5/5/16 UPDATE: I prefer the TC200 over all my other earbuds and IEMs at the moment. The relaxing and open sound is awesome for my taste. I just realized how good the imaging is, I can see the performers clearly when closing my eyes.
I was a strong believer that the more expensive the headphones are the better they sound. After hearing Earbell (or Mrice) E100, and Venture Electronics Monk a short while ago, I proved that I was stupid. Earbuds roar.
I decided to give a try to Tingo earbuds after seeing random good words upon them, and purchased TG-38s and the TC200, along with some other budget earbuds such as Venture Electronics Monk, Yuin PK3, and some earbuds made by a gentleman nicknamed "earbug", also being recognized as Seahf by some members here as earbug made some of his earbuds with cases having a "Seahf" label.
The monk bests in it's $5 price range, TC200 bests in tonality, quality and value, and earbug arguably bests in quality, but they are hard to drive to their full potential, and they are more expensive and difficult to find anywhere to sell in US for general recommendation. I will likely give a review on the earbug earbuds but not today.
I decided not to compare them with the Yuin PK3 or so. I'd rather compare them to my Grado RS1i, Grado SR325. Yes, strong contenders if you may.
I am not a big fan of the idea to tag merchandises more than 500% of the making cost. Therefore I am reluctant to pay more than $50 for a earbud, simply as I know it likely won't cost no more than $10 to make one. That's also the reason I really like brands such as OppoDigital and JDS Labs (just to name a few) and refrain from buying some big names (you know).
Oh well. Let's get back to the TC200.
Comfort:
This TC200 is comfortable. Their pancake-shaped case has a diameter of 15.7 mm, which is not only 1.1 mm smaller than that of my beloved Earbell E100, but also thinner. While I liked the sound of E100, they are definitely less comfortable to me especially if I want them to fit in a conformation that will give me the best sound.
I find the cotton earbud covers make the fit in ears better, and the sound stays amazing. Definitely try the earbud covers if you find the fit not optimal.
Price:
They sell less than $40 on aliexpress link on the link below. In some forums on Chinese websites, some people said they received faulty units of TC200, but I did not experience that problem, and believe that those cases may exist at a very low chance, and Tingo customer service is super.
Drivability:
They sound well and sound consistant with all sources, from an iPhone to a iPod->CmoyBB to a desktop system with a neutral SS amp.
Soundstage:
This TC200 has a good soundstage. Not just a good soundstage for a pair of earbuds----they have a good soundstage, period. Good enough for casual appreciation on classical music of many types.
Sound signature:
They sound like a combination of a Sennheiser Momentum and a Grado SR80i. 80% Sennheiser, 20% Grado to be subjectively objective.
Comparison with other headphones:
Grado is good at creating a nice soundstage with an "aggressive" but polite treble that differs themselves from many other headphone brands, and many people are a fan of this sound: refined without being too fatiguing. TC200 has a similar signature to a Grado in many ways. And that's where TC200 gets a chance to be compared to Grado full sized headphones.
And the TC200 don't lose the battle.
In general: TC200 has slightly more laid-back mids, slightly more background noise (which is normal), a more laid back sound, and a more balanced sound. Definately more forgiving not only to source and amplification, but also to genres (Many Grados don't do symphonies, piano light music too well in my opinion, except for the PS series).
TC200 vs RS1i:
RS1i has a deeper sound separation in transverse direction, and a much better orchestra presentation. TC200 just ticks all the boxes in terms of performance. TC200 has more bass, very slightly slower than Grado, but comparable quality in response. RS1i's clear detailed sound wins overall, and RS1i has better vocal response due to the dampening of certain frequencies by the mahogany casing, but the vocal is simply more touching and relieving. However TC200 has an overall smoother sound and the sound feels a little more lively for pop music.
TC200 vs SR325: SR325 has much better bass response. The bass is thicker, more punchy, more "power", making the bass sounds lively and vivid. The SR325 frequency does not feel as balanced and the sound is not as clear/refined as TC200. TC200 bass is not bad, though, and it sounds more balanced, giving a much better sounding for long-term music listening (That's where the Sennheiser tonality comes from). I prefer SR325 for pop music that emphasize bass, and TC200 for pop music that emphasizes vocal performance and non-bass instruments.
Sennheiser made IE7, IE8, IE60, IE80, in order to reproduce the sound of HD600, and HD650, and failed. They discontinued MX985 which is a shame.
However, TC200 made it, they indeed sound like a HD600/650 in many ways. (TC200 actually uses the same drivers as MX985 but tuned differently in sound, mostly by some foams inside)
Kudos Tingo. Will support the great small company!
Purchase link: search "tingo TC200"
here:
Amplification:
Airist Audio Heron 5, RCA input, High inner impedance output.
Music for review:
Queen - Under Pressure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPCKMLvWfpM&list=PLjw9pdSQ4sqt6xcHrBMHBG3nVamGLp3MK&index=8
Beethoven: Symphony No. 5 / Karajan · Berliner Philharmoniker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aDEq3u5huA
Gummy - You Are My Everything
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToASX6axGuw
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/326...-1;7.59;-1;-1@salePrice;USD;search-mainSearch
Do you know if these are the legit old version? If not, do you know where to buy the old version?