1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

2359glenn | studio

Discussion in 'Headphone Amps (full-size)' started by silent one, Mar 9, 2012.
  1. L0rdGwyn
    Hosting Thanksgiving this year, put up a miniature Christmas tree, best spot happened to be next to my desk, which means...

    Holiday-themed GOTL photos :santa:

    If you ever put out a holiday shopping catalog Glenn, I can be your photographer.

    DSCF5525.jpg
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2019
  2. DecentLevi
    Cute Christmas tree, and you must be getting a nice mist of fresh air from it at your amp, unless it's a fake one?
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2019
  3. L0rdGwyn
    Hey thanks!! It's a real one, pretty subtle smell but refreshing :) I guess I should be listening to Christmas music :thinking:
     
  4. mordy
    Hi gibosi,
    Thanks for identifying the dates. I am getting a little confused because it looks like some of my Tung Sol and Sylvania 6J5 tubes were all made by RCA.
    I have an additional 4 TS 6J5 tubes with the following codes:
    322 4 03-3 322 is the EIA code for Tung Sol; January 1944? The last digit 3 is a factory code
    1H 322KM3 ?
    K3 322DW3 ?
    V3 322MH3 ?
    and then a Ken-Rad with the code
    H7 ?

    Can't get a handle on these.....
     
  5. GDuss
    I'm currently listening to a pair of TS 6J5s with codes 322NR3 and 322DT3. They sound great (with TS 5998s as powers) but there is a bit of a hum that's audible when the music gets quiet. Totally workable though.
     
  6. mordy
    Did you try with a jumper connecting pins 1&8?
     
  7. GDuss
    I'm way behind on my list of experiments (that list keeps getting longer), and that jumper experiment is coming up soon. The first time I listened to those TS tubes was with 6x 6BL7 and the hum was more prominent. So what I was trying was whether it was less of a problem with 2x 5998, and it is less (presumably the lower amplification of the 5998 helps). I still have 2 pair of 6C5 tubes to try and the jumper will be part of that experiment. Science can be painfully slow sometimes :).
     
  8. gibosi
    > 322 4 03-3 322 is the EIA code for Tung Sol; January 1944? The last digit 3 is a factory code

    I would guess 1954. I don't think I have seen the factory code "3" on 1940's production....

    > 1H 322KM3 ?

    "1H" makes no sense as an RCA number.... KM (Tung-Sol) is April, 1961

    > K3 322DW3 ?

    "K3" corresponds to the RCA code for May/June 1958. And my best guess is DW (Tung-Sol) is 1958/1959...

    > V3 322MH3 ?

    As an RCA code, "V3" corresponds to 1945.... As a KR code, July, 1944... But MH (Tung-Sol) is Feb, 1962... I would tend to believe the Tung-Sol code as they didn't use two-letter codes in the 1940's.

    > and then a Ken-Rad with the code H7 ?

    H7 indicates October, 1938. But if KR did manufacture this tube, I would also expect to see "13" stamped into the base, indicating "6N7".
     
  9. mordy
    Thanks for the detective work. Where can I find a chart of the Tung Sol two letter codes?
    I do have Ken-Rad 6N7 tubes with the number 13 stamped in the metal, but this is a 6J5 tube. Will try to post a picture later.
     
  10. gibosi
    Oh, the KR code for the 6J5 is "36".

    To the best of my knowledge, the two-letter Tung-Sol date codes are not available on the net. And in fact, I have yet to find a complete listing in print. But I did find a few years in Tube Collector magazine, October, 2019.
     
  11. Monsterzero
    This what happens when too much audio gear shows up at the same time....

    77158684_556388228491984_4936961346500558848_o.jpg
     
  12. L0rdGwyn
    I know the feeling :ksc75smile: looks like you'll be busy this holiday weekend. What's on the menu?
     
  13. Monsterzero
    Mainly cables. Anyone who denies the differences in cables has either never had a chance to a/b or theyre deaf.
    I have six different RCA cables here ranging in price from 40 bucks to nearly 900.00,and there is quite a bit of difference.
     
  14. GDuss
    Any chance the $40 cable is your favorite?
     
  15. L0rdGwyn
    Well let us know the results! Hopefully the $900 isn't the best. I am open to cable swapping in the future.
     

Share This Page