Simgot EW300

Credit @vandung2510 for his desk setup

If you're interested in graph comparison, here's the link
Disclamer:

+ I'm a normal asian dude with some music producing background
+ I like clean balanced sound signature with focus on sub bass and lower treble
+ Can consider myself as treblehead
+ 60-68db listening session
+ Avarage 4/10 (Quarks/ 7hz Zero), Good 6/10 (Tanchjim Kara), Endgame 8/10, Bias Endgame 10/10
: Good, but with a catch
: Worth the money
: Specialist at something else
: A Very close to perfection
: Perfect for me

Click to expand...

How to read my review: (Which bold font is x2 in score)


. TONE
- Timbre: How sounds projected, usually free score for most iem. Only GK10 would get a 2 from this
- BASS: (20hz - 500hz)

Depth	How low can i hear (physically, not graph)
" /; \; =" + "number hz"	/: rolloff, \: upward, =:flat after Hz of the highest spot i heard
Decay	Decay + Sustain, usually the mid bass and flexability of driver
Resonance (or Release)	Driver + tune. The bass after kick drum
Air	Flexibility of bass. effect by tune and driver
Tone	Based on how balanced it is
Tech	Detail (Texture, Fastness). Effect mostly by air

- MID: (500hz - 5khz)

Acoustic	Piano, Violin, Strings basically, flute, ...
Electric	Synth, Lead, Pluck, Electric guitar and Bass guitar, ...
Tone	Based on how balanced it is
Tech	Detail (Texture, Separation). Effect by tone

- TREBLE: (5khz - 16khz)

Extension	The upper end of high, quite easy to hear if you don't have hearing loss
Air	Spacing between instrument, cymbal
" /; \; =" + "number hz"	/: rolloff, \: upward, =:flat after Hz of the highest spot i heard
Sparkle	Attack and Decay of cymbal. Is tonality element
Shimmering	Sustain and Release of cymbal. Is tonality element
Tech	Detail (Texture, Separation, Transients). Effect by tone and air

- OTHERS:

Vocals	uhm. Vocals?
Drum	uhm. Drum?
Percussion	most of the clack clack click click lol. Effect by texture in mid
Resonance	The one that will let you know if transducer good with rock or not
Dynamism	Ability to make emotion
Sibilance	10 meant no sibilance.

. TECH
- Detail: Bass + Mid + Treble
- Soundstage: Rough description wall of sounds
- Imaging: {Width, Depth, Height}, {blurry, solid (better than blurry); Phantom (Good microspacing)}

Click to expand...

- Bass: Lean, why
+ Driver is good, i have to admit that
+ Why does it sounds so lean in HBB version, i don't understand
- Mid: Well balanced
+ Truly well balanced, what more do u expect
- Treble: Muted overall (Hbb version), DSP version seems pretty normal for a Simgot iem
+ Unattractive treble in HBB version
+ A Normal approach in DSP version
- Vocals: Ya i don't hate HBB but man do i disapointed
- Soundstage/Imaging presentation: Small room with Imaging is so so. I think this is more of driver limitation

SIMGOT - EW300: Versatile Performance!

Summary:

The EW300, Simgot's latest release from September '24, is creating waves. This tribrid marvel features 1DD+1 Planar +1PR architecture with an interchangeable nozzle system. Not only does it look sleek, but it also offers versatile performance, all at an amazingly affordable $69.99. The steel shells are super comfy and ergonomic. And the sound quality? Absolutely top-notch for its price. Let's dive into the details and see what makes it such a standout!



Introduction:

Alright, let's cut to the chase! The EW300 is packed with 1 dynamic driver, 1 planar driver, and 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver in a tri-matrix acoustic setup, according to Simgot. Its interchangeable nozzle design boasts two distinct tuning styles, each set with unique tuning. Overall, the presentation is praiseworthy!
The Simgot EW300 is priced at $69.99.





Design & Build:



The polished steel shells on the EW300 are premium and ergonomic. Despite their heft, these shells match the looks of higher-end IEMs. Comfort isn't sacrificed; I found them consistently comfortable throughout extended listening sessions.

It is described as the following on the website:






Disclaimer: Simgot had sent me the review unit for my impressions & views. The opinions below are based on my own personal experiences with the unit and my own. I have tried to be as comprehensive as I could be - to give a complete picture to the audience.





Specifications:

The EW300 comes at $69.99 price tag and the specifications are as below:

https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew300

The Interchangeable Nozzles:

The SIMGOT EW300 rocks with two nozzle options: one metal and one bronze. The key difference is the material itself.

1. Metal Nozzle: Balanced staging, with a good textured midrange and flat bass response. Staging is just average.
2. Bronze Nozzle: More intimate staging, with a significantly more textured and meatier midrange. The bass response is deeper and more detailed, and the treble is a bit less prominent but just right.

After trying both, the bronze nozzle is my clear favorite! It ticks all the right boxes for me.





Ear Tips:

I've tried a ton of ear-tips with the EW300, from Spinfit W1, CP500, CP100+, JVC Spiral Dots+, to Final Audio Black & Transparent ones. But the best fit and isolation for my ears? Hands down, the AZLA SednaFit ones. They were a game-changer, so I used them for most of the review.




NOW LET'S TALK ABOUT THE SOUND....
Items Used for this Review:

DAC/AMP & Dongles: @Questyle M15i Dongle DAC/AMP, @iFi audio GO LINK

Portable Players / Sources : @Cayin N3 ULTRA, Astell & Kern SE300, @Questyle QP2R

Streaming Source: QOBUZ



Tracks Used:

The tracks I have used can be found from the below playlist that I have used and generally use for most reviews...





Pairing Performance with different sources:

Dongle DAC/AMPs:

EW300 had the best pairing with @Questyle M15i & @iFi audio Go Link dongles. But, I have found that it pairs well with other dongles like @MOONDROP DAWN PRO, etc.




Portable Players:

Obviously the EW300 had the best pairing with the @Questyle QP2R & specially Astell & Kern SE300 since that comes with Class-A amplification! It performs amazing with Cayin N3 ULTRA in it's tube mode also.

EW300 Sound Impressions in Short:

The BASS:

The bass performance of the EW300 is phenomenal with the brass nozzle! With the default nozzle, it's just average. But, when you switch to the brass nozzle, the bass feels incredibly enjoyable with its good speed and muscle. The sub-bass details are delightful, making tracks like "Hotel California (Live on MTV 1994) – Eagles" and "Fluid - Yosi Horikawa" truly immersive.

The MIDS:

Thanks to the planar driver, the midrange of the EW300 is fantastic! The mids are textured and full-bodied, with vocals that are incredibly immersive. Both male and female vocals come through with great texture and realism. Instruments sound natural and accurate with excellent separation. Tracks like "Anchor - Trace Bundy," "A Dog Named Freedom – Kinky Friedman," and "Ruby Tuesday – Franco Battiato" will transport you into the music with their detailed transients and excellent vocals.

The TREBLE:

The treble is smooth and non-peaky on the EW300 with the brass nozzle. It has just the right amount of detail and energy without being harsh. Tracks like "Paradise Circus – Massive Attack," "Mambo for Roy – Roy Hargrove," and "Saints and Angels – Sharon Shannon" are super immersive and enjoyable from a treble perspective.

The SOUNDSTAGE:

Staging is average with the default nozzle, but the brass nozzle improves depth. You can switch based on your preference. Tracks like "The Secret Drawer – Bela Fleck and the Flecktones," "She Don't Know – Melody Gardot," and "Bohemian Rhapsody (live aid) – Queen" sound spectacular and enjoyable with the brass nozzle.

Imaging & Timbre: The EW300's imaging and instrument separation are impressive. Tracks like "Rotterdam (Or Anywhere) - The Beautiful South" and "Hello Again - Howard Carpendale & The Royal Philharmonic Orchestra" really shine. The timbre feels natural with the brass nozzle.

Simply put, the EW300 is a joy to listen to with its versatile and captivating sound!



Comparisons:

I didn't have any other IEMs with a similar architecture to compare with the EW300, but I did have the Simgot EW200 on hand! So, I used that for comparison. The EW200, with its single dynamic driver, comes in at under $40. Let's dive into this side-by-side!



Simgot EW300 vs EW200: A Worthy Upgrade?

Price: The EW300 is priced at $69.99, while the EW200 comes in at $39.99.

Build, Comfort & Features: The EW300 shines with its interchangeable nozzle system, offering more flexibility compared to the EW200. However, the EW200 is lighter, making it easy on the ears.



Bass: With the default nozzle, the EW300's bass is just average. But switch to the brass nozzle, and it transforms! The bass becomes richer and more enjoyable, surpassing the EW200.

Mids: Thanks to its planar driver, the EW300 excels in the midrange. The mids are meatier, more textured, and vocals sound much better compared to the EW200.



Treble: The EW200's treble is good, but the EW300 takes it up a notch with its nozzle flexibility, providing a more refined treble experience.

Soundstage, Imaging, and Separation: This is where the EW300 truly stands out. The nozzle flexibility, especially with the brass nozzle, offers slightly better staging than the EW200, along with excellent imaging and instrument separation.

In short, the EW300 is a fantastic upgrade with its versatile and premium features!



Conclusion:

The EW300 is a fantastic experience and feels effortless. The overall musical journey is incredibly enjoyable and brings much versatility at such affordable price range owing to it's tribrid architecture. The interchangeable nozzle system adds variety and flexibility, making it a standout choice. It's great value for the price—highly recommend!

Disclaimer:​

Good morning, readers! Today we will see together the latest news from Simgot, namely the Simgot EW300 in standard and DSP versions. I think the time has finally come for an heir to the EW200; these in shape definitely recall that model. The Simgot EW300 has maintained the dimensions of the EW200 but inside the driver configuration has completely changed.

To date, I have to say that Simgot is proving capable of producing IEMs with a high quality/price ratio without ever making mistakes in the final result.

I’m not an audiophile; I’m just a guy that likes to test out different IEMs and DACs and spends a lot of time listening to music.

So I’m not going to use super technical words to review it, but I will do my best to describe it.

Tech Specs:​

• Driver configuration: 1 dynamic driver + 1 planar magnetic driver + 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver
• Dynamic driver: 10mm ceramic composite diaphragm dual-chamber dynamic driver
• Planar magnetic driver: 6mm annular magnetic driver
• Impedance: 28Ω±15%(@1 kHz)
• Sensitivity: 121dB/Vrms (@1kHz, silver steel tube&red silicone ring); 119dB/Vrms (@1kHz, golden copper tube&purple silicone ring)
• Frequency response range: 8Hz-40kHz
• Effective frequency response: 20Hz-20kHz
• Connector: 0.78mm 2Pin
• Cable material: high-purity silver-plated OFC
• Plug: 3.5mm (without microphone) or DSP (with microphone)

Packaging:​

First look
The packages are distinguished by the colors they have; in my case, I am missing the HBB version. The silver box is the Simgot EW300 DSP version, while the black one has the standard version.

The content of the two packages is exactly identical and only the cable changes. The accessories are always very complete:

• Hard case
• Classic or DSP cable
• Extra tuning filters
• Tuning sponge
• Nozzle gaskets
• Tips type 07
• manuals and QC

07 Tips
The cable is the usual one already seen in other models; as for the DSP cable, they decided to move the chip not on the connector but in the middle of the cable, reducing the bulk on the Type C of the phone. An excellent choice to minimize the risk of breaking something by putting the phone in your pocket. The tips are the usual 07 model, which in my opinion is excellent but there are better choices for this model. Included we also find tuning sponges, nozzle gaskets, and a nozzle for gaming. By providing you with the tuning sponges, Simgot is very happy if you do DIY tests. The range of accessories is very rich in any case.

Design/Build quality:​

Great looking IEMS
The design is reminiscent of the one already seen on the EW200; starting from this base, they have slightly elaborated the aesthetics of the Simgot EW300, which in fact sports faceplates with symbols, respectively a cross and a heart. The finish of the standard ones is mirror chrome like the EW200, while the DSP version is painted matte black, except for the part on the symbols, which is glossy black. To be honest, the finish of the black ones has a more premium look to my eyes but it could be subject to chipping of the paint over time. There are pros and cons for both versions.

Standard driver
In terms of quality, I don’t see a difference in the choice of materials, but the shell is obtained from CNC machining of a block of high density. alloy. I honestly believe that the alloy is really high density because you can feel the weight. It doesn’t have a light shell like the Kefine Delci. It’s not a problem because they are absolutely not heavy and annoying. If the dimensions are the same, however, the nozzle has become interchangeable and allows modifications. On the shell, we can see two ventilation holes located in the front and rear parts of the drivers.

Initial sound impression:​

Simgot EW300 Macro
Simgot does not disappoint expectations; lately they hit every new release and this is yet another confirmation that they know how to make IEMs that sound good. With the new hybrid configuration with 1DD, 1 Planar, and 1PTZ at a price of 70 USD, it is a real miracle. There are not many manufacturers capable of a similar price and a similar configuration. Perhaps the only company that can compete with them is Celest.

As soon as you put them in your ears, you can notice their musicality, energy, and perfect balance between the frequencies. Unlike usual, they have contained themselves on the high frequencies, pushing the lows a little more. The result is a sound signature that tends to be natural with a touch of warmth that adds thickness to the notes.

Equipment used for testing the above:​

Device:

• OSX
• Poco M4 Pro

Software:

• Amazon Music UHD 24bit 96kHz

DAC:

• Simgot DEW4X (great synergy)
• Fosi DS2 2024 (really good)
• Hidizs S9 Pro Plus (not really impressive)
• Fiio KA17 (better bass)
• Fosi SK02 (more brillance)
• Simgot DSP (stage, sound, and mids improvement)

Comfort & Fit:​

As for comfort, the Simgot EW300 is identical to the EW200. The mold is the same and has the same characteristics. Even when performing tip rolling, the tips that are most comfortable for me are the same ones I had previously used on the EW200.


Simgot EW300 360° Reel

Tips Rolling?​

Tips Rolling
Honestly, the stock tips are more than enough but if you have other models at home of tips to try, it is free. I decided to mount the SS20 as on the EW200 and honestly, they seem perfect to me. I also tested the EPZ M100 and the Divinus Velevet but those that help the stage the most are the SS20. If you want even more defined bass, the M100 is certainly excellent. As for the Divinus Velvet, they did not seem particularly suitable to me.

Tuning Nozzles:​

At first glance, the difference seems only in the color; the internal filters have a very slight difference in the mesh. The stock one should be the tuning intended by Simgot as “Golden 2023,” which is a variant of the gold one, which is the “gaming nozzle,” which is nothing more than “H2019.” They look very similar to my ears; the difference is that one marks the V-shape factor more. The preferred one is without a doubt the silver one. If you want to hear some extra difference, you have to play with the tuning sponges. Maybe since putting 3 pairs of sponges with the same density, it would have been nice to have different types.

Standard or DSP Version?​

It is not easy to give an answer that is valid for everyone. In my opinion, you have to take into account various aspects to understand which variant is best suited for us. I personally believe I would have purchased the standard version for the simple reason that I have plenty of dongles and I don’t feel the real need to own an IEM with integrated DSP, but if I considered use on the move instead of static use (desk or sitting on the sofa), then the DSP would be extremely convenient for more “free” use. Those who do not own dongles, for example, with 10 USD more, should not worry about buying one to make the most of the Simgot EW300. There are many different situations so there is no correct answer.

In my case, I decided to try them with a balanced cable and surprisingly, although they are able to play very loudly even with a 3.5mm output, with the balanced cable they seem to unlock some hidden dynamics. Personally, I would have liked to see the possibility of choosing the cable with a 4.4mm terminal. If you have the possibility, mount a balanced cable and enjoy!

In terms of sound performance, we are very close. Using the standard version with one ear and the DSP version with the other, I clearly hear more bass in the standard version, and I also notice a slight smoothing of the treble extension. Where the DSP seems to make the The most noticeable difference is the emphasis on the mids, which appear to be more energetic and refined.

Nothing really different to tell the truth; they are not two completely different sounds; in fact, their similarity makes the purchase choice freer. The DSP lacks an app to manage it; it would have been an added value.

*Test performed from the same source, using the same eartips and adjusting the volume to the same levels.

Final sound impression:​

I used them alternately for about 2 weeks to try to capture their differences at their best.

During the “macro lens photoshoot,” I noticed that the differences are not limited to the cable but there is also a very slight physical difference. Removing the nozzles and looking at the front driver part, we notice a different-sized filter but also a slightly different-shaped driver.

However, the version with DSP has a sort of treatment that makes it smoother along the entire spectrum, with particular focus on the mids.

If I really had to make a decision on which one to choose, the DSP version would be the one that retains more detail and raises the quality of the mids to the level that Simgot has accustomed us to.

For a $70 set, the sound quality is really very high; it could easily be a set that goes well over $100.

Bass​

Simgot has finally brought back the bass. The Simgot EW300 has decidedly marked bass, the resolution of the same has a very good texture, and the subbass extends correctly. The sensation of depth contributes to a correct image and structure of the soundstage. On the standard version, the presentation is a bit more “wild,” while on the DSP version, it is softer and more refined.

Mids​

As for the mids, the DSP representation wins over the Standard one. The DSP somehow brings a result that seems more in line with what we are used to with Simgot. You can hear more details, more energy, and above all, they seem positioned more forward than the standard version. The Simgot EW300 Standard seems at times slightly veiled in comparison. The difference is not huge if seen graphically but overall the difference is audible.

Treble​

The Simgot EW300 trebles are extended but do not cause any fatigue. Fortunately, they managed to contain themselves compared to the latest releases, which many have seemed too bright and sometimes too shouty. Simgot has managed to maintain a high level of detail with a good presence of macro and micro details. Despite several hours of listening, I have not noticed annoying peaks except on some tracks and only by raising the volume beyond levels considered safe. If the previous Simgots were too much for you, you finally have an alternative just for you.

Soundstage and Imaging​

Honestly, even here, the Simgot EW300 has proven to be excellent (70 USD) and can compete with much more expensive products. The soundstage develops very well in width and depth, an above-average result for the price range. As for the image, it is more refined on the DSP version but they are both excellent. Simgot has always been capable of 100% refined IEMs and this is one of them. You can perceive the directionality of the sounds; the placement and distinction are precise and clean.

Comparison:​

Comparisons are extremely complex in this case because we are dealing with a hybrid IEM with the price of a single DD. Even among the most expensive hybrids, there are not many that stand out like these EW300.

vs Simgot EW200​

Simgot Ew200
I can say with absolute certainty that we can all consider them an upgrade. The Simgot EW200 is still a reference for single-drive IEMs in that price range. For a slightly higher price, you can now even take home a tri-brid IEM. The EW300 is warmer, the bass is more present and the whole mix is a bit more in line with the tuning that is in fashion today. The Ew300 shows off superior technicality and a more advanced staging ability but it loses a bit of energy that the EW200 had in abundance. They are not exactly the same thing but that is also right. Maybe the tuning could have followed the EW200 more.

vs Simgot EA500LM​

Simgot EA500LM
I don’t think there is any competition between them; they are two products with different properties. The EA500LM driver is very accurate, precise, and sharp, but if you are looking for a 360-degree versatile IEM, then the EW300 is more suitable. They are two different concepts and as such, you cannot take one as a substitute for the other.

There would be comparisons to be made with other hybrids from other brands, such as Celest but currently the EW300 is superior to many products heard today. With such an aggressive price, there is little room for the competition to enter for a slice of the market.

Conclusion:​

I think Simgot has once again nailed the recipe for the almost perfect IEM, although I have to admit that the mids could have been slightly better in terms of transparency and energy. As noted by someone, there is a slight veiling on the mids that is less noticeable on the DSP version. What has always distinguished Simgot has been modified a bit for a more commercial tuning but is still excellent. But in all honesty, there are very few flaws for the price paid. In my opinion, the DSP version sounds better but I like to change dongles often so I will probably use the standard balanced version more. But if you don’t have a dongle, the DSP version is the one that gives you more performance for a small difference of 10 USD.

​

Where to buy & more information:​

• Linsoul Site
• Aliexpress Site

Disclaimer
Simgot sent these to me at no cost. The only thing they asked for is my opinion.

---

If you don't like reading, here's a video version of this review:

---

Build

The Simgot EW300 has the same cable as the EA500LM and almost the same cable as the EM6L, aside from the angled plugs, but the EW300 cables do have better LR markings with red and blue colour spots. Also supplied is the usual carry case.

They also both come supplied with exactly the same type of silicone tips as many other Simgot model, so no surprises there.
Looking at the accessories, things are looking like a pretty standard Simgot experience.



The build these seems to be something handed down from their experience designing the EA1000 and EA2000.
The full metal shells are a weighty departure from the usual resin shells around this price bracket, and just like the EA1000, include sets of 6mm tuning nozzles.

The metal shells are a risk to your personal biometric data privacy, as they will show off your fingerprints in style.



They’re also quite heavy compared to resin IEMs, but I found that they were far from uncomfortable.
Simgot has done well to find a general shape that has low risk of causing discomfort.

I was especially happy with the shape of the EW300, which fit more snugly, something I was initially concerned about.

---

Drivers and Nozzles

The EW300 is something new, at least not something I've ever seen or heard before.

It has a very unusual tribrid configuration of a single dynamic driver handling the bass and most of the mids, and then a single planar and single piezoelectric driver handling the upper frequencies.

With the nozzles removed, the dynamic driver is masked by one of the other drivers, however I’m not sure which it is.



Th EW300 comes with 2 different nozzles of it’s own.

Red ring nozzles which only have the dust filters inside.
Pink ring nozzles which also only have the dust filters inside.

Also supplied separately was a small bag of 6 identical foam filters, so I immediately assumed these were supplied for custom tuning variations.
So I think what’s happening is that at these lower prices, Simgot can supply less nozzles and give customers more tuning variations.

---

Nozzle Tuning Differences

When I talk about the nozzle colour, I am exclusively talking about the colour of the silicone o-rings, not the nozzle material colour.

Somehow unexpectedly, the red nozzles made of brass produced a stronger upper-mid presence than the pink nozzles. It appears that the nozzle material actually does have quite an important role to play in the tuning.


Adding foam to either of these doesn’t appear to make a huge difference to the tuning, but the effect is noticeable and immediate to the ear.
The upper-frequencies are smoothed out and somehow a harmony is created between the drivers; more on that later.

---

The Sound

Regarding my impressions of the subjective aspects of the sound, with the EW300 I settled on pink nozzles with foam added
I made this choice since this was the filter that had the least pinna-gain, something I have an averse sensitivity to.

For this part of the review I wanted to do something a bit different, and make it a 4-way comparison of 4 Simgot models.

• EA1000
• EM6L
• EA500LM
• EW300
• (I used the Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite as a neutral territory reference point and palette cleanser)

EW300
- Overall very detailed
- Extremely satisfied with the treble timbre and detail. Actually sounds kinda high-end.
- Very smooth sound overall and shockingly no disjointed sound.
- Good bass kick, not overblown, but can sound bloated with a simple bass boost, so bass tuning is great, but bass quality is average.
- Somewhat close to Harman neutral
- Sound stage is accurate, but more intimate, at least there is no weird positional effect or diffusion
- Imaging is great, with very accurate positional cues in FPS games.

EA500LM
- Immediately sounds more aggressive than EW300
- Prominent upper mids with noticeable pinna gain
- Detail is mostly excellent
- The most sensitive to device humming
- Very satisfying bass thump can balance out upper mids in some circumstances
- Can take bass boost very well, but bass quality is also a weak point.
- Great homogeneous sound, nothing sounds disjointed
- Soundstage is quite tall
- Excellent imaging, also good for 3D positional cues in games.
- Overall similar in quality to the EW300, but a different flavour, to me less neutral.

EA1000
- A bigger jump in overall clarity than I was expecting, despite being a single dynamic driver, and with a significantly bigger staging.
- Strange imaging/staging makes it a poor choice for gaming, but a more musical experience than the cheaper siblings.

EM6L
- Somehow possess a more coherent sound than the EW300 or EA500LM, but not by a big margin.
- Lighter weight from resin shells is noticeably more comfortable.
- Coloured sound is very similar to the EA500LM.
- EM6L takes bass EQ with similar results in timbre and texture as the EA500LM, but the clarity on the EM6L is higher, with a more layered sound.
- EM6L BA drivers are doing some heavy lifting in the treble making these sound more detailed, and dare I say ‘higher end’, but also adding some of that BA timbre, which also makes a somewhat disjointed presentation between the BA and dynamic drivers.

---

Conclusions

The EW300 being the new kid on Simgot's block and the cheapest of the bunch really surprised me.

On one hand, I found that it has the weakest bass performance of the lot, but as long as you don’t need big bass boost, I actually found it the 2nd best performer overall, behind the EA1000, with it’s higher resolution.

For some people, it may sound too smooth, but I think that’s also because I was using the foam damping, so don’t get discouraged. Without the damping, it will have more bite and perceived resolution, but it without the foam, it sounded too aggressive to my ears.

I think for it’s price, it may seem that Simgot is undercutting themselves a bit, but that’s only from my subjective point of view.
Objectively, while it has the weakest dynamic driver performance, I think it’s upper-frequency performance was shockingly competent and I can see this quickly becoming a community favourite, as long as you don’t mind wearing shiny hearts and X’s.

I think this design is riff on the classic XOXO hugs and kisses thing.

In the end, it doesn't excel anywhere, but neither does it do anything wrong and I find that it is all round one of the better IEMs I've heard.
Recommended.

Introduction :-

Today it’s a double review. The double trouble! It’s the simgot Ew300 and the SImgot Ew300 Hbb Edition. The HBB collab between simgot and HBB is the black one.


I have also shared a video version of the review at YouTube any support there in form of a view, A like or A subscribe is greatly appreciated. But if you so wish to read the written version you can read this.






A big thanks to Both Linsoul and Simgot for sending these review unit. Please check below the unaffiliated links to both of them. All the thoughts and opinions you are about to hear are my own.


Buy them here (Unaffiliated Link) :-

Linsoul Website - https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew300?variant=45798828245209

Amazon (If available in your country) - https://www.amazon.com/Linsoul-SIMGOT-EW300-Detachable-Silver-Plated/dp/B0DCZLRKZN

Linsoul Aliexpress Store - https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007543694300.html?
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007541697927.html?


I will be as usual following my bullet style format for better readability for those who are dyslexic and in general find it hard to read long paragraphs. I follow this guide in general from the British Dyslexia Association.


Lets get started!

---

Review :-

1. The packaging of the EW300 and EW300 HBB is same as you can see on the screen.


2. The price of the Ew300 is $69 and the HBB Edition is $79. I really like the case provided with both of them. Also both of them are really really comfortable and can be easily worn for hours without any issues. There is no sense of driver flex.


3. Both the IEM have 1DD + 1 Planar and 1 Pizeoelectric. Also the Regular the EW300 has this polished metal finish which is a fingerprint magnet and the HBB version has this sandblasted matte black finish.


4. I really like the pricing of the regular version as the price increase is not much when compared to the old EW200


6. It slots right between the old EW200 and the sort of new EA500LM


7. It is also awesome that both includes extra foam and rings. You can use the extra fam to change the sound a bit by stuffing another one of them inside the nozzle of you preferred nozzle colour.


7. Both the Normal and HBB have two nozzles one is gold and other is silver.


8. First I will talk about the Normal one and then I will talk about the HBB edition and say the differences between the normal and HBB edition.


9. I will be using stock setup and for my testing I will mainly talk about the silver nozzle and then the gold nozzle.


10. The overall sound of the EW300 can be described as a U shape.


11. The bass of the EW300 is done exceptionally well! I really like the approach simgot took over here.


12. Sub bass follows sort of the harman level and songs like crack crack crackle by classy has this good rumble and punch and the tactility of the sub bass is also really good.


13. The mid bass to has a nice amount of lift and it glides very well over from the sub bass.


14. When listening to harman set there is lack of mid bass which I do not like for many songs, the EW300 doesn’t have that. It has this nice kick to the mid bass.


15. And just like the sub bass the mid bass is really tactile and sounds very clean and crisp.


16. When listening to the 1985 galactic funk live version of the song, there is a nice guitar riff in the song which sounds a bit lifeless if an iem doesn’t have good mid bass. The EW300 produces it really good and it sounds really enjoyable.


17. Now coming to the male vocals they actually sit really well with the entire mix, but the thick texture of Chris Cornells and Bill withers vocals lacks a bit.


18. These kind of male vocals might sound a bit lifeless and thin and out of character.


19. Female vocals as usual sounds fantastic! Simgot did a bang up job here.


20. They have the right amount of crispness and sharpness and edginess I like from them. Specially if you listen to J-POP


21. They come across really well in normal volumes too, although at higher volumes I think so treble sensitive folks might have some issue with it and might it tad bit pokey.


22. Treble is done really tastefully. I think so they made it very safe here when compared to the previous EW200 or the EA500LM or a typical simgot set. Which is good as I always found them to tad bit spicy.


23. At low to moderate volumes they sound really well controlled and has the right amount of sparkle.


24. Treble has good amount of air too. The overall treble seems quite relaxed yet it performs really well specially at moderate volumes.


25. The soundstage for the price of under $100 is good, the width of soundstage is more than average while the depth sounds a bit lacking.


26. Imaging to is good for the under $100 price point and you can point towards the location when an instrument is playing. And the left to right transition and vice versa is quite good.


27. Now for Gaming these are quite good, although in some situations when there are a lot of gunfires and bombs blasting or a lot is happening specially on the lower end it could sound a bit jumbled up. While the soundstage and imaging is good and gives you a good sense of the game space and the footsteps, the sort of boosted bass might not be best for when a lot is happening. Again this is more than fine for most gaming out there and if you don’t play shooters or FPS this is really good as the added bass works really well.


28. Now talking about the gold nozzle, well what the gold nozzle does is it relaxes the sound even more. It adds a tad bit of sub and mid bass and takes away from the upper mids. It also cuts a bit from the air area of the treble.


29. So what you get is the more bass and less upper mids and also the treble sounds a bit laid back. The sound stage too becomes more cramped, now this could be nice for those who like a more in the ear feeling of the sound.


30. Gold nozzle is good for those who likes very relaxed and warm sound signature, it plays very well Rap, Hip-Hop and Nu metal type of genres.


31. Coming to the HBB edition well what it does is take both the nozzles of the regular EW300 it just makes the treble even more relaxing and cuts even more on the air region. This makes the sound even more warmer and the soundstage sound even more cramped.


32. Who is the HBB edition for, well its for those who like very warm sound signature and listens to track similar to Chris and also you like the more intimate and cramped soundstage. And more importantly if you want to support chris.


33. If you had to ask which I would select between this two. Well I would go with the stock EW300 with the stock silver nozzle.


34. v/s EW200 – The EW300 has more mid bass, better tacticlity of the bass and also more wide soundstage and better imaging. EW300 is clearly better than the EW200 in my book.


35. v/s EA500LM – The EA500LM is a slight step up from the EW300 in all aspects, but the LM can be too bright even for me so a minor mod which I suggested was to use another of the simgot tuning foam to control the harsh treble of the LM. But I find the EW300 much more comfortable than the LM and the more mid bass of the EW300 is something I really like


36. v/s EM6L – The soundstage of the EM6L is still one of the best for around $100 iem, so if your intention is gaming then the Em6L is better and the overall tonality of the EM6L is similar but bit more mature than the EW300.


37. v/s Supermix 4 – Well this was quite surprising, in all aspects the SM4 is better. But the added amount of mid bass for the EW300 is something I really like and feels nice. So I do prefer the EW300 more than the SM4.


38. But ….. there is one major con which the EW300 has. Is that they are sort of moderate volume set. So to earn and understand the full potential of the set you have to crank that volume up a bit. As someone who prefers to listen at low volume I still prefer the SM4 over this.


39. So that is my review of the Simgot EW300 and EW300 HBB, If you have any question please do comment below. Like and subscribe to my YouTube Channel is a great way of supporting me as it helps me a lot! I hope you have a great day ahead, bye!

---

If you have any questions please feel free to ask me and also if you have any issues regarding this format of review please do comment I will try to mend it. Also sorry to those who are used to reading long paragraphs of review in headfi. I hope my review was upto the mark, I appreciate any feedback.

Again a big thanks to Simgot and Linsoul for making this review possible.

Have a great day ahead, Bye

thaslaya's star rating system:
☆☆☆☆☆ - Fantastic!
☆☆☆☆ - Recommended
☆☆☆ - There are buyers but not for me
☆☆ - Can't see the appeal
☆ - Product is a failure

Disclaimer:
This product was provided to me by Simgot in exchange for my unbiased and honest review. I receive no compensation and all thoughts and opinions are my own.

Gear used:
●LG v30+
●Samsung Galaxy s22 Ultra
●iBasso DX180
●Samsung dongle
●Hiby FC4
●Kiwi Ears Allegro
●Letshuoer DT03
●Dunu DTC480
●BLON V1

Source:
●Listening was done through Amazon Music HD or Ultra HD.


Introduction:
Simgot has had no shortage of IEM releases in the past year, and most have been fairly well received. I have personally reviewed the EA500LM, EM6L, and SuperMix 4. I also own the EW200 but have yet to review that one. The EW300 is a tribrid IEM featuring a single dynamic, one planar, and one piezoelectric driver and also includes two swappable tuning nozzles. Simgot has chosen to offer multiple versions of this model with some slight variations between them. There are three different EW300s: the standard ($69.99), a collaboration with HBB ($75.99), and one that comes with a DSP cable ($79.99). All three seem to have mostly the same general tuning, or at least the same DNA, but the HBB and DSP models sport a matte black shell. I received the standard version for review, so let's break down this newest iteration in Simgot's EW line and see what it has to offer.


Build, fit, ergonomics:
The shell of the EW300 is very reminiscent of the EW200 in size, shape, fit, and build quality. They are almost identical but with two distinct differences: the interchangeable nozzles and faceplate design. The standard version of the EW300 features a silver, shiny solid metal shell with an "X" on one faceplate and a "♡" on the other. The design is an interesting one and some users may take issue with wearing IEMs with a heart on them but I personally like the design and feel that helps it to standout. The shells feel very solid in hand and have a decent weight to them, but they are still comfortable to wear for extended periods. These standard version shells are prone to smudges, fingerprints, and scratches, so those who are averse to this might want to opt for one of the other versions with the matte black finish. The EW300 features a recessed 2-pin connection, which makes cable swapping a bit more difficult. The nozzles measure 6mm at the lip, and they are a little on the short side with an insertion depth that is not particularly deep. I didn't have many issues with fit, but I would prefer a deeper insertion for an easier and better seal. The EW300 comes with two sets of swappable nozzles: silver and gold. They offer distinctly different tunings and are easily changed by simply unscrewing them from the shell. Simgot also includes a few small foam inserts that can be placed inside the nozzles for those who would like to tame the upper frequencies a bit. I did choose to utilize the foam as the stock nozzle was a bit bright for me. There are also extra rubber rings to replace the ones on the nozzles in case they get lost. The stock cable is the same or at least very similar to those provided with other Simgot models. I do like the aesthetics and design, but it's only available in 3.5mm termination and feels a bit thin and cheap in hand. There are also only three pairs of silicone tips included which feels underwhelming at this price point. The stock tips are fine but I still prefer the Penon Liqueurs as they provide a better seal. The case is the same standard Simgot semi-hard-shelled black zipper-style that comes with most of their IEMs. I actually quite like these cases as they are roomy inside and provide good protection. I appreciate their quality and I usually end up utilizing them for other IEMs as well.



Sound impressions:
After testing both tuning options, all my impressions in this review are made using the silver nozzle. Unfortunately, I find the gold one to sound thin, hollow, and peaky even with the added foam. There is some extra bass, but it does little to balance out the treble, and the scooped upper mids are too recessed for my liking. Of course, just because I don’t care for it doesn’t mean you won’t prefer the gold one yourself, so I encourage every user to try both.

I would characterize the silver nozzle as having a somewhat warm V-shaped tuning with an emphasis on the bass and upper midrange. It's not an overly exaggerated bass response, though, and there's still plenty of energy in the upper frequencies to balance it out. I'm not sure which drivers are handling which part of the frequency response, but the EW300 does seem to lack a bit of overall cohesion to my ear. This could be due to a lack of adequate crossover implementation or perhaps the drivers could be at odds a little in their transients, but something just sounds slightly off to me. The note weight does lean a bit thicker, which is great for my preferences. The detail retrieval is a standout feature of the EW300's technicalities and is highly competitive in its price range, although due to the warmer-leaning tonality, it still presents as more musical than clinical. The soundstage has good depth but lacks a bit in width and can present too close to the head on some tracks. The timbre is good but not the best, as it does sound just a bit off, specifically with vocals, though most instruments are spot-on. The imaging is mostly accurate and three-dimensional, although there is room for improvement. The dynamics are not the best, as the warmer tonality can lead to a less exciting presentation, and its tuning starts to fall apart a bit at lower volumes. The separation and layering can suffer a bit, especially on complex tracks where things tend to run together slightly. The EW300 is efficient and easy enough to drive, and it can reach loud volumes without needing amplification. I did try a few different dongle DAC/amps and settled on the BLON V1, as I found it to have good musical synergy with the EW300.



●Lows - The bass has good balance, with both sub-bass and mid-bass being well represented, but it is slightly more mid-bass tilted to my ears. The rumble and extension are decent but likely won't be enough for true bass enthusiasts. The mid-bass is punchy with good impact, but I do feel like it lacks a bit of weight and slam. The bass also isn't the most resolving, as double kick drums could benefit from being better separated. The attack speed and decay are about average, and the EW300 has a somewhat typical DD bass. By that, I mean it's not super quick like a planar driver nor is it underemphasized like BA bass can sometimes be. The low end does suffer a bit of blooming and bloat, and there's a touch of bleed into the midrange, but it's far from the worst offender I've heard. Overall, the bass is elevated and enjoyable but it won't blow anyone away with its technical performance or texture, as it can sometimes come across as slightly unkempt and ill-defined.

●Mids - The midrange has an inherent warmth and richness that lends itself beautifully to most vocals and instruments. However, there can be a tiny bit of extra energy in the upper mids/lower treble that can lead to some slight shoutiness and harshness at higher volumes. Female vocalists are generally well-balanced and present just forward enough for my tastes, but their male counterparts suffer a bit more recession and have to contend with some bleed from the midbass. Most instruments like guitars and strings are well-represented, but the timbre can have a little artificial quality depending on the track. The mids overall are pretty good, and the warmth is really nice, but I feel like there's something special missing that I can't quite put my finger on. If I could change anything, I would bring the vocals forward a bit more, improve the timbre, and get better separation from the bass.

●Highs - The treble is simultaneously crisp and textured while also polite and inoffensive. It's really a well-done treble for my tastes, although it's not perfect. There is still plenty of air and sparkle for my needs, but the highs do roll off a little early. I personally prefer this style of treble, but some will take issue with the lack of air and extension. Cymbals, hi-hats, snares, and claps are well represented but are not harsh or piercing, and they do a great job staying in their lane without impeding on the rest of the frequencies. There can be just a hint of harshness and thinness at higher volumes, but it's not too distracting. I'm mostly pleased with the treble quantity and quality, but I would like a bit thicker note weight and a little less energy in some of the higher frequencies to smooth out any troublesome spots. I think it could be a little warmer to better match the overall tonality of the other frequencies.



Comparisons: (Credit to ATechReviews,TDM, and Paul Wasabi for the graphs)

●Simgot EM6L (~$110) - The Phoenix is my favorite Simgot to date so I thought it would be a good place to start. It has a hybrid configuration consisting of 1 DD and 4 BAs. Looking at the graphs, it's easy to see these two share a similar tuning though the upper midrange and treble do deviate quite a bit. The EW300 is a bit warmer and smoother, and it also has more sub-bass presence with a bigger impact and rumble. The EM6L is more mid-bass focused with better impact and punch. The vocals and upper midrange of the EM6L are slightly recessed in comparison to the EW300, but they have better separation and clarity. The EM6L's treble is a bit brighter with more air and extension. Its soundstage is bigger and more spacious. It also has a more natural timbre and sounds more open and airy, with more room for vocals and instruments to breathe. Technicalities including separation, detail retrieval, and imaging are slightly better on the EM6L, and it can navigate complex tracks more aptly. The shell of the EM6L is larger and is a better fit for me. I also prefer the aesthetics of the black shell to the shiny silver. They both include basically the same accessories. This one really comes down to preference. The EW300 is warmer, with a more boisterous sub-bass, smoother midrange, and tamer treble. In contrast, the EM6L has a tighter and punchier mid-bass response, cleaner upper midrange, and better treble extension. I do like both sets, and I did initially find myself drawn to the warmth and extra bass punch of the EW300. However, the EM6L is more cohesive, with better tonality, bass texture, and vocal presentation, which for me wins out in the end. Both IEMs can coexist in a collection, and each has its use case, but if I had to choose only one, I'm sticking with the EM6L. It's not quite my tuning preference, but it simply offers a higher quality of sound, and I think it's well worth the increase in price.
My winner: EM6L

●Oriveti Lowmaster (~$150) - Unfortunately, there isn't a specific graph for this one since I have the standard version, and the only one on TDM's squig is the DSP which will have to do in this case. The Lowmaster is a hybrid featuring 1 DD and 2 BAs. The note weight, soundstage, imaging, timbre, and detail retrieval are all about the same on both sets, and I am unable to discern any significant differences. The EW300 has better sub-bass rumble and overall quantity, but the bass texture and separation are slightly cleaner on the Lowmaster. The Lowmaster still leans a bit brighter and has more treble extension and air but is also more fatiguing, with elements like cymbals, hi-hats, snares, and claps being a little more pronounced in the mix. The EW300 comes the closest to the Lowmaster among the comparisons I performed in that review. In the other comparisons, the tunings are close, but I could definitely hear a distinct advantage in technical factors in the Lowmaster's favor, although the margins of victory were not wide. The EW300 does almost everything the Lowmaster can do, with a few minor tuning differences that make it much better for me and, at less than half the price, a better value. The Lowmaster does win in terms of comfort for me, though. I feel that the EW300 is Simgot's attempt at a slightly smoother and further-refined EW200, so it's an easy recommendation over the Lowmaster, and that's not to mention the additional tuning nozzle that adds variety.
My winner: EW300

●Inawaken Dawn Ms (~$50) - Despite different driver configurations, these two graph very similarly. I'd say the Dawn is a bit more energetic and fun, whereas the EW300 is slightly warmer. The Dawn also features just a single DD to the tribrid configuration of the EW300. The Dawn has a better stock cable and tip selection, and I do like the resin shell, aesthetics, and design more too. The fit and insertion depth of the Dawn are also better for my ears. The EW300 has better detail retrieval and resolution, but the Dawn has a bigger soundstage, better imaging, layering, and cohesion, and is more musical to my ears. The bass responses are very similar, but the Dawn has a slightly deeper and bolder sub-bass response, while the EW300 has a punchier, more full mid-bass. In the midrange, vocals are a bit more forward and full-bodied with better note weight and better timbre on the Dawn. But guitar strums sound a bit clearer and are more resolving on the EW300. The Dawn has a bit of extra treble energy, and snares, in particular, are more impactful. It's slightly more incisive with a bit more bite to it, but it doesn't suffer the same thinness as I found on the EW300. These two IEMs are indeed more alike than they are different. It's hard to see why any collection would need both, so it comes down to preference. Is the addition of an extra tuning nozzle worth the added cost? For me, that's a no because I've tried the gold nozzle and it's not a tuning I like, nor would I choose to use it. For me, this one is easy: get the cheaper and, in my opinion, better-looking Dawn unless you want to invest a bit more for the extra tuning nozzle, metal shell, or the DSP option of the EW300.
My winner: Dawn

●Simgot EW200 (~$40) - This should be an apt comparison since the 300 is supposed to be a direct upgrade over the 200, and they are part of the same EW product line. Besides the driver configuration (tribrid vs. DD), these two are nearly identical in build. The shell shape, size, weight, fit, and build quality are all pretty much the same. The accessories are also nearly identical, but the EW300 comes with a case. The EW200 definitely has a brighter tuning and thinner note weight, whereas the EW300 sounds fuller and warmer with less top-end extension and air. The bass of the EW300 digs deeper with more sub-bass rumble and impact, but it is cleaner on the EW200. The vocals are slightly more recessed on the EW200, but other midrange instruments such as guitars are slightly more prominent and have a more natural tone. The treble is definitely brighter, more energetic, and more prominently featured with the EW200, and it can be fatiguing at higher volumes. The technicalities are actually very close, and I can't really discern a significant difference between them, which is honestly a point in favor of the EW200 since it's the less expensive set. Also, because it uses just a single DD, it has a more coherent profile and cleaner transients to my ear. Again, this one comes down to preference and the type of tuning you are seeking. Although I don’t particularly prefer the brighter, more energetic EW200, it is honestly the better IEM in my opinion. It can be found at about half the price of the EW300 and yet it competes in technicalities and has better timbre and a more cohesive sound overall. If the treble is a bit too harsh, adding some nozzle filters or changing tips may be helpful, which is really my biggest complaint with the EW200.
My winner: EW200


In conclusion:
It seems Simgot is listening, at least a little, to its consumer base and has finally offered a tweaked version of its house tuning with an infusion of warmth. The EW300 deviates a bit from the brand's slightly brighter and analytical roots, which is a breath of fresh air for me. Offering two distinctly different tuning nozzles is also a great incentive for new customers looking for variety. Unfortunately, I could not find a way to gel with or even tolerate the gold nozzle's tuning for some reason, but the silver one still makes this IEM worthwhile in and of itself. With the silver nozzle, the EW300 offers a warm tonality and a more musical, laid-back experience but still with decent technicalities. My biggest complaint is with the implementation of the tribrid driver configuration, where the tuning doesn't always have a cohesive flow and can sometimes come across as disjointed and incoherent. The resolution, layering, and separation could also be improved. I do wish the cable and tip selection were a bit better, but those seem to be the standard Simgot affair at this point. Another choice that I found puzzling was offering three different models of the EW300 with subtle differences. Simgot should have seriously considered releasing just a single shell design in the matte black colorway and then offered a choice of a 3.5 or DSP cable upon purchase. This would have simplified the entire product line and made it easier on consumers. While I personally don't feel that the EW300 is a direct upgrade over the EW200, as the latter is still very impressive for its price and even competes well against more expensive IEMs in the budget tier, I do think this newest release is an overall enjoyable experience. This one makes for a pretty good all-rounder and everyday carry option. The EW300 is an excellent choice for both devoted Simgot enthusiasts and newcomers who favor a warm and bass-driven sound profile.

SIMGOT or XINGGE as it is known in mainland China is still the dominant player in under $200/£140 as they keep gripping their hold in this particular audio market segment. And the SIMGOT Revolution is still going on as they release banger after banger after banger after banger…(ah well, enough with these banger words) sets that some of the audio enthusiasts will gleefully try their every released models.



This is SIMGOT EW300 and it is the successor of the EW200 that was released last year. Unlike its precursor model, this one is quite different in terms of driver implementation as SIMGOT implemented not just one, not even two but three types of driver technology but its retains some of its core design of its shell structure but again, unlike its predecessor, it has a feature that some SIMGOT model has, a detachable tuning nozzle system. I almost forgot to mention that SIMGOT EW300 has three model variants, the Standard model, DSP Edition and HBB Edition. What I got here is the Standard model in which I really prefer personally.



As I mentioned, SIMGOT EW300 utilises a three driver technology and they are dynamic driver, a planar (I doubt that this is a true planar magnetic driver as I surmise that it might be the micro flat panel driver or the square “planar” driver that Kinera develops) and piezo-electric driver in also implemented on their SUPERMIX 4. The dynamic driver that was implemented here is a 10mm one with ceramic-like material on its diaphragm to deliver a robust and deep bass and a smooth and rich midrange, and then the 6mm “planar” driver along with a piezo-electric driver will handle the high frequency for clear and crisp treble playback.



The three drivers then encased in a solid CNC-milled aluminium alloy shell structure that underwent anodising treatment and sandblasting process to achieve that glossy, mirror-like finish. On its faceplate panel, each transducer shell has a different embossed design, an X on the left part and a heart on the right part. The brass nozzle is a detachable one via screwing mechanism just like most SIMGOT's previous models that we could interchanged with another tuning nozzle which has a different tuning curve that was included inside of the packaging box. Like most SIMGOT models, it still carries through a 0.78mm bi-pin connector as its interlocking mechanism for its detachable cable.



The fitting and comfort that this set could give is quite pleasant as it rests well into my lugholes without any discomfort and it gives me a decent passive noise isolation that blocks some unwanted external noises from the outside. Although I want to address some slight issues that there are some occasional occlusion effects whenever I insert it to my ears.



The stock cable of this one is quite similar from other SIMGOT sets as it has 2-core design with multi-strand silver-plated OFC copper wiring in a clear PVC insulator for oxidation resistance. It is said the composition of its material will ensure a seamless proper signal transmission for better sound quality and resolution. The cable itself is on a leaner texture but it is quite lightweight and flexible to hold.



The product packaging of this one is pretty similar to most of SIMGOT products in the same price range as its packaging in a medium-size bulky rectangular box. Even the contents, it still has a similar quality and quantity of accessories.



Here are the following contents inside of its packaging box:

• Pair of SIMGOT EW300 IEM transducers shells.
• Stock cable
• Rounded square-shaped carrying case.
• A pair of gold-coloured tuning filter nozzles.
• Three (3) pairs of balanced bore silicone ear tips of different standards.
• Paperwork like user's manual and Q.C. stub.
• Some spare of nozzle rings
• Some spare of tuning foams

As for power scaling, the SIMGOT EW300 is moderately sensitive so that it can be amplified with devices like smartphones, tablets and laptops. That's why my speculation regarding the “planar” driver on this one is not a true planar magnetic planar due to the latter's power-demanding requirement (unless someone debunks my take by showing some pictorial evidence but for now I'll stick to my opinion). But it seems that this set also scales well to better sources with better processing and power output like DAPs, headphone amp dongles and desktop DAC/Amps as it sounds even more fuller and dynamic.

On tonality, since this set has a detachable tuning filter nozzle, it offers two distinctive tonal profiles and all of them follows a new refinement on the SIMGOT in-house tuning evolution which is a modified Harman target curve with some varying degree of elevation on a certain part of the frequency spectrum.


(FR graph was provided by @baskingshark , credits to him)

SILVER TUNING FILTER NOZZLE - it has a mild U-shaped sound signature and it is more balanced tuning of the SIMGOT in-house sound profile.

GOLD TUNING FILTER NOZZLE - while it is still a U-shaped sound signature, it has a warmer take of the SIMGOT in-house sound profile as there are some perceivable drawbacks like reducing the upper-mids up to the brilliance part of the high frequency but it has a more dominant low frequency.




LOWS/BASS:

SILVER TUNING NOZZLE

The bass response of this one is apparently more focused on the sub-bass presence rather than mid bass as it sounds incisive, precise and cleaner with some clearly deep rumble produced by some sub bass-focused instruments like low tuned bass guitars and double basses, synthesisers and drum machines. The mid bass texture evidently seems to be rather adequate to give some enough note weight on bass-clef instruments and male vocals for satisfying punchiness on its bass quality.

INSTRUMENTS:

Bass guitars - on every pluck of their strings, it produces a rasping and resonant sounding.
Double basses - whether moving the bow or plucking, they have a sombre and resonant sounding.
Bass kick drums - on every stroke on its drumhead, they have a rumbling and thudding sound.

VOCALS:

Bass - they have this deep reverberating vocals but it seems that they have some lacking of dark tone and heft on it.
Bass-baritones - they have some slight dusky vocals but less rich and less full sounding.


GOLD TUNING NOZZLE

This one has a mid bass texture as it delivers a heft, robust and authoritative bass response but there are some caveats as it tends to smudge over the midrange section. While the sub-bass presence still occurs as I felt the reverberations and rumble generated by sub bass-focused instruments in this tuning setting but the dominant mid bass is more noticeable that its smearing gives a more warmth on the overall sound.

INSTRUMENTS:

Bass guitars - on every pluck of their strings, they produce a broad and dark sound.
Double basses - whether its plucking and a motion on its bowstrings, they sound weighty and earthy.
Bass kick drums - on every kick, they produce a full and thunderous sound.

VOCALS:

Bass - their voices have a full and dark sound with some rumbling on it.
Bass-baritones - they sound dense and woolly on this setting to give some fullness and richness.


MIDRANGE:

SILVER TUNING NOZZLE

The midrange presentation of this nozzle setting is seemingly quite a bit recessed but it doesn't sound too lean as it has a texture, enough warmth and clean sound to deliver a balanced note weight on vocals and instruments with a tad of energy . But the elements that will benefit from this type of tuning will be mostly female vocals, strings, woodwinds and some percussives.

VOCALS:

Baritones - they have an enough warmth and plush but it has lightness and mild sound into it in which is excellent on specific baritone types like lyric and light ones
Tenors - they have a clear, bright and agile vocal which could suit well on tracking on both leggero and lyric tenors.
Countertenors - they have graceful, tender and expressive vocals from their falsetto voices.

Contraltos - they sound smokey and they have enough richness but wishing for more weight on it.
Mezzo-sopranos - they have these graceful, velvety and sensitive sounds on their vocals, sort of similar to countertenors.
Sopranos - they have a bell-like and silky vocals which is more suitable on soubrette, dramatic, spinto and some lyric types of sopranos, although on coloratura, it needs more energy to execute a light, florid passage with emotive vocals.

INSTRUMENTS:

Guitars - On every plucking of its note strings, they sound balanced with some crisp on it.
Cellos - they sound eloquent and lustrous on either bowing or plucking.
Violins - every motion of its bowstrings, they produce a sensuous, lively and sweet sound.

Concert flutes - they sound mellow and rich.
Piccolos - they have a delicate and graceful sound on them.
Clarinets - they have a melodic, lustrous and rich sound.
Saxophones - they sound sonorous and mildly reedy.

Trumpets - they sound brilliant and full.
Trombones - they have full and powerful sound, could be identified as “heroic”.
Horns - sounds velvety and resounding as I describe in the brass section passage.

Snare drums - hard and penetrating sound on every stroke.
Tom-toms - it has enough warmth and resonant sound on every stroke.
Field drums - they sound sonorous, resounding and hard.
Kettledrums - they have these velvety, substantial and deep sounds on every beat they produce.

Pianos - they sound even and well-balanced as they have a sweet, pleasant and clear tone.


GOLD TUNING NOZZLE

Compared to SILVER TUNING NOZZLE Mode, the midrange presentation of this one is warmer, richer and weighty to the point it sounds too rich and too lush that it sounds overly smoothen and veiled with noticeable lacking of energy in my liking. Due to its richness, it adds more note body on male vocals, female contraltos, brasses and some percussives.

VOCALS:

Baritones - they have warm, rich and lush sound to give a full, raspy and steely voice on noble baritone, dramatic baritone, verdi baritone and Kavalierbariton.
Tenors - they sound richer, warmer and with darker timbre which are suitable for tracking on some tenor types of vocals like Spinto, dramatic and heldentenors.
Countertenors - it sounds too warm and too velvety that it loses its emotiveness and tenderness of its vocals.

Contraltos - It sounds plush, rich and heavy from their chesty vocals.
Mezzo-sopranos - too velvety that it lessens its expressive and fiery sound.
Sopranos - since the tuning of this set is on a warmer and veiled, some dramatic sopranos will suit better on this as it has a darker timbre with rounder and deeper voice with some steeliness.

INSTRUMENTS:

Guitars - too warm and buttery sounding that it loses some of its lingering tones on every plucking and strumming.
Cellos - they sound too warm, thick and heft on either bowing its strings or plucking.
Violins - full, austere and dark, that's how I describe its sound characteristics.

Concert flutes - too mellow, rich and sighing sounding.
Piccolos - while it has that graceful sound, it lacks brightness, brilliance and intensity due to warm and veiled tuning.
Clarinets - too rich, too mellow and less expressive sounding.
Saxophones - overly rounded, earthy and melancholic sounding.

Trumpets - they sound very warm, full-powered with a dark tone.
Trombones - overpowering, full and well-rounded sounding.
Horns - Warm, full yet muffled sounding.

Snare drums - hard, boomy and clattering sounding on every stroke.
Tom-toms - too warm, rich and with less resonance sound.
Field drums - they sound booming with a darker tone.
Kettledrums - boomy, too rounded and mellow sounding.

Pianos - they surely have a mellow sound as they have rich, dark and rounded tones, but sometimes I think it's a bit dull in my liking.


HIGHS/TREBLE:

SILVER TUNING NOZZLE

While it has some discernible accentuated upper-mids and presence section, it still maintains a shimmer and smoothness on its treble response in an appropriate way that it will not sound harsh nor unwanted glaring sound. There might be some slight metallic sound on some vocals and instruments but at least the sibilance was kept under control.

For a multi-driver configuration set, it has a good quantity of airy extension on its brilliance section with ample sparkle that affects some treble-clef instruments.

Cymbals - they sound resonant and brilliant at the same time.
Hi-hats - a shortened buzzing tone to give that distinctive chick-y sound.
Celestas - silvery and golden sound from them.
Glockenspiels - shimmering and brilliant sound on both keyboard and mallet-type ones.


GOLD TUNING NOZZLE

Compared to the SILVER TUNING NOZZLE setting, this one has a more smoother and even inoffensive treble response but at expect of loss of clarity and a darker tuning which will be appealing to treble-sensitive folk out there. There are some noticeable dampening on the upper-mids up to presence treble section as it blunted the definition of vocals and less delineation on note attack of instruments.

The treble air extension of this one seems to be lessened and an obvious less intensity of its sparkle that affects the quality of harmonics and timbre on treble-clef instruments.

Cymbals - too smooth and less brilliant sounding.
Hi-hats - a shortened warmer tone that sounds dull and unnatural.
Celestas - less shimmering sounding.
Glockenspiels - lacking brilliant and shimmery sound on both keyboard and mallet-type ones.


SOUNDSTAGE, IMAGING AND OTHER TECHNICALITIES:

SILVER TUNING NOZZLE

In this setting, it projects an moderately spacious sound field with above-average width on its lateral span, good height ceiling and an immersive depth in a concave-like stereo imaging presentation. On its soundscape, it has multi-layered sections of tonal dynamics and frequencies of instruments and vocals that I was able to pan out to locate their perceived placement. That said, this set is capable of playback some of the complex multi-instrumental tracks effortlessly.

Coherency of its dynamic driver is excellent, which I already expected from SIMGOT's choices of choosing their drivers on their products which are of good quality. Resolution capability-wise, this one is pretty resolving on both macro-dynamics and micro-dynamics as it has sufficient solid dynamics with good micro-detail retrieval as it extracts some details and nuances from an audio track.


GOLD TUNING NOZZLE

Compared to the SILVER TUNING NOZZLE, this one seems to decrease the sound field size as it narrows a bit the width of its span and a slight reduction on height while retaining that concave-like stereo imaging presentation. Apparently, it somewhat lessened the sections of layers and curtailed its spacing of its separation aspect that diminishes its technical performance.

It also happens that it lessened the quality of its resolution that it also blunted the micro-detail retrieval capability to extract more micro-detail information from an audio track.


PEER COMPARISONS:

SIMGOT EW200

• The predecessor model of this set shares similar shell design and materials but the difference between them is that this one has a single driver set-up which is a dynamic driver with a new type of composite diaphragm on it.
• It doesn't have a detachable tuning nozzle feature.
• It still has similar inclusions like most SIMGOT products and of course, it also has a limited quantity of silicone ear tips.
• Like all previous SIMGOT's tonal target, it has a U-shaped sound profile as it has more sub bass presence on its bass response, a noticeable more recessed and leaner midrange presentation, and a brighter treble response with ample air and sparkle. (It was compared to a SILVER TUNING NOZZLE setting of EW300)
• On technical aspects, it has a bit narrower staging, a typical two-dimensional stereo presentation but at least it presents a well-layered soundscape with good separation and a tad more resolving. (It was compared to a SILVER TUNING NOZZLE setting of EW300)

TWISTURA D-MAJOR

• Like the EW300, it has a metal alloy shell structure but it has an unusual outline of its design profile which looks similar to a trimmed fingernail and also it only has a single dynamic driver on its internal.
• It has detachable tuning nozzle features and it even offers not just one, not two but three tuning filter nozzles that makes this set even more versatile in offering different tuning profiles.
• On its product packaging, it doesn't have a solid carrying case but it offers two choices of ear tips to choose from and even includes a USB-C DSP headphone amp dongle, although its stock cable is rather average.
• On the tonality side, since this set offers three tuning profiles, all of them align with U-shaped sound signatures from a balanced one up to the brighter variant.
• On its red ring tuning nozzle, it has a sub bass presence on its bass response, a bit recessed but it has a sufficient warmth to have a balanced sound on its midrange presentation and a tad attenuation on some parts on the treble response but there some cases that it produces some slight sibilance especially on sibilant-laden tracks.
• As for its technical performance, while it has a similar technical prowess with the EW300 but this one is quite more resolving on micro-dynamics as it has a sharper definition on retrieving some micro-details and other nuances.

KEFINE DELCI AE EDITION

• It also has a metal alloy shell like the EW300 but the difference between them is that it has matte-like texture on its surface that it has some fingerprint mark-resistant and less susceptible to light scratches from everyday use and also, it only has single driver configuration.
• It has detachable tuning nozzle features just like the EW300.
• On its inclusions, it offers more choices of ear tip types that we used upon.
• Due to its detachable tuning nozzle features, it offers two types of tuning profiles, a warmer U-shaped sound and brighter U-shaped sound.
• On its SILVER TUNING FILTER mode, the DELCI AE has a more punchy and potent bass response, a slightly recessed but more warmer and rich midrange presence, and a smooth and well-balanced treble response. (It was compared to a SILVER TUNING NOZZLE setting of EW300)
• On its technical performance, it has above-average sound field sizes, an atmospheric-like stereo imaging presentation and similar resolution capabilities.

Once again, SIMGOT proves their point on why they should continue to dominate the entry-level IEM segment as the EW300 is probably one of their defining sets that they currently offer so far aside from the EA500 regular that starts the SIMGOT Revolution. While it doesn't have that resolution quality that some sets have, its tri-brid configuration which is quite uncommon on its price range bracket is well-implemented along with tonal quality and technical performance especially the cohesion performance of its triple driver configuration.

The tuning filter nozzles is one of the features that makes the EW300 even more appealing as we could choose two distinctive tonal profiles that closely aligns with our tonal preferences. The SIMGOT EW300 will be one of the sets that I could truly recommend to some audio enthusiasts who want to upgrade from their usual budget entry-level set in terms of build quality, noticeable tonal improvement and better technical capabilities while retaining some fun and engaging factor of its overall sound quality.

SIMGOT EW300 is now available at LINSOUL, For those who are interested to purchase this set, there's a non-affiliate link that I have provided below.

LINK: https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew300?srsltid=AfmBOooWJUiyRNyeHf_Wsr2UypSUDl1kkdLZ2zkhzPm4xKLCeaQr-Guh

If you are interested in my previous SIMGOT product reviews, check out the following provided links below.

■ SIMGOT EA500

■ SIMGOT EW100P

■ SIMGOT EM6L

■ SIMGOT EW200

■ SIMGOT EA1000 FERMAT

■ SIMGOT EA500LM





SPECIFICATION:

MODEL: SIMGOT EW300
IMPEDANCE: 28Ω
SENSITIVITY: 121dB (SILVER), 119dB (GOLD)
FREQUENCY RESPONSE: 8Hz – 40KHz
CABLE LENGTH: 1.2m
PIN TYPE: 0.78mm 2-PIN CONNECTOR
PLUG TYPE: 3.5mm
DRIVER UNIT(S): (1) DYNAMIC DRIVER + (1) MICRO-"PLANAR" DRIVER + (1) PIEZOELECTRIC DRIVER


TRACKS TESTED: ( * = 16-bit FLAC, ** = 24-bit FLAC, *'* = MQA, '*' = DSD, *'= .WAV)

Alison Krauss -When You Say Nothing At All *
Jade Wiedlin - Blue Kiss**
Led Zeppelin - When The Levee Breaks **
Mountain - Mississippi Queen *
Queen - Killer Queen **
Guns N' Roses - Patience *'*
Eric Clapton - Tears in Heaven '*'
Sergio Mendes- Never Gonna Let You Go '*'
Pearl Jam - Daughter **
Roselia - Hidamari Rhodonite *
Assassin - Fight (To Stop The Tyranny)*
Celtic Frost- Visual Aggression *
New Order - Blue Monday *
The Corrs- What Can I do (unplugged version) *
Jimi Hendrix Experience - Voodoo Child *
The Madness- Buggy Trousers *
Metallica - Motorbreath **
Mariah Carey- Always Be My Baby *
Destiny's Child - Say My Name *
Malice Mizer- Au Revoir *
Mozart - Lacrimosa *
New York Philharmonic Orchestra - Dvorak- Symphony 9 " From the New World." *
Eva Cassidy - Fields of Gold (Sting cover)*
Michael Jackson - Give In To Me *
Exciter - Violence and Force *
Diana Krall - Stop This World **
Debbie Gibson - Foolish Beat *'*
The Sisters of Mercy – Lucretia My Reflection**
Suzanne Vega – Luka **
Lauren Christy – Steep *
Ottoman Mehter - Hucum Marsi *
Diana Damrau - Mozart: Die Zauberflöte*
Type O Negative - Black No.1 *
Felix Ayo - Vivaldi: Presto **
Three Tenors - Nessum Dorma *
Mercyful Fate - Witches' Dance *

P.S.

I am not affiliated to SIMGOT  nor receive monetary incentives and financial gains as they provide me a review unit for an exchange of factual and sincere feedback from yours truly.

Once again, I would like to send my gratitude to MS. KAITLYN WU of LINSOUL for providing this review unit. I truly appreciate her generosity and trust towards me and other reviewers.

I have reviewed quite a number of Simgot IEMs and honestly every one of them is among the best offerings in their respective price ranges. When EW300 was first teased months ago, it stirred up quite the hype but its release took longer than everyone expected. With its $69.99 price for Standard Version and $79.99 for the DSP Version, it directly competes with not only high selling IEMs like Moondrop May and Truthear Hexa, but also their own EA500LM.

Disclaimers​

The Simgot EW300 Standard and DSP versions were provided to me by Simgot for free, and I only paid for the customs fees. As always, it's important to note that everyone has some degree of bias, so take everything you read with a grain of salt. I'll aim to be more concise and to the point in my reviews from now on, without worrying about word count. If you have any questions, please ask in the comments, and I'll do my best to answer them.

Packaging, Build, and Accessories​

Both versions of EW300 come with the usual Simgot packaging and accessories. I apologize for not being able to share the pictures of the packages because I am currently out of town and I only have the IEMs with me. You can refer to other reviews for detailed pictures of the full packaging. Along with the ear pieces, you get the cable of your choice; 2 pin cable with either 3.5 mm or USB-C termination, a set of regular Simgot tips, a pair of different tuning nozzles, spare tuning foams, spare O rings for the nozzles and the usual unbranded black carrying case. I really appreciate Simgot letting its customers customize their IEMs to their liking.



Earpieces are fully made of metal. In fact shells are identical to EW200’s shells apart from the logos on the faceplates. Having a heart shape on one side and an “X” on the other is kind of quirky in terms of design choice but they are understated enough so I don’t really mind it. Standard version has a silver color and a mirrored finish which is to no one's surprise, a fingerprint magnet. The DSP version has a textured matte black finish. The paint doesn’t look like it will chip but only time will tell. Inside the earpieces, driver configuration is rather unique with one dynamic driver, one planar magnetic driver and one piezo-electric ceramic driver on each side. Tips are, as usual, the very serviceable 07 type ones.



Standard version’s cable is identical to the cable that comes with EM6L and EA500LM; it’s easily manageable but if you like thick cables, you might wanna buy a new cable. DSP cable is, however, kind of unique. It’s not among the best behaving cables like Moondrop’s FreeDSP cable (or May’s cable). It’s more in line with the cheaper Tanchjim One DSP cable. Unique part is, they placed the digital circuit to the Y-splitter. Therefore the USB-C type connector could be made comically small. It’s also L shaped so it's very convenient to use with mobile phones. However I had a hard time when trying to remove the connector occasionally.

Sound of EW300​

I will try to describe the sound of both versions of EW300 together because the DSP cable only slightly alters the sound. Considering them having 2 pairs of tuning nozzles it would take too long to describe every combination. Instead I compared different cables and nozzle options in the comparisons section.

Tonality​

EW300 is probably the most balanced Simgot until now. Bass is elevated, powerful, authoritative but thanks to the quality of the drivers that were used, it has fast decay. It doesn’t feel like it bleeds too much into the mids or lags behind muddying up the details and we are talking about Kefine Delci level of bass. The DSP cable I have seems to cut back the bass a notch to clean up the mids to take it closer to Simgot’s usual tuning. Tuning nozzles doesn’t seem to alter the bass.



Mids are lovely to listen to as always. Depending on the nozzle you use, it can be highlighted or neutral. With silver nozzles you get an intimate vocal presentation which we have become familiar with from other Simgot IEMs. If you use gold nozzles, tuning becomes more in line with the latest trend “new meta”. It sounds dead neutral but not really boring. If you didn’t like Hexa because of its lack of bass, you can call EW300 with gold nozzles a “Hexa with bass boost”. Upper mids are cut back with no real honk or shout. While I respect this tuning, I prefer tuning with silver nozzles more. Still I appreciate what Simgot made with tuning nozzles this time around. They make meaningful changes unlike before and a significant number of people seem to prefer tuning with gold nozzles. Mids sound slightly cleaner with DSP cable.

In the latest Simgot IEMs, the treble is getting smoother. SuperMix 4 was surprisingly smooth and EW300 is even smoother, especially with gold nozzles. While it retains a certain level of detail, it doesn’t sound as lively and sparkly as other Simgot models. For me, the EW300 with gold nozzles sounds realatively blunted but with the silver nozzles, it sounds very balanced with just enough energy in the treble. Still I can see people preferring gold nozzles for its ease of listening and neutrality. DSP cable seems to reduce some energy around 8k to eliminate any possible harshness but it doesn’t sound harsh at all in the first place.

Technicalities​

In the usual Simgot fashion, EW300 is among the most detailed and technically capable IEMs in its price range. However, I must say, it’s not extraordinary. It has a similar detail level with EA500LM with a smoother sound which is quite a feat by itself but maybe I was expecting a little more with its unique driver configuration. When all things considered, it’s me being harsh. Afterall, it’s slightly cheaper than the EA500LM with more possibilities and it doesn’t kill its bigger brother SuperMix 4 which is more expensive. Also technical capability of EW300 depends highly on the nozzles you use, they really shine with silver nozzles by getting wider and more nuanced. DSP cable also limits the scalability so unsurprisingly you can get more with a good source if you use an analog cable. As usual, comparisons should shed more light to EW300’s capabilities.

Comparisons​

EW300 Gold Nozzle vs. Silver Nozzle (with Analog Cable)​

• Bass is pretty much the same, both have a fast but impactful and authoritative bass. Both nozzles have good bass extension with a nice rumble as long as you get a good seal.
• Lower mids are also unchanged but upper mids and lower treble is more pronounced on silver nozzles. Therefore vocals feel more intimate and detailed on silver nozzles. Upper mids on the gold nozzle is tuned closer to the new meta and feels on point.
• Neither is particularly sibilant but EW300 silver nozzles would become sibilant easier with volume. Gold nozzle is smoother and more balanced but maybe a little too smooth, it lacks the bite and splash that other Simgot sets have.
• Timbre on gold nozzles is more lifelike than silver nozzles.
• EW300 is more detailed with silver nozzles. Gold nozzles kind of hold them back a little. Feeling of spaciousness isn’t very different between the nozzles but silver nozzles feel like they draw a more precise image in localization.

EW300 DSP vs. Analog (with Gold Nozzles)​

• Analog EW300 has more impactful and powerful bass.
• The DSP version has cleaner mids that highlight vocals and mid instruments more.
• EW300 with DSP cable has a smoother presentation, analog has slightly more treble energy and bite but it doesn’t get too aggressive.
• Analog version is more detailed and nuanced but it’s probably because of the quality of the source. The DSP version of EW300 seems to have slight digital glare that comes harsher than the analog version.
• Stage size isn’t too different but the DSP version feels flatter and congested.

For comparisons with Moondrop May, I used the nozzles that yielded somewhat similar tunings.

EW300 DSP (Gold Nozzle) vs Moondrop May DSP (Standard Preset)​

• May’s cable is of a higher quality, feels better at hand, handles better, also more powerful so it gets louder.
• EW300 has a faster and more powerful bass. May’s bass decays slower and feels more pillowy but also sweeter, not too aggressive. EW300 has a better bass extension too.
• May’s mids have more presence, sounds clearer and vocals come as more intimate but also a little shoutier.
• Both of them are very well controlled in the treble, there is no harshness or sibilance at all. May has more sparkle and energy so EW300 with gold nozzles sounds slightly more blunted compared to May.
• May overall sounds more airy and revealing than EW300 when gold nozzles are used. EW300 probably renders just as many details if not more but they don’t stand out. Stage that EW300 creates is wider but May’s is deeper. Imaging and layering is better on EW300. They both have a realistic timbre but if I were to choose one, I would choose May.

EW300 Analog (Gold Nozzle) vs Moondrop May Analog​

• EW300 has a faster and tighter bass. However May’s slower decay feels more on point occasionally. Bass impact is similar but May feels fuller overall.
• Mids on May pop a little more, again vocals come as a little bit shoutier.
• Neither is sibilant, harsh or too aggressive in the treble but this time EW300 sounds more airy and sparkly.
• EW300 with silver nozzles is significantly more resolving, it renders nuances much more easily. Again the soundstage on EW300 is wider and this time it isn’t shallower than May’s either. Imaging and layering is also superior on EW300 just like before. Both have very good timbre but I would probably choose May’s again if I had to.

Conclusion​

When all things considered, EW300 deserves 5 stars. It has a unique driver configuration and a competitive price. Different nozzles make significant and meaningful changes that would satisfy different types of users. Nozzles not making any meaningful changes was one of my major gripes in older Simgot offerings. It has an exceptional bass response that is both authoritative and fast. Not utilizing EQ presets or customization options with the DSP cable is kind of a missed opportunity and my favorite Simgot IEM is still EA1000. I was actually going to drop half a star just for these reasons but that wouldn't be fair. I hope they don't get complacent and keep improving.

Summary
The EW300 is the latest budget release by Simgot, and I have been living with it for a while now. So what is the EW300 and more importantly is it any good? The EW300 is a budget tribrid iem with a rather unique driver configuration of 1DD+1 Planar+ PZT, coming in at 70$. Build and design is good, fit and comfort is decent, packaging and accessories are decent. In terms of sound, Simgot has gone for a more well balanced, warmer, a bit relaxed version of their house sound. The EW300 is a mature and well bodied version of its predecessor, EW200. I like what Simgot has done with this set and I think this is a very good option at this price point.



Intro
Hey Guys, whats up….
Today I am checking out the EW300 from Simgot. This is the latest release from Simgot and also a sequel to their popular budget set, EW200. The EW300 comes in three different version: standard version, HBB version and DSP version, today I am checking out the standard version. The EW300 is a tribrid iem with 1DD+1 Planar+ 1PZT driver configuration, priced at 80$. So is this the best budget tribrid set right now? Lets discuss…

About the brand:
First, let’s get to know the brand, Simgot is a very popular ChiFi iem manufacturer beloved by many for providing great value for money products. I have personally used and reviewed many of their products, such as, EW200, EA500LM, EM6L, EA1000. So far the EA500LM is my most fav Simgot set, and in general one of te best sub 100$ iems. I am excited to see how the EW300 stands up against the EA500LM, although they have different driver configuration. Anyways enough yapping lets get back to the EW300, starting off with specs.



Disclaimer: Thanks to Simgot for providing this review sample. However, please note that this review reflects my honest and unbiased opinion. I strive for transparency in all my reviews, whether the product is self-purchased, a free sample, or received at a discount.

Specs
Model: SIMGOT EW300 (LOVE & X)
Driver configuration: 1 dynamic driver + 1 planar driver + 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver
Dynamic driver: 10mm ceramic composite diaphragm dual-chamber dynamic driver
Planar magnetic driver: 6mm annular magnetic driver
Impedance: 28Ω±15%(@1kHz)
Sensitivity: 121dB/Vrms (@1kHz, silver steel tube&red silicone ring); 119dB/Vrms (@1kHz, golden copper tube&purple silicone ring)
Frequency response range: 8Hz-40kHz
Effective frequency response: 20Hz-20kHz
Connector: 0.78mm 2Pin
Cable material: High-purity silver-plated OFC
Plug: 3.5mm
PRICE: 70$

Packaging
Continuing on to the packaging section, this comes in a good looking box, although I am not sure how I feel about XOXO theme. Sliding off the outtser sleeve you will find a paper insert covering the box, beneath that you will see the iems nicely presented in a foam insert. Below that there are two more boxes containing the carrying case, cable, eartips, nozzles, extra silicone rings, extra mesh and papers. This carrying case is the same as their other sets, this does not look fancy but serves the purpose fine, I like that the size is big enough to throw in a dac dongle. The eartips are decent in quality, seems to me they are a slight improvement in terms of softness from their previous sets. The cable is decent, I will get into a bit more details later below. List of box contents:
iems
Cable
Carrying case
Extra silicone rings
Extra mesh
Tuning nozzle
Papers


Build and Design
Moving on to the build and design of the EW300, it is solid. This has a solid metal build with a mirrored finish. The design is inspired by their EW200 design. Compared to the EW200, the EW300 has a darker tint and the faceplate has a different design. Although I like the build, the heart and X design choice is ok. The shells feel very solid in the hands, and thanks to the full metal build these have nice weight to them. The shells size are medium. Fingerprints and scratches are a bit of an issue because of the mirrored finish. The nozzle width and depth is standard. The 2pin connectors are recessed type.

Fit and Comfort
Talking about fit and comfort of the EW300, it is fine. This fits perfectly in my medium sized ears. Long term listening comfort is decent, nothing too crazy. One thing I noticed, this tends to slide out if you are using slippery eartips, thus stability is compromised, but sticky eartips such as Azla crystals somewhat solves it. Isolation is good. Breathability is ok. All in all I find it plenty comfortable snough for daily use.



Inner Structure and Tech
Let’s look at whats inside the EW300. Simgot has gone for a rather unique tribrid set up with a single dynamic driver, a single planar and a single piezoelectric ceramic driver, (1DD+1Planar+1PZT). The dynamic driver is 10mm and has a ceramic like diaphragm. The planar is a 6mm annular magnetic driver.

Accessories

Cable
Now let’s look at the cable, the EW300 comes with a classic simgot cable like their other set. Price wise the cable is decent. Build wise this uses nigh purity silver plated copper cable (OFC) wire braided into 2 core. The cable is on the medium to thinner side. The 2 core braiding is nice and tight. The chin singe is properly functional. The cable has no major memory issue. The Y split and the connectors casing seem to be made of metal. There is minimal audible microphonics, close to none. This terminates into 3.5mm.



Please note: Listening impressions are highly subjective and can differ depending on different ear shape, individual music library, choice of source, eartips, cable and personal preferences, so your experience may differ. I personally always use and test all my gear in various setups to get a generalized idea on it. You can find my “tested with” info below.

Now most importantly sound, Simgot has gone for an updated or modified version of the Harmon tuning for the EW300, also a mature and fuller version of the EW200 tuning. I will directly compare it against the EW200 later down below. In general the EW300 has a balanced, clean sound with decent bass. Lets get into a bit more detail.



Bass
Let's delve into the bass performance of the EW300. This provides a fantastic balance between quality and quantity. While the bass is more forward compared to other Simgot sets, it still retains the snappy and well controlled nature of those sets. Positioning wise, sub bass is more forward compared to the mid bass. The sub bass feels visceral and very engaging. Mid bass is slightly less forward but it provides hard and dynamic slam. Specially in the pink nozzle the bass seems more impactful. This does not get bloated in any circumstance. Bass speed is on the faster side. The body and layering are executed well. Decay and reverberation are ok and bass note separation is good.

Mids
Moving on to the midrange, the EW300 takes a different approach compared to other Simgot sets. Unlike classic Simgot’s midrange tuning we know, this has more balanced approach, the mids are not as forward, but in general this is more forward than neutral.. The mid bass slightly bleeds into the lower mids giving it some warmth and heft. The vocals are smooth and clear. Female vocals have a bit of extra sparkle. But the female are more fuller compared to other Simgot sets. There was almost no sibilance or harshness in the midrange. Instruments are natural but not in your face type. Personally I quite liked the attempt Simgot has taken for the EW300’s mids.

Treble
Proceeding on to the treble of the EW300, Simgot has gone for a musical tuning compared to other Simgot sets, similar to what they have done with the midrange. Although on a general prospective this still reminds me of the Simgot house sound, very detailed and technical rather than musical. The overall resolution is still quite good. Level of detail is also pretty good. EW300’s treble is energetic and lively yet still keeps a balance, not to get sibilant or harsh, at least compared to other Simgot sets. Personally I find the treble tuning blends quite nicely with the full frequency range.

Nozzles
Simgot has provided two different tuning nozzles with the EW300, a silver one with red silicone ring and a gold one with pink silicone ring. The silver one is attached stock out of the box and I mainly focused on the silver one. Shifting to the gold nozzle, this makes the sound bit more warmer, thicker and elevates the bass a bit more. Nevertheless the sound changes in each nozzle are not that significant. Simgot also provides dampening foam to smooth out the higher frequencies if they get bothersome.



Technical Sound:
Soundstage of the EW300 is decent, not the most wide but not narrow either. All three plains are decent, this has good width but the height could be better. Stage depth is good. Layering is fine, but in busy tracks it may get blended in.
Imaging is good.
Sound separation and layering is good
Cohesiveness is good
Resolution is good
Dynamics are standard
Timbre is good

Tested With
Source: cayin n3 ultra, cayin ru7, ifi go link, apple type c dongle
Eartips: stock, Final E, spinfit w1, Divinus velvet, Azla crystals
Cable: stock
Music: Tested with versatile genre of music

Simgot EW200



The Simgot EW200 is a popular budget set from Simgot. This is a single dynamic driver Iem coming in at 40$. Although the naming is similar the EW300 takes a different approach in terms of driver configuration. So to compare them both, packaging wise EW300 looks a bit better, stock accessories are also better with the EW300. Build wise they are basically same, design wise I like the EW300 a bit better (specially the HBB version). Fit and comfort as well is basically same. When it comes to sound, the EW300 has a similar tuning but its more mature and balanced sounding with elevated bass and tamer upper mids and treble. Technical sound is also a bit better on the EW300. Although the naming is similar I find they play different roles providing different in different price bracket, but if I have to choose, obviously the EW300 is better, but if you are already using the EW200 I do not think it is worth upgrading unless you are specifically looking for a more balanced sound.

Simgot EA500LM

The EA500LM is the most popular and beloved set by Simgot. This is a single dynamic driver iem coming in at 90$. This is my favorite Simgot so far and also one of my most fav sub 100$ budget sets. Comparing these two, starting with packaging, they are pretty close, but I like the EA500LM a bit better, accessories are on the same level. Build quality is almost same, maybe the EA500LM is bit better, also design wise I prefer the EA500LM. Fit and comfort is almost same. In terms of sound, EA500LM is much more technical, energetic, faster and more detailed. Bass is faster and snappier on the EA500LM, mids are more harmon like and the treble is more forward and brighter compared to the EW300. Technical performance is better on the EA500LM. If you want a fairly balanced set then the EW300 would be a better choice, and if you want a more detailed, technical set and if you are ok with bright treble then the EA500LM would be better.

Final Rating



Conclusion
So to conclude the review, do I recommend this set? I do recommend this set if you are looking for a balanced set with decent bass. I personally find this tuning to be a more versatile which I think both general consumers and more experienced audiophiles will enjoy. This is also a good entry point to Simgot iems if you are treble sensitive. Big props to Simgot for such a good all rounder set.
And huge thanks to you all for sticking around, see yall in the next one.

​

​

Introduction​

Can a sub-$100 tribrid really deliver both versatility and performance? Simgot seems to think so with the EW300, a budget-friendly IEM that offers a unique mix of drivers and customizable tuning—all without breaking the bank. With its tribrid configuration and a price tag under $100, the EW300 combines a dynamic driver, planar driver, and piezoelectric driver to create a unique listening experience. Available in three versions—Standard ($69.99), HBB edition ($75.99), and DSP version ($79.99)—the EW300 offers versatility in both build and sound profile. This review focuses on the Standard edition, which aims to deliver a well-rounded sonic experience without breaking the bank.

Build Quality and Accessories​

The Simgot EW300 features a solid CNC-machined alloy shell, making it feel durable and well-built. In terms of ergonomics, the EW300 is comfortable for extended listening sessions.

The accessory package includes three pairs of silicone eartips (S/M/L), a cable, two pairs of tuning nozzles, a carrying case, and spare nozzle foams and O-rings. While serviceable, the accessory set feels a bit limited, especially in terms of eartip variety.

Tuning Nozzles and Versatility

(Note: All frequency response graphs used in this review are courtesy of Aftersound Reviews (link), as I am currently experiencing issues with my own measurement rig)

Simgot provides two tuning nozzles for the EW300: the silver/red nozzle, which offers a warm-neutral sound similar to the Simgot house sound, and the gold/pink nozzle, which leans towards a "warm Harman" tuning, with more bass and an even smoother treble.

Personally, I prefer the silver/red nozzle. It delivers a cleaner, more engaging sound with better technicalities. In contrast, the gold/pink nozzle sounds too bloated and messy for my taste. For that reason, the entirety of this review is based on the stock silver/red nozzle.

Sound Impressions​

The sound impressions below are based on the stock cable and eartips, using the silver/red nozzle.

Click to expand...

The EW300 presents a warm-neutral sound signature, delivering an enjoyable, balanced listening experience across various genres. The sub-bass is a standout, with deep, satisfying rumble that doesn’t overshadow the mids. The midbass is punchy and fast, though not particularly textured. Importantly, there’s no bleed into the mids, allowing vocals and instruments to remain clear and well-separated. The midrange is clean, with vocals sounding natural and well-represented, making the EW300 a solid choice for vocal-focused music.

Compared to the usual Simgot sound, the upper mids on the EW300 are more laid-back, which is a nice departure from the brand’s often aggressive emphasis in this area. This tuning ensures smoothness, avoiding shoutiness even at higher volumes. The treble rolls off a bit early, so while there’s a hint of sparkle, the set doesn’t feel particularly airy. On the plus side, the treble remains non-fatiguing, making it ideal for long listening sessions without sibilance or harshness.

​

Technicalities​

In terms of technical performance, the EW300 holds its own for the price. The soundstage is expansive, with good width and depth, and imaging is accurate enough to easily locate instruments, even in busier tracks. However, there’s a slight incoherency between the three drivers, particularly in the treble region where the timbre feels a bit off. This is a common issue in IEMs with multiple drivers at this price point, so it's not surprising.

​

Drivability​

The EW300 is very easy to drive and works well with a variety of devices, from smartphones to high-end DACs and amps. Its low power requirements make it versatile for both casual listeners and audiophiles alike.

​

Conclusion​

The Simgot EW300 is a solid all-rounder IEM in the sub-$100 range, offering a well-implemented tribrid setup that brings versatility and an engaging sound signature to the table. With satisfying sub-bass, clean mids, and good technicalities, the EW300 provides plenty of value for its price. It even gives you the flexibility of switching nozzles to customize your experience. While I personally prefer Simgot’s older, brighter house sound, the silver/red nozzle presents a well-balanced tuning that should appeal to listeners who found the previous Simgot tunings too bright. For its price, the EW300 remains an excellent choice for anyone looking to explore tribrid sound without breaking the bank.

Ratings:

• Value: A+
• Tuning: A-
• Technicalities: A-
• Enjoyment: B+

Overall Rating: A (Objective Perspective)
The Simgot EW300 is a great versatile IEM around $100, offering balanced tuning and strong technicalities. It’s an excellent introduction to hybrid/tribrid IEMs and a solid option for those seeking a versatile sound on a budget.

Personal Rating: B (Subjective Take)
While the EW300 is impressive for its price, I find the tuning a bit too safe for my liking. As a fan of Simgot’s brighter house sound, I would have preferred a more engaging, energetic tuning from the silver/red nozzle. It would be great if we could replace the gold/pink nozzle with a brighter more engaging tuning.

Still, it remains a great option, even if it doesn't entirely suit my personal preferences.

This review focuses on the SIMGOT EW300 standard edition. It’s worth noting there’s also a DSP version and an HBB version, but this review will solely cover the standard edition. You can find the EW300 available at the following non-affiliate link:

https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew300



Unboxing

The EW300 standard edition comes with a simple yet sufficient accessory package, including 3 pairs of silicone ear tips, a set of small O-rings, a gold-colored nozzle filter, and a 3.5mm cable similar to the one bundled with the EA500 LM. The earpieces themselves feature a sleek, mirror-like finish, but while visually striking, they are prone to fingerprints and potential scratches. Extra care is recommended if you want to maintain their pristine appearance.



Fit & Comfort

With a nozzle diameter of 6.0mm, the EW300 offers a secure and comfortable fit. Once inserted, I found them incredibly comfortable for extended listening sessions, and I hardly noticed they were there, making them suitable for prolonged use.



Sound Signature

The SIMGOT EW300 has a warm-neutral sound signature, characterized by good detail retrieval and an overall pleasing tonality.



Bass
Right off the bat, the sub-bass performance is exceptional, delivering deep, satisfying rumble when the track calls for it without overwhelming the mid-bass. The mid-bass is punchy and detailed, offering an enjoyable slam, especially on bass-heavy tracks. It strikes a fine balance, hitting hard without overshadowing the other frequencies.

Mid-range
The lower mid-range presents a warm, full, and slightly thick character. While male vocals have richness and depth, they could benefit from a bit more clarity and separation to stand out more distinctly. Female vocals, on the other hand, are lively, detailed, and spacious, with a moderate pinna gain that keeps them from sounding harsh or shouty. Overall, the forward mid-range allows for clear vocals and instruments, although the warmth can slightly reduce the clarity of male vocal presentation.

Treble
The treble is the second standout aspect after the bass. It’s clean, detailed, and free from sibilance. While it doesn’t possess a particularly airy quality, it’s incisive and well-defined, bringing a great sense of clarity and sharpness to the high frequencies. This contributes to the EW300’s precise imaging, especially in the upper ranges.



Detail, Separation & Soundstage
In terms of detail retrieval, the EW300 is impressive for its price point, offering a balanced presentation of details without feeling overly analytical. The instrument separation is also noteworthy, allowing for clear distinction between elements of the track, and the soundstage provides enough space for instruments and vocals to breathe, enhancing the overall listening experience.

Silver vs Gold Nozzle
The gold nozzle adds some extra bass and warmth to the sound while taming the upper mid-range. However, for my taste, it made the sound too warm. Although I appreciated the added bass, I wasn't fond of how it affected the mid-range, as it reduced vocal clarity. The gold nozzle also lowered the level of detail retrieval and impacted the soundstage and imaging. Overall, it's a great option if you're looking for a laid-back, warm sound signature that's easy on the ears, but personally, I preferred the silver nozzle.



Comparisons

Vs Kefine Delci

The Kefine Delci edges out slightly in sub-bass rumble, reacting more easily to subtle bass triggers. However, the EW300 offers stronger mid-bass slam and more punch. In the treble region, the EW300 outshines the Delci with greater clarity and sharper definition, resulting in more precise imaging and better separation.



Vs SIMGOT EA500 LM

The EA500 LM has a brighter, more detailed sound signature with greater separation and precise imaging. It also has higher quality, textured bass, though less in quantity than the EW300. While the EA500 LM is more detailed, the EW300 provides a warmer, more relaxed and enjoyable tonality, making it less fatiguing for longer sessions.



Conclusion
The SIMGOT EW300 standard edition delivers a warm-neutral sound with strong sub-bass, forward mid-range, and clear, detailed treble. It offers solid technical performance with good separation and a pleasing overall tonality that makes it highly competitive at its price point. If you’re looking for a non-fatiguing yet detailed IEM with enjoyable bass and clear vocals, the EW300 is worth considering.

General/Packaging/Comfort/Build
Simgot has consistently impressed the audio community with products like the EA1000, EA500, and Supermix 4. Their latest offering, the EW300 and EW300 DSP, continues this trend with a captivating 1DD+1PLA+1PZT driver configuration.The familiar Simgot packaging houses a treasure trove of accessories, including a protective pouch, ear tips, nozzles, and cables tailored to each model. The build quality is exceptional, with meticulously crafted faceplates that exude elegance. The EW300 DSP's matte finish offers a more understated aesthetic, while the standard EW300's mirror finish gleams with sophistication.Despite their compact size, the shells provide impressive isolation and comfort, making them ideal for extended listening sessions. I experienced no discomfort or driver flex issues during my 2-3 hour listening sessions. The combination of comfort and sound quality is a testament to Simgot's attention to detail as well as consistency.


Equipment and Software used

• Simgot EW300, EW300 DSP
• iPhone 15
• Macbook Air M2
• Sony ZX300
• Fiio KA15

Foreword
My review is solely based on what I hear via my equipment and I never consider my reviews to be objective in any way rather a subjective approach. Do take into consideration that everyone’s ear anatomy is not the same, so the psychoacoustics perception might be different as well, but i believe it will not stray too far



Sound Impression (EW300 Gold Nozzle)
Upon first listening impression, if you have listened to several Simgot’s IEMs, it is very easy to tell the traits that this is a Simgot IEM, a slightly pronounced upper mids and also harmanish sound profile on the stock nozzle. I personally prefer the gold nozzle’s tuning as it gives a thicker note weight and also less pronounced upper mids. The timbre does sound quite natural to my ears with slight planar timbre. Let’s take a look at the breakdown below:

Bass

• Sub bass performance is good but slightly lacking extension to my ears, can be felt rather than heard, but when the track calls for it, it is there and not too overpowering, certainly not basshead level kind of rumble but good enough
• Mid bass is very punchy and has good texture to it, doesn’t sound bloated nor bleed into the mids
• The bass is quite speedy and can keep up with complex song such as Slipknot’s People = crap
• The bass performance is very good overall, i wouldn’t say this is a bass head’s IEM, but it definitely has a bit more bass compared to the usual Simgot’s tuning

Mids

• The mids does have good enough details but it is not that lush sounding, but for the asking price, this is totally acceptable as long as you have the right expectation
• Male vocal is not too thin sounding nor thick, texture is good, female vocal on the other hand has better energy and sweet sounding due to the energy from the upper mids
• Pinna gain is rather safe and never shouty even when the volume is being cranked up, but again, this is depending on your own tolerance

Treble

• Treble has enough energy and air but never offensive, it is definitely not dark sounding
• Amount of air and presence is slightly above average but this is understandable as it is the tuning that they strive for
• The implementation of piezo from Simgot is really well done in my opinion, it doesn’t have that kind of piezo zing that some of the brands have, kudos!

Soundstage/Imaging

• Soundstage is slightly out of your head with good width, depth and height perception is good
• Imaging is good as the instruments can be pinpointed easily even during busy track, certain complex orchestral track might not perform that wel
• The soundstage and imaging’s performance makes it very suitable for media consumption such as movies as well as gaming based on my experience
• Overall, the technicalities is quite good for the asking price

Driveability

• EW300 is not hard to drive but it does scale well with more power, in terms of dynamics and bass control
• Most of the entry level/mid range dongles will do just fine but desktop setup or mid range DAP will squeeze every bit out from the EW300

VS (EW300 DSP Stock Nozzle) Differences:

• Warmer sounding overall and slightly thicker note weight compared to the EW300
• With the gold nozzle, everything will sound a little forward
• Bass texture and speed’s performance is more or less similar
• Treble is smooth but resolution and detail retrieval capability is more or less similar
• Soundstage does sound a little bit more filling and spacious kind possibly due to the warmer sound profile from the DSP cable
• Overall, the differences are minor in terms of sound profile based on my listening experience, but is it worth the extra 10$ over the standard EW300? Yes, certainly, the matte black faceplate is really very nice, the DSP cable does do something to the stock tuning, without the DSP cable, the DSP variant is just like the standard EW300, so if you want the DSP cable for the sake of convenience, and already have other cables and you like the matte black look, you can go for the DSP variant

Comparison (NF Audio RA15)

• The RA15 features a single dynamic driver with interchangeable nozzle
• Both RA15 and EW300 features metal shell and similar in terms of sizing, no issues on the comfort both of as well as fitting
• RA15 features a more energetic sound profile and highly technical, the signature traits from NF Audio
• Note weight is slightly thinner on the RA15 even on the gold nozzle, but the timbre is very natural which is to be expected due to the transducer being a dynamic driver
• Good resolution and detail retrieval capability, pinpoint accuracy imaging but soundstage is slightly narrow compared to EW300
• Sub bass doesn’t extend that deep and mid bass is not as punchy as EW300, but bass texture and quality is good and speedy
• The mids are clean but not thin sounding, vocal performance is more or less similar to EW300
• Overall, the sound signature and driver configuration is different, i wouldn’t put it as bad or good, it’s more towards preferential kind of thing

Final Thoughts
The EW300 and its DSP variant are exceptional tribrid IEMs, showcasing a unique and effective driver combination that sets them apart. This innovative approach results in a remarkably cohesive sound, with each driver contributing harmoniously. The DSP variant offers added versatility, and while I personally prefer its finish over the standard model's mirror finish, both models are aesthetically pleasing. Whether you're a longtime Simgot enthusiast or new to the audiophile world, the EW300 and EW300 DSP are highly recommended additions to your collection.



*A big thanks to Simgot and Linsoul for sending both the EW300 and EW300 DSP over for the purpose of this review. Thanks for the support and opportunity as always

Head over to their store if you are interested in getting a pair:

Simgot EW300/EW300 DSP - Non affiliated

Introduction

As I said recently in my review of the Simgot SuperMix 4, the Shenzen-based company is still very active. Moreover, it continues on the path of multi-hybrid IEMS creations. This time, Simgot has released a true triple driver, which mounts three different transducers (1DD+1Planar+1PZT). The brand persists in offering two types of sound using two different pairs of mouthpieces. One is Silver, made of steel and has a red washer. Its reference is the Simgot Golden 2023 curve. The copper mouthpiece with a purple washer has the H-2019 curve as its reference. It is curious, but the copper mouthpiece has been designed specifically for gamers, tailored to gaming scenarios. On the other hand, the capsule is all-metal, CNC machined from high-density alloy. It has a shiny mirror finish. Its design has been possible thanks to an exhaustive 3D analysis of the ear contour and an expert ergonomic molding, providing a perfect fit.
Also, it is curious to note that there are several versions of this model: there is the standard version, the HBB limited version, in collaboration with the famous YouTuber Hawaii Bad Boy (HBB) of BadGuyGoodAudioReviews. This version has the matte black housing, but keeps the tuning of the standard model. The other version contains a USB Type-C DSP instead of the classic 3.5mm SE audio jack. Let's take a look at what this new Simgot model, in its standard version, has to offer.



Specifications

• Type of Drivers: 1 dynamic driver + 1 planar magnetic driver + 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver.
• Dynamic driver: Dual chamber dynamic transducer with 10mm composite ceramic diaphragm.
• Planar magnetic driver: 6mm annular magnetic driver.
• Frequency Response: 8Hz-40kHz.
• Effective frequency response: 20 Hz-20 kHz.
• Sensitivity: 121 dB/Vrms (@1 kHz, silver steel tube and red silicon ring); 119 dB/Vrms (@1 kHz, gold copper tube and purple silicon ring).
• Impedance: 28Ω ± 15%(@1kHz)
• Cable material: High-purity silver-plated OFC.
• Jack Connector: STD&HBB Edition [3.5mm (without microphone)]; DSP Edition [Type-C connector (with microphone)].
• Capsule Connection Type: 2Pin 0.78mm.
• Launch price: $69.99.

Packaging

The EW300 comes in Simgot's classic size packaging, which is 140x120x60mm in size. It is almost square and is black. On the main side there are alternating hearts and silver X's. The logo is at the top center and the model name and drivers are at the bottom. The logo is at the top center and the model name and drivers are at the bottom right. On the rear face you can see the frequency responses of the two mouthpieces, a description of them and the specifications in several languages. Once the cover is removed, you can access the box protected by a black cardboard flap with the external face of the IEMS engraved on it in large size. Underneath, the capsules are enclosed in dense black foam. On the outside there are two transparent plastic sheets for protection. At the bottom there is a box with the accessories. The complete contents are as follows:

• The two capsules.
• One high purity silver plated OFC cable.
• Three pairs of translucent white silicone tips with black core, sizes S*M*L.
• One pair of copper nipples, one pair of steel nipples (already installed in the capsules).
• Four red washers, four purple washers.
• Six foam filter tubes.
• One black oval zippered case.
• Instruction manual.
• Warranty card.

Although it is a continuist set of accessories, I like the zippered case and the details of accompanying washers and extra foam filters. There is only a single set of silicone tips, but I must admit that the large size is the one I usually use, filled with homemade foam, of course. Finally, the cable is the same as the brand usually uses in models of this price. Little to object, I would only like the possibility of a balanced plug option.



Construction and Design

I repeat what was written in the introduction: the capsules are all-metal, manufactured in high-density alloy by CNC. They have a shiny mirror finish. The external face has a shape that mixes flat parts with a lower curve. On one vertex is inscribed the brand name and on the opposite vertex is a gold-plated Torx screw. In the center is a depressed circle and each capsule has a different drawing. The right capsule has a pixelated heart and the left one has a pixelated cross. On the edge there is a hole near the 2Pin 0.78mm connection interface which is completely recessed. The inner side is composed of three levels. The first is flat and is inscribed with the model name and the letter indicating the channel. The second level starts with a step and grows in a cone shape towards the nozzles. The third tier is the mouthpieces themselves, with a length of 4.6mm, a center diameter of 5.1mm and a crown of 6.2mm. Like all alloys they have some weight, but not very noticeable in the ears. The construction is impeccable.
The cable has two coiled strands. Inside there are two wires, one black and one gold. It has a transparent PVC coating. The OFC cable is specified as high purity silver plated. The splitter piece is a black metal cylinder. The plug sleeve is the same, slightly longer, with the brand name written lengthwise. Both cylinders have whitish plastic cable outlet protectors. The plug is gold-plated 3.5mm SE. The pin is a gold-finished ring with a hole in its center. The connection interface is 2Pin 0.78mm and it is the classic one mounted on transparent rectangular pieces with a dot to determine the channel, as well as a barely visible raised letter. They have transparent ear guides. There is also a white Velcro strap with the brand's slogan.
This is the classic Simgot cable in this price range, while the shape of the capsules is very similar to that of the EW200 model, except for the heart and the cross.



Adjustment and Ergonomics

The ergonomics are very good. Its flat shape on the outer face makes it integrate quite well in the ears. The curved shape of the rim fits perfectly in the pinna and its integration is very high. Once the capsules are adjusted, the movement is minimal and the discomfort is almost nonexistent, fading, even the weight of the capsules. The inclination of the nozzles is sufficient for orientation to be noticeable. The length is not long enough for the insertion to be more than superficial, hopefully, it can be average if longer tips are used. As usual, I have used my large foam-filled tips, which I make at home. With them the fit is immediate and the level of insulation is good. The seal is subtly occlusive although slight movement can spoil it. To improve it, the mouthpieces should be subtly longer.
Finally, to note that a good metal construction like this implies a light weight of each capsule. But, as I said, the good ergonomics of the model means that once in the ears, this weight is relative.



Sound

Profile

Simgot presents two mouthpieces to reproduce two profiles. It should be noted that the Silver mouthpiece, made of steel and with a red washer, makes the frequency response almost identical to that of the EW200 model. It is clear that its reference is the Simgot Golden 2023 curve. With the copper mouthpiece and purple washer, its reference is the H-2019 curve. According to the brand itself, this copper mouthpiece has been designed specifically for gamers, tailored to gaming scenarios. According to the brand's own description: it excels in accurate sound reproduction, making it perfect for both audiovisual content and game playback. With powerful bass, precise positioning and immersive spatial effects, it ensures that crucial sounds such as gunshots and footsteps are clearly distinguished, giving it a competitive edge in the game.
Unlike the EW200 model and despite the fact that the H-2019 profile is very common, I will use the gold mouthpieces for the sound description.



Bass

As usual, starting in the bass with the gold-plated mouthpiece, a moderately high sub-bass boost is achieved. Simgot's good workmanship is maintained, with a deep, punchy, relatively dry and tight low end. There is a point of springy gumminess that promotes fun, but limits the punch from being too concise, adding a point of extension and relaxing the speed. Still, the brand's classic canonical bass behavior trend persists. The lower range feels deep, sufficiently clean, precise and non-invasive. Once again, the respect for the rest of the range is emphasized, allowing the voices to be free, even protagonists. This implies that the bass knows how to disconnect correctly from the upper frequencies, despite its power and energy. It does not reach Bass-Head level, but it is above neutrality. In my opinion, it is in that sweet spot that allows you to enjoy its quantity and power, but without overwhelming. It may be high for some, but not for me.
In the very low frequency pure tone test the ability of the brand in the lower range is manifested. The sound is pure, physical, dark, deep, with a natural behavior, subtle wave character, but not colored. It already achieved a great effect with the EW200 for a ridiculous price and redoubles the bet with the EW300 while maintaining excellent performance in the lower range. The translation when it comes to playing music is obvious, precision, technical skill, extended ability to follow various complex bass lines, remarkable competence in recreating different layers and layering bass. Of course, the EW300s pass the dirty, unfiltered bass test with flying colors. No suffering is shown, there is no sound out of naturalness, reproducing such bass accurately, including a soft but perceptible texture, very nice too, knowing how to maintain a very high and accurate resolution quality. Even, it still moves very well at high volumes, which attests to the great quality that treasures the low end of the EW300.
Finally, it should be noted that as a good bass emphasized in the sub-bass, its mid-range is not too prominent, allowing, on the one hand, to maintain a good volume of occupied space, on the other hand, to sound clean and never swollen.



Mids

While the bass roll-off is relatively relaxed, it seems that the midrange valley is not very pronounced. The bass possesses just enough roll-off to make the lower mids sound clean, but has enough energy to bring a slight warmth to the midrange. Again, almost 9dB separates the high end from the lower midrange. But the excitement is not very sustained in the upper mids and I think a balance has been sought when it comes to adding clarity and transparency to the sound, but respecting the smoothness, naturalness and realism of the timbre. In that respect, this is not an exalted or polarized midrange. I would delete the word “splashy” to describe the EW300s and consider using terms like “relaxed”, even “more homogeneous”. Thus, their sound is more pleasant, restrained, much more all-rounder than other IEMS in the range. Moreover, with the advantage of possessing a remarkable technical ability based on its concise, precise and resolute sound. The male voices do not appear complete, but they remain a step and a half away from the listener. Enough to be observed with clarity, feeling their body and half physicality. They don't feel thin, nor do I seem to observe that hollow feeling I usually abhor. Without being completely full, they possess a fairly full timbre, which doesn't make them thin, nor do they sound more organic and analog, very close to neutral.
The female voices gain in prominence, but are equally measured in the aspects of tonality and timbre. By gaining that half-step, they feel closer to the listener, but remain free of sibilance, performing in a very clean, clear and transparent way.
Again, I must emphasize the naturalness in the execution of the upper midrange. I think Simgot has found a very good balance, moving away from brighter profiles, as in the big EA1000s, to find a very versatile, pleasant, smooth, yet explicit and informative midrange. He's packed more meat into the bass to lower midrange transition, but also thinned out the upper mids to balance the midrange in a very musical way. The result is a double gain, maintaining resolution richness while gaining stability, weighting and timbral restraint. In this way, both the instrumentation and the voices are more profuse, lush and rich. The central range is copious and nourished, being too dense or busy, as there is plenty of room on the stage to expand.



Treble

I think the EW300s have been tuned to achieve a smooth finish with the golden mouthpiece, with a relatively controlled transition between upper mids and first treble. And so it is, the sibilances tend to zero and the first highs are sweeter, moderately well extended, with a good amount of harmonics, but without becoming penetrating, incisive or too energetic. All this implies a more relaxed listening (more demanding with the silver mouthpiece) and this is new for Simgot. As with the EW200s, it seems that this new path of more affordable IEMS may have a more musical, all-terrain and smooth tendency.
On the other hand, the combination of drivers for the high end may give a somewhat drier look on the high notes, and perhaps not the most resolving level here either. At some point, the timbre may feel subtly impaired by the behavior of these transducers.
Finally, I would like to comment on a certain limitation in the air area.



Soundstage, Separation

The scene is quite good, with a good width, noticeable lateral feel and decent height. It is not a completely open scene, but no congestion is noticeable. The perceptible sense of cleanliness, clarity and transparency gives a crisp impression of distance between elements. This characteristic does not clash with the musicality of the whole. In addition, its great fun factor, its remarkable versatility and its all-rounder character make it a set for everyday use.
Simgot has been known to squeeze the upper mids in such a way that his sound became excited, penetrating, incisive and splashy. He is adept at forcing situations of more analytical clarity, generating a very informative and expressive sound. But also more intense. With the EW300 and despite being a tribrid, Simgot has found a more restrained and organic profile. It does not possess as much expressiveness as its big brothers. While its level of macro detail jumps out, the micro detail is lost a bit more in the background of the music, being less discernible (the silver mouthpiece can subtly improve this aspect). On the other hand, it remains accurate, with a well-formed, defined image without artifice. This is not an analytical ensemble, the background is not the darkest as there is a latent cohesive feel. But it maintains a good balance in many technical aspects.



Comparisons

KZ ZS10 Pro 2 1111

The classic and popular Chi-Fi brand KZ, put on the market a good sequel called ZS10 Pro 2. Many last names, as usual in successive versions. In addition, these KZ have 4 micro switches to give more versatility to their sound. In the all ON position (1111 as I like to say) there is a clear resemblance to the EW300 with the golden mouthpiece. There is no doubt that the KZ are more economical, with 56$, they have that clear typical KZ design, with a resin capsule and open metal plate on the outside, with its semi custom shape, thicker to house the switches and the 5 drivers. The presentation is very simple, with a very fair, cheap headphone cable. The appearance of the mouthpiece seems fragile as well. Nothing to do with the EW300, metallic, with a careful design, smaller, with better cable (although it is not a marvel either, but it does not scream “change me”). The ergonomics are not bad in either model and although the EW300 are heavier, I prefer their fit as they are smaller. In the non-sound aspects, the Simgot clearly outperform the KZ. We are talking about a price of $70, $14 more, not a fortune.
In the sonic aspects you can see that both FRs are very similar. The EW300s have a bit more body in the mid bass and in the first half of the midrange. In the upper midrange they are more restrained and also in the treble, having less air and extension than the KZ. The KZs are more sensitive and at the same volume they sound louder.
FR aside, the KZs have a thinner and sharper sound, with a brighter and less dense feel. The EW300s sound relatively darker, denser, but also silkier.
I was surprised by the bass performance of the KZs, with very good behavior, darkness, density, naturalness and technical skill. The EW300s have all that and then some. A little more volume, a denser and deeper feel. It also has a little more volume and a little more power. The KZs have a little more color and are a little drier, subtly more concise. Very low frequency pure tone performance is slightly better on the Simgot, sounding a bit more natural and a bit better behaved.
In the mids, the first part is thinner and lighter in the KZs, giving the sensation of less body and less physicality. Although the proximity of the male voices is patent, thanks to the greater sense of finesse, cleanliness and transparency of the notes. The KZs are somewhat more detailed and analytical, with a point more separation. While the EW300s are warmer, more cohesive and a bit more blended.
In the upper mids the KZs are more splashy, maintaining that finer, lighter feel of their notes, accentuating that greater sense of sparkle, clarity and definition. The EW300s do not have as much definition, but their timbre and tone is more natural, full, musical and enjoyable. The KZs offer more punchy notes that become a bit unpleasant over time. The EW300s wrap the mids in a silky, harmonious richness, offering a more mellow, calm and enjoyable response.
While the first part of the treble has similarities in both models, the harmonics are more restrained and smoother in the Simgot. The KZs sound more crisp, energetic and punchy, while the EW300s are drier, with less power, a bit thicker and less extended. Both Simgot's PZT and KZ's BA drivers offer different treble reproduction. But I'll stick with the Simgot's high end performance, despite their characteristics.
The EW300s have a slightly wider soundstage, with a bit more depth and volume in it. The KZs are a bit more volatile with a bit cleaner separation.
Macro detail is obvious in the KZs, with a hint of micro detail. In the Simgot, the macro detail is more natural, not as pronounced, but clearly discernible. On the other hand, the micro detail feels more diluted.
Overall, the sound of the Simgot EW300 is more balanced, harmonious, musical, full, dense, powerful and enjoyable than the KZ. Only if the enthusiast likes to play with the switches, looks for a sharper, crunchier sound, like the one offered by the BA's of the KZ's, I can understand their purchase.



Conclusion

I like the Simgot in this price range. If I already thought the EW200s were good, the EW300s are an improved version of those. Including a tribrid configuration of drivers (1DD+1Planar+1PZT), the EW300s maintain that profile that mixes the H-2019 curve and Simgot's Target Gold, which fits my preferences very well. The Simgot EW300s have a fairly full, dense, well-balanced, musical and pleasant sound. Sibilance tends to zero and maintains a smoothness between the upper mids and first treble. This harmony makes the EW300 a very versatile model, all-rounder and ready to be used for many long sessions. The bass is practically canonical. I don't notice that hollowness that irritates me in the first part of the midrange and the upper mids stay away from shouting and harshness. On the other hand, the two filters allow us to emphasize or limit the energy level in the high and upper part, to adjust it to our preferences. But, the gold filter achieves a more placid and calm sound, maintaining that sense of cleanliness and clarity restrained, while rich and melodious.
On the physical side, Simgot maintains the design and metal construction of the capsules, adding those pixelated Love & X icons on each of them. Attached is the cable typical of the models immediately above, as well as its nice zippered case. Admittedly, there is a single set of tips. But, if I'm honest, the large Simgot tips are among the few I can take advantage of for my personal use. So, welcome to them.
Finally, with these two avenues of sonic profiling that Simgot follows in their IEMS, I'd like to see the brand look to improve the profile of the EW300s in the EA1000 range, see what they manage to do. My eyes and ears would point there without hesitation.



Sources Used During the Analysis

• EPZ TP50.
• Tempotec V3.
• Burson Audio Playmate 2.
• Aune X8 XVIII Magic DAC + EarMen ST-Amp.
• Aune M1p.

Purchase Link



You can read the full review in Spanish here

---

---

---

Specification:

• 1DD + 1Planar + 1PZT Tribrid Driver Configuration;
• Impedance: 28Ω±15%Ω;
• Sensitivity: 121dB;
• Frequency response range: 20Hz-20kHz;
• Connector: 0.78mm 2-pin;
• Cable material: High-purity silver-plated OFC;
• Price:70$.

What's in the box:

• IEM itself;
• 2 pin 0.78mm 4 core High-Purity Silver-Plated OFC Cable,1.2m length;
• 3 sets, 6 pairs of eartips (S / M / L);
• Detachable Nozzles;
• Sealed rings;
• Damping foam;
• Carrying case.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Simgots are V-shaped and tuned according to the Harman-2019 curve, but their sound is quite different from Simgot’s usual tuning, which typically emphasizes the high frequencies. Let me explain why.




Let's start with the bass. It’s impressively rich!



Balance of Tonality
The midrange is handled by a 6mm ring planar driver, which is impressively accurate and naturally mapped midrange. I like the tribrid setup used in the EW300 because each driver is tuned almost to perfection. As a result, the planar driver doesn't sound stiff or have a metallic tint.

Quality > Quantity


Separating, sound stage


Gaming impression

---

Simgot EW300 vs Simgot EW200:

vs Simgot EA500LM:



vs BQEYZ Weather Series Cloud

---

This EW300 IEM has been provided to Audio reviews Downunder by Simgot Audio and we thank them and will provide honest assessment in kind.

Introduction

Simgot’s very successful budget models of EW100 and 200 were well received in the past and provided a pathway for many people to experience quality audio for very little investment. Both the previous models were single dynamic drivers and Simgot decided to step up the game with the next model introducing a hybrid IEM. The Simgot EW300 has a single DD plus a 6mm annular planar magnetic driver and piezoelectric ceramic driver and comes in at a higher but still reasonable $70USD.

Simgot have made two versions of the set, and This is a review of the standard model.

EW300 standard edition. Simple, no-frills version.

EW300 HBB edition at $10 more and features a DSP cable connector.

What’s in the Box?

Simgot provide a reasonably good quality cable with a 3.5mm termination> this cable is fairly lightweight but has a good supple feel and a usable neck slider. Included are a minimal set of silicone tips and a nice leatherette zipper case to travel with. There are also two sets of nozzles which alter the sound. Silver for cleaner more neutral sound with enhanced treble and a set of gold nozzles which damp down the treble and smooth out the sound. Simgot also provided a set of foams to be placed inside the nozzle that can further tame the treble response



My listening tests were conducted using a 4.4mm balanced cable either with my Hiby R3 Saber DAP or in conjunction with a Cayin RU6 dac. I preferred to use a wide bore tip to accentuate the mids and highs and I also get a good ear canal seal using Divinus velvet wide bore tips.

Its driveability is good. Needs a little more power/ volume than EW200 or EA1000 due to multi drivers I used 38 to 40 levels depending on the recording on my Cayin RU6. The former two Simgots give good sound pressure at 30. The EW300 scales well with a more powerful input with the dynamics coming alive.
I find the comfort with the EW300 very good. The smallish metal shell and the tapered metal nozzle assembly fit snugly and securely with good isolation.




The Sound.

What the EW300 is not is a V shaped tuning or a bland Harman shaped tuning. It is a breath of fresh air being a balanced, detailed neutral sounding IEM with excellent technicalities.

The EW300 has a forward presentation with vocals and instruments pushed close to the listener. The good thing is there is good separation of voice and instruments with a great soundstage creating an open and reasonably expensive sound. There is no congestion or muddiness in tracks.
A good example is "Erase me " by Lizzy Mcalpine. Lizzy's voice is right inside your head putting you right at the microphone. Drums and synths are right up with her. There is a sense of depth and space, but this track is rendered very intensely.
Treble performance is good but perhaps not as detailed or extended as the driver combination would suggest. Cymbals seem muted and acoustic guitars are missing that little extra zing. There is also a lack of airiness in the high frequencies. Having said that treble sensitive listeners with appreciate the lack of sibilance or shoutiness. These comments come from the point of view of a bit of a treble head who has been listening to a planar for a week. As I listen more, I can appreciate the way the treble balances with the rest of the frequencies.

The strength of the Simgot EW300 is a tonally correct midrange with a good sub bass and a balanced presentation. Combine this with its great soundstage and spacious unmuddied sound and you have a versatile instrument that's easy to listen to for extended periods. Combine it with a revealing source and the EW300 impressed with its musicality and lack of vices. Listen to "Billie Bossa novel by Billie Eilish and the percussive clicks and deep bass line underline her intimate vocals. Impressive.

Pump up the volume with a little rock and City and Colours "A Little Mercy" and the kick drum and snares have good bite and impact. The Simgot has plenty of rock potential. EDM is solid and dynamic. The EW300 is the IEM you want to grab when you want fun and excitement. There's nothing retiring or laid back with this set. I tried the gold nozzles but found the bass to be boomy and missed the treble emphasis. I experimented by adding two foam inserts in each nozzle and that improved the balance for my ears. Treble seemed to be barely diminished but the overall balance was a tad less aggressive.



Comparisons and conclusion

Compared to the Simgot SuperMix4 this set is far superior in clarity, dynamics and staging. Compared to the single DD EW200 the 300 has a less harsh more mature and sophisticated sound without any treble harshness. Compared to the big brother EA1000 it can't match the cleaner deep reaching bass with its beautiful timbre. You also hear vastly improved details and treble which is extended and yet easy to hear. Stage is more open, and the vocalist has more airiness and expansiveness. Thus the EA1000 at three times the price easily exceeds the budget IEM’s capabilities but the genes of the big brother are obvious. Both have a similar forward presentation, but it is more emphasized with the EW300 because of the smaller soundstage. The two IEMS have a similar tonality and that's a big plus for the new EW300.

Anyone looking to upgrade from the budget models or simply purchase a capable IEM at this price point will be well served and impressed with the Simgot EW300.

Simgot EW300

Simgot folks are hard at work to bring personal audio enthusiasts some very good bang for your money IEMs. Just because an IEM is considered in the budget sector, does that mean it has to sacrifice sound quality to do so? The answer to that is not really. If any of their IEMs are indicators on what Simgot has been doing. You can guess the newer EW300 will also have some formidable chops when it comes to sound quality. The EW300 is a tribrid meaning it is using 3 types of drivers for its sound quality. A nicely resolving 10mm ceramic composite dynamic for its bass to mids coverage + 6mm planar driver for its trebles + 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver for the upper highs. Included in an all-metal compact smaller shell.

This shell design is very similar in shape and size to the prior EA200, being able to cram 3 complete non BA drivers into a shell of this compact size is an achievement. An all metal design gives fairly decent passive isolation with the added strength of being a metal design. The EW300 as far as comfort and use, should last the test of time. Most Simgot IEMs use metal vs something like Resin or plastics for the housing. An accidental drop per drop, it will be the all metal build that might get scratched but will definitely be ok from the occasional drop or scrape. Resin and plastic builds, not so much. Its Build and comfort due to compact size with an average yet decent passive isolation is on the good side of all things IEMs.

EW300 comes with an oval zip up case, 3 sets of standard silicone tips, an extra set of tuning nozzles in a different golden colored nozzle vs the silver colored nozzle that was installed from the factory. Comes with extra small rubber ring spacers for the nozzles, apparently the rubber spacers tend to break off from the nozzles. A bit of a bonus is that the package also includes some dampening foams. The idea of the foams here is that if you feel either of the nozzles here brings a bit too much brightness to how you like your IEM sound than you can stuff one of these small foams underneath one of the nozzle sets for the EW300 for a less forward upper mids to lower treble presence. This small included foam mod for the existing nozzles effectively smooths out the tonal character a touch and tones down the trebles a bit to where you can actually tolerate aggressively recorded music.

Of course this will all depend on just how much hearing sensibilities you have with clarity and or brightness you like for your IEM sound experience. It might also depend on what genres of music you listen to as well. I do notice Simgot IEMs in general does not excel for rock and metal music where upper registers crash cymbals and screaming guitars at play brings a bit more presence than I would like for Rock and Metal music but otherwise clarity is the name of the game it seems for the Simgot IEM including the EW300.

Simgot IEMs are all harmon tuned so you know. That means they all incorporate at least 10dbs of upper mids emphasis. The famous Simgot harmon tuning brings more presence for the upper registers of what you're hearing. If you're looking for analogue type warmth from any of their IEMs then you are looking at the wrong brand. When reviews mention warmth on a Simgot IEM, they are more closer to neutral in all things tonal quality vs any real warmth, true warmth in an IEM sound means they would have much more balanced mids presentation where there are more substantial lower mids at play to be balanced with the upper mids. Unfortunately most “harmon” tuned IEMs will lack in the lower mids department vs having substantial upper mids meaning most will be either neutral or slightly bright sounding or both in the case of the EW300.

The included gold nozzle is a modified version of the stock harmon tuning and it is a touch more reserved in the upper mids and treble registers to my ears but otherwise the actual technical character and their sound seems to be fairly similar with the gold nozzles being a bit more forgiving vs the silver nozzles. In tinkering around with the foams I like the silver nozzles with the foam inserts which sounds more balanced to my ears and best of all I can actually appreciate my rock and metal tracks. To be fair, most Chinese manufacturers are not going to care so much for your rock music library. They tuned them for more vocal and instrumental presence, especially female vocals so I can understand the harmon approach, I do appreciate that the foams are a part of the package here to help bring greater variability for their EW300. My review is mostly based on using them foams with the silver nozzle as it was a part of the package.

I do recommend a good burn-in for the EW300 because it is using 3 drivers that are not the same. I did notice an increase of coherency and dynamism after burn in so it seems these definitely need some run in with some music. How long you do that for is up to you but I would recommend a solid 100 hours at least.

Just because the EW300 is yet another Simgot harmon tuned IEM, does not mean it will sound exactly like its brothers that came out before it. I do find that the EW300 reminds me the most of the little brother to the acclaimed EA1000. Which in of itself is a bit surprising, however it does have its own sound presentation and is not exactly as refined as the EA1000. Where it reminds me of the EA1000 is just how technical they sound. The idea of utilizing 3 different types of drivers for a sound design is to bring the strengths of each driver to be taxed in a certain portion of the sound to your ears. In the case of the EW300, it is clear to me the bass and the mids are handled by the 10mm Ceramic composite dynamic, the 6mm annular magnetic planar handling the trebles and the Piezo ceramic handling the ultra highs.

With two dedicated drivers handling the high notes you can guess what the sound angle is for the EW300. It is a surprisingly highly detailed and technical sounding IEM, almost leaning analytical. I say almost because of its technical ability and its detailed treble presence. If you feel that either of the stock nozzle configurations sounds a touch aggressive to your ears for the upper registers of sound. Again that is exactly what the included foams will help with.

Trebles
It is interesting that Simgot is using a smaller planar driver for its treble performance. Planars have no issue with treble articulation and extension. Its timbre is another matter. Trebles have a slightly rigid metallic timbre with a thinner note presentation than the mids and or the bass. This being said, It actually does an amicable job at the treble note being taxed with every bit of the treble presence and its note transients. Simgot is not the only manufacturer tapping into the ability of the planar treble here and it is good to see folks use this particular driver for its strengths. For the most part the cohesion is good but not outstanding here due to the thinner treble notes vs the mids and bass. Adding a piezoelectric ceramic driver for the ultra highs, which handles that shimmer and the EW300s high overtones and you get a nice pronounced crisp picture of your trebles for a budget level IEM that is not all too common. Using 2 types of drivers for the highs are more reserved for higher end IEMs in the market. The piezo ceramic tweeter is basically a poor man's EST driver used on much higher end IEMs. For the most part does a good job at what it is taxed with but does have its limitations due to a characteristic tinny metallic tonal character. It's not exactly what ESTs do for the upper trebles but for the money paid, if the implementation is good, it's not a bad way to hear your trebles like what is on EW300. You will get a type of treble articulation that is not heard too much in the price range albeit that characteristic planar & piezo timbre. Its timbre it's just a touch rigid and not as liquid as it could be but otherwise what you're actually getting is a snapshot of higher end IEM treble performance on the cheap. And that is never a bad thing.

Mids
The coherency of the 3 drivers are surprisingly good and the mids of the EW300 brings Simgots clean clear midrange into view. Its stage while average for IEMs is another surprise. Sounds spacious for its average stage and depth. I do notice the EW300 benefits from some amping, even though it is an easy to drive IEM. I can understand why Simgot markets a DSP version of the EW300 to be for gaming as much as music listening. The mids are clean and more neutral in foundation, meaning it's not a forward sounding IEM nor is it recessed. Its harmon mids tuning definitely has a bias toward female vocals vs male vocals. Male vocals are not bad here but I can’t say any Simgot tuned IEM will be a male vocal specialist. It's just ok, where it sounds more forward will be for female vocals. Of course if you have an affinity for female vocal performances. Simgot IEMs will be right up your alley.

The ceramic composite driver used for the bass and mids has a resolving ability not too common at the price range. Simgot IEMs have a natural ability for the technical elements for the sound presentation and the EW300 is no different. Its mids imaging, timbre, stage, sound separation and tonal character are all done very well on the EW300. Its tuning for the most part is balanced with a bias toward clarity and its mids are a strong suit for its overall sound quality. I noticed the EW300 amped is where they sound much more spacious with well defined edges to music notes for better imaging. Its technical character is evident regardless of the source you are using but definitely comes more alive with your better amped sources. My IFI signature, Ibasso PB5 for example. On the Ibasso PB5 they don't sound anything like a sub $100 IEM.

Mids have good clarity as just about all Simgot IEMs do, its imaging is a stand out and sounds for the most part, accurate in tonal character to my ears but can sound a touch bright without the foam inserts inside the silver nozzle. The gold nozzle reduces some of the upper mids extension and does come off a bit more subdued in its clarity vs the silver nozzle, adds a touch more lower mids and bass emphasis which brings a slight bit of warmer tonal character vs the stock silver nozzle. If I was to complain about the mids, it would be that it's lacking a bit of depth and note weight. Hence not exactly good for male vocals. Its lack of real warmth does not bother me but using a warmer sounding source synergizes much better with the EW300. IFI Signature, Fiio M15s, Shanling M6 pro, Ibasso DX300Max, Ibasso PB5. Its mids are a touch dry sounding but otherwise makes up for it with a clean and mostly accurate tonal character.


One thing I always try to do, especially with budget level IEMs is to maximize its potential. Simgot is limited in what it can include with a $69 IEM which goes without saying, hence the included stock cable will get you there but is by no means optimal for the EW300 to sound its absolute best. I highly suggest cable rolling. I suppose it will depend on how much weight you put into the effects of a good IEM cable upgrade but the stock cable is the type that will show you the sound of the EW300 and will certainly let you know what you are dealing with. However, in trying out Simgot’s own LC7 cable. It is very clear to me that the stock cable limits the ability of the resolving drivers in the EW300. That lack of depth and note weight can be mitigated with an upgraded cable of all things. It is when I am using the LC7 cable on the EW300 on my Ibasso PB5 and this makes the EW300 sound like a much more expensive IEM vs its actual price tag. If you own the EW300, I know the cable here costs as much as the IEM itself which breaks my own rule about not using a cable that costs as much as the IEM. BUT, you can definitely hear the potential of the EW300 with stock cable and all. Just know you can get it to sound even better with better cables and a warm dynamic sounding source.

Bass
Another strong suit for the EW300. Its bass is surprisingly good in quality. This is another aspect that reminds me of the EA1000. So you will never hear a Simgot made IEM with the sloppy burly type bass. It is the tighter, speedy and well defined bass notes that I am used to from Simgot. They seem to have an affinity for quality and not quantity for the sake of more quantity. I would say emphasis is just a bit more than what I consider moderate bass. It's not quite basshead level yet it will clearly punch and rumble with good distinction to its notes. It is more accurate in all aspects of bass with good speed and tightness. EW300 leans more subbass emphasis vs mid bass with an accurate decay and good texture. Bass on a Simgot made IEM is never inadequate but seems to straddle a fine middle line of emphasis but always with good to excellent quality for bass. The bass quality is not exactly at the level of the EA1000 but it's got a surprising quality to the bass notes that brings solid detail to the low notes that is well represented in IEMs at double the price point. I am sold on the driver being used for the bass and mids. It is clear to me the ability of this driver is on full display and the good news there is that your average consumer of personal audio will have no idea just how good this particular driver is for the sound it is taxed with. For the given price point the bass end is the one very strong point of reference for this IEM. I am more impressed with the EW300 bass ability than the bass ability for the higher end Super mix 4 to be honest.

Gaming.
Ok so that is the one area where Simgot has put in their marketing that these IEMs are well suited for gaming. And I have to agree. These are not only good for gaming they are excellent at gaming. Its detail and imaging element is really what makes these IEMs a standout for gaming. The ability to hear faint noises and positional cues are very important to gaming. Not to mention the addition of enough dynamism for dramatic shifts in sound presentation at all times. The Simgot EW300 are very good at media of all types let alone gaming and music. Watching movies on the go with them is a treat due to decent passive isolation with the ability to hear clear vocals and something like explosions with sound effects ranging from gun fire to speeding cars all sounds great. I suppose you can use your premium expensive IEM to watch movies and game with but why? These will sound just as good and not to mention you can carry them around and not worry they might get dinged up or mishandled somehow. I am impressed with the sound quality and the usability of the EW300. It is a clear step up from the EA200 in my book and in many ways hangs with the EA500 and the LM version. I actually prefer these to their recent supermix4, which cost more and with a SQ that is not exactly better than the EW300. I can understand why Simgot has made 3 different versions of the EW300. Don't know anything about the HBB version, apparently it's just a color thing and the DSP version which I have yet to open up and listen to. That is what's next for me.

In the end the EW300 is a solid IEM and even though it still adheres to Simgots harmon tuning and all, there aren’t too many technically proficient IEMs at this price range that does all the things the EW300 does well. I like that Simgot has considered its user base and added a way of quickly modifying the EW300 to ones likes in a sound. Versatile with decent passive isolation. Its technicalities are what wins the day for the EW300 over other budget sets. Clean tonal character with headroom for improvement via the type of sources and cables you can use on them. I have heard the peak EW300 using the LC7 cable and my Ibasso PB5 and one of these days I am gonna test the hearing of a good friend to see if he can tell the difference using this combo vs using an optimized EA1000 to see if he can hear much of a difference. While the planar and piezo combo does not bring the absolute tops in timbre or articulation. It does more right than wrong with one of the better implementations for piezo ceramic super tweeters. For a sub $100 that in of itself makes these a solid recommend but also that it is using one of the better dynamic drivers I have heard being used at its price point for bass and mids. I went from reviewing a $4,000 IEM to this $69 IEM and you know what? I enjoyed the EA300 for what is and that says a lot about what Simgot has done for the EA300. Thanks for taking the time to read.

Standardly disclaimers: I would like to thank Fia Lam of Simgot for providing the Simgot EW300 for the purpose of a review. You can look up their Simgot EW300 IEMs here

Intro
SIMGOT is a renowned brand in the world of audio, specializing in headphones and in-ear monitors. I've previously owned the EM10 and Supermix 4, and now here's a short review of the EW300 DSP.

This model takes a bold departure from SIMGOT’s usual sound signature, offering a rich, punchy audio experience.

Features
The EW300 integrates a three-driver setup:

A 10mm dynamic driver for bass and mids.
A 6mm planar magnetic driver and a custom piezoelectric driver that focus on the highs.
SIMGOT has released three versions of the EW300:

Standard Version (which is the focus of this review)
HBB Limited Edition (similar sound, different black color scheme)
EW300 DSP Edition (features a USB-C cable with an integrated DAC and DSP tuned specifically for the EW300, and includes a microphone)

Specifications
Driver Configuration: 10mm dynamic + 6mm planar magnetic + piezoelectric ceramic drivers
Impedance: 28Ω±15%(@1kHz)
Sensitivity: 121dB/Vrms
Frequency Response: 8Hz-40kHz
Connector: 0.78mm 2-pin
Cable: High-purity silver-plated OFC, 3.5mm termination for the standard version, USB-C with DSP for the DSP edition.

Priced at USD69.99 to USD79.99

You can purchase the EW300 using the unaffiliated link below:
https://www.linsoul.com/products/si...fyUugPDcFmFI7D9d_JG5KKif2n3nHLm9H6dhS2F5VDm3J

Build Quality and Comfort
The EW300 is a well-constructed IEM with CNC machined housing that fits comfortably.
It comes with 3 sizes of silicone eartips, two pairs of tuning nozzles, extra silicone rings, foam filters, and a high-quality cable.

Tuning Nozzles
Steel with Red Ring: Emphasizes more mid-bass and upper treble.
Golden Copper with Purple Ring: More V-shaped, suitable for gamers, with a Harman 2019 target.
The differences between these two tuning nozzles are minimal, but they offer subtle tweaks to the sound profile. For this review, I stick with the steel nozzles.

Sound Impressions
Bass: Deep and textured, with great sub-bass and tight control. The warmth in the lower frequencies adds a pleasing, non-intrusive thickness to the sound.
Midrange: Warm and lush, delivering excellent detail and balance.
Treble: Clear and articulate, though occasionally lacking in finer details.
Soundstage: Good, though not extraordinary; it’s a balance between warmth and expansive sound.
Timbre: Warm and natural, without being too dark.

Comparison to SuperMix 4
The $149 SuperMix 4 offers superior detail, a larger soundstage, and more accurate imaging. However, the EW300 excels in bass performance and offers a fuller, more intimate sound experience.
Both are equally good and you have to decide on which price point and sound signature you want to go for.

Conclusion
The SIMGOT EW300 is a fantastic IEM for its price, offering punchy bass and a warm, forgiving sound. The tuning nozzles add versatility, and it provides a satisfying audio experience for those who enjoy rich, bass-driven music without sacrificing detail.
Lastly, just purchase the DSP version and cable roll instead. That will save you some $.$

Simgot EW300

Hello there and welcome to my impression & experience of Simgot’s successor to the EW series IEM, this is the EW300 which has a 1DD, 1 Planar and 1 PZT coming in at $70. There’s apparently three versions to this, this version, a HBB version with a black color scheme ($75) and a DSP version ($80) so plenty of versions to choose from but what I have here is the base version. I hailed the predecessor which is the Simgot EW200 as one of the best budget IEM for 2023 and I was blown away by its price to performance for the EW200 but now the EW300 is coming in double the price but it also carries a planar magnetic and a PZD driver inside it instead of a single DD in the EW200 so will we be getting double the performance?



Disclaimer

Keep reading to find out but before we dive deeper, I’d like to take this opportunity to thank Betty from Simgot for sending the EW300 in exchange for my honest opinion however as always, all thoughts and opinions are my own and are not influenced by any parties. Now that’s all out of the way, read on for the specification of the EW300 and also, let’s talk accessories



Specification

Driver Configuration: 1 Dynamic Driver + 1 Planar + 1 Piezoelectric Ceramic Driver

Sensitivity: 28 ohms

Impedance: 121dB/Vrms

Cable Material: High Purity Silver Plated OFC Cable

Connector: 0.78mm

Termination: 3.5mm



Unboxing & Accessories

The unboxing experience of the Simgot EW300 is very similar to many other Simgot releases where opening the box you’ll have this front page but this time they’ve got the outline of the IEM’s design on that page. Opening that page will reveal contents inside and you have the IEMs themselves at the top portion, another box under that which has a set of interchangeable eartips, at this point they should just either give more eartips or find a way to condense this packaging a little bit more because a big long box for just a set of eartips is overkill. The other box contains the usual warranty and instruction manuals and the carrying case.



The carrying case is pretty much the same as the others where it’s just a simple, generic black carrying case. Nothing special about it but at least you have a carrying case for your IEMs. For this package, they also give you a set of interchangeable tuning nozzles, a few sets of foam dampeners, a few extra nozzle rings to differentiate your tuning nozzles and of course, the stock cable and the cable is also the same as the Supermix. It’s just an okay cable, it does the job and I feel it suits the budget packages but I kinda wished they gave a better stock cable to the Supermix now but that’s just a preference thing. In terms of unboxing experience and accessories, aside from the tuning nozzle and associated accessories that comes with it, it’s pretty much the same as other budget releases from Simgot.




Design
For the design of the EW300, it’s essentially the same shell design as the EW200 with the addition of the X and heart engraved onto each faceplates and the addition of a bigger screw at the faceplate. It still has that mirror chrome finish but that also means that it’s a huge fingerprint magnet so you have to carry a wiping cloth if you want it looking pristine. The HBB version comes in a powdercoated black finish so that would be less prone to fingerprint magnet compared to this but it’s a simple design but with a bolder looking faceplate from the EW200 with the Xs and Hearts.

Fresh out of the box


After multiple finger touches throughout the day


Comparison with EW200 (Left: EW300, Right: EW200)



Fit and Comfort

For fit and comfort, surprisingly despite having 2 additional drivers in it, it wears pretty much the same as the EW200 which is to say, it still retains its compact form factor and I can wear this IEM for hours without it applying any unnecessary pressure or pain to my ears.



Sound

So just testing the EW300 with the silver nozzle first. Bass has the speed and cleanliness to its attack, carries the weight of the bass notes but not necessarily the most impactful punch and slam. It lacks a little bit of that rumble that planar is known for but I believe the dynamic driver is playing the role in the bass department and the tradeoff for not having that much sub bass is so the mid bass comes across cleaner when it hits. Background music are slightly pushed back but it gives the vocals some room to be in the forefront but you can still hear what's going in the background and it doesn't steal the spotlight away from the singer. There's some energy from the top end so vocal notes does retain it's open sounding nature and clarity but it's a little shaved off to give the overall presentation a bit of smoothness so if you're looking for something a bit sparklier or have something with a bit more bite then the EW300 will not fit that criteria. Imaging and detail retrieval is really good with the drivers contributing to add some clarity to their positioning despite being recessed in the presentation and while the attack of those details is not the sharpest or most distinct due to the nature of how this IEM is tuned, it still retains its imagery and clarity of details. It definitely delivers a bit more and competes with IEM at this price category while still not taking over the spot from its bigger brother. It has some sense of depth within the soundstage and it's not overly wide. All in all, on the silver nozzle, it delivers a safe sounding presentation but still giving you a little bit more from your music to keep you engaged.



Gold Nozzle

When you're switching to the gold filter from the silver filter, I'm hearing a bit more sharpness to the top end and the bass presence is a little bit more audible in the presentation which can be a good or a bad thing depending on how much you want the bass to come through from your music. The setback to that is that it masks some of the subtle nuances in the background music and due to the positioning of the background music, and having the bass more on the forefront, it does take the spotlight away however the differences between the nozzles are very minor and it would take a lot of focus to truly differentiate between them, dependant on how sensitive you are to the changes in the sound. If you found any of the treble energy being a little much on either one of these 2 nozzles, you can add a dampening foam in there just to smoothen it out a little bit. My personal preference would be the silver nozzle but if there's a day where i just want to hear more bass from my music, at least I've got that option with the gold nozzle



VS EW200

Till this day I still hold the Simgot EW200 to high regards for its price to performance so it only makes sense to compare between the 2 to see if the Simgot EW300 will be replacing the EW200 as my top budget pick so when it comes to their sound. The EW200 sounds a touch more recessed, background music is more on the same place as the vocals and as an overall, the attack on its note weight is a bit flatter in comparison. The Simgot EW300 definitely has more meat to their bass notes. The background music sounds a bit more in the background, vocals are a bit more forward it its positioning within the soundstage and treble energy is a bit more smoothen out, which could also be contributed by their positioning in relation to the singer where it’s more in the background as opposed to being on the same place as the singer, which is what is presented in the EW200.

In terms of imaging and detail retrieval, because of the small differences in their presentation, the EW200 put the background music more in focus whereas it's more recessed in the EW300 but despite that, it's still made audible so I think that's where the EW300 edges out the EW200 in that sense because of the limitation of the driver from the EW200 and furthermore, I feel where the EW300 is a little bit more justified with its slightly fuller presentation, the additional nozzles and of course, the extra drivers so it's sort of future proofing this device against many others in this lineup. However, if you're on a budget, the EW200 still holds as my top pick for budget -fi level IEM. In terms of power, having a planar and a piezoelectric driver does mean that it takes a little bit more to power the EW300 compared to IEMs in general that has a single dynamic driver so be sure to bring something with power and once you feed the EW300 some juice, it’ll sing for you.



Conclusion

So in summary, I think Simgot was successful in releasing a successor to the EW300 when it comes to sound presentation but the Simgot EW200 still holds the reign when it comes to price to performance and I feel you’re getting more like a different alternative to the Simgot EW200 rather than a direct upgrade that totally disregards the EW200’s existence which is great in a way where you now have options in 2 separate price brackets and the Simgot EW300 does offer a bit more with its asking price, not only from its sound but also their accessories. However, this is based on one man’s experience and I’m curious to know your thoughts, will the EW300 be taking the throne as the top budget pick of 2024? Is the EW200 still the pick for some? What are your experience like with the EW300? Comment below, let me know and with that all said, thank you once again to Betty, Simgot and to all of you for reading this article. Until the next impression, take care and happy listening

Intro:
This IEM was sent directly by the Simgot Discord admin for me to discuss my impressions. The EW300 I'm discussing is the standard version.

For the completeness, it's just standard at a price of around one million rupiah. There's a hard case, 3 pairs of eartips, a cable, and the IEM. The housing design and material are cool. Made of metal that is quite solid, but you have to be careful because the paint color like the housing of this ew300 tends to be prone to scratches. There's also a love and cross logo on the faceplate. The cable material feels thin and not good in my opinion, typical of other Simgot IEMs.

The driver configuration of this ew300 is 1 dd + 1 planar + 1 piezo. This IEM tends to be quite light when drive to weak sources like cellphones.

I almost forgot that this IEM also has a gold nozzle which I don't think is necessary, haha. The gold nozzle makes the bass bigger and less well controlled. In addition, the technique is also worse than the silver nozzle


How is the sound impression? Let's get straight to it..

Bass:
The tuning of the ew300 is a harman warm ushape. The bass has a sufficient quantity, a little dominant in the mid bass which feels heavy with good impact and texture.

The sub bass extension is quite rumble, although it is not that deep. The bass character tends to be tight, with a fairly short decay, and good control. The speed is also fast.

Mid:
The mid position is slightly behind the bass. The mid presentation is a bit unique because the male vocals feel more backward than the female vocals which are more forward, with a different timbre and tuning.

Does that mean it's less coherent? Yes, the mids don't feel that coherent. Especially in featuring songs of male and female vocals such as biar menjadi kenangan, the emptyness machine, beauty and the beast, etc.

It really feels like the male vocal timbre is more of a dd timbre with sufficient weight, less airy and less sweet. While the female vocal feels like a planar timbre with a sweet, airy, clean, and light presentation. Actually, this is also felt in jpop songs like Omokage which is dominated by the dd bass beat that responds to the vocals of millet, aimer, and lilas in the planar driver. The incoherence is also felt here.

This makes the coherence and mid tuning IMO not as coherent as Supermix 4. So it feels a bit annoying and confusing when I'm trying to enjoy the song, there are some differences, the musical nuances are not unified. Fortunately, the peaks and sibilance are minimal here. It is also safer from shouty compared to Supermix.

Treble:
The shortcomings in the mids are fortunately covered by the good treble presentation from the piezo driver. The timbre is quite natural and there is minimal sensation of disturbing piezo timbre in the treble.

The treble presentation feels crisp with a pretty good extension. The treble body is also just right, not too thin and not aggressive either. The cymbal sound feels addictive here. The treble extension is quite good, although not too extensive. The treble has minimal peaks and sibilance, but in rock songs it still feels a bit dry, typical of a piezo driver.

Technical:
Technically, the ew300 feels improved compared to the ew200 and em6l. Especially the resolution, micro details, and details are better than both.

The stage also feels wider, and tends to be wider. The depth of the stage is sufficient with a good stage height. The imaging is quite good, although not as precise as the imaging of the Titan s2 and hexa. The separation is also good, although not as good as CCA Hydro and Hidizs ms3. Compared to the two, the separation of the ew300 still feels a bit stacked. The clarity is quite clear with fast transient speed. It's quite good for rock or metal songs.

Unfortunately, the dynamics are standard, still similar to the Supermix which also lacks dynamics.

Outro:

Almost, bro. That's the sentence I can express while using the ew300. This IEM actually has good potential if only the mid sector was made more coherent like its big brother, the Supermix. Even though this IEM is good for all around.

Is it true that the ew300 is more worthy than the Supermix? Of course not, bro. The Supermix is almost superior in all sectors compared to the ew300, except for the bass which is more thumping on the ew300 and the lower mid which is thicker on the ew300 (that only adds to the problem in its coherence). Technically I can say it's different according to the price, supermix is better.

Another thing I noticed is that the scalability of the ew300 is not that good. Changing cables, sources, and tips doesn't make the technical and tonal increase quite differently. Some of these things make it difficult for me to put the ew300 into my top 3 under 100$ IEMs.

This rank now occupied by Sivga Que, Titan S2, and Tinhifi Dudu.

TL;DR: Smooth, detailed, chill sound without the Simgot spice

Overview/History
Hi all.

Another review/write up coming through - this time from a company that's been a bit of a Chi-Fi darling - Simgot. Simgot has numerous IEMs from varying price ranges including the EA500LM, EM6L, Supermix 4, etc. - each have it's biggest fans while there are some that aren't as warm on them.

Enter the Simgot EW300 which is the next step up from Simgot's budget line up with the EW100 and EW200. The primary thing that sticks out for the EW300 is that the tuning for this IEM was influenced by HBB/Bad Guy Good Audio/Hawaii Bad Boy. From my understanding, HBB made the argument to Simgot that their line up/fans are already used to their tuning so why not vary it up a bit to capture more market share.


*Official image from Linsoul*

Thus, we have the EW300 which has 3 different versions:

Standard
HBB Collab version (which comes with a matte shell instead for $5 more)
DSP version (which comes with the matte shell and a DSP cable instead for $10 more)

The Simgot EW300 is a tri-brid design with a 1DD + 1 Planar + 1 Piezoelectric (PZT) driver. The 10mm DD is used for the bass notes while the 6mm Planar and custom Piezoelectric handle the mid-range and highs. Tuning is handled by nozzles with the idea of following H-2019 (likely Harman 2019) and what they call the 'Simgot-GOLDEN2023' tuning choices.

Specifications so you don't have to look yourself from Linsoul's website:

• Driver configuration: 1 dynamic driver + 1 planar magnetic driver + 1 piezoelectric ceramic driver
• Dynamic driver: 10mm ceramic composite diaphragm dual-chamber dynamic driver
• Planar magnetic driver: 6mm annular magnetic driver
• Impedance: 28Ω±15%(@1kHz)
• Sensitivity: 121dB/Vrms (@1kHz, silver steel tube&red silicone ring); 119dB/Vrms (@1kHz, golden copper tube&purple silicone ring)
• Frequency response range: 8Hz-40kHz
• Effective frequency response: 20Hz-20kHz

Disclaimers: I would like to thank Kaitlyn from Linsoul for this review sample that was received in exchange for my honest opinion. I was not given any directions or instructions so the statements below are all my genuine take.

You can pick up the Simgot EW300 at these Non-affiliate links:
Linsoul website: https://www.linsoul.com/
Linsoul Aliexpress Store: https://ddaudio.aliexpress.com/store/2894006
Linsoul USA Amazon Store link: https://www.amazon.com/s?me=A267P2DT104U3C&marketplaceID=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Build Quality, Comfort and Accessories
Photo dump time!











The EW300 is a comfortable IEM that's on the smaller/compact side which makes fit absolutely great. The nozzle size isn't too large, either, with the lip at 6.0mm. There's two looks to the EW300 and I received the metal/standard shell which is shiny.







The only issue is that this is going to be more prone to fingerprint/scratching. If you want a matte version, you'll need to pay $5 or $10 more for either the HBB version or the DSP cable version which will likely alleviate that concern.




*Yes, I made a heart out of this picture*



The EW300 comes with a decent cable (it's a bit memory prone to me but better than a lot of other stock cables I've used recently), a non-descript carrying case, some decent tips, extra tuning nozzles (Gold - silver was already installed), foam pieces, and rings for the nozzles. This is a pretty decently accessorized kit.



Tip Rolling
So, I did some tip-rolling but early on figured that the real biggest impact to the tuning really came from the swappable nozzle. Still, here's my favorite tips for the EW300 + how I feel about the stock tips.

Stock Tips: Stock tips were actually okay here. I didn't mind them. As far as comfort and fit goes, a bit on the softer side and it kind of added okay extension on bass and treble. But, on I go!
Final Type E - Clear/Red: Standard baseline which usually is pretty transparent - I felt like this synergized well with keeping the good extension but helped with the sub-bass.
Dunu S&S: Gives a bit more of that mid-bass sensation with the Dunu S&S. This helped warm it up a bit and gave a wider soundstage. Probably my favorite combination in this set up!
Radius Deep Mount: I think the extra bass increase with the Deep Mount worked better than the Clear/Red in this case. A good combination but I know not everyone will have this tip set.

Cable
The stock cable isn't too bad.



It's not the best and it's a bit memory prone but I've seen some terrible ones that come with +$200 sets and would easily be good with the EW300's version instead.

Sound
So, how do they sound?



In a nutshell, the EW300 is a very solid upper budget IEM that leans away from the generally reported brighter/treble extended Simgot 'house sound' to offer a safer yet still decently executed tuning.

Coupled with a nozzle that changes the overall sound signature so you can dial in your preference, you get an absolutely capable IEM that does everything decently well in a comfortable shell. For the subject of my review, I'm going to be talking about primarily the Silver with some additional flavor based on the Gold nozzle near the end. The primary score will be based on the stock Silver nozzle.

Gear Tested On: Primarily streamed music via either dedicated Streamer, Laptop or Phone
Phone chain: Pixel 8 Pro -> Abigail Pro
Phone chain: Pixel 8 Pro -> Shanling Onyx XI1
Streamed Music Chain Workstation: Laptop -> JDS Labs Element 3 MK2 (Boosted)
Streamed Music chain: WiiM Mini -> JDS Labs Atom DAC+ -> JDS Labs OL Switcher -> Geshelli Labs Archel 3 Pro

*My Audio Preference and Score Disclaimer*: To preface my breakdown, here's my sound preference. I tend to prefer warmer sound. I enjoy good sub-bass extension with enough mid-bass to feel the music. I prefer more fuller sounding mids to match my library. My preference is for smooth treble extension; while I'm not treble sensitive, I'd probably lean more towards 'safer' treble tuning for longer listening. I also tend to listen at either medium to louder listening volumes (reasonably loud).

In addition, all scores listed below are typically (unless otherwise stated) rated/scored as it relates to it's peers in the same price group.

Lows/Bass: Sub-bass is where the EW300 shine for the low end. Sub-bass goes deep, matching well with a lot of it's competition, while retaining good texture/detail.

I would say that the mid-bass can be a bit too quick for my tastes but the EW300 isn't trying to go full 'analog' or 'warm' and there's a happy medium that they toe very well. Mid-bass is a bit weaker than the sub-bass so you don't quite get that sastisfying punch for certain music genres but it's not entirely lacking.

The tuning choice for all of the bass feels like it's sub-bass boosted but presented very cleanly with the intention of ensuring there's no bleed, boominess or added wamrth to take away from the rest of the sound signature.

Bass Score: 8/10 - TL;DR: Sub-bass has great deep'ness but mid-bass isn't quite as punchy. Bass quality/detail is very good though but a bit too quick for my preference

Mids: Detailed, clean, snappy - there's a very certain bite to the upper-mids that really help instrument details and female vocals shine but never to the harsh/sibilant side. It feels very much in control to balance out the solid sub-bass.

For higher volume listening, this can be very close to being too elevated but for general volume listening, I enjoyed how detailed and overall clear the instruments sounded along with the female vocals having that airiness to them.

My only issue that follows with these types of tuning is that male vocals and lower-mids tend to come across a bit lean without the fullness, warmth or note weight to bring home the mid-range. It's not too distracting in what it's missing but it's definitely the biggest point of contention that I have with the mids. This does make it work well with genres like rock/classic rock but other genres may be more glaring.

Mids Score: 8.25/10 - TL;DR: Instruments shine, very detailed mids - female vocals are fantastic but male vocals tend to lean towards the thinner side, not as warm or full sounding

Treble: Treble is probably the best part of the EW300's tuning where there's enough energy to be different than it's competitors but without going past that line and being difficult to listen to.

I believe that's part of the Simgot baseline where they tend to try and bring out the elevation in the treble to be energetic and sharp but with tonal balance so you're not quite swimming in the air.

That being said, my understanding is that the EW300 will have less treble energy/extension than the rest of the Simgot line up so anyone expecting that standard Simgot boost may be disappointed. To my ears, they're just above that 'safe' threshold but the controlled bite helps make the EW300 stand out.



Treble Score: 8.5/10 - TL;DR: Elevated and detailed without being harsh - the primary standout for tuning

Detail, Separation, Imaging, Overall Timbre, Etc.: Keeping in line with the rest of the overall performance of the EW300, the detail and imaging for the EW300 is very competent.

I don't think that there's anything that sticks out as being truly exceptional but they're a smidge above average. There's good separation between instruments, there's good imaging, decent soundstage, and overall nothing feels lacking or missing while not leading the competition in it's price bracket.

That being said, the overall combination of the sound signature being neutral but with a solid sub-bass boost and just the right amount of brightness and details carves a good niche.

Technicalities Score: 8.25/10 - TL;DR: Very solid - no real negatives, right about average to just above average to the competition

Library Recommendation: What I think the EW300 works well for is rock music the most but it handles most genres decently. Some of my favorite tracks that worked well with the EW300 per below.

Fleetwood Mac - "Rumors"
Stevie Wonder - "Sir Duke"
Portishead - "Glory Box"
AC/DC - "Thunderstruck"
Red Hot Chili Peppers - "Rain Dance Maggie"
The Black Keys - "Gold on the Ceiling"
The Doobie Brothers - "What a Fool Believes"
De La Soul - "The Magic Number"

I think female vocals or some rock instruments shine the brightest here but you won't find yourself chomping at the bit to swap if you're using this as your all-rounder.

Comparisons: Here's some quick shot comparisons with others either in it's price bracket.

Xuan NV: Xuan NV will have less sub-bass but adequate mid-bass. I think note weight is fuller with the Xuan NV so it comes off infinitely warmer but the EW300 will be more technically capable and detailed. Coin toss but my preference is the Xuan NV to the EW300 even though I know the EW300 better in a lot of aspects for bass and overall extension. (Xuan NV > EW300)
Kefine Delci: Kefine Delci is similar to the Xuan NV just with more bass emphasis and note weight. I think the Delci will come off as more aggressive in it's sound presentation this way while the EW300 is more technically capable and chill. I prefer the Delci over the EW300. (Kefine Delci > EW300)
Aful Explorer: The Explorer can be had for sub $100 and there are things about the EW300 that reminds me of the Explorer (especially with the Gold Nozzle). Note weight, extension, bass is where the Explorer shines though upper mid/treble and technicalities will be better on the EW300. I prefer the Explorer over the EW300. (Aful Explorer > EW300)

As much as I may prefer the competition to the EW300, that doesn't mean that I don't like the EW300 but it's just a huge testament to how many good sets are out there.

Other Things to be aware of:
So, to reiterate a few things about the EW300 - there are a few different versions of the Simgot IEM but they are all supposed to be tuned very similarly if not the same. There's conflicting info and, likely, the thing it comes down to is unit variance.

If you wanted to pick up a version, you're really looking at three things:

Do I want the cheapest version? Standard EW300.
Do I like HBB or want a matte black version vs the shiny metal version and I'm willing to pay $5? HBB collab version.
Do I want a DSP capable version with matte black? And if I want to use my own cable for 3.5/4.4, I can? And I'm willing to pay $10 for it? DSP version.



I don't think you can necessarily go wrong if you're interested in trying out a Simgot that's safer and less likely to be sibilant/borderline too trebly as it's got enough at it's price point to be worth a flyer.

Volume Listening: Listening is predomintantly to the mid/moderate volume level. I was able to listen to the EW300 at higher volumes without an issue but, this isn't necessarily meant to be a loud volume set (like the Explorer). You won't get a lot of sibilance if you do listen to louder volumes but it's not scaling or doing much more at higher volume (unless you go with the Gold Nozzle).

Tuning Accessories: That does bring me to the Tuning Accessories.

The EW300 comes with an additional nozzle (called the Gold Nozzle) as well as some foam that you can pack into the IEM. I didn't play around with too much on the foam (like stuffing it all in there, only one or two) but it did seem to help tame a bit of the treble extension for those that are treble sensitive. YEMV (Your Ear May Vary).

The gold nozzle, though, had a relatively decent tuning change to the point where I figured I'd do a quick shot on what really changed and what I prefered.



Gold Nozzle Scores:
Gold Bass Score: 8.5/10 Bass is better - slightly elevated and warmer but still detailed. Prefer Gold Nozzle on bass.
Gold Mids Score: 8.5/10 Mid-range is warmer, male vocals are slightly fuller, it may be slightly less detailed or airy for female vocals but much more laid back.
Gold Treble Score: 8.25/10 Still very detailed and extended but safer than even the already lower than normal Simgot experience.
Gold Technicalities Score: 7.75/10 I think the soundstage and overall presentation sounds a bit more enclosed and essentially is in line with the competition at this point. Probably the biggest hit going to Gold.
Gold Overall Score (including bias): 8.2/10 - I think the Silver does more special things for the EW300 but I prefer the Gold Nozzle more for general listening

Special Sauce/Personal Bias Score: 8/10 - TL;DR: Not the biggest fan of the marketing, 3 different editions, but these are very good and the tuning nozzles/filters provide extra bang for buck.

Conclusion:
If you're in search for an accessibly priced tri-brid design that provides solid overall performance, look no further.

The Simgot EW300 has three flavors as a release but, at the end of the day, is extremely competent with it's sound signature, performance, and detail while still providing a bit of the Simgot spice up top. This is a deviation, and likely safer, than the standard Simgot lineup but the tuning philosophy change I think works for the general market and I think will help introduce more listeners to exactly what Simgot (and their other line ups) are capable of.



Final Weighted Score: 8.2/10 - 8.20 puts this firmly as a 4/5 star IEM and is good to add to the collection while not breaking the bank. But, a lot of other IEMs perform similarly and may be more to your preference at the end of the day.



Thanks for reading!