TangZu Audio Zetian Wu Heyday Edition

General Information

heyday-5-min.jpg
1_9_2bc8f408-676b-49d4-bbee-3950e789d778_600x.jpg
heyday-3-min.jpg
collaboration-min.jpg
tangzu_wu_heyday_graph-fix_e070067b-f059-4b54-90e2-d472fb3eaac8.jpg
tangzufaceplate-min.jpg
tangzucable-min.jpg
IMG_6876.jpg
heydayedition.jpg


SPECIFICATION:

MODEL: TANGZU ZETIAN WU HEYDAY
IMPEDANCE: 16Ω
SENSITIVITY: 100dB
FREQUENCY RESPONSE: 20Hz – 20KHz
CABLE LENGTH: 1.2M
PIN TYPE: 2-PIN CONNECTOR (0.78MM)
PLUG TYPE: MODULAR (2.5mm, 3.5mm, 4.4mm)
DRIVER UNIT(S): (1) PLANAR MAGNETIC DRIVER

Latest reviews

DestinoAzell

New Head-Fier

TANGZU x HBB Wu Heyday Edition


One of the better planar….

Pros:
- Mid-centric tuning.
- Impressive detail handling with great technical performance.
- One of the cleanest sounding planar.
- Great price : performance value. Generous packaging!
- Minimal planar timbre.


Cons:

- Works best with warmer DAC/AMP.
- Potential treble fatigue on higher volume or brighter source.
- Crispy note hits but light on note-weight/density.
- Lacks musical factor. Can sound soulless at times.

- Rather unforgiving on bad mastering/recorded tracks.

[MY PERSONAL HEAD-FI GRADING]

1 ★ - Appalling! Please Avoid This!
2 ★★ Subpar Offering, There Are Better Options Out There!
3 ★★★ Decent With Some Caveats! You Should Consider This !
4 ★★★★ Solid ! This Should Be In Your Shortlist
5 ★★★★★ Class Leading! You Should Go Right Ahead & Buy One!

TANGZU x HBB Wu Heyday Edition 3 ★★★


IMG_20230414_103727.jpg

SOUND-SIGNATURE:

It is quite hard to pin-point it’s native sound signature as it is quite transparent on the source you’re using. It can be some kind of a cold mild v-shaped or neutral bright-ish in sound. Overall, it is quite a balance sounding set. The bass is definitely elevated but within the realm of cold-neutral. The mid-range is much more forward in the mix. The treble is leaning on the bright side of the spectrum but not overly bright as some of it's rival. Timbre wise, the planar traits are still present but very minimal.

BASS:​

Being one of the more mid-centric planar set in the market, the bassline is noticeably fast, soft-punchy yet well judged in it's response. The bass sounded slightly more mid-bassy with polite amount of sub-bass presence. The demeanor of the bass is quite cold, lacking that touch of warmth which gives heft to your music. The bass attack is rather soft and the decay is on the quicker side of the tempo. I’d prefer it to linger just a tad longer just so that it can sound more natural. As a result, the sub-bass rumble and boom are present but they fade away too quickly . The mid-bass thump just lacks physicality to the hits. It just doesn't slam, kick or punch as hard as you'd like it to be. The bass just sounded too fast and too soft. In short, this level of bass quality and quantity will definitely not impress a hardcore bass-head but shouldn't be a deal breaker for most listeners. At the very least, there is no sign of bass-bleed, muddiness or bloat is heard.

MIDS/VOCALS:​

The mid-range is quite intimate/forward in the mix versus the rest of the frequencies with good level of transparency. It does a great job on highlighting the texture on the vocals but fall short on retrieving those reverb/echo which add a sense immersion on vocal replay. It sounds more analytical than musical in its approach. The overall tone is quite lean, almost thin sounding especially when connected to bright leaning source. Seemingly, male vocals lose of some that fullness and richness to the voices. The lows just didn't provide enough warmth and body that it needs. The female vocals on the other hand, offers a much more satisfying performance on stage. They have very good presence and they never seem to lack in extension. Other than the vocals being on the dryer side of the scale, it tends to highlight those grit or harshness on vocals, especially on poorly recorded tracks, thanks to its elevated lower treble/presence region. As for instrument like guitar, piano and strings they have good sense of crisps on the initial bite but sadly the note weight is abit light on its replay.

TREBLE:​

It is one of the cleaner sounding planar sets I've heard. Tonal-wise, like any other planar, the treble does lean towards on the bright-side. It offers a smooth treble response with good extension up top. It has plenty amount of air presence that gives a nice sense of openness to the stage. The top-end haze is very minimal but the treble can come across a bit too sharp, highlighting unnecessary treble elements/artifact which is not welcome. Instrument like constant hi-hats or cymbals can sound a tad too pronounce in the mix especially when pairing with a bright source. As result, on many instances, the treble can bleed onto lower registry, affecting the vocals/mid-range which can be distracting. But among the planar, it has to be one of the finer tuned treble execution in its class. It sounded less intense and more relaxing for more of the time versus some of Its rival. It is void of unwanted peaks and grains with just a hint of bearable sibilance. As good as it is, the treble response will never be as natural sounding as well tuned dynamic driver. The planar magnetic timbre is still inherently present but at a minor degree.

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:​

- The head-stage of the Heyday is pretty open sounding. It is above average, it's got good width, decent depth and height with adequate sense of spaces between elements. The vocals will be more forward in the mix versus the rest of the instruments which is great.
- Stereo Imaging is not bad either. It is not laser-sharp but it is quite precise to say the least. It is potent enough to tell the direction of each sound elements when you closed your eyes.
- The overall macro/micro-detail retrieval are pretty impressive, seemingly on par with most of its planar counter-part. It's resolving power are commendable. It carries good speed with great consistency on all tracks. The elements of vocals and each instrument are thoroughly separated between them, no matter how complex your music gets.
- As mentioned briefly, the overall instrument timbre/note weight are very crispy on the attack but they tend to roll-off ever so slight too quickly. The trailing end of notes are rather weak. And it lacks weight and density to the notes most of the time. These traits do translate on vocal replay as well. As for the dynamic ambience, it is pretty shy. Any sense of reverb or echo that are rightfully present in the background are almost muted.


SYNERGY/VOLUME SCALING​

To my ears, owning a warm and dark DAC/AMP is a must have option just to run the Heyday properly. I find it truly fatiguing when pairing it with colder or brighter source which tend to trigger its planar metallic timbre. And not to mention, less forgiving to sibilance as well. On top of that, it will also give rise to overly sharp, edgy vocal presence with thinner note weight which will come across unnatural. As for the tips, it is best to use a wider-bore ear-tips as that will help to mitigate some of the treble quirks. Swapping it with a warmer sounding cable will definitely helps to improve it's tone and timbre. When everything is set and done, you should be able to dial up the volume and enjoy your Heyday to the fullest with no distortion.

HEAD-2-HEAD

IMG_20230414_104544.jpg

VS 7HZ TIMELESS FEAT. KINERA LEYDING.​

+ Timeless bassline is warmer and thicker in tone. It has better sub-bass presence, fatter mid-bass body. More pronounce ghetto bass. Slightly more natural on the decay.
+ Timeless male/female vocal have better sense body and warmth. It sounded fuller yet more natural, less sharp/edgy on the vocals with a hint of bearable sibilance.
+ Timeless treble is definitely brighter with better extension but thanks to the warmer low-end, it creates a better balance between the lows and the highs.
+ The overall instrument-replay on the Timeless is truer to life. They have more realistic attack & decay, contributing to a more accurate timbre.
+ Artificial sounds like electronics sounded more pleasing on the Timeless as it is less piercing with more rounded edge to them.
+ Overall transient on the timeless is still soft but slightly more incisive than Heyday.

- Heyday overall sounded cleaner from top to bottom, the treble is less hazy.
- Heyday bassline is definitely faster, less forward in the mix and the mid-bass has better controlled when the tracks gets busy. Whereas the Timeless can get slightly congest on complex passages.
- Heyday still remains to be the more mid-centric set among the two. The mid-range resolution is definitely a step up. The vocals are more forward in the mix while giving it a better sense of texturing and transparency to them. They sound crispier but sadly not as full or lush sounding as the one on the Timeless. As a result, the tonality of the vocals is more euphonic on the Timeless.
- On certain songs, the Heyday treble can sound more relaxing which is nice sometime.
- The overall instrument on the Heyday will sounds crispy on the attack but it lacks the overall fullness or note weight of the Timeless.
- Heyday has slightly wider stage and better depth. The height is nigh identical.
- As for layering and separation, the vocals and instruments has clearer separation on the heyday and I find heyday to be more consistent in maintaining the border of each element of sound.
- Sound localization prowess between channels is ever so slightly sharper and more accurate on the Heyday.
- Overall build packaging is definitely generous on the Heyday, you do get alot more for your money.

I'd still pick the Timeless x Leyding over the stock Heyday. Although , it doesn't sound as clean nor as technical as the Heyday, the vocals and instrument timbre on the Timeless are more realistic overall. The warmer bassline is more to my liking. The lower treble is less fatiguing and it is tonally more pleasing to listen to. Don’t get me wrong, the Heyday is surprisingly competent for a planar. But on its pursuit being the more clinical and technical set, it loses sight of musicality. The Timeless just rewards you with more fun and its more pleasing to my ears for more of the time. It’s makes the Heyday sound a bit soulless at times. Though it would be interesting to see how the Heyday x Leyding would performs. But unfortunately I don't have a 2-Pin Kinera Leyding on deck.#snakeoilgang you know what I'm saying. Having said that, I am not sure if I would prefer the stock Timeless over stock Heyday... Hmmmph.

CONCLUSION:​

It is undoubtedly, one of the best planar on the market only if you get the right synergy. If you managed that, the price: performance value is just insane. And I can see why this set gets a lot praise and hype when it was first released. It's technical performance is on par with those well-tuned hybrids which cost way higher. But on the pursuit of that, it does sacrifice some of those musical traits which is why, it is not going to work on everyone’s favor. Like myself. I cannot deny that it is very impressive from a technical standpoint, but I can’t seem to enjoy listening to it. It can be too cold and soulless at times. I respect it as a technical set but I just don’t love it as much, especially having heard the Timeless x Kinera Leyding and the stock BQEYZ Winter recently. Those two sets on the other hand, managed to be musical yet highly technical which rewards you the best of both worlds.

SOURCE & GEARS

Native FLAC Files [44.1Khz 16bits-96Khz 24bits]
Foobar2000 [Laptop] [Ugreen USB C Adapter]
Huawei P20 PRO [Phone][ App- Foobar2000]
Dongle DAC/AMP only :
Moondrop DAWN 4.4
Tanchjim SPACE
Tempotec Sonata E44


PLAYLIST (AS TESTED)

1982 Chicago - Greatest Hits (album) - Hard to say I'm sorry.
2009 Greatest Maksim (album) – Exodus
2010 Ichiban Ushiro no Daimaou (OST) - Kokoro no Oku De Ha
2012 To Love-Ru Darkness OP - Ray - RAKUEN PROJECT
2014 Grabbitz - Here with you now.
2019 Blade & Soul (OST) - Half-Moon Lake
2021 OWV - CHASER (album) Fifth Season.
2021 SELECTION PROJECT Vol.1 - Only one yell -天沢灯ソロver.-
2022 Belle (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) - Million Miles Away (ENG vers.)
2022 rei (E-girls) - Just Wanna Sing (album) – IDNY, Dark Hero.
2022 SHINEPOST TINGS - Yellow Rose
2022 I can fly (Special Edition) - Bleecker Chrome - You will shine
2022 I can fly (Special Edition) - YOSHIKI EZAKI x Bleecker Chrome - UP
2022 BEAST TAMER (OST) - じんわり感じている幸せ
2023 La prière - Sweet Dreams
2023 Bungou Stray Dogs 4th Season ED - Luck Life - しるし

[IEM-SCORING-BOARD]

RATING
1: Trash (F)
2: Horrible (E)
3: Bad (D)
4: Subpar (C)
5: Decent/Average (B)
6: Good (A-)
7: Great (A)
8: Superb. (A+)
9: Masterclass/Top-Drawer (S)
10: Perfection (P)


7HZ TIMELESS + [PLANAR]

Tuning: 6/10 (Warmish Mild-V)
= Tonality =
Bass: 6.5/10 Mids: 6/10 Treble: 5.5/10

Male : Female : 6:6
= Technicalities =
Detail : Resolve: 7 : 6.5
Timbre/Note Weight: 7.5/10
Layering & Separation: 6/10
Head-stage: 5.5/10
Dynamics/Transient: 6/10
Stereo Imaging 5.5/10
Ambience : 6/10
Cleanliness: 7/10
Build : Comfort: 6:9
Value: 8/10
Personal Enjoyment: 6.5/10

Cons:

  • Potential fatigue on longer listen.
  • Only work best with warmer dac/amp.
  • Prominent planar timbre.
  • Perculiar head-stage (lacking depth)
  • Tend to congest on complex tracks.
Pros:
  • Pleasantly warm yet engaging.
  • Great note weight and density.
  • Good technical performer. Except for the staging.
  • Comfortable light-weight shell.
SETUP (As tested)
  • Kinera Leyding 4.4BAL
  • No-brand 2-flange/medium-widebore tips.
  • Moondrop DAWN 4.4

TANGZU HEYDAY [PLANAR]

Tuning: 7/10 (Bright-Mild V)
= Tonality =
Bass: 6/10 Mids: 6/10 Treble: 6/10
Male : Female: 5.5 : 5.5
= Technicalities =
Timbre/Note Weight: 6.5/10
Detail : Resolve: 7 : 7
Layering & Separation: 7/10
Head-stage: 6.5/10
Transient/Attack: 6/10
Stereo Imaging 6.5/10
Ambience : 5/10
Cleanliness: 4.5/5
Build : Comfort: 7 : 8
Value: 8/10
Personal Enjoyment: 6/10

Cons:

- Works best with warmer DAC/AMP.
- Potential treble fatigue on higher volume or brighter source.
- Crispy note hits but light on note-weight/density.
- Lacks musical factor. Can sound soulless at times.

- Rather unforgiving on bad mastering/recorded tracks.

Pros:
- Mid-centric tuning.
- Impressive detail handling with great technical performance.
- One of the cleanest sounding planar.
- Great price : performance value. Generous packaging!
- Minimal planar timbre.

SETUP (As tested)
- Stock Silver-plated Cable : 4.4 BAL.
- No-brand 2-flange/medium-widebore tips.

- Moondrop DAWN 4.4



THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR READING!!
Last edited:
vandung2510
vandung2510
Nice concise review. Like, dang. I agree with you so much about the bass part, which is one of my main nitpick about this set, even though i rated it at 4.5.
On a side note, have you tried Tanchjim Oxygen by any chance? I'm wondering if you can have some comparison between the 2 since it has similar graph
DestinoAzell
DestinoAzell
@vandung2510 I used to own Tanchjim Oxygen, from memory, Tanchjim Oxygen it has warmer bassline, the mid-range is more euphonic, the highs has adequate amount of brilliance and air. The O2 may not have the technical prowess of the Heyday especially in terms of detail handling, mainly micro-detail and sound seperations are league below. BUT it has one of the best balance of technicalities and tonality among single dynamic driver even till this day. The timbre is way more organic than the heyday. You might be impress by the Heyday on 1st few minutes of listening experience. But in the long run that you started to notice that soulless timbre. Whereas in the O2, you just enjoy your music. At the end of they day, what we want to achieve is pleasantness not analyzing your music. At least thats how I felt back then. Between the 2, Get the O2, it is an evergreen set and has stood the test of time.Which does says something.

Jarlaxle

100+ Head-Fier
Queen in her Pure Times
Pros: Beatiful Modular Cable
Improved build quality with a full metal shell
Has the same great treble tuning with the Original Zetian Wu so again not fatiguing
Does not Have the Usual Planar Timbre
Exceptional Packaging, Accessories and Box Art
Cons: Might not be the best tuning for genres like EDM and Hip-Hop
Price hike from the Original Zetian Wu
Tangzu x HBB Zetian Wu Heyday Edition is the collaboration version of the now discontinued Tangzu Zetian Wu between Tangzu and the popular reviewer Hawaii Bad Boy (A.K.A. Bad Guy Good Audio Reviews). I reviewed the Original Zetian Wu and it took its place among my all-time favorites. In case of Heyday, personally I find HBB’s preference very safe and likeable. Heyday comes at 199$ and a Linsoul exclusive item. You can also read the full review as well as my other reviews at mobileaudiophile.com and check out my IEM measurements at https://fahryst.squig.link/

Zetian Wu Heyday Edition


Zetian Wu Heyday Edition

Disclaimers​

Without boring you too much, I don’t necessarily have a sound preference. I tend to enjoy different sound profiles as long as they do well at what they intend to do. I try to be critic in my reviews but I might be somewhat biased one way or another (Recency bias, buyer’s bias etc.). Please keep these in mind. Also, I bought Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday Edition as well as other headphones mentioned here with my own money. If a unit I reviewed is given or loaned to me in the future, I will say so here.

Company Info, Build and Comfort​

Sorry for my laziness but I had given every bit of info about Queen Wu Zetian and Tangzu as a company so I’m copying them here.

Company Info​

Zetian Wu or Wu Zetian as Chinese use family names before their given names, was the only female ruler of China History. The Empress belonged to Tang Dynasty, which also gave the name of the brand Tangzu. However, Tangzu was named T-Force before they changed their name. Yuan Li was their first entry to IEM market, although they were relatively experienced driver producers and sourced driver to many other brands.

Yuan Li started, what they call Dynasty Trilogy, as they name their IEMs after Tang Dynasty Emperors. Shimin Li was their second entry to the dynasty trilogy. Then they released very successful iems like Original Zetian Wu, Wan’er S.G and Zetian Wu Heyday Edition. Original Shimin Li got mixed reviews so Tangzu decided to collaborate with SeeAudio and released Shimin Li Encounter Edition. Apparently SeeAudio added their twist to the tuning without moving too far away from the original.

Zetian Wu Heyday Edition Box and Accessories


Zetian Wu Heyday Edition Box and Accessories

Build, Comfort and Packaging​

Zetian Wu, like every Tangzu (T-Force) product, has expectional packaging and accessories in its price range. Actually, they are pretty much the same with the Original Zetian Wu. Carrying case is same that came with the Zetian Wu, only now it is black and feels more premium. It is quite large, not very suitable for carrying IEMs. However, in my experience, none of the IEM case really is. In my review of the OG Zetian Wu, a criticized the cable and Tangzu listened. Well not me but all the fans. Cable has a pretty baby blue color and modular termination. There are 7 pair of tips in the package, which are the same as 7hz H07 and H08 tips. Also, a black pair is on the IEMs which makes it a total of 8 pair.

The most notable improvement on Heyday is the shells. Now they have a full metal build. Shape and size looks the same but strangely OG Zetian Wu stays in my ears more safely. Still they are pretty comfortable even for my weirdly shaped small ears.

Technical Specifications​

  • Driver Size: 14.5 mm
  • Frequency Response: 20 – 20.000 Hz
  • Sensitivity: 100dB (1kHz)
  • Impedance: 16 ohm
  • Channel Difference: 1dB (1kHz)
Zetian Wu Heyday Edition and Original Zetian Wu


Zetian Wu Heyday Edition and Original Zetian Wu

Sound​

Tuning on Heyday didn’t change much from the Original Zetian Wu. The most notable adjustments HBB made is lowering the subbass and upper mids. They still have the same non-fatiguing treble tuning. Now they are fairly neutral IEMs. Several times I forgot that I was listening a recording, it sounds very very natural. In the end they became more suitable for loud listening.

Bass​

Heyday’s bass is probably the biggest difference HBB made on its tuning. Surprisingly now they have become a fairly neutral pair of IEMs. They are not devoid of any bass but I found it was not very satisfying with genres like EDM and Hip-Hop. Midbass is lighter than most other planars on the market but still pack a decent punch. Subbass is although behind the Original Zetian Wu, Heyday still has some decent rumble.

Mids​

Thanks to the bass tuning, mids on Heyday is clean but not necessarily lean. Lots of sets are warmer than Heyday. Vocals don’t feel too much up and close, presentation is fairly natural. Heyday also doesn’t share the whispy nature of most of the mid-centric iems.

Treble​

Treble is just right. Original Zetian Wu was famous for its treble tuning and control; and Heyday is more or less the same. Again, cymbals and high hats are not splashy and sibilance is nowhere to be found on Heyday. In the end they don’t feel congested as much as the Original Zetian Wu.

Technical Performance​

Heyday has exceptional resolving capability as you would expect from a planar. It also layers and separates different instruments without breaking a sweat. Perceived soundstage is probably one of the wider IEMs I’ve heard and depth is also great. Timbre is also more natural than most of the planars.

Zetian Wu Heyday Edition and Timeless


Zetian Wu Heyday Edition and Timeless

Comparisons​

Since Heyday is a collaboration IEM that is based on an existing product, a comparison with the Original was unavoidable. I also used Timeless which is still considered one of the best planars and has not exactly been surpassed yet.

Original Zetian Wu vs. Zetian Wu Heyday Edition​

  • OG Zetian Wu fits and seals better in my ears, probably due to their different vents.
  • OG has more vocal presence
  • OG is a touch warmer and has more impactful and satisfying bass. Heyday is cleaner therefore it emphasizes bass guitars more instead of drums and other lower bass notes.
  • Heyday feels just a little bit wider and airier.
  • Neither is sibilant but Heyday feels like it emphasizes “S”s a little more. If you turn up the volume it might become an issue more easily. This also might be caused by their different fit in my ears.
  • Treble tuning is more or less the same in isolation but when other parts of the frequency range, Heyday sounds a little more prominent in the treble.
  • In the sense of driver’s resolving capability, I don’t think they are different. That said, I won’t deny Heyday’s more neutral frequency response and cleaner presentation helps it show more details. Also, in my review of the OG Zetian Wu, I didn’t agree to the people that found Zetian Wu congested. However, Heyday is noticeably airier and maybe a little wider but much deeper. Imaging is on par. In short Heyday is technically superior to the OG Zetian Wu.
Zetian Wu Heyday vs Original Zetian Wu


Zetian Wu Heyday vs Original Zetian Wu

7Hz Timeless vs. Zetian Wu Heyday Edition​

  • Timeless again have a more comfortable fit in my ears.
  • They are more similar than different.
  • Timeless is more prominent in the subbass and midbass therefore leaves a more powerful impression. Also listening to EDM and Hip-Hop is more fun with Timeless.
  • To be honest I’ve never found Timeless harsh like some other people. But still, they are slightly edgier and also warmer, borderline boomy. Heyday in comparison sounds cleaner with just enough bass and lower mid energy.
  • Vocals are a little more in your face on Timeless while Heyday present them in a more natural way.
  • Neither is sibilant but, Timeless is a little more relaxed in the sibilance region.
  • Timeless felt wider and deeper. Imaging is similarly decent on both.
  • Because of its cleaner presentation Heyday may come as cleaner but their resolving capabilities are on par. Timeless might even be a hair superior but it is hard to tell. Heyday’s timbre is a tad more natural.
Zetian Wu Heyday vs Timeless


Zetian Wu Heyday vs Timeless

Conclusion​

This review comes after the initial hype of the Zetian Wu Heyday Edition so I didn’t rush it either. I took my time with it. Now I can confidently say there wasn’t too much of an exaggeration. They are not suitable for all genres that’s for sure and that would be my only nitpick about them. For genres like EDM and Hip-Hop or simply for more excitement I’d suggest the Original Zetian Wu, which is now discontinued by the time I wrote this review unfortunately, or other planars on the market. That said, for pure, clean and neutral planar goodness, that is also non-fatuguing and suitable for loud listening Zetian Wu Heyday Edition is probably the best choice right now.
Last edited:

RemedyMusic

100+ Head-Fier
Deserving of the Crown
Pros: natural sounding for a planar
Impeccable imaging and separation
Close to neutral sound reproduction (subjective)
Clean and precision
Inclusions
Elegant faceplate design
Details and texture
Price point
Comfort and fit
Modular cable
Scales well with added amplification
Cons: Planar sheen still occasionally present
Unrealistic decays still present on rare instances
Source plug a bit long and big prone to damage if handled carelessly
INTRODUCTION:
Alright, this is going to be my third review of Tangzu, formerly known as Tforce, and I must admit, I'm struggling to come up with a fresh introduction for the company. It's starting to feel like déjà vu.

I began my Tangzu journey with their IEM, the Tforce Yuan li, which laid the groundwork for the company. It quickly became a fan favorite, a hit with the crowd. Next up was Shimin Li, a budget offering which, to be honest, didn't quite tickle my fancy in the long run. I even took a beating for hyping it up, and during that time, the market was flooded with low-cost audio gear. The community wasn't yet ready for the likes of $50 gears that sound fantastic, but that's just the way it goes. Following that, Waner arrived, and by now, people were getting used to entry-level gear that narrowed the gap with mid-levels. Finally, Tangzu jumped into the planar wars with the OG Zetian Wu, which I reviewed. I have to be frank - I still wasn't convinced that planars could be effectively implemented on IEMs at this time.

Another day, another collaboration - this time between Tangzu and the Hawaiian Bad Boy, HBB. But wait, haven't we had enough of these collabs already? Anyway, back to the topic at hand. The OG Zetian Wu didn't quite hit the spot for me, as I found it to be a bit too bass-heavy for my taste. So, when the Heyday edition was released, I wasn't particularly intrigued. But, did Tangzu manage to prove me wrong? Only one way to find out, old chap - keep on reading!

FOREWORD:​


  • The gear on hand has undergone at least 10-15 hours of use before it was assessed.
  • No EQ is ever applied in my reviews.
  • For the sake of convenience, I try my best to use a stock setup. Not everyone has access to personal ear tips or cables. If personal ear tips, cables, or accessories are used, you will be notified.
  • As I try to be objective, my claims inevitably will be subjective and biased to my personal preference. I cannot stress more that you should take this with a grain of salt for we have different perceptions to sound and what we hear.
  • Stock cable and ear tips were used for the entirety of this review. In particular, the tips placed in the “foams” section, which is not foam tips at all. Wide bored and stiff stem.


SPECIFICATIONS:​


Configuration: 1 x 14.5mm planar
Impedance: 16ohms
Sensitivity: 100db
Freq response: 20hz - 20khz


EDZ01425.jpg

PACKAGING:​

The packaging of the Tangzu Heyday edition IEMs reminded me of the Yuan li. The company has kept a consistent style both inside and out, and their packaging impressed the community when they released the Yuan li. While I have no complaints, personally, I find the style a bit dated now, and it doesn't mesmerize me as it used to. Please don't take offense, though. The front of the box features the Empress, the only empress in China's history. However, I won't go into a historical lecture on this, as many other reviewers have already done so.

EDZ01426.jpg


Well, well, well, what do we have here? A cable thick enough to choke someone (oops, did I say that out loud?)! And the color...oh, the color! Powder blue, really? At first, I was thinking, "Who in their right mind would make a cable in powder blue?" But hey, I'm not one to judge. After all, I'm no fashionista, and I'm certainly not here to start a cable color trend. Anyway, after some time, I learned to appreciate its pastel nature, and I have to say, it's growing on me. On the bright side, the cable comes with modular plugs - 4.4mm and 2.5mm balanced, and a single-ended 3.5mm. For this review, I opted for the single-ended 3.5mm plug, and it served me well - 90% of the time, at least.
EDZ01427.jpg


The ear tips come in the usual categories of balanced, bass enhanced, and "foam" tips, which are not actually made of foam, but their actual composition is unknown. It would be helpful to know what kind of tips are included in the "foam" section. The Heyday comes with a pair of black ear tips that are wide bore and super soft. While I typically prefer these types of ear tips, I found that they produced a very lean and thin sound and even caused some borderline sibilance issues.

In the box:​

  • a pair of Heyday IEMs
  • cable and modular plugs
  • 3 pairs of balanced ear tips in S, M, and L
  • 3 pairs of bass-enhanced ear tips in S, M, and L
  • parchment welcoming paper
  • a pair of foam tips (whatever that is)
  • a pair of black wide bore and soft ear tips
EDZ01428.jpg

SOUND IMPRESSIONS:​

Alright, let's dive right into the most important part of this review. I'll give you a little spoiler - the Heyday blew me away that I ended up buying a pair for myself. In fact, my personal unit arrived just yesterday and I'm still grinning from ear to ear. Let’s start with the technicalities…
EDZ01429.jpg

Describing soundstage in IEMs can be a bit tricky, as they're meant to be placed inside our ears and not necessarily deliver a spacious presentation unlike headphones and ear buds. However, I must say that the Heyday pleasantly surprised me with its discernable stage that feels almost holographic. It's ideal for gaming and movies, as it adds to the overall immersive experience. As for music, I can confidently say that Heyday checks the box in this aspect as well, with a good sense of headspace in terms of depth, height, and width.

When it comes to sound quality, resolution and texture are crucial in delivering a high fidelity experience. With the Heyday, you can expect intimate details in guitars, rich tones in bass, crisp notes in pianos and cymbals, and nuanced sounds in percussion. The orchestral instruments are also impressive and perform as expected of a planar driver.
EDZ01430.jpg

The Heyday's imaging and separation are impressively precise, aided by its spacious sound stage. Each instrument has its own distinct place in the mix, making it a valuable tool for a musician like myself. As a member of a cover band, we strive to replicate songs as faithfully as possible, and the Heyday has consistently delivered when it comes to capturing subtle chord changes and vocal harmonies that I need to delegate to my bandmates.

After listening to several planar IEMs, I must say that the Heyday's tonality and timbre are spot on. The sound is natural and realistic, and it is one of the most commendable planar IEMs that I have come across. Although, there are still some nitpicks to discuss. For instance, drum snares can sound just a bit unnatural with that "planar sheen." I noticed this on the track "You've Lost That Loving Feeling" by Hall and Oates at the 1:57 mark. When compared to dynamic driver counterparts, the drum snares sounded more natural.
EDZ01431.jpg

Planar drivers are known for their excellent transient response, but sometimes this strength can be overdone. The Heyday is not immune to this issue, especially when it comes to percussive instruments. For example, in David Benoit's "Take a Look Inside my Heart," the piano sounded fine, but the drum toms at the timestamp 1:12 had an "unrealistic" quality to them. The decays were too abrupt, lacking the natural tail end that supposes to make them sound more authentic. As a pianist who grew up listening to Benoit's music and has been heavily influenced by his style, this was a noticeable flaw to me.

Now, let’s break down the sound profile…

The Heyday's bass presentation is primarily focused on the mid-bass and presented almost neutrally, with some extension to the sub-bass that is not overpowering. It's evident that bass isn't the top priority for this IEM, but when a track demands it, the Heyday reproduces it with tightness and punch. This makes it a versatile choice for any genre, although rock music may not be its strong suit. Rock enthusiasts may want to consider other options unless they are neutral heads. On the other hand, if you are a bass enthusiast, you may not find the Heyday to be suitable. In such cases, the OG Zetian Wu might be a better option, although I personally found the bass boost on the OG Zetian Wu to be a drawback for my personal taste. Quality over quantity is the name of the game here.

When it comes to the midrange, the strength of this IEM lies predominantly in how it reproduces vocals. Female vocals, in particular, are favored over their male counterparts, but overall, vocals are rendered exceptionally well. To describe the experience, I would use the words "engaging" and "immersive."
EDZ01432.jpg

The Heyday’s midrange also excels in reproducing the weight and density of instruments such as cellos, violins, flutes, pianos, and guitars, as well as any acoustic instruments. Additionally, the sound is characterized by a pleasant warmth. However, there are some tracks, particularly those featuring trumpets, that can sometimes sound borderline shouty.

The treble region of the Heyday inherits the genes of the midrange. Warm and pleasing to the ear without any hint of veil or dullness. The overtones from drums, cymbals, and hi-hats are clearly audible, but not excessively bright. The extension to ultra-high frequencies has a noticeable roll off resulting in a safe and non-fatiguing sound signature. For those who enjoy a more energetic treble, the Heyday might still deliver satisfying energy at the top. What impresses me most is how refined the tuning is, striking a balance between being safe and not being boring or uninteresting.

Heyday produces an even more pleasing sound when used in conjunction with a balanced output, which suggests that they are receptive to an increase in power. The entire sound profile has a feeling of more weight, and the sound stage is felt more. Therefore, there is no reason to hold back from utilizing those modular connections.

Driving the Heyday is relatively easy even with my not-so-powerful dap the Hiby RS2 and I reached my desired listening level at around 65-70 out of 100, depending on the track. However, compared to my other IEMs, I’ve noticed I have to add around 3-5 notches for two gears to match the same output. Pairing Heyday with my Centrance Dacport HD that sports 4vrms of power and switching to high gain gave me the most blissful listening experience.
EDZ01433.jpg

It should be noted that Heyday is reasonably responsive to its sources. Having said that, neutral sources present the technical prowess of Heyday, whereas sources with a more organic sound depict a more balanced sound profile.

COMFORT AND FIT:​

It may come as a surprise that Heyday's medium-sized casings are pleasant to wear, but they don't simply vanish into the ears the way that some lighter IEMs do. Although the build quality remains lightweight, the cable has a timge heft to it and can occasionally cause minor discomfort due to a subtle pull. A good fit is reasonably simple to achieve, with insertion falling somewhere in the middle. Getting a good seal is easy, and you won't have to mess with the fit too much.

SOURCES USED:​


  • Ovidius B1 dongle
  • Hiby RS2 DAP
  • Questyle QP2R
  • LG V30 quad dac with Centrance Dacport via Hiby music app
  • Oppo A94 with Centrance Dacport via Hiby music app
  • Oppo A94 with Ifi Hipdac v2 via Hiby music app
  • Macbook pro 2011 with Centrance Dacport via Foobar
  • Macbook pro 2011 with Ifi Hipdac v2 via Foobar
  • Tidal Masters
  • Qobuz Studio
  • Apple Music
EDZ01434.jpg

COMPARISONS:​

vs Letshuoer S12​

I adored the S12 and thought it was one of the finest planar IEM releases. Despite the fact that I no longer have the S12, please consider this comparison with a grain of salt as I will be drawing it from memory as best I can.

The S12 and Heyday both have a natural sound profile. To summarize, the S12 has more low-frequency quantity, and while I'm not a fan of elevated lows, the S12 impressed me with how clean the presentation is in this domain. The S12 does, however, have a tendency for hotness in the upper midrange, which the Heyday does not have. The S12 is also lacking in note definition and has a bit less attack.

Nonetheless, choosing between the two comes down to personal preference, with the S12 offering more realistic transients and the Heyday emphasizing agility and precision.

vs Bqeyz Winter​

Now, let's compare the Heyday to the Winter, my top-ranked IEM. Despite the fact that we are comparing apples and oranges and that Winter is equipped with a different driver setup (a DD with bone conduction), please hearken.

When it comes to natural timbre and tonality, the Winter is still the clear winner. Period. However, Heyday has some tricks up their sleeves, specifically in terms of precision, note definition, attack, and overall technicality. Although the Heyday are excellent natural-sounding planar IEMs, they fall short on timbre in some instruments, most notably drum snares. The Heyday's transient response is insanely fast and occasionally emits some unrealism, particularly with percussions. Conversely, the Heyday depicting engagement nails the vocal presentation. It's worth noting that the lows on Bqeyz Winter are more pronounced, whereas Heyday has a more neutral sound profile.

As far as tonality is concerned, the Bqeyz Winter remains at the top of my ranking. The Heyday is close behind in the second position. I prefer the Winter for its musical involvement and the Heyday for its technical prowess.

TEST TRACKS:​

Here are some tracks I usually listen to when reviewing:

That’s the way of the World by EWF
Africa by TOTO
The Girl in the Other Room by Diana Kral
Balmorhea album All is wild, All is Silent
Sila by Sud
Smooth Escape by D’Sound
Never too Much by Luther Vandross
P.Y.T by Michael Jackson
Ain’t no Sunshine by Eva Cassidy
Shoot to Thrill by AC/DC
Another one bites the Dust by Queen
Good times bad times by Edie Brickell
Alice in Wonderland by Bill Evans
Ain’t it Fun by Paramore
Redefine by Incubus
Far Away by Nickelback
Lovesong by Adele
Lingus by Snarky Puppy
Harvest for the World by Vanessa Williams
Love Bites by Def Leppard
No Such Thing by John Mayer
As by Stevie Wonder
Whip Appeal by Babyface
Ain’t Nobody by Chaka Khan
Futures by Prep
Landslide by Fleetwood Mac
Every Summertime by NIKI
SADE tracks
AC/DC tracks
Queen tracks


And many more… I always listen to High resolution format, being the least quality 16bit/44khz FLACS be it offline or online.
EDZ01435.jpg

VERDICT:​

Heyday impressed me so much that I agreed to purchase my own unit. They are extremely beneficial to my needs as a musician, breaking down chordal and vocal harmonies and capturing the subtleties that I impart to my band. And, while there are minuscule flaws in timbre and tonality, as well as unrealistic transient responses, none of them are deal breakers. The overall sound profile, which is close to neutral and aimed at more mature listeners, is right up my alley.

I would highly suggest these to those who have a lot of vocal tracks on their playlist, especially female vocals; those who appreciate details and nuances; and those who dissect songs like a musician or a vocalist. The separation of instruments is something to brag about.

The planar wars have ceased as the Heyday is worthy to inherit the throne. Bend the knee and hail to the Queen of planars!

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top