bitrate AAC (probably what you want to use anyway). But I don't think Foobar actually comes with those encoders? You need to already have the command-line executables on your computer for the encoders you want to use and direct foobar to their locations.