Simgot EW100P | EW100

Mister Zeng

New Head-Fier
SIMGOT EW100P - Kid Harman
Pros: ✔ Jack of all trades, but master of none
✔ Price is well-set
✔ Well-balanced tuning, but sounds slightly too warm for my taste
✔ Good tonality
✔ Good imaging and separation
✔ Comfortable fit
Cons: 🚫 Lacks a bit of energy up top for details
🚫 Cheap build quality
🚫 Sound quality is not as organic/natural as it sounds
🚫 Dull/boring
🚫 Soundstage is fine
Hello everyone! 大家好!I'm Mister Zeng, your go-to audio reviewer, committed to providing you with unbiased and no-nonsense assessments. When it comes to audio gear, I'll cut through the hype and give you honest insights you can trust. No BS here, just genuine reviews to help you make the best decisions for your audio needs. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, MAKING YOU LOVE AND ENJOY MUSIC THE WAY IT SHOULD BE EXPERIENCED!
Today, I'll be offering my insights on the SIMGOT EW100P, kindly provided to me by LINSOUL and was sent to me by Sir @Zerstorer_GOhren for review purposes. Rest assured, all thoughts and opinions expressed are my own, entirely independent and unbiased. I maintain no affiliations and haven't been requested to provide any particular viewpoint in exchange for these units.
📝NOTES BEFORE THE REVIEW:
Just so you're aware, my review will focus solely on my personal sound impressions of this in-ear monitor (IEM). I won't delve into the details of the packaging or the accessories that accompany the unit. Additionally, I'll be sharing my personal equalizer (EQ) settings that cater to my specific sound preferences. I'd appreciate your thoughts on how these settings sound on your end - feel free to share in the comments below.

The eartips being used in this IEM are the XL silicone eartips that came with the box. The cables being used are also stock cables with 3.5mm jack. No aftermarket cables or other eartips have been used throughout this review.
All of the audio gears that will be used have been burned in for at least 150 hours or more.

Here are the list of audio gears used for this review:

  • Topping A90 Discrete
  • SMSL SU-9N
  • Centrance DACport HD
  • Abigail Dongle
  • Apple Dongle USB C to Headphone Jack
Here are the list of tracks used for this review: (All tracks have been streamed at Qobuz and while other tracks have been bought for the FLAC file)
  • Shoot to Thrill - AC/DC
  • You Shook Me All Night Long - AC/DC
  • Back in Black - AC/DC
  • Highway to Hell - AC/DC
  • For Whom the Bell Tolls - Metallica
  • Killing Strangers - Marilyn Manson
  • Sunflower - Post Malone
  • Save Your Tears - The Weeknd
  • Always Remember Us This Way - Lady Gaga
  • Time - Pink Floyd
  • 雪落下的声音 - 陆虎
  • Seishun Kyousoukyoku - Sambomaster
  • Lay Me Down - Sam Smith
  • Let's Groove - Earth, Wind & Fire
  • September - Earth, Wind & Fire
  • Porco Rosso - Joe Hisaishi
  • Summer - Joe Hisaishi
  • Innocent - Joe Hisaishi
  • Nostalgia - Joe Hisaishi
  • Don't Stop Me Now - Queen
  • Radio Ga Ga - Queen
  • Come Together - The Beatles
  • Early Summer Rain - Yasuharu Takanashi
  • Mourning - Post Malone
  • AND MORE...

SIMGOT EW100P - A Review By Zeng
362214804_662243945441064_8167652817364640122_n.jpg
362143614_1258525398181552_3694605319303145672_n.jpg
361921941_237385815853258_5660729578975490355_n.jpg


Tonality (8/10)
The tonality of the EW100P is great. They offer a well-balanced sound signature, although they lean slightly warm for my personal preferences. While the sound is technically well-tuned, it doesn't quite deliver the natural and organic sound one might expect. Let me compare them directly to my reference earbuds, the NiceHCK EB2S Pro. Both have a similar tuning, but the EW100P is bassier and overall warmer sounding. The vocals of both male and female tracks on the EW100P are well-balanced and well-tuned, but they lack the emotions and natural quality found in the EB2S Pro.

When listening to tracks like "Lay Me Down" by Sam Smith or "Immortality" by Celine Dion, the vocals are good, but they sound dull and fail to provide that immersive and emotional experience in their voice. One of my favorite male tracks is Michael Bolton's "When a Man Loves a Woman." His voice doesn't sound impactful or strong. The depth in his voice is not present in that track at all. Additionally, with Lady Gaga's "Always Remember Us This Way," I also experienced the same result.
Moving on to instruments, the EW100P was able to maintain good detail and tonality in the instruments played in orchestral tracks. My favorite tracks from Joe Hisaishi, "Porco Rosso" and "Summer," both delivered really good tonality. However, they fell short in evoking strong emotions or delivering that "wow" factor.

Overall, the EW100P showcases solid technical tonal tuning, but its overall sound can be described as somewhat dull and lacking excitement. It doesn't bring anything special to the table. But as mentioned in the pros of these in-ear monitors (IEMs), they are "a jack of all trades, but master of none."
Bass (7.5/10)
The bass of the EW100P earphones is impressive. It consistently delivers good-quality bass during my listening sessions. The sub-bass and rumble are also noticeable in my test tracks. However, at times, it tends to obscure the sound of my tracks, resulting in a warmer sound signature.
One of my favorite tracks to test the sub-bass and rumble is Marilyn Manson’s “Killing Strangers”. It effectively reproduces the deep lows at the beginning of the track, and I thoroughly enjoyed every moment. Another track that stands out is “Flirting with Jane” by Les Gordon. The bass remains consistently good and smooth across all my bass-heavy tracks. It produces a strong, punchy, and wide slam effect.

However, when listening to drum hits or any organic instruments that are associated with the bass, such as the track “Serious Business” by Jazz Funk Soul and “Hotel California” from the album “Hell Freezes Over” by Eagles, the IEMs fall short in delivering the natural and organic tones of the drums and congas. It doesn't quite capture the essence of these instruments accurately.

For movies and gaming, the bass performs well, allowing me to enjoy the impact of explosions and other intense moments.

Overall, the bass quality of the EW100P is good, consistently delivering decent bass performance during my testing. However, one major flaw is that it fails to provide the organic and natural sound that I am seeking.

Mids (5.5/10)
The mid-range performance of the EW100P is average. The lower mids, in particular, pose an issue. They are slightly elevated for my preference, resulting in additional honkiness and warmth in the sound. Additionally, the upper mids' performance is not as impressive as I had anticipated. It fails to reproduce the intimate vocals in my tracks. There seems to be a noticeable distance between me and the singer, leading to a recessed sound signature in the upper mids. This becomes evident in songs like "When a Man Loves a Woman" by Michael Bolton and Celine Dion's "Because You Loved Me". Furthermore, the tone of their voices lacks naturalness and lacks impact and presence. While there is some clarity, the overall sound tends to be artificial and slightly too warm for my personal preference.

Treble (7/10)

The treble performance of the EW100P is decent. It provides the clarity and detail that one would expect from a good in-ear monitor (IEM). However, as mentioned earlier, the detail and clarity don't sound natural or authentic. It feels like they are being forced and don't come across as genuine. Nevertheless, one commendable aspect of this IEM is the absence of the typical 5000 - 5500Hz peak that often annoys me. In that regard, I can say that it sounds quite pleasant and smooth, albeit still sounding somewhat artificial and lacking vibrancy.

Furthermore, the extension and airiness of this IEM are lacking, especially in the 9300Hz range. It requires more energy in the higher frequencies for me to fully enjoy the level of clarity in my tracks.

When listening to orchestral tracks such as "Porco Rosso," "Summer," and "Departure -memory-" by Joe Hisaishi, the IEM is able to maintain a nice tonality throughout the track. However, it fails to capture the authenticity and sparkle that I was hoping for. The sound comes across as somewhat dull and fails to evoke any strong emotional response, leaving one feeling indifferent, thinking, "It's alright."

Imaging and Separation (7.5/10)
The imaging and separation of the EW100P are impressive. It effectively identifies instruments coming from the left and right channels. For instance, when listening to "Hide" by Juice WRLD, the beginning of the track creates a 360-degree sound effect, and the IEM is able to recreate it, although not flawlessly. Similarly, in the track "I Want To Break Free" by Queen, the electric guitar part at the start of the track also exhibits a 360-degree sound effect, which the IEM manages to produce, but still with some room for improvement.

As for the dynamic range, it is only average and fails to reach an exceptional level. However, when listening to orchestral tracks, the positioning of the instruments is accurately represented, each occupying their rightful place.

In terms of gaming, specifically playing games like Counter Strike 1.6 and Valorant, the EW100P performs well. It effectively renders the footsteps and shooting sounds from enemies, allowing for precise localization. It enables me to quickly determine the direction from which a shot was fired.

Soundstage (5/10)
The soundstage of the EW100P is average. While it offers good imaging, the sense of distance between instruments in orchestral tracks is not as immersive as I had anticipated. It lacks the expansive and enveloping feeling that I would expect from a more impressive soundstage. When listening to a concert recording, the height and width of the stage don't give me the sensation of being in a large venue; instead, it feels more like I'm confined to a small room.

Moreover, when using the earphones for FPS games, the distance between enemy footsteps is acceptable. However, the dynamic range of the IEM hampers its performance in this category, causing it to fall short of delivering a truly immersive and engaging gaming experience.

EQ Performance (7/10)
The EQ performance of the EW100P is commendable. I was able to achieve the sound I desired with minimal EQ adjustments. Upon reviewing the information on the back of the IEM's box, I discovered that it is specifically tuned to the Harman 2016 target. This explains why I felt little need for extensive adjustments. The main changes I made involved reducing the lower mids and bass while increasing the energy around 9300Hz to add sparkle to the music.

Overall, the sound quality was satisfying to me. However, I must note that the natural and organic sound I seek still eluded me. I invite you to share your thoughts on my EQ adjustments for this IEM in the comment section below.


362273102_1217941495557597_5558338576717031449_n.jpg


Conclusion
The SIMGOT EW100P is an excellent all-rounder that caters to individuals in search of a versatile IEM that can handle various tasks without significant issues. As I mentioned in the pros, it can be seen as a Jack of all trades, but a master of none. While it may not excel in areas such as soundstage and dynamic range, it still delivers a commendable sonic performance that makes it a reliable recommendation for the average consumer.

Priced at only $20, this IEM is a safe choice, particularly for those who are new to the hobby and prefer not to invest a substantial amount of money upfront. However, it's important to keep in mind the mentioned cons when considering this option.

Overall, the SIMGOT EW100P offers a well-rounded experience and represents a solid choice for individuals seeking an affordable and versatile IEM that performs capably in various scenarios.

P.S.

Again, I would like to express my gratitude to LINSOUL and Sir @Zerstorer_GOhren for providing me with the review unit of the SIMGOT EW100P. I want to clarify that all the thoughts and opinions expressed in this review are entirely my own, and I have not received any sponsorship or incentive to promote or favor this IEM in any way. It is important of me to provide an unbiased and honest assessment of the product.

ahammedsojib

New Head-Fier
Simgot Ew100p (New contender for 20$)
Pros: ~ Light weight and comfortable shell.
~ Slightly warm and musical midrange tonality.
~ Fatigue free smooth treble performance.
~ Separation , and staging is fairly good in the price category.
~ It gives overall admirable sound performance considering the price point.
Cons: ~ Somewhat thin midrange tonality. (common problem of harman target or "V" shape tuning)
~ not the best detail retrieval set.
~ lacks airy extension of treble.
~ Bass lacks deep impact and lacks texture.
~ average technical performance.
Introduction :-

20230712_145207.jpg


_20230712_145608.jpg


Simgot is a well-known name in the audio marketplace, although simgot is a Chinese brand, they have launched several products in the market, which has also increased their reputation to a large extent. Their recently launched EA500 IEM created a lot of hype and has been accepted as a true value for money device. However, the topic of today's review is Simgot EW100P, which is a very low budget category ($20) earphone.


★ Note :-
EW 100P being a very low price category's earphone, its stock eartips are not very convenient, so I have used final audio E-series black eartips in my full review, which gave better sound with this earphone. Also, if you want, you can use spinfit w1 eartips. So eartips rolling must for better result.

20230712_154151.jpg



Build & comfort :-


The build quality of Simgot EW 100P is nothing extraordinary, its shell is made of fully polycarbonate and the gold plate area with the branding of Simgot at the back is made of aluminum alloy only. However, the whole shell has been given a glossy finish, which generally looks a bit attractive, but when you hold it in your hand, it gives a cheap feeling. However, the entire IEM shell is made of polycarbonate and is very light weight, so it keep in ear for long time . By doing this, there is no chance of any ear problem at all. On the other hand, to say something about the stock cable & eartips that come with it, I will say that the eartips that comes are average grade, but its stock cable is quite commendable because the cable is silver foil shielded detachable woven copper cable which is pretty good considering the price point.
Although the structure of the cable is a bit thin, but the cable does not create unwanted microphonics and I believe that the cable will last for a long time. Besides, the 0.78mm 2 pin connector of the cable is very strongly attached to the IEM, even if you hold the connector point of the cable and pull it lightly, it is not possible to open it easily from IEM and that is very good thing.

20230712_153855.jpg


Box content at a glance :-👇


1. A pair of Ew100p IEM.
2. Silver foil cable.
3. 3 pairs of different size of white colour eartips.
4. A user manual.

1689213493572.jpg



Specifications :-


~ Driver : 10mm high-performance dual-cavity dynamic driver ( LCP diaphragms)
~ Impedance: 32 ohm
~ Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms (@1kHz)
~ Distortion ratio: THD<1%(@1kHz)
~ Frequency response: 5Hz-45kHz
~ Connector: 2-pin 0.78mm


Sound Impression :-


Ew 100p basically harman target 2016's sound signature and sound is produced with 2 Lcp dynamic drivers in the device, two drivers handle full frequency of sound together. However, despite harman target tuning, the bass section of the device was relatively weak, which will disappoint many bass head people. For your convenience, I have given the graph below, which I think will give you a better idea.

PSX_20230712_232252.jpg

Credit : audio discourse



★ Now at first start the bass......


★ Bass :-


The bass section of the device is not so strong because the deep impact of the mid bass punch cannot be felt. However, the sub bass has a good weight & height due to which a decent rumble is obtained. At the same time, the notes of the high hat of drum pedal & bass guitar are not so precise, but their existence can be found. So I used final e-series black tips with this IEM which boosted up the mid bass of this set a bit and made the bass more enjoyable.

_20230710_115403.jpg




★ Mids :-


The IEM's midrange tonality was well balanced and neutral, though naturally a bit forward. The midrange has a nice body and a decent amount of texture, but the surprising thing was that the mids were quite clean, as a result of which the male & female vocals were able to show off their crafting quite nicely. Although its mids will not be the best or I will not say, but it has given quite satisfactory results compared to other competitors in the 20$ price category, on the other hand, the mids were slightly thin, which is a common problem of harman target tuning. All in all, I think the mids or vocal section will not make the listeners very unhappy.

20230712_153210.jpg




★ Treble :-



Treble is nothing extraordinary but the delivery of treble can be said to be quite good. Its dual dd driver handles treble fairly well. Although the treble is not very detailed, there is no unwanted harshness or sharpness found here, but little amount of sparkle was there, so I got a modarate texture that naturally represents the quality of the treble. Although there is some jitter in the higher frequency which I would say is normal considering the price I think overall treble performance can be enjoyed fairly but treble head people will not be satisfied with it I am pretty sure.

_20230710_115403.jpg



★ Technicalities :-


Technical performance was similar to others of 20$ but could not give anything outstanding. On the one hand, the imaging was weak and the resolution and clarity were okay. It is not very convenient for gaming, so it is not for those who are looking for earphones for playing games, because the depth and height of the stage is a little tight, so the precise positioning of the opponent is not visible during gaming. Moreover, the separation & layering was also of mediocre level, so there is nothing special to say about the technicality of this set.


20230712_144009.jpg


Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give it👇👇👇


Mids : 3.8/5
Bass : 3.2/5
Treble : 4/5
TECHNICALITIES: 7.5/10


★ Conclusion :-



Simgot Ew 100p can be a good option considering the price for those who are looking for IEM under 20$ just for music listening. But the device has some lacks which I have already discussed, if someone likes its harman target sound signature and wants a daily use earphone with a budget around 20$ then this would be a solid recommendation from my side.


I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience....... 👇

https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p

_20230709_195033.jpg


20230712_153855.jpg


20230712_144009.jpg


20230712_153855.jpg


20230712_153210.jpg
ahammedsojib
ahammedsojib
M
Md Ismail Hossain
I'll recommend it for my friends
Most of them prefer fun sound and affordable price
R
RK Turan
I should've tried it out ig

Leonarfd

Headphoneus Supremus
EW100P can stand on its own feet besides the other entry models
Pros: Very ergonomic and small
Energetic
Fun with most music
Clear vocals
Good low end extension with okay impact
Jack of all trades master of none?
Cons: Not the most resolving set
Not the best accessories
Upper mid energy can be to much on certain instruments or music
Bass lacks compared to upper mids, can appear bright or bass light due to this
Simgot EW100P


X30jkDisrtBvg5Gd78AhZvAlCjuMasx0lewqowBBqR6b-mf9b-UmN9-n03tYeCBgjTtA9R7PNbQB9hmRHbiH0QExEA8DAcsm5Y5bPJdvY4wLMApIDMcguz3y0RzKDzzKKPsP2LqCGOQWnXjP-Q_Oyq4


A smaller review from me, more can see it here outside the forum thread.

Simgot approached me and asked if I wanted to get two models from them, the only thing they wanted me to do is give feedback. It was up to me to write online about them, they are both capable sets and I am thankful for the opportunity. All impressions are my own subjective thoughts after having used them for some time.

This is also a very subjective hobby where everything from experience, anatomy or age will affect what we hear. Also keep in mind that it is easy to use bold words when talking about differences, while it may be perceived as a small change for you. While I can perceive something as natural sounding, I also do believe we can never get a perfect performance similar to what is achieved live.

https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p

About me and my gear used for the review

My audio preference is neutral with sub and mid bass boost, mids can be forward but not too much. I can also handle some treble spikes if it is not excessive. I am a believer in having different tuned IEMs for different genres or moods instead of chasing the single perfect one.
Main music genres I listen to are Metal, Electronica, Jazz, Indy rock/metal, Pop. I am a music lover, and can also listen to almost all the genres out there. I have been into music gear since the mid 90s, gifted some big speakers at an early age. Then moved more and more into headphones with the Koss Porta Pro and a Sony Discman and Minidisc.

I have also tried playing many instruments over the years from piano to sax and have a feel for what's a natural tone, but not the biggest patience in learning to play. My wife has also played many instruments from string to wind instruments.

My current standard in Headphones is ZMF Verite and Beyerdynamic T1 G2.

My current standard in IEMs is AüR Audio Neon Pro and Penon Serial. The Neon Pro has 10 BAs, and has a near perfect tonality for me on the brighter side. The Penon Serial that also has a near perfect tonality for me, that is more relaxing and organic sounding with its triple DD configuration. Both of them have sound signatures that I can listen to all types of music with.

Gear used in the main rig is Topping E70 DAC together with the Topping A90 Discrete headphone Amp. I also have a Schiit Lokuis I can swap in if I want to do a little analogue EQ.
I have also used the Feliks Audio Echo, one of the more silent OTL amps.

Portable gear used during the review: Cayin N7, Hiby R6 III, Quidelix 5k DAC/AMP, FIIO BTR7 and Penon Tail.

I have a good range of cables from Gladiator Cables, ISN, DUNU, Penon, NiceHCK, XINHS and some others.


DSCF2199.jpg


The EW100P is a single dynamic driver 10mm LCP, and has a cost of $20. It has 32 ohm impedance and quite high sensitivity of 122dB, there should be no problem with most players to get good sound and enough volume.

The shell is in resin with a Aluminium Alloy faceplate, the plate is here for increased stability and durability according to Simgot. But that sounds like marketing to me, it looks great with the plate and makes it stand out a little to the normal resin IEMs.

The EW100P is also super light and is very small, nozzle is also average size so tips fit easily with no discomfort. The length of the nozzle is not too short and not too long, just perfect for me.
Cable is a little thin, but it works okay and is pretty comfortable. The stock tips are normal silicon type, I haven't tried them and used my own favorites.

This should be a very safe IEM to buy blind based on comfort.

QoLyP2tjFGmjYi1Safw3mhm8ZrThW4YO50rK2y9S3DuHkUP-sFnsoQlDT3KeUpgifKjOvdyKcEj-QAuLIUuXNsr_5uEQNQ8-ngZWyHDfIiRT4LAwX7q_Vp2C419qaGWT1JMKiCiInRW5_Eh05HW5cHA


The sound is energetic and fun, the tuning is also reminiscent of other IEMs in the budget realm.

Bass is neutral in amount, with more sub bass than mid bass. Personally I would have liked more sub bass, it's not enough deep rumble for my own taste. Mid bass is also for me a little thin, making drums and bass instruments lack a more full sound.

Mids are overall good and both vocals and instruments are clear with good detail, only when going up into the upper part of the midrange it is too energetic for me. This boost does affect already intense music like some metal genres, or even technical electronica. Depending on your music this boost can be either good and give great details, or become too much where you want to turn the music down or not use it.

Treble is quite detailed and has enough forwardness to not make the sound boring. I do lack some sparkle and airyness, but that is true for almost all cheap single DD IEMs out there.

Soundstage is average in both depth and width, nothing spectacular and also doing nothing wrong. Can pick up where sounds are coming with okay enough accuracy, but it's by no means a master. Resolution is one of the better $20 sets I have tried.

m74fLScnYOBYiNCVzyBuOQmzznGzvEmkaf3LRGaoKRdTWgA1gilNHjl9eOmv8rjHnoWQShrAC6DHvdd62U9Xe-QED368tFkB_jGnM3F2YAhPmgx0wXVigau00jQ3Nvyg5ooUSgbvfyGmJrehiBxSoX4


I have 2 IEMs that are very similar, following similar tuning in the same price range.

Tin Hifi C2
It uses 10mm LCP DD and is in full metal shell.
This is also quite small and comfortable, but has some sharper edges. The nozzle is a little short for me, but I still have a good secure seal.
This sound is very similar to the EW100P, an energetic sound. Lacking also a little bass and having to forward upper mids and treble for me.


https://www.tinhifi.com/products/tinhifi-c2

Truthear HOLA
It uses 11mm LCP DD and is in resin shell.
The largest of the three, still very comfortable.This also has a little short nozzle, but the same as C2 is still secure and gives a good seal.
This does sound quite different from EW100P, bigger bass with slower decay. Mids are fuller while not being as aggressive. Treble is a little relaxed but still gives good details.

https://truthear.com/products/hola

Rating based on quality 1 - 2 - 3

Bass amount: HOLA - EW100P = C2
Bass quality: C2 - EW100P = HOLA
Bass Impact: HOLA - C2 - EW100P
Female Vocal: HOLA - EW100P - C2
Male Vocal: HOLA - C2 = EW100P
Mids instruments: HOLA - EW100P = C2
Treble: EW100P - C2 - HOLA
Soundstage: C2 - EW100P - HOLA
Resolution: EW100P = C2 - HOLA
Light to Dark: EW100P = C2 - HOLA
Fun factor: HOLA - EW100P - C2

1ampkCRKk8vdhkmgbAmrylwN9z2PFRKY7EdPeSGxpvTbUf-sxpUEOL3dOuCJQhLIivYRMq-mj0KwOGV-6yWKrGjPe9mSFsMzVp1xwuaD5ewE-hVQRrub7upjjtdTlsMqNSDMI6ws3UcfRmcrs1Ljvsc


I have used my Topping E70 + A90 Discrete and also the Hiby R6 III when evaluating the EW100P and comparing. Music has been from my own files or Tidal. Just going to write about some of the songs used by me. I will also try and rank the IEM per song, it's hard to choose C2 over EW100P and vice versa as they share a very similar sound.



Maybe not the most technical metal track, but for me one of my test tracks. Get a little mix of vocals that are normal and growling, bass,distorted guitar and drums.

The start builds up with a bass beat I want to feel, I need to crank up the volume a little extra on EW100P. Then the problem arrives when the rest enters, making me turn the volume down due to sharpness and intensity.

There are good details going on, and his vocals sound full and clear with EW100P. It can handle the more busy parts also. Except for the energy in the upper mids and treble it fairs well here, could have wished for more bass or less upper energy.

1 Hola 2 EW100P 3 C2



Introduced recently by my friend, I absolutely love this track. Perfect to test rhythm, bass, resolution and more. Here the upper mid energy gives the track life, the tuning goes really well with everything. Only personally I would have preferred more bass.

The bass drum has very natural decay and the spatial cues are quite 3D and fun, also detail retrieval is very good to be a $20 set.

1 EW100P 2 C2 3 HOLA



Take Five is a masterpiece, one of my favorite Jazz performances. The Alto Sax has the right amount of bite where it's not dull or to forward. Same for Piano is detailed with good clarity, just lacking a little soul and fullness.

The drumming is also very good and I can't really complain.

Both the C2 and EW100P do Take Five better than the more relaxing HOLA.

1 C2 2 EW100P 3 HOLA




Just a beautiful Jazz piece with Tenor Sax and Double Bass. The amount of bass is actually very perfect here, and goes well with the Double Bass. There are good details in every note with very correct decay.

The Tenor is also nice with good resolution and can pick the breathiness and nuances. I just feel that it's a little lifeless and hollow when I'm comparing it to higher end IEMs.

1 EW100P 2 C2 3 HOLA




Lately I have been trying more and more K-Pop, catchy music and nice vocals.

EW100P is only lacking some bass for my taste here, their voices sound clear and good with no sibilance. Some of the sounds are a little sharp for my taste, and are not sharp on the HOLA.

The clarity is excellent with a good black background.

1 HOLA 2 C2 3 EW100P

YUvM6orfuhVx7fkhssrOy9Ycd59ExX5gskDPjB135jgwKeTqgiuKBcHk8yRUATV4rgyDkni2mx9dd1Fv-iHvsycnxprMbEqqAHDLIGvpnOf7Y5RZLAhM3t9PAUsrXTU_1qiyf4q0GQP4Q0OqJFPv4ow


Conclusion

This is a set costing $20, it's super cheap. It has an energetic sound that has good enough detail retrieval. Bass that makes music lively, even though I prefer more this is perfect for many. Vocals are detailed and sound good, same goes for instruments. The only downside as I can see is the upper mid range, it's energetic and forward. Give lots of energy in music, this is very personal and is a perfect amount for others. For me personally it's too much, and I have to choose my music after it.

Do I recommend it, yes I do. It's so cheap, most can afford to buy it. It's small and comfortable. The other set I also got from Simgot is EA500, it has similar energy to the EW100P. So EW100P can be a good set to check if you like upper mid energy, and if you do move up to EA500 as it's a much better IEM.


y40tyYhviwM-04mwXl04FQSCNVQKNwWnG9smBJrVkvusQJi3ro_KTql4-yhUO62rgjLxmmS6CG8b8-LsmzJaTy1rawvQJIu13hmglaGnIcfEqZhINPXqUsRsQRekmY99XJg0TfFv1JPpYuEGjgj7VhA
Last edited:

cqtek

1000+ Head-Fier
Basic Package
Pros: Fits a Harman 2016 profile that is suitable for a wide range of musical genres.
- Slightly warm, coherent, cohesive and musical sound.
- Highs with initial sparkle and subsequent smoothness.
- Good design and construction. Better ergonomics.
- Good cable.
- Remarkable price/performance ratio.
Cons: Basic level of detail, not a very technical sound.
- Not much texture.
- It doesn't stand out in any area, although it doesn't do anything wrong.
Introduction

Simgot seems to be one of the recurring brands this summer. The company, founded in Shenzhen in 2015, has brought a new model to the market. It is the Simgot EW100P and is priced at $20. Without a doubt, this model is in the budget range, where there is a lot of competition. These are high-performance, entry-level, dual-cavity dynamic IEMS. They use a 10mm LCP diaphragm. The construction is PC and H-2016 aluminium alloy. They are Hi-Res Audio certified and use a detachable woven copper cable shielded with silver foil. Let's see what Simgot can deliver for this price.

Simgot EW100P 01_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 02_r.jpg

Specifications

  • Driver Type: High-performance 10mm dual-cavity dynamic driver with LCP diaphragm.
  • Frequency Response: 5Hz-45kHz.
  • Effective Frequency Response: 20Hz-20kHz.
  • Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms (@1kHz).
  • Impedance: 32Ω±10% (@1kHz).
  • Distortion: THD<1% (@1kHz).
  • Jack Connector: 3.5mm gold-plated.
  • Capsule Connection Type: 2Pin 0.78mm.
  • Cable Specifications: Woven silver foil shielded copper cable.

Simgot EW100P 03_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 04_r.jpg

Packaging

The Simgot EW100P comes in a small, shiny silver box, 114.5x99x38mm in size. In the centre of the main face is a fishbowl-like ball of the world, inside of which is a shark. Underneath, it reads "High Performance". At the bottom, "Shark" and the model name are written. The brand name is in the upper left corner and the Hi-Res logo in the upper right corner. All lettering is black. On the back side, at the top is the model description, with the model name on the right, on a black background sticker.
Below that is the frequency response. On the bottom half are the specifications, in several languages.
The shiny silver cardboard slides away to reveal a black cardboard box, with the brand logo only in its centre. After lifting the lid, the capsules are encased in a foam mould lined with black cardboard. To its right, there is an elongated box containing the accessories. Under the first layer is another box containing the cable, the tips and the manual. The contents are as follows, but in a nutshell:

  • The two Simgot EW100P capsules.
  • The cable.
  • Three pairs of white silicone tips, sizes SxMxL, in a pouch.
  • One instruction manual.

There is nothing else, no pouch, let alone a zipped case. The bare minimum.
The packaging is small and shiny and the cable is not as bad as the classic black braided cable.

Simgot EW100P 05_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 06_r.jpg

Construction and Design

The capsules do not adopt a classical pattern and their shape has flat faces, along with rounded ones. The outer face does not follow the classic semi-custom pattern, but has an arrow shape that alternates a right angle followed by a rounded face. The capsule is made of semi-transparent polycarbonate, of a very dark brown colour, and on its outer face there is a drop-shaped piece with a hole at its apex, made of H-2016 aluminium alloy. On it you can read "Simgot High Resolution" and "Salute to Art and Science", while in its centre is the logo of the brand. The edges of the capsule are flat and wide. The 2Pin 0.78mm connector is fully recessed. The inner side has two levels, there is a hole near the disc which is the second level. A recessed mole has the lettering that distinguishes the channel. The second level has the shape of a disc, on which the inclined nozzle is mounted. It has a smaller diameter of 5.3 mm, while its crown is 6.2 mm. The full length is 4mm. The nozzle bore is protected by a dense metal grid.
The cable has 2Pin 0.78mm connectors. They are straight and transparent. They taper at the base which contains the two gold-plated pins. A blue or red dot indicates the channel, as well as the letters L and R inscribed inside a circle, almost imperceptible. The cable uses two strands of woven copper and is shielded with silver foil. The sheath is made of transparent PVC. It has semi-rigid over-ear guides, which are also transparent. The splitter piece is a small rectangular piece of transparent rubber. There is no adjustment pin. The 3.5mm connector sleeve is the classic 90° angled cylindrical black plastic block.
Neither the shape, nor the cable are substandard. The effort to create a design and a cable that are not completely simple is appreciated. There is an original design base, while the cable, without being anything special, is far from being the most common cable, and even gives an idea that it is not necessary to change it. I can only criticise the fact that it does not have an adjustment pin.

Simgot EW100P 07_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 08_r.jpg

Adjustment and Ergonomics

I would like to emphasise once again that the capsules have a well thought-out shape. Its flat rim sits very well on the contours of my morphology, it hardly turns and its positioning is very stable. The nozzles have a good inclination, although the insertion is only shallow. It could be average if you use some tips with more projection. But overall, the fit is pretty standard and uncomplicated. The weight is very low and that is much appreciated. The simple fit is not without a good level of occlusion and insulation. Although, that will depend on the seal you get with the tips you use. In my case, using my homemade foam-filled tips, the fit is quite firm, enhancing the fit and achieving a remarkable isolation.
The cable with the over-ear guide is not annoying at all. It is subtly stiff, but does not take shape, it remains quite extended, without any tendency to curl up, which is unusual and is appreciated.

Simgot EW100P 09_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 10_r.jpg

Sound

Profile


The Simgot EW100P's profile is based on the Harman Target 2016, but with less elevation in the sub-bass. To me, it reminds me of a soft V-profile, seeking bass depth and a point of excitement in the mid-high and early treble, albeit within a generalised softness. The high range feels controlled and nuanced. Overall, the sound is somewhat thick, warm, without much sparkle or detail, with an adequate technical competence for the price, but not outstanding.

Simgot EW100P.png

Bass

The bass is dark-leaning, relatively thick, with a good level of darkness, depth and sensory presence. The punch is not too fast and neither is the retrieval, it feels like it lingers slightly in the environment, taking up space, generating volume and leaving sediment. It even subtly muddies the sound, making it more shaded and less clear, ironing out detail in other areas. There is power in its punch, pressure and force, but it feels a little springy and gummy, not so dry. The quality is not bad and the execution is pleasant. Above all, it improves in the reproduction of pure tones of very low presence. While the LFOs at the audible edge are just fair, their sonority is more sensory and does not show colouring. In fact, I prefer this performance to that of other, more expensive IEMS. There is a good level of darkness, depth and, most importantly, naturalness in the reproduction of these pure tones. All in all, without being an IEMS for Bass-Heads, the low-end performance is above neutral and ready for the enjoyment of those looking for some punch and presence in this area.

Simgot EW100P 11_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 12_r.jpg

Mids

The descent into the mid-range is gentle and warmth is felt in the first half of the central area. This helps the male voices to have a good substratum, without their presence being the protagonist. There is volume at their base and repeated thickness in their notes, although they do not have too much projection and remain in that middle distance. The string instruments do not have the bite to stand out and lack the finesse to draw out their details with effective naturalness. In this respect, the thickness of the notes works against them, as does the warmth and darker tone that characterises the sound. In this way, the midrange sounds controlled, more musical than technical or defined. The sense of volume persists, as does the continuity in the sound, which makes it sound cohesive, but wide, dense, busy. The guitars have a shaded pitch, with tight overtones, without too much projection or brightness. With this tuning, the sibilance is practically nullified. Meanwhile, the female vocals have a bit more favour, as far as realism of timbre is concerned, as well as closeness to the listener. They are still not the protagonists, but it is true that they feel fuller, more complete, pleasant and accurate in their overall execution. Although I still miss some more sparkle, brightness, definition and finesse in their reproduction.
However, in some ways, emancipated tuning in the upper-mids can result in a sense of extra clarity in some recordings, which concentrate much of their base in that area. Although this is not the most common occurrence, it can happen with some genres of music.
As a positive summary, the presence of the mids is ascending, it keeps a certain musical coherence, it is pleasant, smooth and controlled. There is no shrillness, no sibilance and its warmth, consistency and homogeneity give the sound body, presence, relative closeness and a feeling of a fairly full sound.

Simgot EW100P 13_r.jpgSimgot EW100P 14_r.jpg

Treble

The initial sparkle is present, but its execution does not enjoy a superior technical skill, it suffers from a certain refinement and the coarseness of the notes is perceived. This makes its flashes a little sharp in that first phase, with a slightly harsh sound, which makes it somewhat penetrating and less calm. With this profile, I thought the flares were going to be more controlled at the start, but this feeling fades as the hertz advance and everything seems to calm down and soften. The extension is not bad for the price range and that makes the initial phase more supportive.

Simgot EW100P 15_r.jpg

Soundstage, Separation

The scene is laid out with more than adequate width and depth. Admittedly, it doesn't do much in the way of recreating different planes or musical layering, with the sound being more dense than spaced out. Still, there is a good level of clarity, despite the warmth of the ensemble. This is not a bright, broad, vigorous, defined or sparkling sound, but I was surprised by the exposure of incipient detail. Despite the level of density of the music, it is capable of presenting medium detail, albeit not in a refined way. The thickness of the notes, the volume occupied by the sound, a certain lack of light, sparkle and brightness, limit the separation, also its level of transparency. The image is successful, without the positioning being too strict or explicit, but there is coherence in its approach.

Simgot EW100P 16_r.jpg

Comparisons

NiceHCK DB1


Few may remember the very inexpensive IEMS from NiceHCK audio shop. They are the DB1s and are currently priced at around $15. The Db1's move away from the Harman profile and go for a more excited mid-high and more present treble. They are IEMS made of transparent PC, with a classic semi-custom shape. They are larger than the EW100P and perhaps that's why they can be a bit more uncomfortable. There is not much to comment on the packaging and contents of both models, but I prefer the Simgot's cable, better finished than the classic black braided NiceHCK cable.
The profile is somewhat different between the two. While the EW100Ps have similarities to the Harman 2016 profile, the DB1s have a slightly more neutral bass and aim for more clarity, at that bold edge.
In the low end, the DB1s are faster and tighter, technically better, more defined and clearer. The EW100P's bass is darker, denser and longer, has a tendency to take up more space and has a longer decay. Qualitatively speaking, I prefer the bass of the DB1s, they are more complete.
In the mid-range of the DB1s, the unevenness is more prolonged between the first half and the mid-highs. This makes the range brighter, clearer and more transparent, but it also makes it leaner and thinner, especially in that first part. Male voices can suffer from a certain body, their timbre is brighter. Whereas, in the EW100P, there is more body, perhaps even a more accurate timbre, but there is also less clarity and a more shaded, homogeneous and continuous surface. Notes on the DB1s are sharper, more pristine and separated, there is more air and distance between notes. To reach the same level of resolution with the EW100P, you try to turn up the volume, without success. Their sound is less analytical, smoother, more permissive, but less detailed. It has more body and physicality, something that favours male voices, but they also feel more distant, less prominent. The difference in note thickness, brightness and the lower sense of volume, bring a higher degree of transparency and clarity to the DB1s and this is something that is noticeable in female voices. Their reproduction is much more prominent, fine and virtuosic; their details are more vivid and the nuances much more visible. As always, in this price range, this ability can be a double-edged sword, as the DB1s can be more annoying, uncontrolled, even sibilant. But they are undoubtedly more technical and skilful, with a timbre that is more accurate from the upper-mids onwards.
In the high end, the treble extension is superior in the DB1s, with more extended brightness and fuller presence. Their sparkle is finer and this provides a higher level of detail. But there is also a higher level of punch, which should be taken into account for those ears more sensitive to a higher energy level.
The EW100Ps have a good initial sparkle and a softer follow-through, something that makes them sketchier, but more gentle at times.
The level of detail in the DB1s is far superior to that of the EW100Ps, their sound is more separated, cleaner, transparent and brighter. The EW100Ps are more musical, dense and cohesive, something that unifies the scene and nuances the sound. The feeling of openness is superior in the DB1s. The sound is more opaque in the EW100Ps and details are less visible. I find no difference in the width of the two scenes, nor in the depth. But it is clear that the DB1s have more projection, a more ethereal, gaseous and volatile feel, something that gives them a more three-dimensional and escapist aura.
The DB1s are a risky response that aims for a high level of detail at a very economical price, but is not without its limitations when it comes to demonstrating its technical level. It is not creaky, but greater refinement is reserved for higher-priced IEMS.
The EW100P's are not looking for that, they are just content to be more melodic and pleasant, more restrained and harmonious, for a smoother, longer and more prolonged enjoyment. But they risk little, they are somewhat more opaque, dense and with less definition and technical skill. Neither are perfect, but they can complement each other quite well.

Simgot EW100P vs NiceHCK DB1.png

Conclusion

The Simgot EW100P is an effort by the brand to have a competitive representative in a very affordable price range. In my opinion, they have not taken many risks. The design has a shape that can be classically Simgot, with ergonomics that work very well and a cable that aims to avoid the "cheap" label. In terms of sound, the risk is low. Within the curve followed by the brand itself, close to the Harman 2016 curve, the profile of the EW100P is smooth, coherent, with a good level of warmth, cohesion and musicality. It does not stand out in any area. The low end has a good level of presence, energy and darkness, but is a little slow. The mids have a good level of body, but lack some sparkle, presence and prominence. The treble has a good initial punch and adequate extension, but lacks refinement. Overall, these are IEMS that average well and can be enjoyable for day-to-day use. But they don't stand out for being technical or detailed. They are on the useful, fun, enjoyable and musical side of sound. But, that may not be enough in an economic range that has become so tough.

Simgot EW100P 17_r.jpg

Sources Used During the Analysis

  • Tempotec March III
  • Burson Audio Playmate II
  • Aune M1p.

Simgot EW100P 18_r.jpg

Linsoul Audio Store, offered me this model, in exchange for writing an honest review. I want to make it clear that all my opinions written in this review have not been conditioned by this fact, nor will I ever write anything that I do not really think or feel here. I will only write about my personal opinion in relation to the revised product.

Simgot EW100P 19_r.jpg

Purchase Link

Simgot EW100P 20_r.jpg

You can read the full review in Spanish here

Simgot EW100P 21_r.jpg

NymPHONOmaniac

Headphoneus Supremus
Pros: -cohesive balance
-nice female vocal
-warm bass thump
-natural timbre
-decent sound value
Cons: -more of the same harman tuning
-poor imaging
-average clarity
-average technical performance
-a bit fatiguing upper mids (pinna gain)
-dry darkish treble that lack air, sparkle and snap
-muddy bass separation
-cheap plastic built
344807381_1616630885520621_8570822805012566283_n.jpg

TONALITY: 7.5/10
TECHNICALITIES: 7.5/10
CONSTRUCTION: 7/10
SOUND VALUE: 8/10

INTRO


Simgot is an experienced earphones maker from China, they begin to have a solid fan base for IEM like EA500. While their IEM release like EW700pro get more praise from basshead, it seem since 2022 Simgot take a new turn and goes balanced near neutral tuning, inspired by the Harman target.
It most be noted that Harman target tuning is vast since the tonal balance get modify every year, so the Simgot approach differ than the Moondrop or Tanchjim approach of harman target.

Today I will review the most budget friendly IEM from Simgot, the EW100P.

Priced only 20$, the EW100P use a 10mm dual layer LCP (liquid crystal polymer) diaphragm dynamic driver that promise fast transient response with low distortion at an extremely competitive price.

Let see in this review if these IEM will stand apart in over crowded ultra budget IEM world.

CONSTRUCTION&ACCESSORIES

343298109_506746598215798_1111970375255595944_n.jpg

352141459_291665786765880_1529062401598429598_n.jpg


The construction of EW100P is just average and those like me that are use to incredible craftmanship from Simgot will sure be underwhelmed by the all light plastic built. Only metal part is the round decorative back plate. The housing is very small and light which is a plus. The 2pin connector are slightly recessed, another plus.
355633354_1015794222761590_6927777171424127427_n.jpg


The included cable isn't plain bad but just average, so i didn't even care to use it.


1687368259764.png


When it come to packaging and accessories, its the bare minimum. You get 3 white silicone eartips, a cable and the IEM and that's it.

All in all, nothing impressive here, but it's to be expected at this minuscule price.



SOUND IMPRESSIONS


343720904_3444808255802023_3485491398800997635_n.jpg


Another chifi day, another Harman target tuning! So, if you own Kiwi Ears Cadenza or Moondrop Chu you don't need these.

This review is for those not owning any Harman target IEM which flood chifi market right now and can be consider safe neutral tuning to U shape tuning, with different upper mids take as well as upper treble, some will make it roll off after 10khz as suggested by Harman but it's a big error...and Simgot choose this approach it seem. Yet, it's safest harman tuning we can get right now in sub-50$ market.

So the tonality is bright neutral with slight bass and lower mids boost. Main brightness come from upper mids gain, but overall signature is warm due to safe approach. We are in lukewarm territory and your source will magnify warm or bright side ot this IEM.

The bass is very boring, and a bit muddy and warm, we can't perceive the separation properly which mix up with lower mids in a natural way we can say. We have a mellow slam, not a very deep extension, some boom can happen with very bassy track when needed but it's not a fast heavy slam and feel damped in resonance and extension.Bass line feel compressed, thickned, lacking transparency. We have minimal texture to permit minimal kick drum presence. It's not a fast attack and the edge is warmed in definition.

The mids aren't bad and some might consider mid centric the EW100P, even if in a rather lean and cold way. I find female vocal shouty and fatiguing, especialy soprano like Arianna Savall or Marjan Vahdat when they go louder in high pitch it can be fatiguing and distracting.
Piano have enough note weight but note definition is a bit warm and decay isn't clean but blurry. I still find this IEM good sounding with jazz and classical and acoustic music, tone is right and for an harman target mids aren't thin. Violin sound quite good, natural and gently textured, but can go too loud in upper range like female vocal.
Mids are very centered in intimate with you, not distant, but not very dynamic, so a bit compressed I would say, lacking in wide presence openess.

The treble is underwhelming, not for those seeking sparkle and snap. Attack is softed in edge and blurry, percussions feel overly damped in presence and lack crisp definition. It's a safe treble that do all it can to avoid treblyness and harshness, cohesion is organic with the rest but it's a bit dark and rolled off on top. It lack air and this affect spatiality negatively. Lower treble region is where we get extra instrument presence, so violin sound way more fowards than clavichord or acoustic guitar which both lack proper attack lead, brilliance and sustain in decay.
We can say its refined in it's own right, but i don't suggest these for fast busy track since it will go mushy macro resolution wise....the driver in there isn't the one of EA500 for sure. Very average and on par with Moondrop Chu i would say. What the Simgot nail here is tone and timbre, this is where they show their tuning knowledge since their no timbra imbalance or out of place micro details or peak. The upper mids pinna gain don't create sibilance or harshness too, just sometime can be borderline shouty as noted above.

Soundstage is underwhelming here, it's like you tape 3 speaker right left and front side of your head, without air between them. So, it's compressed and intimate but what it lack the most is deepness.


Which mean Imaging is underwhelming too, unless very simple or slow track still sounds layers are sticken toghether and it lack wide (and clean) space between instrument, which aren't very sharp in definition edge for accurate positioning....that a big con since the neutral tuning could have deliver monitor like imaging with superior technical performance and acoustic design.

COMPARISONS

352450553_764217718832419_8975767011887320306_n.jpg


VS KZ DFI


DFI is crisper and more V shape. It sound more open and airy but mids are a bit more recessed even if a hint brighter and better layered, less lean and softed-blurry in definition edge.
Bass hit harder and have more rumble resonance and extension. Mids are a hint more shouty in upper mids with the EW100P too (higher pinna gain peak).
Treble is dryer and leaner with the EW100P, fuller in term of balanced details retreival but less sparkly and airy for micro details, making the DFI feel W shape in term of post-10khz extension.
Sounstage feel compressed, less wide, tall and deep with EW100P that have center stage presence more fowards and flat.
Imaging is average with both, but sound layering is better with the DFI as well as space between instrument wider.

All in all, the Simgot is more neutral, lean and boring than bassier more W shape in dynamic DFI which offer perhaps slightly less natural timbre and more recessed mids but superior technical performance still as well as more musical and engaging tonality.

VS KIW EARS CADENZA

The Cadenza is very similar, it's an Harman target too but with sligthly more U shape approach and even brighter upper mids. So, again, its sound more open, a hint more sub bassy with heavier slam and mids are hint less warm and thick than EW100P. Simgot bass is warmer, rounded but less heavy in punch and less clean in sepration. Mids are more natural, warmer and full sounding with the EW100P, edgier in definition, lighter in note weight and more prompt to sibilance and texture presence boost with the Cadenza. Treble is more airy, snappy and sparkly with the Cadenza, more energic and exciting than dryer leaner treble of EW100p.
Soundstage is notably wider taller deeper with Cadenza and imaging is sharper, more accurate, benefiting from higher level of transparency, faster attack speed and better layered and wider instrument spacing.

All in all, the Cadenza is a brighter bassier EW100P with superior technical performance.

VS SIMGOT EW200

Simply put the EW200 are edgier and more technical sounding EW100P. For plain timber lover, the EW100 is warmer and smoother, but this mean definition of instrument is more softed and creamy too.
The bass is just a hint more boosted with EW100, which warm lower mid range a bit more so it feel thicker as a whole but more muddy too. Sub and mid bass are darker and more mixed up with EW100P. The the mids are less energic and less edgy, less transparent and darker in resolution and leaner in dynamic as if bass swallow whole macro dynamic. Biggest difference is the treble which is more rolled off, dry and dark with the EW100P, while more open, airy, snappy and sparkly with the EW200 that deliver notably crisper resolution and higher level of micro details, we can perceive each percussions more easily. Technical performance of EW200 is from another league here, faster in attack so better layered, and then way wider, taller deeper soundstage. And then, this technical superiority is fully noticeable in superior imaging capacity of EW200, which is more precise and accurate and don't have compressed and darkenen layering.

All in all, the EW200 is intensely superior in technical performance, a bit like Moondrop Chu or SSP vs Kato in term of technical gap. But tonality is even brighter-louder in upper mids than the EW100, so if you expect less pinna gain to avoid any hearing fatigue as a upper mids sensitive listener, this will not be for you too.


CONCLUSION
343125207_910861456692695_5367264563915351397_n.jpg


While a big fan of Simgot IEM, I'm quite underwhelmed by the EW100P which is the safest tuned IEM they ever did.…
The EA500 was ultra hyped for legit reason and is still among best sub-100$ IEM i've try this year, so this put the bar quite high for the EW100P. This might have induce utopic expectation but one thing I always love with Simgot is the open spatiality it deliver and this is where EW100P fail for me mainly.

But this isn't all, even if not plain cold or clinical sounding, EW100P doesn't trigger any emotional response in term of musicality reach and that even if female vocal are pleasant.

Playing too safe can be risky. This is what Simgot will learn with EW100P as well as their Harman Target inspiration. Not everybody is Crin fanboi and harman target is a compromise for the mass, it doesn't mean it please the individuals. We need more flavor and for me most harman target take is like French cuisine, its just about a pinch of salt and pepper on fancy dead meat.

Oh, and ''spoiler alert'', I just receive the EW200 yesterday and it's miles ahead of these in term of technical performance, so don't be rubbish and invest 40$ in them, the construction will most likely be more durable too since it's an all metal wonder, like only Simgot can do (but fail to do with EW100P).





-------------------------------

PS: I want to thanks Simgot for sending me this EW100P out of the blue. This is pure time consuming passion here, with zero incentive to write this review. As always, these are my honest and independent minded subjective audio impressions.

You can order the EW100P here: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005588739118.html


For more review you can give a look to my audio blog No Borders Audiophile
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zerstorer_GOhren
SynaestheticA
SynaestheticA
I gotta ask. How does something with such average performance get 4 stars
NymPHONOmaniac
SynaestheticA
SynaestheticA
@NymPHONOmaniac this isn't a dig at you but rather an opinion of products like this. But a $20 iem with completely average performance to me makes me ask the question: Does this need to exist? Or is it just a waste of people's time and money and labour and material. Cheap enough no one cares if it's bad, average enough to be put to the wayside as soon as something else comes out.

Just an opinion of a guy on a forum that's all.

littlenezt

100+ Head-Fier
Budget Vocal Lovers
Pros: +Vocal
+Lush
+Technicalities
+Allrounder
Cons: -No Pouch
Simgot EW100P
1DD LCP

1684921082937 - Copy Cropped.jpg
Before I even begin this review, first let me apologize for my weird English and grammatical mistakes.
The Simgot EW100P is sent from Linsoul in exchange for my honest opinion.

Just in case you're interested on getting the EW100P after reading this review, check this link below :
Linsoul website: https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p
Aliexpress: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005468221586.html
Amazon US: https://www.amazon.com/Linsoul-SIMGOT-EW100P-Detachable-Silver-Plated/dp/B0C27P11HW

Let's start with the Unboxing
Simple box with shark logo(?)1684921082961.jpg1684921082954.jpg1684921082945.jpg1684921082937.jpg1684921082930.jpg
Inside the box you get :
  • IEM
  • Cable
  • Eartips
  • Manual
Sadly no included pouch on the packaging.
as for the
BUILD of the IEM,
1685698667074.jpg
the shell is made from PC / PolyCarbonate / Plastic, with metal faceplate (probably glued to the shell) even though it's made from plastic, it's a nice feeling plastic, not the cheap feeling one (if you know, you know)
1684921082924.jpg
the Cable is using standard 0.78mm 2pin connector, nothing fancy for the cable build, it's functional, that's it.


Comfort and Fitting
Using the stock Eartips and Cable, I don't have any issues with comfort and fitting, it's pretty comfortable for long session listening.
1684921082918 - Copy.jpg

Now let's talk about the Sound.

Sound is tested using Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G, iFi Go Blu and FiiO Q11, Stock Eartips, Stock Cable
Music is mostly from Apple Music Lossless (J-POP, J-Rock, Anisong, EDM, Jazz, Metal)

Tonality in general, the EW100P is tuned to H-2016 target curves (probably Harman target curves), it has a very musical, lush, balanced presentation with a bit more focused on the midrange and vocal.
Vocal on the EW100P is really pleasing to listen especially at its asking price.

BASS : is boosted but not to exact harman quantity bass, and the bass is more focused on the midbass region rather than sub-bass.
Bass is deep, but not that punchy, well controlled, and the decay is rather long.
Don't worry, even though the decay is rather long, the EW100P is still usable for double pedal / metal track (Trivium).


Mids : probably the strongest point of the EW100P.
Vocal is very pleasing to listen, regardless male, female vocals, its very good. If you're in for vocal / midrange focused IEM, the EW100P is one of the better one on its price, or probably the best one that I've ever heard.

Instrument such as violin on Violet Evergarden OST is also rendered very good on this set, especially on its asking price.
Placement of the midrange is a bit more forward compared to the bass and treble.

Treble : is very smooth, lush, but still extend, 0 peaks, 0 sharpness, very safe for one that is treble sensitive.

Note Weight & Timbre : normal, not too thin, nor too thick, natural, probably the most natural sounding IEM of its price bracket.


Technicalities
Detail Retrieval : Very good, for the price its rather mind blowing, in class with the better one like CHU and HOLA.

Stage : is average, not wide, not small either, the presentation is like on an empty field, didn't have exact wall placement but the shape is symmetrical.

Imaging - Positioning - Separation : for its asking price is very good, layering and left-right panning is pretty good, not 2D sounding, you can image shape of the sound easily on the EW100P.
Separation is also very good though not the most razor sharp that I've ever heard on its price (CHU).


Comparations

Moondrop CHU : CHU is made from metal, but the cable is non detachable.
Sound of the CHU is more on the neutral - bright to my ears.
Bass is noticeably smaller in quantity, overall note weight is more leaner on CHU.
CHU is also more sparkly and has more treble compared to the EW100P.
As for the technicalities, it's pretty close, CHU is a bit better on the separation thanks to its more analytical presentation, though for the tonalities and timbre I prefer the EW100P a lot more than CHU.

Truthear HOLA : also tuned to Harman target like EW100P.
HOLA has more bass and treble quantity compared to the EW100P.
HOLA has more unique design compared to the EW100P in my opinion, also HOLA includes pouch on its packaging.
If you like a more bassy and sparkly presentation compared to more vocal / midrange focused, HOLA is probably better option for you, though HOLA has a bit more metallic timbre compared to the super organic timbre of the EW100P.


Conclusion
For me, the Simgot EW100P is a very easy pick because myself is a vocal lovers and its price.
It can be used for all kinds of genre and again, the focus here is on the very lush and pleasing midrange and vocal presentation.

Just in case you're still contemplating whether you should get the EW100P or not, let me help you.

The EW100P is RECOMMENDED if :

  • You want an allrounder IEM
  • You're vocal lovers
  • Sensitive to treble
  • Want a lush and relaxed sounding IEM
THE EW100P is NOT so RECOMMENDED if :
  • You're a Basshead / Treblehead, because the main focus here is on the Midrange area

Just in case you're Indonesian or understand Bahasa Indonesia, here is my review video of the Simgot EW100P

that's all from me for now, I'll probably edit this later to correct my weird English

-littlenezt
Last edited:

SenyorC

100+ Head-Fier
Another contender in the 20€ battle!
Pros: Comfort, weight, price, decent performance for most genres...
Cons: Missing a little bit of "life" to the sound...
DSC_3411.jpg


TLDR version on YouTube: TDLR - Simgot EW100P

The Simgot EW100P have been sent to me by Linsoul in exchange for the publication of this review. They have not made any requests or comments and I will, as always, do my best to be as sincere and unbiased as I can.

I will leave a link to the EW100P via Linsoul in the version of this review published on my blog (link at the end of this review)

As always, this is a non-affiliate link, meaning I do not receive anything for clicks or purchases via the link.

To avoid being repetetive in my reviews, you can find all the info about how I create the reviews, equipment used, how I receive the products and how to interpret my reviews by visiting: About my reviews

DSC_3464.jpg


Intro…

Very recently I reviewed the Simgot EA500, a set of IEMs that cost just under 80€ and are a good set of IEMs, although I don’t find that they work (for me) with all genres and recordings. Today we have the EW100P, set of IEMs that come in at a quarter of the price, available for under 20€ at the time of writing this review. There are quite a few differences between the two models, apart from the price, so I am not going to focus on comparing them.

As we all know by now, there are lots of very good options in the 20€ bracket, so can the EW100P make space for itself in what seems to be turning into a very crowded but very good value for money sector?

DSC_3539.jpg


Presentation…

The Simgot EW100P arrive in a very flashy and shiny silver coloured box with a shark on the front and the word "shark" in very bold lettering under which the actual model is shown in smaller text. I am not sure what the shark is all about, as there is no mention of it on the Linsoul site (or the Simgot site), but it does make the box stand out in the crowd of budget IEMs.

On the back of the box, in a similar style to the bigger brother, Simgot show an FR graph of the IEMs, alonsg with more information in Chinese and English.

Sliding out from the silver cover, we get a much more discrete black box, with the Simgot logo on the top, that flips open to reveal the IEMs sitting in a cardboard cutout with a small accessories box to the right.

Under the IEMs we find the cable and a usual manual, while inside the accessories box we get three sets (S,M,L) of white silicone tips.

That is it as far as packaging and presentation, nothing extraordinary but nothing to complain about at this price either.

DSC_3434.jpg


Build and aesthetics…

The IEMs are rather small and while they are listed as being an aluminum alloy construction, they are actually a semi transparent plastic, except for the copper coloured faceplate that is. The shell is not quite as rounded as some of the other more generic shapes but, as they are so small, I find that they fit easily in my ear, being comfortable and lightweight for long periods of time.

The aesthetics are also pretty basic, with a plain black (semi transparent) shell and the copper plate that features the Simgot logo in black and “Salute to art and science” in small letters. They are certainly not offensive by any means and while they aren’t a fashion statement, they look pretty good in their simplicity.

The included cable is also pretty basic, similar to those found with KZ models but better looking (in my opinion). The clear plastic coating on the outside of the grey covered cores is not really apparent and it isn’t until you pick up the cable that you notice it. The listing says that the shielding of the cable is silver foil and I have to say that I quite like the look.

DSC_3115.jpg


Sound…

All tracks mentioned are clickable links that allow you to open the reference track in the streaming service of your choice (YouTube, Tidal, Qobuz, Spotify, etc.)

Let's get straight to the point and start off with my usual graph comparing them to my personal preference target as a reference:

graph%20(4).png


Starting off in the extreme lows, there is quite a bit of presence in these ranges without being overpowering. The low note rumbles are present but are not really as tight as I would like. This makes things seem a little slow and out of control when there is a large presence of subbass, such as in “Chameleon". They are by no means bad in this region and I’m sure that many will find them to work well, especially considering the price, but they can seem a little sloppy on occasions.

This midbass is not too elevated and although it is not the cleanest of midbass, it is quite well defined for such a budget set of IEMs. With my typical “Crazy” test, I do find the guitar to be a little too boomy in this regard but not enough for me to find it fatiguing. Using “Sun Is Shining” to get a feel for how they deal with EDM, they do a pretty decent job. The bass is kept fairly tight and while they are not the most impressive in these ranges, they are certainly not a set that I can complain about in this regard.

The midrange does seem to lack some definition for my liking. It is tuned very similar to so many other sets in this region, yet comes across a little 2 dimensional, without much body to things that are happening in this range. For example, the vocals in “Down To The River to Pray”, seem to be all happening in a similar plane and come across a little dull, without that nice feeling of chorus that other sets can bring in this track.

The upper mids climb later than on the EA500 and I actually prefer this, at least as far as tuning. The negative is the same as with the rest of the midrange, vocals, while forward enough, are not very exciting, seeming to be quite flat. This is something that I don’t find with the lower ranges of the EW100P, it seems to be apparent more in the mids and upper mids/lower treble.

Moving into the treble, extension is not great, adding a little to that sensation of bluntness found with vocals in the mid range. There is a lack of sparkle and air that takes away from the “excitement” of the music. Sibilance is kept in check, actually subdued in my usual “Code Cool” test, while Paul SImon does still exhibit some sibilance in “Diamonds on the Soles of her Shoes”.

Soundstage is not great, mainly influenced by that sensation of the mids not being very open and while the treble is a little better as far as separation, it is still on the lower side of average in this regard. The same can be said for the image placement, where things are more in a “general” location than specifically placed like on other sets.

DSC_3378.jpg


Conclusion…

Once again we have a set of IEMs that suffers from a few issues but once we factor in the price, we really can’t complain. Is it my favourite set of IEMs in its price range? No. But it is still a long way from being a terrible set of IEMs.

They are comfortable, seemingly well built, and perform adequately for a large range of music, although they don’t really excel in any of them. I would say that the bass ranges are the most impressive and while the mids are tuned to my liking, there is just some “life” missing from them, which is made even more apparent by the lack of air and sparkle up top.

There is no way I can bring myself to say that these IEMs are not worth their price, they are more than worthy, it is just that we are a little spoilt for choice at this end of the budget and some of the competitors are very good.

___
As always, this review is also available in Spanish, both on my blog (www.achoreviews.com) and on YouTube (www.youtube.com/achoreviews)

All FR measurements of IEMs can be viewed and compared on achoreviews.squig.link

All isolation measurements of IEMs can be found on
achoreviews.squig.link/isolation

Redcarmoose

Headphoneus Supremus
Paint-by-Numbers
Pros: Perfect fit being 3 grams of low-weight and relatively small
Nice packaging and cable at this price-point
Sounds basically the same from any source
Great timbre and staging
A Harman 2016 bassed tune
Nice Pace and rhythm
Cons: Slightly forward upper-mids combined with a lack of bass presence
Lacking in lower midrange despite offering a take on being balanced
Lacking sub-bass
Not showing any style of individuality in tone
Generic
"Paint-by-Numbers"
Formulaic; showing no original thought or creativity.


SIMGOT EW100P
While technically proficient, this paint by the numbers approach results in a $19.99 IEM that while good, brings nothing new to the table. Such commonality results in a sound you most likely already bought before. Firing on all eight cylinders SIMGOT’s prior release the EA500 bypassed this boredom, using the same Harman 2016 idea, yet followed through with better execution. Join me as I compare the EW100P with other IEMs, using the differences to arrive at my 3 star rating value rating!


DSC_0017.jpegs.jpeg
DSC_0066.jpege.jpeg


$19.99
https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p


As far as headphone pricing goes, I tend to place all under $40.00 ear-phones in the same value price category. Here today we will put the new SIMGOT EW100P up against two other recent releases, and the 7Hz Salnotes Zero from August of 2022.........much later in the review! It seems SIMGOT has recently had a run-away hit with their $79.00 EA500. Arriving at the 2016 Harman Target with the Red Ring Nozzles, the EA500 proved there really must be something to this Target Curve business. Now while we all know frequency response is only part of what makes a successful IEM, maybe, just maybe it is 80% of the equation. With the added technicalities the $79.00 EA500 brought to the table, it really made you question why you would almost need to spend any more. With that SIMGOT recent history behind us, let’s see if they have done it again at this ultra value price point!

Sticking with the same formula in some ways SIMGOT has attempted the 2016 Harman Target again, though as we will find-out sound results are more than a squiggly line on a piece of paper. Replay characteristics such as note-weight, transient response and soundstage are not graphically shown. Timbre is not measured by graphs. So even though the SIMGOT EW100P may measure one way, that’s only half the battle to reaching a competitive sound signature.

DSC_0056.jpegwq copy 2.jpeg
Screen Shot 2023-05-20 at 12.25.36 PM copy 2.jpeg

Above left to right, the Tripowin Piccolo, SIMGOT EW100P and famous BLON X HBB Z300.



The others that came out at exactly the same time:
Regardless of the replay of frequency response or technicalities, there is still the personal subjectivity in listening to an individual IEM, that will mean more than can ever be put on paper. And interestingly enough there have been other reviewers which have heard the BLON X HBB Z300, the SIMGOT EW100P and the Tripowin Piccolo and chose the EW100P as their favorite. I didn’t, in-fact I put it in third place, of course this hinges on what sound you’re after, what you are looking to achieve in playback. All reviews are subjective anyway…..as a personal understanding of a set of values to be arrived at with a purchase. But as reviewers we try and explain the reasons why and use simple terminology in relation to playback which will possibly enlighten the reader over to our side of the street. Anyways, that is way I will attempt to do today, if you read on.

Tripowin Piccolo 11mm single full-range LCP dynamic driver $35.00
Reaching up to join almost with the 7Hz Salnotes Zero for my affection. It's simply a better balanced sound signature. Better, more defined bass, holding texture and timbre.....showing a separation into the stage while still providing ultimate PRaT. Pace, Rhythm and Timing. This upper treble is seemingly better separated and showing a well-done anti-sibilance dip! This is how I like my IEMs to sound. While looking slightly strange and different, the fit, finish and ergonomics are spectacular.

BLON X HBB Z300 10mm silicon dynamic driver $39.99
The HBB tune. And while different from the above Tripowin Piccolo, I totally see how people will value this style of playback. The Piccolo is forward in mids, the BLON X HBB Z300 a slower less detailed but heavier bass....the mood is real here. Here we also showcase a slight dip in the 6kHz-7kHz allowing for the rest of the treble to gain notoriety with-out heat. Such a controlled brightness is needed crucially to balance out the bass region.


SIMGOT:
This is only my third IEM to review from SIMGOT. In early November of 2022 SIMGOT sent me the EM2R, yet it only received 3 stars! My issue was simple note-weight, there was not enough. With such a score I thought they would never (again) send me anymore noisemakers? Yet once again SIMGOT contacted me and mailed the new EA500 IEM over, and I’m so glad they did!

_wom.jpeg

The EM2R

DSC_0007.jpegqwerttryty.jpeg

The EA500
https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ea500

It’s safe to say SIMGOT kinda does have a sound, yet with tuning filters and a wide range of perceived technicalities between the sets. I wonder how much that particular sound means to you?

The EA500:
https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/simgot-ea500.26361/reviews#review-30453

In March of this year I reviewed the EA500 as one of the very best values of the year. And in actuality part of the treble was not all that even or balanced, no matter what nozzle filter you chose. And that goes to show you it isn’t always the tune, that overall sound comes from the whole package here. That it has to do with the texture of the bass, and clarity in transients which promote focus in hearing the music clearer. In the end there are sound constituents which become more life-like due to timbre and vibrancy, such happenstance at times seems to be just that……..luck.


The packaging:
Coming in as one of the best packaging of the three in comparison today, all three IEMs came out at the same time. The Tripowin Piccolo is $35.00, the BLON X HBB Z300 is $39.99, yet in many ways the $19.99 SIMGOT EW100P comes in a nicer package? It’s simply the way they are presented, in that the 3.5mm plug has a plastic cover, the quality of the ear-tips included. When you get down to it probably they are all packaged close to the same, with the other factor being the cable personalities. Look at the BLON X HBB Z300 copper cable! The EW100P comes in second place while I still totally get the direction they were going with this cable. They needed a smaller included cable because the EW100P is super small. Yet the included has no chin-slider, it still has nice ear-hooks and the 2Pins are color coded red right and blue left, which I can’t say for the Piccolo or Z300. And while the Z300 and Piccolo are marked, it is extremely difficult to read. The SIMGOT EW100P came with 3 sets of S,M,L ear-tips made of silicone, and an owner manual/warranty card.

Screen Shot 2023-05-20 at 12.41.46 PM.png

1) The Tripowin Piccolo cable black.
2) The SIMGOT EW100P grey/silver.
3) BLON X HBB Z300 copper.

DSC_0007.jpegas.jpeg
DSC_0008.jpegas.jpeg

DSC_0015.jpegx.jpeg
DSC_0018.jpegx.jpeg


Build:
Weighing in at a stealthy 3 grams each, the shell build is 100% plastic with a small metal “sticker” as the shining faceplate add-on. The back side shows two air vents being behind the driver, the other out-in-front, with this smoked plastic coming to a head at the nozzle. The nozzle length is borderline too short for me, needing me to gain extra length by using extra long ear-tips. Such a trick of using extra long ear-tips comes in valuable as the results are now perfect fit, even more so due to the weight and shape here. What happened was the added nozzle length went and pushed the IEM outwards from the ear, adding a smooth unobstructed positioning where they just sat in the zone! Honestly I don’t remember these long ear-tips getting such success in the past, as this must also be from nozzle angle positioning, as I’m totally amazed? This is truly a style of all day listening comfort! A joy in fitment!

DSC_0040.jpegd.jpeg
Screen Shot 2023-05-20 at 12.38.35 PM.png

DSC_0050.jpegqwqw.jpeg


Sound:
Bass:

They simply sound like $19.99 IEMs. Nothing special or even making them needed. While the bass is present, it doesn’t offer any great sub-bass. The missing 20Hz to 35Hz sub-bass zone is truly there. Added to that fact the included bass holds very little texture or defining quality. I say this as spending the $50.00 to get the SIMGOT EA500 is real…..real bass obtained and not an attempt. Still to throw in another bass shy $19.99 IEM, the 7Hz Salnotes Zero………..the over-all tone is warmer and has added note-weight across the board, thickening the midrange and treble, adding the smooth realism though timbre and note-weight. My description of bass is done.

Midrange:
Due to the tuning you could say the EW100P is all upper-midrange ability, and you wouldn’t be that far off. And normally I like this style of IEM broadcast, kinda? The upper mids are simply slightly too forward combined with a lack of warmth, enhanced with the missing bottom character and that’s what we have. A generic and slightly thin idea of the Harman 2016. I mean the mids are OK, and technically the timbre is really good. The spatialization into imaging very good….and vocals do get separation and clarity. But I seem to encounter an IEM by the numbers here with the midrange, where harmonically the EW100P just barely gets there. Even, complete yes, but harmonically rich, no. Now I would have nothing to complain about if I seemly understood this as a $19.99 IEM, except a more natural and exquisite reality in replay is out there.........for one the $19.99 7Hz Salnotes Zero. There is just nothing to get excited about here, even though on paper the EW100P probably shows well. There is nothing wrong with it, if you like the style and fit/placement.............but in a way it’s just going through the motions?

Treble:
A little splashy would be the first of ideas, where really that can still work-out to be rewarding. The main-main issue here is the 6kHz to 7kHz region being just slightly too forward. There is detail that results from such exploitation, yet here there is zero bass energy to balance it out. We are left with a tone of brightness no matter which ear-tips, source or file? This brightness borders on sterile and shows itself while offering detail, is harmonically reserved.

Conclusion:
While not bad at all, the EW100P arrives at form-factor as being its number one asset. That means that as far as cheap jogging IEMs go, the EW100P really has a place in the world, that is if you don’t already own the same sound signature in something else.

Fit:
What makes the EW100P good is the fit, the low weight and the sturdy yet agile cable. I was a little hard on the EW100P, as the market has truly changed in the last two years, bringing audiophile sound to the masses for chump-change. But to be truthful there is nothing exactly wrong with the EW100P, as it really does offer an even and complete sound, not quite as heavy in the bass as some, nor as smooth in the mids/highs as others, but walking that middle-ground between inoffensiveness and showboating.

Evenness:
Going about its day the EW100P offers (almost) evenness and careful replay, going towards a sterile sound yet just staying on the other side. Such blandness asks for a dose of spice and individuality to stand-out from the pack. Of course this hobby is totally subjective, even with the best attempt at an objective review. Such a statement means other reviews may offer more light into a purchase and user experience? While I don’t offer these opinions as the final end-all truth, they are simply one persons opinion after all. :)


Probably my biggest amazement is how the prior EA500 release met with such success on all fronts, simply being complete and interactive in tone? And with SIMGOT seemingly having the formula to success, they couldn’t miniaturize the experience? As there is a place in the world for OK sounding $19.99 IEMs nowadays, and the EW100P is one of them, it is just not sticking-out in any way from the pack. If after reading all this you still want to move forward on a pair you won’t be let down, yet not maybe thrilled either? It is what it is.

In my attempt to rectify playback (with 18 days of testing) I tried every playback system I normally use. The Sony DAPs make the treble character all the same, a phone style of playback did similar, as while soundstage and imaging was nice, there seemed to be too much emphasis is the 6kHz-7kHz region? This resulted in a slightly forward presence region, that while this style of tune works at times, it’s balanced out by excessive bass, which the EW100P lacks. Here the specific tone is left to feel and analyze and while relatively good, I’ve just heard better in th
e $19.99 zone.

$19.99
https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p

PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS​

Sound unit-10mm high performance dual-cavity dynamic unit
Diaphragm-LCP
Unit impedance-32Ω±10% >@1kHz
Sensitivity-122dB/Vrms >@1kHz
Distortion-THD<1% >@1kHz
Frequencyn Response Range-5Hz-45kHz
Effective Frequency Response-20Hz-20kHz
Connector-0.78mm 2-pin
Wire Specifications-Woven silver foil shielding copper wire

Linsoul website: https://www.linsoul.com/
Linsoul Aliexpress Store: https://ddaudio.aliexpress.com/store/2894006
Linsoul USA Amazon Store link: https://www.amazon.com/s?i=merchant-items&me=A267P2DT104U3C

Disclaimer:
I want to thank Kareena of Linsoul for the love and the SIMGOT EW100P Universal IEM review sample. I want to thank SIMGOT also for offering a review sample, which was not needed in being redundant, so not accepted.

Disclaimer:
These are one persons ideas and concepts, your results may vary.

Equipment Used:
Sony WM1Z Walkman DAP MrWalkman Firmware 3.5mm
Sony WM1A Walkman DAP MrWalkman Firmware 3.5mm
Sony TA-ZH1ES DAC/AMP Firmware 1.03
Electra Glide Audio Reference Glide-Reference Standard "Fatboy" Power Cord
Sony Walkman Cradle BCR-NWH10
AudioQuest Carbon USB
Shanling UA3 Dongle DAC/Amplifier 3.5mm
Samsung Android Smartphone 3.5mm output

DSC_0124.jpegsw.jpeg

It is my privilege and pleasure to reiterate again on the 7Hz Salnotes Zero (originally $19.99) and continuing to kick-ass in comparisons to future IEMs. Yep, legendary playback, getting all the ducks in a row, with ample note-weight, gorgeous soundstage and true to life balance. The 7Hz Zero remains my favorite in the above grouping.

Zero-Salnotes-S1.jpg
Simgot_EW100_Graph.jpg

Above is the SIMGOT EW100P Universal IEM target curve.
Last edited:

SherryLion

New Head-Fier
New Budget King? The SIMGOT EW100P
Pros: 1. Smooth and clean treble
2. Melodic mid range
3. Punchy and slamming bass
Cons: 1. Average technicalities
2. Build feels cheap

Review OF The SIMGOT EW100P


photo_2023-05-14_04-50-38.jpg


Introduction


My second time reviewing a Simgot product is this one. The highly famous IEM from the Chinese business SIMGOT, named the EA500, was the first IEM I examined from SIMGOT, and I was satisfied with its performance. SIMGOT specialises in developing electroacoustic goods. I wonder if their most recent model, the EW100P, is capable of doing the same. Another one of their most recent products, the EW100P, marks SIMGOT's entry into the low-cost IEM market. Let me make a few things clear out before we continue.

photo_2023-05-14_04-50-40.jpg


Disclaimer


*Since this unit tour was organised by the kindly people at Linsoul, I am grateful to them. And as I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, go to this link.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to these IEMs as "EW100P."
*I am using different Ear-tips for convenience and better versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the EW100P based on their performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.

Specification


The EW100P is a single 10mm dynamic driver in-ear monitor with a dual LCP diaphragm. It is stated that the interior of the shell, the placement of the driver, and the interior cavity are all designed to deliver precise imaging and an accurate soundstage. While the faceplate has an aluminium plate made of the H-2016PC aluminium alloy, the majority of the shell is made of plastic. The sleek, lightweight shells are comfortable to wear and fit better with ear-tips from AZLA and Spin Fit. In terms of the cable's make-up, it is a detachable, woven copper cable shielded with silver foil, with 2 pin connections on one end and an L-shaped 3.5mm termination plug on the other. The package also includes eartips in three different sizes. The sensitivity is 122dB, and the impedance is 32 Ohms, according to the technical specifications. The total harmonic distortion is less than 1%, and the frequency response ranges from 5Hz to 45kHz.

photo_2023-05-14_04-50-44.jpg


Sound


Because of its tuning and specification, the EW100P is actually a close relative of the TangZu Wan'er S.G., Moondrop CHU, and Salnotes Zero. The EW100P has received a similar response to other sets in this price range. Although there are differences between the sound impressions when heard thoroughly, the EW100P follows the same balanced sound signature as the Zero Wan'er and the CHU. To be more precise, the CHU response sounds less balanced and more neutral with a sub bass boost. The EW100P's response astounds me because it differs from others in this price range. In addition, I believe the sound is presented more tonally rather than being more technically with the notes. Others either demonstrate tonally rich performances that lack the technicalities, which results in sounding a little dull, or they sacrifice tonality for details and annoyances in an effort to surprise an audiophile with the response. Let's investigate the sound further while contrasting it with its peers.

photo_2023-05-14_04-50-39.jpg


Treble


The EW100P competes effectively with IEMs in this price range like the Zero or CHU without focusing on sounding particularly bright or finely detailed in order to highlight the nuances made in this region. The energy also satisfies the response and elicits enough information to maintain the engagement while preventing any offensive characteristics. If I were to compare this response, the only one that comes to mind is the Wan'er S.G., which sounded similar but had more energy in the lower frequencies and less air in the higher ones. In contrast, the EW100P sounds as though it has more energy in the lower frequencies and less air in the higher ones, which, in my opinion, makes it sound more open than the Wan'er. The instruments have more rounded and smooth notes, which make it sound lush and clean, and the upper treble is nicely extended, with the vocals sounding complete. Although less thorough than the CHU or Zero, the response is adequate. The EW100P can handle the lean notes that CHU brings. The EW100P sounds richer, but I think the Zero sounds lighter and airier and has a few more details. The notes of the vocals and instruments have more clarity and detail and are presented forward in the mix, making the lower treble sound almost identical to the Zero but more tonally balanced. If I were to compare it to Zero, I'd say it sounds more natural. Overall, the treble response has a lush, clean, and smooth sound.

Mid Range


As it sounds most forward in the mix, particularly in the upper mid range, the mid range is the main focus of the response. The lower treble's energy potential is represented by its energy resilience. This range's response is nearly identical to the Zero's, but it has a richer tonal range. Although it doesn't have as many details as the CHU, the mid range sounds superior to the Wan'er. The vocals come across as vibrant and energetic in the upper mid range, and the instruments support them with a smooth response. This range's good energy brings out the best in both the vocals and the instruments. Even though I occasionally hear some particularly offensive female vocals—they don't happen very often, though—I still think the response has less heat than the Zero or CHU. Since it sounds thicker and denser and has better note weight, the lower mid range is superior to the Zero. When compared to the Wan'er, the vocals and instruments sound dull, dense, but still clean. Bass guitar, for example, has a rich, organic sound. The smooth energy flow between the lower and upper mid range produces a sound that is more melodic than analytical. Overall, the mid range responds melodically, energetically, and naturally.

Bass


It doesn't mean that the response from the EW100P sounds less engaging, but I prefer the Wan'er's response because the bass is presented more boomily and resolves more quickly. The Wan'er and CHU are comparable in terms of bass and mid bass balance, but the Wan'er's boomy presentation gives it a slightly uneven sound. In fact, the response is much better than the CHU or the Zero. The EW100P excels in this area because it has good bass response control, allowing punches and slams to come out clearly and resolve quickly. Although the bass is powerful and captivating enough, it doesn't elicit any other responses or upset the harmony between the regions. The sub bass region is where the emphasis is most prominent; it extends deep and offers a supple amount of sensation in terms of rumble characteristics. The punches hit particularly hard when listening to bass-heavy tracks. Though it isn't the case for me, the Wan'er primarily amplifies the bass to the point where it can overpower other speakers. The EW100P, however, doesn't elicit the same cunning response. Due to the impactful slams and ample boomy bass exposure, the mid bass has a strong presence and sounds fantastic as well. This results in a bass that is more full-bodied. Although the lower mid range is affected by the mid bass leak, the mix is not bloated or muddy as a result. Mid bass is what the EW100P lacks compared to the CHU and the Zero in their response. The Bass region's response is generally captivating, punchy, and slamming.

Technical Performance


When it comes to technical performance, I typically do not notice many differences between IEMs priced at 20 USD or less. primarily because I prefer the sound's stronger tonal focus. The EW100P produces sound more effectively from a tonal standpoint, but in terms of technical performance, it is comparable to other IEMs in this price range. However, I would maintain it in a position higher than the Wan'er.

photo_2023-05-14_04-50-43.jpg


Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation


The imaging could be sharper but it is cleaner than anticipated. The stage is sufficiently present and is wide enough to sound spacious. Although the distinction between the elements is good, it could have been clearer. The CHU is the only IEM that excels in these areas, but if it were to compete, Zero would have put up a valiant fight.

Speed & Resolution


The EW100P's resolution is comparable to that of other IEMs, but the Zero and the CHU make the details more approachable. The EW100P surprises me with its speed, as the notes attack and decay quickly and more effectively than I had anticipated.

Sound Impressions


Sources


Tempotec V6 - The treble became more sophisticated with details and clarity as you listened to the V6, and the sound was more detailed and approachable. While the bass felt more in control, the midrange sounded more sorted. The imaging and resolution were the only aspects of the technical performance that I noticed improving, resulting in a clearer response. This pair's response is the one I favour.

photo_2023-05-14_04-50-42.jpg


iFi Hipdac - As you are hearing the V6, While the upper midrange and lower treble became more forward and energetic, sibilance was also introduced, the sound became duller in the upper treble. The bass became more pronounced, particularly in the mid bass, and the pair sounding more enjoyable. There were no changes to the technical performance other than the stage becoming smaller. This pairing doesn't appeal to me as much, in my opinion.


photo_2023-05-14_04-50-41.jpg


Tracks Used


Luna Haruna - Glory days
Luna Haruna - Overfly
Rokudenashi - The Flame of Love
LMYK - 0 (zero)
ORESKABAND - Jitensya
Marina Horiuchi - Mizukagami no Sekai
RADWIMPS - Suzume
Indila - Love Story
Indila - Tourner dans le vide
Earth, Wind & Fire - September
Tom Petty - Free Fallin'
Fleetwood Mac - Everywhere
Nirvana - Smells Like Teen Spirit
Blue Oyester Cult - (Don't Fear) The Reaper
Guns 'N' Roses - Sweet Child O' Mine
The Police - Every Breath You Take
Gojira - Amazonia
TV on the radio - Wolf Like Me
Bring Me To The Horizon - Can You Feel My Heart
Bring Me To The Horizon - sTraNgeRs
Avril Lavigne - Dare To Love Me
Travis - Love Will Come Through
Gotye - Somebody That I Used To Know
DJ Shadows - Six Days (Remix) [feat. Mos Def]
Lady Gaga - Just Dance
Lil Wayne - Lollipop
Flo Rida - Low
Sebastian Lopez & Flug - Electronic Measures
Federico Mecozzi - Blue (Da Ba Dee)
Wayve - Not Enough
Kai Wachi & TeZATalks - Ghost
NGHTMRE, Zeds Dead & Tori Levett - Shady Intentions
Zeds Dead, DNMO & GG Magree - Save My Grave
Skrillex, Noisia, josh pan & Dylan Brady - Supersonic
Skrillex & Nai Barghouti - Xena
Skrillex, Missy Elliott & Mr. Oizo - RATATA
Kaifi Khalil, Eva B & Wahab Bugti - Kana Yaari
A.R. Rahman, Javed Ali & Mohit Chauhan - Kun Faya Kun

Conclusion


I won't outright claim that these are superior to other IEMs in this price range, particularly those I highlighted in this review, but I can definitely hear that they add something unique to the sound landscape. Even after listening to music for a long time, the sound is so soothing and attractive that you won't feel fatigued. I can recommend these IEMs to everyone because of the seamless presentation; you won't be anything but surprised by them.


photo_2023-05-14_04-50-40 (2).jpg

Zerstorer_GOhren

500+ Head-Fier
SIMGOT EW100P: THE FEISTY ONE
Pros: △ Decent build quality.
△ Its small frame shell chassis will be more versatile to all ear size.
△ High performance LCP diaphragm dynamic driver that can deliver a full range sound.
△ Probably one of the best Harman tuning IEMs in under $100/£80.
△ Very affordable
△ Clean and clear-cut midrange
△ Smooth, well-balanced treble register.
△ Quite nifty on separation and layering aspect for its price.
Cons: ▽ Regarding my major issues on most Harman-tuned IEMs and its derivatives, lean and recessed midrange.
▽ Dull and unremarkable quality on most male vocals and some even female ones.
▽ Mediocre sound/speaker stage.
▽ Resolving on detail retrieval is rather pedestrian.
20230515_163623.jpg


Cookie cutter sharks are small species of sharks that its way of feeding is to suck and gouge up some flesh from its unsuspected prey or host with its circular suction mouth with band saw-like set of teeth.


I did a review on a SIMGOT product before and it was the SIMGOT EA500. I think that it is one of the best entry-level single DD IEMs that was ever released and I still enjoy using it in my casual listening session.


What I have SIMGOT EW100P, this is SIMGOT's current ultra budget model that will compete with some of the best in the entry-level audio market segment. It has 10mm dual chambered with LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer) diaphragm to provide better dynamic, more solid audio output with good transient response, faster driver performance to avoid excessive distortion and to achieve a more cleaner sound.

20230515_170623.jpg
20230515_170603.jpg


It has a composite shell chassis made up of an opaque polycarbonate plastic on its cavity base and an aluminium alloy on its teardrop-shaped face plate. It has three vent holes that allow it to escape some excessive air pressure generated by a high performance dynamic driver. EW100P uses a 2-pin connector as its detachable interlocking mechanism with its 2-core cable with silver foil shielding on its copper wirings.

20230515_170204.jpg


Due to its diminutive size. It fits easily into my lug holes so that I can even use them for long listening sessions without experiencing any listening fatigue at all. Though the noise isolation is rather average as it barely blocks any noises from the outside.

20230515_170258.jpg


The product packaging of SIMGOT EW100P is somewhat bare bones but compared to other products with similar price range, SIMGOT EW100P product presentation is way more presentable and the inclusions are compartmentalised. Its silver-coloured rectangular box has a brand name logo, model name, a design print of a shark and a Hi-Res logo at the front, while at the back, there is a frequency graph and product specification.

20230515_165753.jpg


Here are the following contents inside the box:


■ a pair of SIMGOT EW100P IEMs

■ a 2-core parallel SPC cable with an L-shaped 3.5mm termination plug.

■ 2 pairs of spare white-coloured ear tips of different standard sizes (small and large).
■ Instruction manual.

20230515_165931.jpg
20230515_165936.jpg

20230515_165940.jpg


As for amplification and power scaling, EW100P is an easy to drive set but putting it on other devices with better power output will sound cleaner, more dynamic sounding that you will definitely feel its full range scale.


The EW100P has a U-shaped sound signature that follows the Harman target curve. More emphasis on sub bass and upper mids as most Harman-tuned IEMs tuned in that manner.

20230515_163743.jpg


LOWS/BASS:

Well, given that it has Harman tuning which gives more emphasis on sub bass rather than the mid bass but surprisingly, EW100P has a bit more textured mid bass compare to most IEMs with similar tuning curve.

It has a good sub bass as I discerningly felt those reverberations and rumbling from sub bass focus instruments like synthesisers, drum machines and low toned bass guitars. Mid bass has a decent note weight but not the most textured and still a tad lean sounding to my hearing. Bass guitars have a rather hollow and weightless sound while bass drum kick has this rumbling and enough thudding sound. Then on bass-baritone vocals, it lacks depth and strength to have a dense and thick sound that truly defines its characteristics.



MIDRANGE:

The midrange is certainly a bit recessed in the overall frequency range spectrum with its lean, neutral and transparent presentation. It gives more significance to female vocals and some woodwind and string instruments.

Almost all type male vocals sound leaner and lacking of texture to give a more robust sound on baritones and tenors with the exception of countertenors which are somehow passable due to their similar characteristics and register to mezzo-sopranos. Female vocals fare better on this one especially on mezzo-sopranos and sopranos as they have enough energy and shimmer to give that silvery and harmonious voice with the exception of contralto vocals. (Tracy Chapman and Annie Lennox sounds unexceptional here in my opinion)

On instruments, it gives a crisp and bright sound on acoustic guitars, a vibrant and eloquent sound of a violin (love the violin lines on Malice Mizer's track, Au Revoir), trumpets have rounded and resonant sound while trombones have also rounded with acceptable intense sound on them. There are some sharpness and dry sound on toms and snare drums while the pianos have a vivid and bright tone on them.



HIGHS/TREBLE:

The treble of this set definitely has some emphasis and elevation especially on upper mids and some parts of the presence treble region just to have a sufficient brightness to give a decent detail and clarity. I don't hear any harshness nor sibilance on this one that treble sensitives will probably have a long listening pleasure.

The cymbals have an undulating and lustrous sound rather than shimmering and more sizzling sound. The airy extension is modest and average at best as I find it insufficient but enough for more on usual casual listening.



SOUNDSTAGE, IMAGING AND OTHER TECHNICALITIES:

It has an average size on its overall sound field dimension, average sound/speaker stage width, average height reach and average depth which give me an almost equal proportion within my headroom but not a spacious one which I usually prefer on my IEMs.

Imaging of this one has a typical two-dimensional stereo presentation which is acceptable enough in my opinion given its price. It has a good separation and layering is actually decent on how it was arranged and give a specific frequency and dynamic tone of each instrument and vocals that gives a good mixing composition that can decently handle even the most busiest and complex tracks out there.

There is a good coherency of its single dynamic drivers to deliver faster transient response with lower distortion to give a clean sound and even more definition in all frequencies.

On resolution capabilities, It has a good emphasis on macro-dynamics but on the micro-detail reproduction is rather average as it barely extracts some nuances and subtleties from an audio track data. Overall tonal colour is somehow natural albeit lean and less dynamic.



PEER COMPARISONS:


TRUTHEAR HOLA


● Both have a new generation of LCP diaphragm, dynamic drivers on their internals. They even have the same materials on their shell chassis but Hola has more quantity on its inclusions and even got the best stock cable in under US$20/£16.

● Like EW100P, Hola has a U-shaped sound signature. It has leaner and less textured mid bass compared to the EW100P but it has tad more air on the brilliance part of the treble region.

● They have similar technical performance but on separation and layering, Hola really struggles on more complex tracks like jazz and orchestra.



TANGZU WAN'ER S.G.

● They have similar build quality on their shell chassis but Wan'er is more eye pleasing with its face plate design. Both have comparable product packaging but Wan'er has a cloth with a beautiful illustration of the Premier (Shang Guo Wan'er was a prime minister during Empress Zetian Wu's reign).

● Wan'er also takes a U-shaped sound signature but it is warmer and more textured but has a similar safe treble register which is smooth and less offensive sounding.

● On technicalities, Wan'er has an above average proportions on its sound/speaker stage dimensions from width to depth. Both have similar imaging presentations but Wan'er scrambles and have some difficulties on more complex tracks which EW100P can deliver decently in a more organised mix on its composition.


The introduction of SIMGOT EW100P in the highly contested battle in the ultra-budget segment makes it even more exciting and and even complicated as it adds on the list as one of the viable and compelling to purchase.

I can even assert that SIMGOT EW100P will probably buried some of the well-known hype products with similar tuning due to its affordability and even more engrossing tonality and some technical performance that make it more a safer bet to budget-conscious audio enthusiasts to have a "high quality sound" that they are looking for. If you want to experience a well-tuned Harman tuning set then this one's for you.


Checkout my review on other SIMGOT products:


■ SIMGOT EA500


SIMGOT EW100P is now available at LINSOUL, check out the link below if you are interested in purchasing it.


◆◆SIMGOT EW100P◆◆


20230515_163816.jpg



SPECIFICATION:

MODEL: SIMGOT EW100P
IMPEDANCE: 32Ω
SENSITIVITY: 112dB
FREQUENCY RESPONSE: 20Hz – 20KHz
CABLE LENGTH: 1.2M
PIN TYPE: 2-PIN CONNECTOR (0.78MM)
PLUG TYPE: 3.5mm
DRIVER UNIT(S): (1) DYNAMIC DRIVER


Some Tracks Tested: ( * = 16-bit FLAC, ** = 24-bit FLAC, *'* = MQA, '*' = DSD, *'= .WAV)

Alison Krauss -When You Say Nothing At All *
Jade Wiedlin - Blue Kiss**
Led Zeppelin - When The Levee Breaks **
Mountain - Mississippi Queen *
Queen - Killer Queen **
Guns N' Roses - Patience *'*
Eric Clapton - Tears in Heaven '*'
Sergio Mendes- Never Gonna Let You Go '*'
Pearl Jam - Daughter **
Roselia - Hidamari Rhodonite *
Assassin - Fight (To Stop The Tyranny)*
Celtic Frost- Visual Aggression *
New Order - Blue Monday *
The Corrs- What Can I do (unplugged version) *
Jimi Hendrix Experience - Voodoo Child *
The Madness- Buggy Trousers *
Metallica - Motorbreath **
Mariah Carey- Always Be My Baby *
Destiny's Child - Say My Name *
Malice Mizer- Au Revoir *
Mozart - Lacrimosa *
New York Philharmonic Orchestra - Dvorak- Symphony 9 " From the New World." *
Eva Cassidy - Fields of Gold (Sting cover)*
Michael Jackson - Give In To Me *
Exciter - Violence and Force *
Diana Krall - Stop This World **
Debbie Gibson - Foolish Beat *'*
The Sisters of Mercy – Lucretia My Reflection**
Suzanne Vega – Luka **
Lauren Christy – Steep *
Ottoman Mehter - Hucum Marsi *
Diana Damrau - Mozart: Die Zauberflöte*



P.S.

I am not affiliated to SIMGOT nor receive monetary incentives and financial gains as they provide me a review unit for an exchange of factual and sincere feedback from yours truly.

Once again, I would like to send my gratitude to LINSOUL especially to MS. KAREENA TANG for providing this review unit. I truly appreciate their generosity and trust towards me and other reviewers.

20230515_163629.jpg
20230515_163634.jpg
20230515_163641.jpg
20230515_163648.jpg
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: o0genesis0o

Berry108

New Head-Fier
𝐒𝐈𝐌𝐆𝐎𝐓 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐄𝐖𝟏𝟎𝟎𝐏 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰: $𝟐𝟎 𝐋𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫
Pros: Smooth inoffensive sound
Good and ample bass response
Clean sound presentation
Great 2-pin Cable
Lightweight build
Inexpensive
Cons: Other IEMs are build more sturdier for the price
Can be boring to some and not for those looking for a really energetic sound
𝐒𝐈𝐌𝐆𝐎𝐓 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐄𝐖𝟏𝟎𝟎𝐏 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰: $𝟐𝟎 𝐋𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫


|| 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 ||

Simgot recently has been the talk of the town because of their newly released and highly acclaimed EA500. However, unbeknownst to others, SIMGOT released a new IEM in the competitive $20 price range with the all new Shark EW100P (Not to be confused with the EW100).

346049359_1452373022271748_7924033902309045018_n.png


Sporting a translucent plastic housing, Liquid Crystal Polymer(LCP) dynamic driver, detachable cable, and big shoes to fill, the EW100P aims to stand out against the sea of IEMs in the $20 price range.

|| 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀 ||

I don’t fancy confusing lingo, therefore, the reviews will simple without too much confusing terminologies

This set is sent in exchange for an honest review. There is no material or financial incentive for me to do this review and I guarantee no exchange has been done by both parties to influence or sway our opinions on this product.

My thoughts and opinions are of my own. My experience will entirely differ from everybody else. The contents of this review should not be considered factual as this hobby heavily leans on subjectivity. YMMV.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

𝗛𝘂𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 Linsoul Audio 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄. 𝗗𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗼-𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝘄𝗲’𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


| 𝗣𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 |

The EW100P comes in a compact reflective box with an adorable shark illustration and a branding all over. Additional information is present on the back of the box like a provided FR graph and details about the IEM.

345065183_1087690542266477_4379365666374928936_n.png



| 𝗨𝗻𝗯𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 |

Unpacking everything is a breeze with a simple slide mechanism. The IEMs themselves immediately greet you encased in foam with an accessories box right beside it. Under the IEMs are the included cable and some paperwork while the accessories box only holds the provided ear tips.
345665041_166702443027835_3811543755617344215_n.png
345864319_3156366714509108_5572833560715826165_n.png


I love how unobtrusive the included cable is. Cables these days are becoming more and more thicker and harder to maneuver, and an included cable that feels nice but discrete at the same time is really refreshing. I’m a bit bummed out that they didn’t include a chin cinch though.

Item Breakdown:

IEM earpieces
Paperwork
A set of ear tips(S,M,L)
Unbraided copper L-shaped 2-pin cable


| 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱, 𝗩𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁, 𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 |

The EW100P is built with a high quality black plastic that is somewhat translucent and a circular segment in the faceplate that is made out aluminum, where the SIMGOT logo with text sits. Speaking of the faceplate, a vent is visible and is facing outward whilst the other remaining two on each earpiece sit around the nozzle area. The nozzle itself is made out of the same material as the majority of the build of EW100P which is plastic, and has this ridge to better hold the ear tip in place.

345901579_192935023635009_4764019084431163412_n.png


This uses a 2-pin connection which is great for a budget set whereas other offerings use QDC. Not really a big deal, but I’d pick 2-pin over QDC any day of the week.
The overall build feels nice despite the relatively low asking price and being made out of plastic. No rough edges are present and everything is nicely polished. It feels really light but not at the cost of feeling cheap. This set has a universal fit. There are no grooves and pronounced wing that may bother other people and is quite lowkey in the ear.

345857677_823786202702031_6265523061478959136_n.png


This uses an Liquid Crystal Polymer dynamic driver, which, as you know, is a very capable and well-liked dynamic driver configuration popularized by the likes of the Moondrop Aria 2021 and the TinHifi T3+ that were released for quite some time now.


| 𝗜𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 |

The isolation on these are below average, probably because of the plastic build not being thick or enough to block outside noise or the presence of the vent pointing outward.

You can still use this for passive noise canceling but still a far cry from actual active noise canceling.


| 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁 |

These are really comfortable in the ears. It doesn’t weigh down my ear, and the fit is snug when jammed in my ear. I found myself having enough insertion depth, which the shape of EW100P helped for how universal it is. No pronounced wing or grooves that may hinder one’s experience here too.


**𝑺𝒕𝒐𝒄𝒌 𝒕𝒊𝒑𝒔(𝑺𝒎𝒂𝒍𝒍) 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑽𝑬 𝑨𝒗𝒂𝒏𝒊 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒁𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝑼1**


|| 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 ||

This is probably going to be my number 1 set in the $20 price range. Dethroning my TinHifi C2, which I still love. It sounds so balanced and clean. Frequencies don't sound as if they’re fighting for dominance.

345048601_1531653960694313_1315773230473888452_n.png


I can listen to this set for hours on end without being fatigued and enjoy every second of it.

344769973_6123309707746736_3269257698508168116_n.png


| 𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 |

These are pretty efficient and you can easily add more power without much worry of distortion. Be careful of noise floor though, as it can still persist while feeding it more power than it needs.


| 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝘀 |

Bass despite being light, it still kicks quite well and has nice tightness and fast attack. Mid-bass is more pronounced than the sub-bass but so rumble is still somewhat present.

A clean presentation of the low-end that can definitely fit a lot of genres, making the EW100P more versatile.
Bleed is minimal, if not non-existent. I do however would like a little bit more grit and texture to really sell the decay of kick drums.


| 𝗠𝗶𝗱𝘀 |

Vocals are nicely spaced and don't feel obnoxiously intimate, allowing the vocals to breathe a little. Male vocals are a tad bit more forward than their female counterparts. Female vocals can sound thin sometimes though.

S-sounds and T-sounds can sound harsh in really loud volumes. Not really surprised as this is a common problem for IEMs not just in this price range. It is really tolerable though as I find myself ignoring for the most part and doesn’t seem to be bothered by it.


| 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘀 |

This is the area that made the EW100P better than the TinHifi C2 purely because of the C2’s issue of having treble that is quite coarse whereas the EW100P is more tame yet is a smooth experience. I found the extension to be good, as well as details.

Cymbals rarely sound thin and the overall performance is inoffensive in my opinion as a treble sensitive guy.


| 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 |


Layering is great while imaging can be quite middling, Staging feels wider than tall. Middling imaging can be due to the warm-neutral-ish sound signature which is a good trade-off if you ask me.

I still prefer the C2 over this in terms of technical performance but one can comfortably use this for things other than music listening like gaming for example.


|| 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 ||

A great relaxing set coming from SIMGOT. This will be my favorite set around $20 overall, with its great mix of clean sound and inoffensive tuning. There are still a few points where they can improve upon, but I’m probably nitpicking at this point considering the price the EW100P goes for.

345319312_1287385345530808_4347715815503821981_n.png


Some may not find the plastic build and design to be alluring but the sound that this produces is a perfect match for what I’m looking for in a set that revolves around my taste.

baskingshark

Headphoneus Supremus
Sedate, Soothing, Serene, Silky Smooth Sharky
Pros: Moderately easy to drive
Well fitting
Excellent price-to-performance ratio
Detachable cable at this price point
Acceptable technicalities
Expansive soundstage
Organic timbre
Balanced tuning, smooth and fatigue free
Cons: Limited accessories
Bass could be a bit tighter and more textured
Not enough bass for bassheads
Trebleheads may want more sparkle and air
DISCLAIMER

I would like to thank Linsoul for providing this review unit.
The Simgot EW100P can be gotten here: https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p (no affliate links).

Rest assured that even though my nickname incorporates a shark, I will grade this IEM objectively and accordingly. There will be no favouritism given to fellow sharks! And no, the EW100P is not a collab with myself hahaha!

Simgot EW100P Conclusion.jpeg



SPECIFICATIONS
  • Driver configuration: 10 mm dual LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer) dynamic driver
  • Frequency response: 20 Hz – 20000 Hz
  • Impedance: 32 Ohms
  • Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms
  • Cable: 2-pin, 0.78 mm, woven copper cable with silver foil
  • Tested at $19.99 USD

HOW MANY VARIANTS OF THE SIMGOT EW100 ARE THERE?

Like many fish (or sharks in the ocean), there are currently 4 existing models out there.

Variants.jpeg



The EW100P is the version available for purchase in the West, whereas the original EW100 (mic and non mic version) has non-detachable cables, and were released exclusively in China for domestic consumption.

We have a fourth variant called the EW100 DSP, which has a DSP in a type-C connector, similar to something like the Moondrop Quarks DSP, Tanchjim Tanya DSP and Moondrop JIU.

To reiterate, the model we will be evaluating today is the EW100P, which has a detachable 2-pin cable.


ACCESSORIES

Other than the IEM, these are included:

- 3 pairs of silicone ear tips (S, M, L)
- Cable

Well the accessories are indeed spartan, but for something retailing at sub-USD$20, there's nothing much to make a fuss about. Some IEMs at this price bracket do not even have detachable cables, so wishing for foam tips and a case may be a bit too demanding.

Simgot EW100P Accessories.jpeg


The eartips are quite decent in terms of fit and sonics, though intrepid audiophiles will probably find some aftermarket tips for the EW100P, so fair enough.

The stock cable is a 2-pin woven copper cable with silver foil. It is quite microphonic, thin and tangly, and doesn't even have a chin cinch. I guess once again, at this ultra-budget price bracket, this is something we can close one eye for, considering some cables cost even more than the EW100P itself!


The rest of this review was done with the stock cable and stock tips. No aftermarket accessories were used, so as not to add any confounders to the sound.


BUILD/COMFORT

Simgot EW100P Cover Photo.jpeg



The earpieces are fashioned from H-2016 PC aluminum alloy, and are coloured black with a golden faceplate. It is similar in shape to the Moondrop SSR, if you have tried that before, though the EW100P is much lighter.

In terms of ergonomics, the comfort is very good. Being vented, isolation is bang average, though the EW100P should be usable outdoors. I did not encounter any driver flex, but this is partially dependent on ear anatomy and type of eartips used, so YMMV.


INTERNALS

The EW100P's engine is a 10 mm dual LCP DD.


DRIVABILITY

I tested the EW100P with the following sources:
- Apple dongle
- Colorfly CDA M1 DAC/AMP dongle
- Creative Sound Blaster X5
- E1DA DAC/AMP dongle
- Hiby R3 Pro Saber 2022 DAP
- Khadas Tone Board -> Schiit Asgard 3 amp
- Khadas Tone Board -> Topping L30 amp
- Questyle M15 DAC/AMP dongle
- Sony Walkman NW A-55 DAP (Walkman One WM1Z Plus v2 Mod)
- Sony Walkman NW A-55 DAP (Walkman One Neutral Mod)
- Sony Walkman NW WM1A DAP (Walkman One WM1Z Plus v2 Mod)
- Smartphone


The EW100P is moderate easy to drive. It may scale with amplification, as per most single DD types, in soundstage, bass tightness and dynamics.


SOUND & TECHNICALITIES

Simgot EW100P.jpg

Graph of the Simgot EW100P using a IEC711 compliant coupler. 8 kHz area is a coupler artefact peak.

Tonally, the Simgot EW100P is tuned to a warm U-shape. It is pretty balanced and should be suitable for most music genres.

In keeping with its single DD roots, timbral accuracy is very natural for acoustic instruments and vocals.

Technicalities are decent for a USD$20 pair. Soundstage is surprisingly large in all 3 dimensions, something that belies its price tag. The EW100P is not the most detailed pair, but imaging and instrument separation is acceptable for an ultra-budget set, aided by the above-average soundstage.

The EW100P is not a basshead pair, with the bass just slightly north of neutral. It is mostly focused at the sub-bass, with decent extension to the sub-bass registers. In terms of bass quality, texturing is below average, and basslines can sound a bit one-noted with a sprinkle of mid-bass bleed. Bass speed is moderate, though it may smear with very complex bass riffs.

The lower midrange is a tinge depressed, with the aforementioned mid-bass bleed warming this area and adding heft and a lush undertone to notes. With an 8 dB pinna gain, the upper mids are non-fatiguing, though vocals may not be at the centre of the mix as such.

There's a small lower treble rise that continues on from the upper mids, but thereafter the treble rolls off quite early. This translates to a very smooth higher end with not an ounce of sibilance, though sparkle, clarity, resolution and micro-detailing take a hit.

Simgot EW100P Photo 2.jpeg



COMPARISONS

Comparisons were made with other USD$20ish single DD IEMs. Planars, hybrids and pure BA types were left out of the equation as the different transducers have their pros and cons.


BLON BL-03

The venerable BLON BL-03 is much more bassy, though the bass isn't as tight and clean, and bleeds way more than in the EW100P. The BL-03 is also darker in the treble, with less extension.

Timbre is a bit more organic on the BL-03, with a thicker note weight. However, the EW100P trounces the BL-03 when it comes to technicalities, with the EW100P a league or two ahead in soundstage, imaging, micro-details and instrument separation.

The elephant in the room is of course the BL-03's horrendous fit, due to too short nozzles - most consumers may need to source for aftermarket eartips to address this issue, which does add to costs.


Salnotes Zero

The Salnotes Zero is a neutral bright pair with a thinner note weight. The Zero has less bass, though the bass is a bit tighter and cleaner. The Zero has more boosted treble and air, though sibilance is present, and it can be harsher and fatiguing for longer listening sessions.

The Zero has a more sterile and analytical signature, with a less natural timbre. In technicalities, the EW100P has a bigger soundstage, though the Zero has slightly better micro-details and imaging.

The Zero has bad fit due to the sharp angular housings, and this may be a deal-breaker for some.


Tangzu Wan'er

The Wan'er has a similar tonality to the EW100P, just that the former is just slightly bassier, with a more recessed lower treble.

Timbre is natural in both sets, though the Wan'er is inferior in soundstage, micro-detailing, instrument separation and imaging.


CONCLUSIONS

For the price of a restaurant meal, the EW100P packs superb value proposition. Other than an expected dearth of accessories at this price point, the EW100P is well-fitting, with a natural timbre and a balanced and warm fatigue-free tuning.

Technicalities are okay for a USD$20 set, with soundstage being a highlight for its price. The bass could be tighter and cleaner, but one can't expect the moon for 20 bucks.

Simgot EW100P Photo 1.jpeg



The Shark design may be ironic, given the aggressive connotation this animal provides (I'm not aggressive too, I hope!!), as the EW100P is sedate, soothing, serene and silky smooth.

Indeed, trebleheads who want a bit more sparkle and air might be better served at looking at an alternative option. It may not have enough bass to please bassheads too, but other than that, the EW100P is well-balanced in tuning, and most other listeners would be quite at home with the tonality.

The ultra-budget segment has come leaps and bounds in the past few months, and it is really amazing what USD$20 can get us in sonics nowadays. The EW100P is definitely an IEM that newcomers to this hobby can check out.
Last edited:
Back
Top