Employing large-caliber drivers, these in-ear headphones deliver full-range sound with powerful...

Yamaha EPH-M100 High-Performance Earphones

  • Employing large-caliber drivers, these in-ear headphones deliver full-range sound with powerful bass, clear mids and crisp, sparkling highs. A lightweight, ergonomic design provides an ultra-comfortable fit and a tangle-resistant cable offers a built-in remote/mic that puts control at your fingertips.

Recent Reviews

  1. Nymphonomaniac
    Microscopic size earphones craving for microscopic details. Impressive but overrated.
    Written by Nymphonomaniac
    Published Apr 30, 2016
    Pros - Excellent sound quality, very good mids, super articulate bass presentation, good instruments separation
    Cons - Little too bright, sound can be too foward with some type of music, cable look fragile
    I just sell my Yamaha EPH-100, so before I forget how they sound I will write a little review here.
    My attempt for this micro driver earphones was BIG, especially because of the praise I found here on Headfi. So yes, let's be honnest: I wasn't that impressed the first time I listen to them, I try to convaince myself but the soundstage wasn't large enough and I feel lack of air between instruments even if the separation was great. In other words, if I listen to them without having read numerous review I will surely have a more objective opinion.
    Wasn't very impress by the construction, perhaps more by the ingenery behind it. The earshell are nice brushed metal AND metal paint plastic (that can be easily scratch and loose his paint). Cable look fragile and is connect loosely to the earshell. Anyway, I find them very beautifull and elegant, I try to wear it over ear and it go well, it reduce microphonic sound too.
    SOUND (Using Ibasso Dx90, Fiio E7 and Xduoo X3):
    These are not bassy earphones but the bass is there, it call present and show himself in all it's nudity. Yes, nude bass, because it isn't beefy but very revealing and articulate, we can effortlessly extract every note of bass line in a track easily with the EPH-100 wich is very impressive. The drawback is that it can feel cold and too analytical for some type of music, but I find it very enjoyable if not a tad too bright. Sub bass isn't really there as it need more space to blossom and rumble in the extreme low end. It is still punchy enough to give energy to track but Toms for example do not decay very long in sound spectrum. Anyway, this is a very unique approach to low frequencies that can be very revealing with complex bass playing.
    Foward and gently bright with great texture is how I remember the medium frequencie range, Vocal were sweet and spot on and positioning in the (little) soundstage was good too. This brightness in the overall EPH100 soundsignature can be fatiguing with already bright DAP like Ibasso Dx90. The Yamaha EPH-100 are quite neutral sounding too, we feel close in a little space with lot of details with this type of sound, it is intimate and urgent at the same time. I really like how female signers sound with this earphones and was utterly impress by the quality and plenty of details they offer.
    Treble is bright but do not have lot of sparkle, very good to extract texture and details, so much so that it can be overwhelming and make too complexe music sound congested with too much details and layers. But most of time it,s delactable, especially with my Fiio E7 (Wolfson DAC) it have an exquisite synergy were the warmnest of the DAC complete with the analytical brightess of they EPH-100, and a little bass boost do not harm this earphones, quite the cntrary I will say.
    Overall sounds impressions:
    The Yamaha EPH-100 is a unique earphone with lot to like, it's incredibly small size, it's good look, it's superbly elegant and detailed sound, it's over average soundstage (especially for his size). Still, I feel something is not right with the overall sound presentation, I guess it's my subjective earing and do not deny they excellent drivers and tuning, they are somekind of little miracle that barely touch perfection.
    I really think that this earphones sound good, but with the number of IEM I have and the music players I use the Yamaha EPH-100 wasn't mean't for me.
  2. greadlier
    Written by greadlier
    Published Oct 15, 2014
    Pros - very good sound, comfortable, production quality
    Cons - lack of microphone
    It is the most fun in ear I have ever had at this price. 
  3. SandyMan
    Great pair of earphones
    Written by SandyMan
    Published Oct 14, 2014
    Pros - Great noise cancellation, wonderful bass
    Cons - earbuds are not comfortable
    I really like this earphone because it gives you wonderful sound quality at a reasonable cost. When I started listening to all the songs on my laptop with this earphone and also all of the smooth jazz, it was as if the whole world was cut off because of the noise cancellation. I use it on the airplane and I couldnt hear the tons of babies that were on the plane .
    I tried it with three different devices ( mac book pro . galaxy tab and galaxy s3 phone ) and each had excellent results.
    It comes with a really good earphone puch with idfferent size buds. The buds get a little uncomfortable after a while.
    Definitely buy if this is your first pair of expensive earphones
      rajeevrn likes this.
  4. lumberjake
    Excellent SQ for the money
    Written by lumberjake
    Published Sep 18, 2014
    Pros - Imaging, detail, responsive and dynamic or engaging sound.
    Cons - Fit can be an issue. Perhaps for perfection a bit more sub bass and sparkle up top and a wider SS but that is perfection.
    Read a ton of reviews before purchasing. However, I will be honest and say that I was a bit let down by the bass. Don't get me wrong, its very detailed and balanced and perhaps there lies my issue, I was under the impression that these were more bassy. I am a bit of a basshead, in that, I like to feel it. Obviously, to many these have plenty of bass and the upper bass is there but it diminishes as it gets deeper to my ears which surprised me, again due to reviews. For the vast majority of what I listen to the bass is fine but for electronic stuff there is near zero rumble where there should have been. This could be due to the fact that I cannot insert them but rather rest them inside using the largest tip for a seal which itself is very vague(fit), perhaps due to the thin silicon used. My theory based on other reviews and my findings is that there is simply too much air volume between the driver and my ear drum to get deep bass. Really this is the only thing I have an issue with.
    UPDATE: I finally figured out what I needed to do fit wise. For some reason the smaller tip would not seal despite being a very tight fit and realized the L tip was required but still needed to be inserted which takes a bit of actual force. The comfort could be worse but could be better. But inserted with the large tip does deliver that elusive bass response. Sealed, it really hits hard. Matter of fact I just got the PannyHJE900 known for its Monster like bass and the Yams are very similar. It is just that the Panny just sits there and it seals.
    Mids are very engaging. Not recessed at all, nor are they affected by bass bleed. They are not warm or particularly thin but really detailed. I hear things I never noticed before and they kill my old Klipsch X5 BA IEM. This is the earphones strength IMO.
    UPDATE: Just got the Panasonic HJE900 and they are both really quite similar in that both are very quick, clear and both use a micro driver.Neither would I describe as thick or warm but not cold either. This gave me further insight to the Yamahas mids which decimate the Panasonic. Not that the 900s are bad, they are recessed and not even that badly. I guess what I am saying is that it is true, most of the music is in the mids. I am listening to psytrance and both deliver on the beat but all that cool sound effects flowing about in stereo is much more clear on the Yams. This only helps to draw me further into the soundscape. More immersive and enjoyable. The Pannys make that all sound a bit distant. This is really what sets the Yams apart because it is extremely common to have the V shape sound with the exception of flat, analytical but boring IEMs. The Yams have that dynamic fun sound while still able to deliver all that musical info often overwhelmed by other fun IEM.
    Treble is also really good but not up to the mids level. I am hearing cymbals that I never heard before and they have there own realestate like all the instruments through these things which only helps with detail and complex metal music where everything is loud. To be nit picky they could have some more splash or just a bit more forward after hearing my Panasonic HJE900(which is too bright).
    Finally, I am still surprised what a tiny dynamic can do. There is mucho detail but these are on the fun side rather than the analytical side without being too soft or warm. An IEM that makes you want to listen to every album again to see what you missed before. I came from Klipsch X5 and have the SoundMagic HP 100 and they don't approach the Yams for insight and resolution. However, the fit and weak sub bass makes listening to electronic stuff a bit conflicting because they really draw you into the sound with their detail then the sub bass comes and I am left hearing it buried by everything else with zero rumble. I must keep reminding myself that bass is perhaps the most conflicted aspect of sound as everyone has what they think is too much or not enough. That for some audiophiles, apparently being able to actually hear the bass drum is fine and forward bass. Also, many never listen to electronic music where sub bass is a must and therefore don't notice it as much.
    UPDATE: The bass is no longer a real issue as I have finally figured out the correct fit. I still could use more deep sub bass but then that is hard to find on any IEM. I am accustomed to the Soundmagic HP100 which is blessed with incredible sub bass. It is literally as loud at 40Hz as it is at 100-150HZ.
  5. Head-Head
    Balanced Beauties
    Written by Head-Head
    Published Mar 14, 2014
    Pros - Build Quality / Sound Quality / Value
    Cons - Thin Wiry Wire / Not The End All In Detail
    Nothing is perfect & these earbuds are certainly a compromise. None the less, they are not too bright, not too boomy, not too recessed, & not too expensive.

    The sound is overall rich & smooth; therefore far less fatiguing yet still enjoyable.

    Soundstage is lacking, still separation is very good giving impressive imaging [for the device category & price].

    Fit is way too personal too recommend for any head spks. Too each their own.

    1. kaotickelly
      I actually found them to be quite boomy. I would describe it as substantial bass that can sometimes over power the rest of the range. It's great for thump heavy tracks and genres, like dance, D&D, and the like.
      The fit is quite particular, and can hurt if the metal ends touch your ear.
      kaotickelly, Mar 15, 2014
    2. Head-Head
      "Quite Boomy" compared too what?
      The metal touching your ear, it's totally dependent on the position of the unit not being level & the shape of one's ear.
      As well as being true for ALL metal and non-metal earbuds, not just this model.
      As my comment on comfort in the review stated:
      "Fit is way too personal too recommend for any head spks. Too each their own."
      Head-Head, Mar 17, 2014
  6. daerron
    Best bang for the buck ever
    Written by daerron
    Published Oct 10, 2013
    Pros - Excellent sound quality, bass, separation
    Cons - Uncomfortable eartips, durability
    This is my second pair of EPH-100s. I purchased my first pair in the beginning of 2012 some while after they became a FOTM here on Head-fi. Strangely enough I would have thought that they would have increased in price with the popularity these have, but I got the second pair for $15 less than the first pair I bought. The first pair survived a lot of hours of music at work, but the housings were starting to fall apart. The tips have also become very uncomfortable and I thought it was about overdue to get a second pair. 
    Listening to the replacement set I was immediately smitten with these all over again. What a bargain for the sound quality on offer! I can't think of any headphone that I've listened to that offers even remotely close to the amount of bang for the buck that these do. In some ways I like them more than the Westone 4s I had previously. The W4s are obviously more detailed and neutral, but these have a certain fun factor and they sound great with modern music and anything electronic. The dynamic drivers also convey a lot of impact which contributes to the fun factor of bass heavy music.
    Excellent sound quality, great bass, very good separation and imaging in the mid range, smooth sounding, very good isolation. I was wearing these while sitting close to a couple of 5-axis CNC routers and these isolated the noise very well.
    The housings on my first pair fell apart after a year and half's usage. Difficult to get the tips off if you wish to swap them. the ear tips become uncomfortable with extended listening. They also seem to lose some of their flex as they become older. Treble is a bit non descript, but adequate.
      f198 likes this.
    1. View previous replies...
    2. TWerk
      All IEM's are very tip dependent. Bass response is usually all about the seal you get. Provided you get a good seal, the EPH are very enjoyable and just fun.
      TWerk, Oct 11, 2013
    3. byunjoe
      On my third pair. Can't get enough of these. Despite the frustration of having one side completely die once, and one entire pari go out, I loved these enough to get a third.
      byunjoe, Oct 17, 2013
    4. TWerk
      You have good taste^ I have a few expensive pairs of headphones and these are just as enjoyable. Such a great signature.
      TWerk, Oct 17, 2013
  7. jcksa
    Top Quality-Great Price
    Written by jcksa
    Published Feb 2, 2013
    Pros - Excellent fidelity, great musical detail, classy design
    Cons - Slight ear fatigue
    The Yamaha EPH-100 surprised me with their excellent fidelity. I already owned a $300 set of Sure SE425s which are also wonderful but fall in the $300 price range and should be. I was so impressed with the performance of the EPH-100s that they are my primary headset. Their performance is at least equivalent to the SE425 and much easier to put on/in (if you're familiar with the twist and insert wire over the ear design from Sure. I do experience some slight ear fatigue but have not yet tried the smallest ear buds which will probably eliminate the fatigue.  I highly recommend the EPH-100s.
  8. Lifted Andreas
    Yamaha EPH-100 are the best earphones for EDM!! Especially Trance.
    Written by Lifted Andreas
    Published Jan 26, 2013
    Pros - Amazing clarity, precision, separation and 3D'ness
    Cons - Low bass is a little lacking, perhaps not as rumbly. Sub-bass is great!
    Best ear-phones around $150 for EDM.
    Can't go wrong with these. :D
    EDIT (15/01/2015) (bought from Audio Affair UK for £60):
    So, I got a second pair after selling my 1st a long time ago and plugged them into my X3 tonight again for a listen. All I have to say is WOW! I cannot believe I ever got rid of these, the IEM love of my life has returned. As I've been listening to Zero Audio Carbo Tenore for the past year and a bit the EPH100s are like a breath of fresh air for me (familiar air). Bass is again back in my ears, not to say that the Tenore bass is lacking, but the quantity and the quality is nowhere near the EPH100s standard. The way that the Yams involve you in the center stage is amazing, soundstage is way above average... 3D detailing is one of the best I've heard.
    Just to mention one thing, Zero Audio Carbo Tenore come close with regards to low bass quantity when using the MEElec M6 dual-flanges.. however the quantity of sub-bass is still lacking. The control isn't quite on the same level as the EPH100 either.
    I need to reunite myself a bit more with the sound before I can add any more to this review. However, its safe to say that once you got these beauties you should never get rid of them!!
  9. regiapemid
    Written by regiapemid
    Published Dec 14, 2012
    Pros - Sound is clear and crisp, great sub-bass response
    Cons - Cable is not the best
    Bought these two months ago, and they are my favorite IEM to date. One thing to note is that I did indeed get the condensation problem. It has only happened a handful of times, and has completely cured up, but it is something to be aware of. I had to dock a half star from the Design rating because of this issue. They're still my favorite IEMs, though. I might have some funny ear canals too, as most people never got the problem.
    For me, personally, these trump the GR07, SE215, and MC5/3/2. I always recommend that you do your own testing. For example, many people may find the GR07 to be on par or slightly better, whereas I found the EPH-100 to be much better. I'm chalking it up to my ear canals. More (rambling) thoughts here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/577712/yamaha-eph-100/3030.
    From a review I also wrote on the Yamaha site:
    Some excerpts from my rambling:
    First, the comparison against the GR07:
    The guitar in "Collide" sounds muffled or dampened on the GR07. Similar effect in "Under My Bed" by Meiko - the intro sounds much clearer on the Yams. The guitar intro in Michelle Branch's "Breathe" is markedly cleaner on the Yams. And when the vocal lines come in, they again sound sharper on the Yams. So on and so forth for other songs. After adding in my EP-630 into the testing, the GR07 is not as noticeably clearer than the EP-630 as the EPH is. Especially for The Duhk's "The Wagoner's Lad", which I have in .flac, the EPH is by far the sharpest, followed by the GR07, and then finally the EP-630.
    Did another long A/Bing session today, and the Yams are the clear winner. Retested "Collide" and "Cosas Que Suenan A..." numerous times, which really showed how much better guitars sound on the Yams. I also A/Bed the Feed Me remix of Robyn's "Call Your Girlfriend." The Yams again sounded clearer, this time on both the snares and the electronic synth notes. I felt the sub-bass was better on the Yams as well - when the bass line comes in I get a much more visceral feeling when I'm wearing the Yams. I also A/Bed the instrumental version of Radiohead's "High & Dry", and the guitar is more clear and crisp on the Yams.
    And another excerpt of some of my thoughts of the EPH-100 against a pretty hyped up product, the Sony MH1C:
    The EPH-100s sound clearer than the MH1Cs. From the songs I've A/Bed so far, guitars and vocals sound slightly better on the Yams and there seems to be a sense of overall improved clarity on the Yams. When a slew of instruments enter the mix ("Por El Miedo A Equivocarnos", ~35 sec in and ~2:40 in; "Entertain The Pain", ~50 sec in) however, the difference becomes much more noticeable. The MH1Cs become congested while the Yams keep everything separated and clear. In addition, the Yams are less fatiguing, which I noticed after many, many repeats of sections of several songs, over and over. The MH1Cs sound harsher ("Por El Miedo A Equivocarnos" ~2:40 in, especially) and its inability to keep all the instruments from running over each other contributes a bit to this as well.
    Only two cons. First, I got this condensation problem after extended periods of listening (maybe >5 hours or so), which would dampen one side of the earphones. This problem has only happened a handful of times, and has always resolved itself by simple drying. I'm listening to the EPH-100 right now, and loving it. This not a dealbreaker at all (especially since most people never get this problem, I think I have slightly wonky ear canals, but that's another story), and even considering this I put the Yams above the GR07, Shure SE215, and the Mtymotic MC2/3/5.
    The second con is barely worth a mention, but it's that the cable is not amazing. The GR07 has undoubtedly a better cable. The MH1C, on the other hand, has a godawful cable. The Yams' cables have never bothered me - I never even thought of them as a con, until some other people pointed it out and I thought, "Hum, I guess the cable's not the best."
    At the end of the day, these IEMs are absolutely phenomenal, and I'd buy them again in a heartbeat (I'm actually considering buying a 2nd pair of these for working out. I bought the GR07 for that purpose, but the sound was so much worse than the EPH-100's I had to return them. Probably something to do with my ear canals that don't play nice with the GR07. Alright sorry, I'm rambling off now.).
      Head-Head and stalepie like this.
  10. byunjoe
    Yamaha EPH-100SL Review
    Written by byunjoe
    Published Dec 6, 2012
    Pros - Detailed, thick bass; Clear mids; Circular soundstage; Instrument separation; Build quality; Isolation
    Cons - Unusual treble; Unsure cable
    I come from a long line of mid-range earphones including the Sennhiser CX300II, Klipsch Image S4, Monster Beats by dr dre Tour, and Monster Jamz. I was looking for an earphone that I can continue producing electronic music on and concluded, by the reviews, that the Yamahas were my best bet. They were not that expensive here in S. Korea, being approximately 124 dollars. I craved prominent bass (not basshead-ish nor Balanced Armanture like; just clear bass), good instrument separation, and good build quality.

    First Impressions:
    When I first put these in and listened to Below Us by Seven Lions, I was amazed at how clear the bass  rumbles and kick punches me. The mids really bring out the 'bodies' of the bass and warm instruments. The only thing that caught me a little off guard was the treble. The treble felt like it had a high speed lfo (low frequency oscillator) attached to it, giving it a fast, fluctuating, vibrato like tone, strange. These are not-suprisingly tuned a lot like at type of studio monitors that Yamaha makes: the HS80Ms. This is ideal as I can basically have a portable studio now; I no longer have to worry about mastering issues when I produce music!
    After 3 days:
    After a few days of use, I have now become accustomed to the strange treble and enjoy it. All my music seems to have become smooth. The bass massages me, the mids soothe me, and the rather unique treble gives everything and airy, jazzy feel. I have continued discovering new elements of my music. The soundstage and separation helps this a lot. I find percussion lines and unknown riffs flying here and there in small corners of the headphone. This is very satisfying as I need to be able to hear all the details in my music. The Klipsch Image S4 doesn't hold a stick to these Yamahas as the Klipsch have very low volume levels. The Klipsch would seem more geared towards listening to classic rock music or any other kind of smooth and quiet music. The Yamahas can reproduce anything well except for Classical. The treble seems to be a big factor in preventing the Yamahas ability to reproduce Classical properly. I am not a big fan of Classical and listen and produce mainly Progressive House and Trance, which was not a problem. I expect these to sound even better and have more controlled (stable) bass by the time I reach approximately 100 hours of use. I also expect to be using these for at least 2 years; though I prefer they last me a lifetime.
    I would recommend these to anyone within the $100 to $150 range budget!
    I would recommend you to buy these if you are an audiophile and if you find this for less than $120!
    I would recommend these to anyone who listens to and/or produces EDM (Electronic Dance Music)
    I would recommend these to anyone who listens to Jazz or Chillout music.
    I wouldn't recommend these to bassheads; these have very clear bass and it goes down low, but in terms of quantity, the Monsters earphones have a little more by sacrificing the mids.
    I wouldn't recommend these to treble lovers; they might have trouble adjusting to the strange treble.
    I wouldn't recommend these to anyone who listens to Classical; try the Sennhiser IE8/IE80s then, they have a wider soundstage and more 'normal' treble.
      Head-Head likes this.
    1. analogsurviver
      Great review. Thank you for this. It sums it up nicely, in a very concise fashion. I have been considering EPH 100 for some time now, but since I listen and record almost exclusively classical, that treble is perhaps really no go. Did you try any EQing the EPH-100s; it might work also for genres that without EQ leave too much to be desired.
      analogsurviver, Dec 7, 2012
    2. extrabigmehdi
      Well the eph-100 has a nice soundstage and great separation, which can be enjoyable for classical too ... I think people perceive them as detailed because of their good instrument separation (i.e 3d sound).
      extrabigmehdi, Dec 7, 2012
    3. SAM63
      these dont have great bass. its lacking in quantity. if you are a basshead go for the cks77 or the fxz200
      SAM63, Dec 20, 2012


To view comments, simply sign up and become a member!