Oriveti Dynabird Exclusive 9.2mm Berylium-coated 1DD In-Ear Earphones

Beryllium on a Budget: Is Dynabird Bleqk Worth $99?

So, I decided to blind-buy an IEM that I rarely see at audio events. It’s from the brand ORIVETI, and the model is called Dynabird Bleqk. This IEM is really under the radar, not very hyped, but it has this mysterious aura that tempted me to give it a try.



Oh, and fun fact: “Bleqk” stands for “Basic Line Exquisite Quality Kept”
sounds fancy, right? The price? Around $99, just like the more well-known Dunu Kima2 among local audiophiles.

---

​

​

Specs & Build Quality​

The Dynabird uses a single dynamic driver (1DD) coated with beryllium
a lightweight yet stiff material often found in higher-end IEMs for more precise and detailed sound. The housing is CNC-milled from aluminum, giving it a solid, premium look and also helping with stable acoustics.


Quick Specs:

• Impedance: 16Ω
• Sensitivity: 105±3dB/mW
• Driver: 1DD beryllium-coated
• Connector: 2-pin 0.78mm
• Jack: 3.5mm

Super easy to drive even with a smartphone, it sounds great. With something like Acmee 4S or Moondrop Moonriver2 DAC, it performs even better.

---

​

​

Unboxing & Accessories​

Don’t expect a luxurious unboxing experience with ribbons and such. The box is minimalist, but when you open it, you can tell they put real thought into it.


Inside the box:

• Dynabird Bleqk IEMs
• Black 4-braid cable with 3.5mm jack – looks surprisingly elegant
• 7 pairs of eartips (4 wide bore + 3 narrow bore)
• Hard carrying case

First impression? Build quality is excellent. The CNC machining is precise, and the matte finish looks classy. The shape is similar to Tin HiFi C2, but with sharper edges. I thought it might be uncomfortable at first, but the fit is surprisingly stable and comfy.

---

​

​

Sound Impressions​

(Tested using Sony XZ Premium + Acmee 4S DAC, with Dunu Candy eartips)

Bass​

The bass has fast decay, is tight, and well-controlled. It’s not boomy, but not weak either. Subbass is present, but doesn’t rumble down your spine. Midbass isn’t very punchy, so don’t expect CCA Trio levels of impact. For tracks like “Bad Guy” by Billie Eilish or “Hysteria” by Muse, it’s enjoyable, though maybe not for hardcore bassheads.

Mids​

Upper mids are the focus here. Female vocals like Aimer, Adele, or Suisei sound clear, emotional, and sparkly.
Male vocals? A bit recessed. Songs like “Lemon” by Kenshi Yonezu or “Perfect” by Ed Sheeran sound okay, but not special. So if you’re into female vocals, this is your heaven. For male vocals just consider it a bonus.

Treble​

The treble is airy, detailed, and has a nice sparkle that brings the music to life. But with neutral or bright setups, it can get sharp. Listening to “Ghost Rule” by Amane Kanata showed some harshness and sibilance, especially on "S" sounds.


That said, with cleanly mastered tracks, the treble enhances the soundstage nicely. Still, if you're treble-sensitive, consider pairing it with warm-sounding tips or cables.

---

Technical Performance​

• Soundstage: Good left-right width, but depth and height are a bit flat
• Imaging: Quite accurate
• Separation & Layering: Good, each instrument has its own space
• Timbre: Fairly natural, but can sound metallic in mid-treble and cymbal crashes
• Distortion: None, even at high volumes
• Scalability: Changing DACs or cables makes a difference, but doesn’t change its core tuning

---

Is It Worth Blind-Buying?​

At $99, the Dynabird Bleqk offers a solid package:

• Premium build quality
• Sound tuning that works well with pop, rock, J-pop, EDM
• Decent accessories
• Fun yet controlled tuning

Compared to Dunu Kima2 or Moondrop Aria, this one leans more V-shaped, with a more energetic presentation. ORIVETI clearly wanted to establish their identity through this IEM from the beryllium driver to the distinct housing design.

---

So, who is Dynabird Bleqk for?​

Great for:

Those who enjoy V-shaped sound, female vocals, lively details, and premium looks.

Click to expand...

Not ideal for:

Hardcore bassheads, mid-lovers, or people wanting a deep, concert-like soundstage

Click to expand...

---

Blind-buy worthy?
Yes, as long as you know your preferences and are okay with a fun, energetic tuning.

---

This product is available via international audio gear distributors such as Amazon, HiFiGo, or other reputable online retailers. Ensure authenticity by buying from trusted sources.

https://hifigo.com/products/oriveti...w_W1aG_rabGSKrvQxVVcb7cMihsd9aMyLZRaNxf5adC3w

https://www.amazon.com/HiFiGo-Dynabird-Earphones-Berylium-Coated-Extended/dp/B0D739Z4Y6?th=1

DISCLAIMER

This set is provided to me by HiFiGo in exchange for a review, although no exchange has been done to influence any positive or negative thoughts about this product.

UNAFFILIATED LINK
Click Here - Dynabird

INTRODUCTION TO BRAND

I am not familiar with this brand well. They released a few banger IEMs in the past and I have not heard them either.

People in my community vouched for the 700VB, which is much pricer than this, at almost $700. Their OD200 was a massive hit, and HeadphoneZone recently collaborated with them.

They have budget options like OD100 and yet I haven’t tried either so it is safe to say that this headphone is being judged with a completely blank slate towards the company.



FEATURES

Dynabird houses a Single Dynamic driver of 9.2mm, which is “Be-Coated” as per Oriverti. The shell is made of metal and is very sturdy to the touch and feel. It is also fairly easy to drive since it's somewhere around 105db in sensitivity per milliwatt.

You will be provided with two sets of tips of different bore sizes and a pretty solid cable. The cable is good in touch and feel but might get tangly sometimes. It comes with a pretty pocketable case too.

Now let's start the review with the Objective Analysis



INTRODUCTION

When you listen to it for the first time you will notice that this IEM is very analog. It’s not very snappy and aggressive for the most part but it is kind of on the natural and soft kind of area. It does sound aggressive in certain areas and I will talk about it later but overall this IEM produces a sound that is in every aspect leaning toward a sweeter sound.

BASS

The bass on this IEM is elevated a lot. It is more of a subbass over the midbass thing. We can see a gradual falloff theom the 50-300hz. What it does takes effect in the mids, but it pronounces the subbass more than the mid-bass. So it is in fact a deep and rumbly experience more than a thumpy and attacking nature.

So if we conclude we can say that the bass is

• Very rumbly
• Authoratative (in the subbass)
• Deep reaching
• Not so great in resolution
• Decay and Falloffs are very analogue-like
• The Midbass is not as good as the Subbass
• Midbass is not very punchy either
• This makes the midbass very Controlled and it doesn’t bother the mids anyhow

MIDS


Due to the cutoff of the midbass way too clearly, the slope of the graph continues to decrease till 400hz very sharply. Thus the mids are a bit recessed in the mix. But to cover that up there is a big dip at around 10khz which makes it very organic and you can’t find dryness of any kind as such. Collectively the mids are neither bloated and not masked by any other frequencies. The textural information is apt, not too strong and impressive like the EA500LM and nor too grainy and shy like the Aria.

Upper mids on the other hand is very upfront in amplitude but not very high. The pinna compensation starts very early from the 1khz range instead of the typical 1.5khz. What it does it, create an overall uplifted upper mids representation than the lowe-mids comparatively. It goes very smoothly till the 6K and it takes off from there, and the peak in 6-8khz is really noticeable in the music. The clarity region is elevated to make up for the detail retrieval this driver exhibits is not much, so this peak adds to the resolution. Some cues and instruments will jump up very vividly and make things noticed that otherwise would go unnoticed.

In conclusion, the analysis of the midrange is as follows

• No dryness in the lower-mids
• No bloating or masking of any kind is noticeable
• No bleed what so ever as a result
• Textural information on the lower mids is not that great
• Upper mids are relatively well-tuned
• For most of the part, the upper mids doesn't exude any sharpness
• Except for the clarity region peak, there is no unevenness
• The resolution here seems to be good
• Texturing in the upper mids is good too

TREBLE

The treble on this IEM is nothing to write home about.

After the peak till 8K, there is a big dip at the range of 9-12Khz. Although it does help the lower and uppermids to be a bit safer and organic. The range feels too safe for my liking. There is another peak at the 15khz which is not that noticeable in the IEM but helps to pronounce a few trailing edges and resonant frequencies to come across nicely. Needless to say, the treble is extended while being a bit jerky.

Overall the treble on this IEM is

• Consisting of air frequencies
• Better resolution from the rest of the frequency
• It depends on your sensitivity to different ranges (For me it was quite safe)
• Bite of the instruments are there (Steel string guitar plucks)
• The attacks though are not sharp enough
• A bit safe on the later half of the spectrum (of the treble frequencies)

SUBJECTIVE REVIEW

With everything covered in the tuning department let’s jump onto how this IEM portrays the technicalities.

Soundstage - Soundstage this IEM is pretty adequate and more on the spacious side of things. Height and Width perception can be observed. Although it feels stretched to the Left and Right more than the front and back.

Resolution - The resolution of this IEM is pretty average to say. Details and microcontrasts are not that impressive enough. Although they sometimes add to the whole organicness of the sound.

Timbre - The timbre on this IEM is like among all the IEMs below $100, not too realistic. The good thing is, it offers a more natural representation of the instruments instead of feeling like a digitized version of the albums.

Imaging - The stereo imaging on this IEM is pretty good. And again only time I was amazed by a sub $100 IEM was when I listened to EA500LM. The pinpoint accuracy on Dynabird is not that impressive either.

Dynamics - Although the pillowy-sounding bass might add to the fact that the dynamics are really narrow and limited, it felt the other way. The Dynamics are really good. I enjoyed and never felt that the dynamics were trying to steal the enjoyment factor of this IEM.



CONCLUSION

For the price being this IEM is a solid contender and definitely deserves a listen. The organic nature of this IEM is what makes it special. Not only this IEM is balanced but it will create excitement through the peaks it has. So, as an overall package, I can confidently say that this is a worthy contender for something right now in this price bracket.

COMPARISON

EA500LM - If you want more organic and natural sound get the dynabird. If you want technicalities in your music get the EA500LM. For me personally, I would use EA500LM for gaming and Dynabird for listening to music.

The boring stuff:​

MSRP: $99.99 (from Oriveti website)
Impedance: 16Ω
Sensitivity: 105dB
Response Range: 10Hz-20kHz
Driver configuration: Exclusive Be-Coated 9.2mm Dynamic Driver

Disclaimer:​

I’m more of a Tech head than audiophile and I use Youtube Music for 99% of my listening. Take everything I say with this in mind and please don’t come after me for not having refined taste. This is purely from my silly little point of view. I was also loaned this pair for free to test and play with but all opinions are all of my own with no guidance given whatsoever.

Gear Used:​

Streaming Platform: Youtube Music Premium (Bitrate: 256kbps AAC & OPUS)
Dongle - Mobile use: USB to Lightning JCALLY JM08L
DAC - PC use: Letshouer D03

Box:​

Oriveti packages the Dynabird in a lovely slim box that’s not too large and justified with the fact that it comes with a practical carrying case and 2 sets of included ear tips for your pleasure.The carrying case isn’t the flashiest looking which is good and is a practical size, enough for the pair on one side and then some dongles or accessories on the other. The inside is seemingly lined with felt which is a nice touch and has a little elastic band where the IEMs sit that don’t choke the pair but keep them in place enough that I feel comfortable throwing them around in my backpack without much worry.

Build:​

I appreciate the clean lines with the dark gun metal like finish that highlights the subtle branding on the sides of the pair itself. They honestly don’t look very ergonomic because of its overall design but I found them pretty comfortable even for longer listening sessions while working. They’ve got a pretty small foot print in general so I don’t think a lot of people will be having fitment issues with these.
The cable the Dynabird comes with is nothing special from what I can tell at least. It’s your usual glossy black braided wire that can be a little annoying when it tangles because of the knots in between persistently catching itself. There’s no rubbing noise when you wear them and they’re pretty light which doesn't add any unnecessary weight since the IEMs themselves already feel on the weighty side because of the aluminum shell(compared to plastic shells at least). They also don’t interfere with my glasses while wearing which is always a plus for us visually impaired folk.

Sound:​

The Oriveti Bleqk Dynabird presents a surprisingly pleasant sound without swinging too much in either direction. The bass can still boom without losing detail and it’s got a nice texture to it and not just a soulless bump shaking your skull while not clouding over any of the light details like strings or gentle vocals.

In Feather - Sabrina Carpenter there's this unexpected crescendo of strings that I only now realized was there during the later chorus. It adds these short build ups to the chorus that keep it feeling alive and vibey when you hear them clearly.. For Gloria - Kendrick Lamar & SZA, the subtle jingle of the wind chimes at the back adds such nice ambience to the song without being grating considering its high pitch.

Nitpicks:​

While they’re comfortable fitting, the sharp lines and edges can be a little harsh when they shift every now and then from regular movement. If you happen to put them on a little bit wrong you’ll definitely feel them pretty quickly. Holding them or accidentally laying your arm on the IEM can also be an annoying experience with how sharp the edges are.

This might be a me issue but I found the pins loosening off the IEM after a few wears. Not to a concerning amount mind you but just enough that you see the pins. I’ve had to push them multiple times to reset. This could honestly be a nothing burger but I’d hate to imagine not noticing them then storing them in a bad position only for a pin to break.

Final Thoughts:​

I wouldn’t call the Oriveti Bleqk Dynabird class leading in any way to be honest but I also wouldn’t have any regrets spending $99 on them that’s for the most part. If you’re looking for what seems to me a pretty solid sound that feels good enough for almost all of your listening in a fairly premium feeling build then should tick those boxes. I’d definitely place these in the solid everyday carry category especially with the secure and practical carrying case it comes with.

But remember the best audio gear is the one that makes you enjoy your music the most, regardless of what a stranger on the internet says.

I have used this product for a week to make this review.

SUMMARY
Oriveti's Bleqk Dynabird a 100$ IEM as far as competitions within the price range goes this can't stand on its own unfortunately especially with how robust the Competitions are at that price range, It's sibilant at the upper frequencies coupled with a metallic timbre the Treble is peaky and harsh upsides to that it's very detailed due to that treble elevation downsides to that it sacrifices smoothness and it presents itself as very aggressive and unpleasant to listen at longer sessions, Upper mid-range gets very shouty. other than that the Bass is decent controlled and punchy lower mid-range is clean, Aesthetics it's reminiscent of the JVC FD01 with fancier cables which i liked design wise which much of a shame that it's generally an unpleasant IEM to listen to.

(yikes look at that 6-8khz ramp up)

PACKAGE:
Packaging is important it's the second thing behind price that builds your anticipation and expectation, Oriveti does well it's got that sleek minimalistic black upon removing the sleeve of the box the brand logo greets you its almost as if I'm unboxing as sports watch, Accessories are very minimal too minimal in fact that the box that houses accessories only has tips inside (three sizes only btw) response to that would have two camps, the Hooray its environmentally friendly and I spent 100$ on this and this is what i get? I'm in limbo deciding if it's a good thing or not.



BUILD:
Features an Aluminum body sleek contours and feels premium and well built to use as home construction tool, Matte like finish and still shines as if its polished metal without the issue of having a war with fingerprint marks and it's got that JVC FD01 style design with some adjustments like extra contours to support to the ear-hook design which i really liked, cable is really robust and fancy as well.






SOUND: "It's a V-shape what did i expect. lol"

BASS:
It's Alright tight and controlled punchy clean even with a decent rumble not lacking any mid bass.
MIDS:
Lower mids are fine inoffensive, Upper-mids are shouty very forward and unnatural in some tracks.
TREBLE:
Highly Resolute treble due to how high that 6-8khz is perched up in turns makes it un-smooth, sibilant, peaky, harsh generally unpleasant to listen to. cymbals is the most audible weirdness if you haven't taken a rest after listening to it for more than 10 minutes it's way too emphasized in all my tracks and unnatural for it be so prevalent there.


Timbre is metallic, Technicalities is pretty meh Detail retrieval is a given good trait owing to the tuning, Soundstage is above average, Instrument separation isn't bad, Imaging is decent at least.

CONCLUSION:
It's one of the Single DD's of the 100$ of all time, it's really baffling how unnatural it is considering it's a DD if you want intense detail retrieval for monitoring purposes and such this takes the cake its highly resolute, conventional music listening there's more in the land of 100$ IEMS that gives you the better experience.

Disclaimer
Please note that I am not an audiophile, and this review does not delve into the technical aspects of the IEMs. My impressions are based on my personal preferences, and others may have different experiences with this product. I also have a very limited experience with audio products so please take this review with a grain of salt.

The Oriveti bleqk "Dynabird" was lent to me as part of a review tour in the Philippines.

Price: 99.99 USD
Link: https://hifigo.com/products/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird (non-affiliate)

Part 1: General Product Details

Package Inclusions

• IEM shells & cable
• Carry case
• 7 pairs of eartips

The IEM Shells

• The shells are black cnc-ed aluminum pieces with a brutalistic shape to them that reminds me of Empire tech in Star Wars.
• Each earpiece weighs about 5.6g

The Cable

• The cable has a good thickness to it and is braided well. It terminates with a 3.5mm jack.
• The chin clinch and splitter are made of plastic.
• It is well behaved and easy to wind and unwind.

The Carrying Case

• A basic soft carry case with the Oriveti logo printed on the top.
• It’s a little small but should fit most headphones.

Part 2: Subjective review


General Usage Impressions

• The fit is just right, it gives me a good seal.
• Using this pair for long periods isn’t a problem, not fatiguing at all.

Sound Impressions

• This is a forward vocal pair, meaning the higher frequencies are more pronounced. Sometimes it can be sibilant.
• There’s a respectable amount of bass and bass rumble
• The sound effects for games are brighter, but the clarity, and details are good. Soundstage is average or above average at least.
• This pair reminds me of the NF Audio RA15 that I’ve reviewed before, both have great details and imaging, above average soundstage, but the Dynabird is less brighter than the RA15 and has better bass presence.

Final Thoughts

The Dynabird is an interesting pair, while it has a particularly bright tuning that brings with it above average details, and imaging, the bass performance is decent. It’s a pair that is not fatiguing to use for long periods.

Overall, the Dynabird are great headphones. But for 99 USD it finds itself in a position where some other budget headphones that have similar tuning can be more appealing like the NF Audio RA15 (with the tradeoff of the decent bass and bass rumble).

Summary
This is the Oriveti Dynabird, a single dynamic driver iem coming in at 100$. So how does it compare with all the other single dynamic driver iems in this price? Lets discuss. The Dynabird is a gorgeous looking set with solid metal build. Fit and comfort is pretty good, packaging and accessories is decent. Sound wise this has a V shape tuning with emphasis on the upper mids and treble, which does get peaky and sibilant. The bass is well controlled but lacking in extension and quantity when compared with the highs. Technical sound is decent. So is it any good? It is just mid, the sound seems unpolished in my opinion.

Pros: nice build & design, good fit & comfort, well controlled bass
Cons: unnatural and shouty upper mids, peaky and harsh treble.



Intro
Hey Guys, whats up….
Today I am checking out the Dynabird from Oriveti. This uses a 9.2mm beryllium coated dynamic driver. The retail price of the Dynabird is 100$. So is this worth the price? Lets discuss…

About the brand:
First, lets get to know the brand, Oriveti is a popular iem manufacturer. They have been around since 2015. Personally I have not used any Oriveti products before, thus this will be my first.

Disclaimer: thanks to Hifigo and the review tour group “Audiophile Alliance Bangladesh” for loaning me this unit. But as always this is my honest and unbiased opinion.

Specs
>Impedance: 16Ω.
>Driver: 9.2mm Be-Coated Dynamic Driver.
>Frequency Response Range: 10Hz-20kHz.
>Sensitivity: 105±3dB.
>Distortion: 0.08%.
=PRICE: 99.99$



Packaging
Continuing on to the packaging section, the Dynabird comes in a minimalistic looking box. Sliding off the outer sleeve you will find a simple black/ dark grey box with some branding on top. Sliding off the lid, you will see the carrying case and a small box below it containing the tips. Inside the case you will find the cable and the iems. This comes with a single set of S,M,L eartips, the quality is standard. The hard shell case is quite nice looking and feeling for the price. And the cable is decent. I will get into more detail about the cable later. List of box contents:
Iems
Cable
Case
Eartips


Build and Design
Moving on to the build and design of the Dynabird, this is quite nice. I quite like the angular design, futuristic but not too overdone. The design also plays quite nice with light and shadow. Build wise it uses CNC machined aluminum. The shells feel nice in the hands, these have nice weight to them. The shells are on the smaller side. Fingerprintes and scratches were not an issue for me, but these may be prone to scratches because of its metal finish. The 2pin connectors are flush type. The nozzles are standard sized with nomal insertion. The noszle filter has an interesting looking design, which improves the sound according to Oriveti.



Fit and Comfort
Talking about fit and comfort of the Dynabird, it is solid. Long term listening comfort is quite good, whether for music or movies. Isolation is ok. Breathability is fine. Stability is good. All in all I find it plenty comfortable for daily use.

Cable
Now let’s look at the cable. The Dynabird comes with a good looking black colored cable which pairs well with the dark grey iems. I am not sure what kind of wire this uses, but I am guessing SPC. This is a 4core braided cable, the braiding is nice tight. There is no audible microphonics. Cable memory is normal. The earhooks are on the stiffer side. The Y split and the connectors seem to be made of metal.




Please note: Listening impressions are highly subjective and can differ depending on different ear shape, individual music library, choice of source, eartips, cable and personal preferences, so your experience may differ. I personally always use and test all my gear in various setups to get a generalized idea on it. You can find my “tested with” info below.

Now most importantly sound. Oriveti has gone for a V shape tuning for the Dynabird. In general the Dynabird has a very clear, detailed, bright, somewhat sibilant sound with well controlled bass. Honestly the tuning idea is good, but the execution could have been better.

Bass
Let’s look at the bass performance of the Dynabird. It has a lean, fast, well controlled tuning. Sub bass is more forward compared to the mid bass. Dynabird has a strong authoritative sub bass but this does not go as deep. Mid bass is not as forward, maintains balance and lenience. If you are a bass head, you will not be satisfied with its quantity. Overall its bass is on the faster side. I personally prefer a more stronger and more extended bass, but I can appreciate the quality Oriveti has achieved.

Mids
Moving on to the midrange,the Dynabird has a crisp, bright and transparent presentation. There is almost zero bass bleed from mid bass to lower mids. Male vocals are clean and maintains balance. But the female vocals and upper mids in general is a bit too extended and bright. This gets sharp or fatiguing for me in mid to high volume. This is not suitable for treble sensitive listeners . Instruments are decent, but it can also get fatiguing and may sound a bit metallic. Note separation and layering is decent. Note weight is lean.



Treble
Proceeding on to the treble section, the Dynabird has an extended, bright and detailed treble. In most cases I find the treble to be overly extended and peaky, this gets fatiguing pretty quick. Although detail and resolution is pretty good, but all in all the treble is just disappointing. There is a decent sense of air and space. As you can guess this is just not suitable for treble sensitive listeners. Personally I do enjoy a bright or extended treble, but I am not a fan of peaky treble.

Technical Sound:
Soundstage of the Dynabird is slightly better than average
Imaging is also better than average
Sound separation and layering is good
Resolution is good
Dynamics are good
Timbre is ok


Tanchjim 4U
Recently I reviewed the Tanchjim 4U, this is a single dynamic driver set with 4 way tuning switch, hence the name “4U”. This comes in at 70$. Packaging and accessories wise, Dynabird is slightly better as it comes with a hard shell case. Build and design wise, both are really unique and good looking, and build is also good. Fit and comfort wise, 4U is slightly better because of its small size. Sound wise, 4U has a much more smoother, warmer and relaxed sound with more bass quantity (the level of bass can be changed using the tuning switch). The Dynabird in comparison has more energy and resolution in the upper mids and highs. Soundstage is almost same, imaging and sound separation is better in the Dynabird.



Simgot EA500LM
Previously I have also reviewed the Simgot EA500LM, and it is my overall favorite set in the sub 100$ range. And I think this is clearly a better option over the Dynabird. The EA500LM is a single dynamic driver set coming in at 90$. In terms of box and accessories both score the same. Build and design wise, I like the Dynabird better. Fit and comfort wise, both are same. Sound wise, as I said previously, Simgot is a clear winner in my opinion. The EA500LM has a mild V sound, with clean and transparent mids and highs, with a some refined energy and sparkle on top. Bass is well controlled yet deep and engaging. Technical sound wise, they score same.



Moondrop Aria 2
The Moondrop Aria 2 is a very popular single dynamic driver set coming in at 90$. Although this does not provide the best value for money, it is still a good option for beginners if you consider the whole package. Packaging and accessories wise, Aria 2 is better, specially the cable. Build and design wise, I will rate them sane, although the Dynabird shells looks great, I find the Aria 2 paired with its cable looks really good. Fit and comfort wise, Dynabird is a bit better. Sound wise, Aria 2 has a more impactful bass with more quantity. Mids and treble is more natural in Aria 2. Dynabird has a more extended, bright and more detailed upper mids and treble. Bass is less prominent in the Dynabird. Technical sound wise, Dynabird is better in general.



Tested With
Source: cayin ru7, fosi sk02, apple type c dongle
Eartips: stock, Final E Black, Divinus velvet, Spinfit W1
Cable: stock, kinera leyding
Music: Tested with versatile genre of music




Conclusion
So to conclude the review, is this worth the price? Pricing on this set is ok, nothing crazy. I mean build, design, fit, packaging, accessories is decent, but the most important part, sound, is not up to the mark in my opinion.
So who is this for and do I recommend it? I honestly did not like it all that much, so I would recommend it. If you are looking for a mild V set with lots of treble energy, this could be an option, but I think Simgot EA500LM would be a better buy at this price.
Big thanks to you all for sticking around this far, see yall in the next one.

Purchase link (not affiliated)
Hifigo: https://hifigo.com/products/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird?srsltid=AfmBOoqZvpwB0OC4rWhNCFP0PDoxTcaeOrIcZH9kE_EHAyBl4Zxe3JkR

Hello everyone, and thank you for joining. Today, I am reviewing the ORIVETI Dynabird, an IEM with a single beryllium-coated dynamic driver. This unit was sent by ORIVETI for review purposes. I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to them for providing me with the sample. The impressions in this review are in no way influenced. I write what I hear.

ORIVETI have been quite active in recent times, with some really exceptional releases. I had the privilege to review two of the best releases from late 2023: the OD200 and the OH700VB. Both these IEMs are still among the best in their price range, offering a very musical sound. ORIVETI recently launched the bleqk series, which is a new line of products that will deliver nice quality and performance. The name "bleqk" stands for "Basic Line Exquisite Quality Kept". Dynabird is one of the IEMs from the bleqk series, the other being Lowmaster, which features 2BA and 1DD.

The ORIVETI Dynabird can be bought here: https://www.oriveti.com/product-page/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird-single-dynamic-driver-hifi-iem




Rating Criteria:

I want to lay out my rating criteria before we start off. For me, the primary criterion for evaluating audio gear is its intrinsic value rather than its price tag. A higher price doesn't always correlate with superior quality, and similarly, a low-priced product can give enough listening pleasure for it to be called outstanding. I consider the build, features, and, most importantly, the impact on the listening experience. The fundamental purpose of audio gear is to enhance the listening experience. So for me, this degree of enhancement in the listening experience is a key determinant in rating a product.

Rating below 4: It is more of an uninspiring release, lacking on many fronts.
Rating of 4: The product is good, and some users may find it more satisfactory, but it does come with a few caveats, such as price, fit, tuning, etc.
Rating of 4.5: The product is excellent and comes with an easy recommendation, reflecting its high quality and overall positive attributes.
Rating of 5: This product can be deemed groundbreaking, a trendsetter, and an eye-opener and deserves a spot on everyone's list due to its exceptional features and outstanding performance



Package Includes:

• Pair of IEMs
• 2-Pin Detachable Cable
• Carrying Case
• Narrow-bore Silicone Tips: S, M, and L sizes
• Wide-bore (smaller stem) Silicone Tips: S, M, L, and XL sizes

Specification:

• Driver: 9.2mm beryllium-coated dynamic driver
• Impedance: 16 Ohm
• Frequency Response: 10 - 20000 Hz
• Sensitivity: 105+/-3dB/mW
• Distortion: 0.08%
• Plug: Gold-plated 3.5mm Plug

At the core of the Dynabird is a 9.2mm dynamic driver with a beryllium coating. Beryllium, known for its exceptional rigidity and low mass, allows for a fast transient response and extended high-frequency performance. The driver also incorporates a double-chamber design, enhancing its ability to deliver more detailed and powerful sound reproduction.






Design, build, and fit:


The Dynabird features a solid CNC-milled aluminum shell, giving it a durable and robust feel. The shells are lightweight and compact, with an intriguing geometric design that adds a unique visual appeal.

The nozzle design is particularly noteworthy, featuring a well-crafted grille with fabric beneath it, which ORIVETI mentions plays a role in the IEM's tuning. The nozzle is slightly wider than average and has a shorter length, which may impact its fit for some users.

While the build quality and design are commendable, I found the fit to be somewhat challenging. The short, wide nozzle can make it difficult to achieve a secure fit without the IEMs pressing uncomfortably against the ears. Selecting the right ear tips was also tricky. I struggled to get a proper fit with both the stock narrow-bore and wide-bore tips, but eventually found a decent seal using Spinfit W1 tips, which insert deeply enough to secure the IEMs.

In terms of isolation, the Dynabird provides an average level of noise blocking. It also has two vents on the shells that help relieve pressure buildup, and I experienced no driver flex during use.

The included carry case is a small zippered pouch with a soft inner lining, offering just enough space to store the IEMs. While the case isn't particularly protective, it is sturdy enough to provide secure storage. The stock cable has a decent build and does its job perfectly fine.






Sound Analysis:

Dynabird has a warm v-shaped tuning, though not a very strict v-shape, with a nice, clean bass response that is not quite pronounced. The midrange and treble frequencies carry a nice energy and maintain a decent level of transparency.

Bass:

The bass on the Dynabird is one of my favorite things, though it lacks the punch and impact some might expect. Instead of a head-filling, reverberating bass, it offers a more localized and controlled presentation. The sub-bass presence is decent, but the mid-bass feels somewhat lacking. However, the bass is clean and doesn’t introduce much warmth, which helps keep the higher frequencies clear and unclouded. The layering and texture of the bass are decent, and while it may not satisfy bass enthusiasts, it adds a fun element to the overall sound signature that I find enjoyable.





Midrange:

The midrange, however, leaves something to be desired, especially considering ORIVETI's reputation for delivering excellent mids in their recent IEMs. Given that the Dynabird is a single dynamic driver IEM, you might expect a more natural and organic midrange, but it doesn’t quite reach that level. While instruments sound pleasant and musical, the vocals can feel slightly off. The midrange isn’t particularly forward, but it’s not recessed either. On the plus side, it’s not overly warm and carries a good amount of energy. Things get bit hot especially in the upper midrange, which can verge on shoutiness for some listeners.


Treble:

As for the treble, the Dynabird delivers detailed highs with good extension, offering a nice sparkle and airiness. However, the emphasis on the lower to mid-treble region can make the sound a bit bright. This treble response might not appeal to those who prefer smoother highs. Pairing the IEM with a warmer source can help to tame the treble’s excessive energy, making it a more balanced listening experience.


Technical:

The Dynabird delivers average performance in technical aspects. The soundstage offers a standard width but lacks depth, so if you’re seeking a spacious, holographic experience, you might find it underwhelming. However, given the IEM's price point, these limitations are somewhat expected. Imaging could also be improved, as it isn't particularly strong with the Dynabird. On the positive side, it offers decent resolution and micro-detailing, providing a well-resolved sound that captures most details. Instrument separation is adequate, allowing individual instruments to be heard clearly.






Source Pairing:

In terms of drivability, the Dynabird does not bother. It can be easily powered by less powerful sources and doesn’t require a lot of amplification. However, at higher volumes, the treble can become sharper, and the IEM’s sound doesn’t scale well with increased volume. This suggests that the IEM performs best at moderate listening levels, where the treble remains controlled and the overall sound signature stays balanced.


The Dynabird pairs best with a warm source. When used with a neutral to bright source, it can sound overly bright, which some listeners might find fatiguing. For instance, when paired with the Lotoo Paw Gold Touch, the upper midrange to treble region becomes more relaxed, and the bass gains better impact. On the other hand, with the Questyle CMA18P, a DAC/amp known for its neutral to bright sound, the Dynabird exhibits a noticeable metallic timbre.



Comparisons:

TinHifi T5S:

T5S is a single dynamic driver IEM, with an impedance of 32Ω and a frequency response of 10Hz–20kHz. T5S does not demand much power, but the dynamics do improve if it is paired with a nice, powerful source, something that is not exhibited by the Dynabird.

The shells are built of aluminium and have a light weight, similar to the Dynabird. In terms of fit, the T5S has an edge as it has a more ergonomic, ear-friendly shape. The nozzle on it is a bit wider and longer than the Dynabird. It does not pose any challenges to finding good-fitting ear tips. I find the cable on both the IEMs to have a decent build, both of them are supple and lightweight and do their job nicely.





Sound Comparison:

The bass on the T5S has more midbass presence and a nearly similar quantity of subbass. The bass overall has a better presence and is more punchy on the T5S. In terms of texture and layering, I feel T5S may have an edge.

In the midrange, T5S has a relaxed, warmer, and lusher character and does not carry the energy level that is portrayed in Dynabird. The midrange is more natural on the T5S. Vocals are more true-to-life and denser on T5S.

In the treble range, Dynabird has a lot more energy, while the T5S lags behind, but it also carries a good amount of energy. T5S does not get as sharp, and treble is a bit tamed on it. T5S misses the airiness that Dynabird has.

In the technical aspect, both of these IEMs have similar width in the soundstage, while the depth is a bit better on the T5S. The stage on T5S has a better around-your-head experience. The level of resolution and micro-detailing is a bit better on the Dynabird, but the T5S is not very far behind.

Overall, as per my preference, I lean towards the T5S for its musicality and a better timbre.





Meze Alba:

Alba is a single-dynamic driver IEM. The dynamic driver size is 10.8 mm, with an impedance of 32Ω and a frequency response of 15 Hz–25 kHz. The IEM has a 32Ω @1kHz impedance and a sensitivity rating of 109 dB/Vrms, which means it is fairly efficient and sensitive enough to drive well from most sources.

In terms of fit, the Alba has an edge with its small shells, which nearly disappear in the ears. However, I prefer the build on the Dynabird.

Sound Comparison:

In simple terms, the sound on Alba is an upgrade over that of the Dynabird. The bass on Alba has a nice balance of subbass and midbass and has more punch and impact. The layering and texturing are better on the Alba's bass.

The midrange on Alba has a nice hint of warmth. Alba's mids are more neutral and have a good balance of energy, which does not put forward a very sharp presentation as found on the Dynabird. The upper mids have nice energy on the Alba but are still tamed in comparison to the Dynabird. On the Alba, the mids are more forward and closer to the ears.

The treble extends better on the Alba. The details are more crisp and precise on the Alba. Alba has a metallic sheen in its sound, which is a lot more prominent on the Dynabird.

In terms of technical aspects, Alba leads in most of them. The soundstage on the Alba spans wider and has a more holographic feel. The soundstage on Dynabird offers a moderate width, neither too wide nor too intimate. The depth of staging is just average on Dynabird.

Conclusion:

When I first heard about a new ORIVETI IEM featuring a single dynamic driver, I was eager to try it out. Given the impressive performance of the OD200, my expectations were high for this release. Unfortunately, the Dynabird doesn't quite live up to the legacy of its predecessor. While there are some positives, such as the attractive design, solid build quality, and decent cable, the sound—particularly the tonality—didn't captivate me. Compared to its peers, the Dynabird doesn't offer much to make it stand out. The tuning misses the mark in several areas, leaving it feeling rather uninspiring. I had hoped this IEM would set a new standard for $100 models, but it falls short. However, I remain optimistic that future releases from ORIVETI will raise the bar and deliver the exceptional performance we've come to expect from the brand.

Introduction

Oriveti. They are a Hifi company that’s founded in 2015, so they can be considered as an old player in the game. In the past, they’ve released several high quality iem like the OV800 (8BA) and O400 (4BA) yet they didn’t have much traction into the market. That is, until now.

At the end of 2023, they suddenly make a grand comeback with 3 new back-to-back iem at three different price ranges: The OD100, OD200 and OV700. These iems, in such a short amount of time, have received a lot of love and being talked about from many audiophiles across the globe.
This time, they have started a new series called “BLEQK”, which stands for “Basic Line Exquisite Quality Kept”, aiming to deliver exceptional quality and performance. The Dynabird is a 1DD in this series, featuring a 9.2mm Beryllium-coated dynamic driver. It is currently selling for 100$ on online retail stores

Disclaimer: I would like to give a special thanks to Oriveti for providing a reviewing unit for the Dynabird, in exchange for an honest review and impression.

Packaging

The Dynabird’s box is relatively average in size. Inside the box, there are:

- A carrying case

- The iem themselves

- A cable

- 3 pairs of wide bore silicone tips in S/M/L size

- 3 pairs of narrow bore silicone tips in S/M/L size


Design/Build quality/Comfort

The Dynabird’s shell is made out of CNC aluminum. It has a cool grey, gunmetal type of color. The finishing feels smooth as well. The overall build quality feels really sturdy. You can confidently throwing this iem around without having to worry about breaking it



Design wise, it’s... interesting. It has a very rugged design characteristic, with those square, aggressively cutted angles. The ergonomics and fitting is honestly not great with this design because I can feel that lip on the shell body, those edges rubbing on my ears. Isolation was only average.


The cable is a 4 cores cable with 3.5mm end termination. The quality is quite decent. It’s light, soft and supple, and has no memory to it.

Sound impression

Source: Poco F3+UAPP, Dell laptop + Foobar 2000

Dac/Amp: Chord Mojo, Ibasso DC07 Pro, EPZ TP50.
Cable: Stock

Tips: Stock wide bore tips

Tonality: V shaped

Bass:

The Dynabird has a subbass over midbass presentation.

The subbass reaches deep, has decent rumbles and air movements. The subbass drop of “Why So Serious” sounds decently tight. Midbass on the other hand is leaner. Midbass punches are there, a bit mellow and having a rounded feeling. Kick drums are present with enough body to them. Contrabass and cello are decent, a bit thin, and don't feel lush or buttery smooth. The texture overall is just average

The transients are decent, feeling a bit blurry between the notes when i listen to some agressive stuff like the drummer’s part of Brutal Truth – Sugar Daddy

Mids

The lower mid range has a bit of warmth to it. The midbass does show some bleeding into the mids on the graph, but it doesn’t sound muddy. Male vocals sound clean, lower baritones have less warmth and depth to their voice, but tenor and countertenors sound quite nice with a clean and dazzling characteristic. The upper midrange is really forward, borderline shouty to my ears. Well, at mid high to high volume, it does sound quite shouty. Female vocals are now more emphasized than male vocals, more in your face and bright.

Listening to “Shivers” – Ed Sheeran, there’re signs of some sibilance going on.

The timbre of the instruments are natural, but it’s on a more metallic side as opposed to being warm leaning and smooth. Violin and viola are vibrant and bright with the bow string’s movements. Pianos are light and bright with good resonance.

Treble

The treble of the Dynabird is quite bright and extended. The 6khz region is a bit emphasized, while does make the instruments sounds more high-res, it also sounds quite fatiguing and harsh. There’s also a high peak at above 10khz. I’d say the Dynabird is more for mid volume listener rather than high volume.

Cymbal crashes and hi hats sounds energetic and crisp, but also sounds a bit splashy and scratchy when listening to Caravan – John Wasson and Silhouette - KanaBOON

Tech

The Dynabird has an acceptable stage presentation, where it’s quite similar to many of its 1DD contenders in the price range, not claustrophobically small, but not exactly openly holographic either. Imaging and separation is also average.

Comparison

1/ Oriveti OD100

The OD100 is the Dynabird’s younger brother, which is also a 1DD iem. Side by side, it’s apparent that the Dynabird’s shell has similar characteristics to the OD100’s shell. But with some additional “material”, the Dynabird is easier to fit than the OD100. For the cable, you can see the material being used with the OD100 while the Dynabird’s cable is fully black.

The OD100 is priced at 30$ lower than the Dynabird

Sound wise, to my ears, the Dynabird is an upgrade and revamp over the OD100. The OD100 has a brighter, more W shaped kind of tuning.

The bass on the OD100 is more midbass focused, giving acoustic drums more body. The overall texture, subbass extension, the speed and tightness of the bass region are all better with the Dynabird.

The lower midrange is thicker, a bit muddier on the OD100, while the Dynabird now has a more linear transition from the bass to the mids, which now gives some bass baritones and low mid instruments less heft.

The upper midrange is where the Dynabird has the most improvements over the OD100. It’s less shouty, less peaky and harsh. Although yes, the Dynabird still sounds a bit sibilant, but it’s way more improved than the OD100’s. With a now lower pinna gain, you can perceive more of the bass, which makes the overall tonality more balanced.

Treble wise, the OD100 is more energetic, more edgy than the Dynabird. Percussion instruments feel more rough and crunchy.

Technicality wise, the Dynabird has a better sound stage in all 3 dimensions with better imaging.

Most importantly, the timbre is now improved on the Dynabird, despite still having a bit of metallic characteristic to it.

2/ Tinhifi P1 Max 2.

Although the P1 Max 2 is a planar iem, these 2 have very similar measurements that I can't help comparing them. The P1 Max 2 is a more expensive product, pricing at 140$ on Linsoul. Outside of sound, the P1 Max 2 have full resin shells which are lighter and have a much more comfortable fit. I like the cable of the Dynabird more.

Sound wise, the P1 Max 2 also has a V shaped tonality.

For the bass, the P1 Max 2 has noticeably quicker speed with more air movements. Bass texture is better as well.

Midrange wise, these two are really similar in the overall coloration, positioning and texture, especially with the lower midrange. The upper midrange, the P1 Max 2 sounds less metallic, but now has additional planar timbre as a trade off.

Treble wise, the P1 Max 2 has better extension, more air and sparkles.

Technicalities wise, the P1 Max 2 has wider stage with better separation, though the depth and height are still on the average side.

3/ Kefine Delci

The Delci is a fellow 1DD iem, but with a lower price tag at around $80 selling on Linsoul.

The shells of the Delci are also made out of aluminum, but the comfort is way better.

For the sounds, I'd say the Delci is more of a warm U shaped-ish iem rather than V shaped like the Delci.

For the bass, the Delci feels a bit more mellow, softer with the drums, while the Dynabird sounds more distinct and speedy.

For lower midrange, it’s honestly very similar on both. The Delci has a more natural upper midrange presentation. It sounds less in your face and shouty as well as less metallic sounding. This part makes the Dynabird a brighter set between the two. The Delci also sounds smoother here. I like male vocals on the Delci more while female vocals on the Dynabird.

Instruments have a bit more note weight to them and quite a lot more natural timbre.

Treble wise, the Dynabird is airier, crisper, but cymbals and hi hats also sound a touch more splashy.

Technicalities wise, the Dynabird is wider to my ears, yet the Delci has a more rounded stage with better imaging

Conclusion

I think the Dynabird is a decent product from Oriveti, but unfortunately, the current market for good 1DD at under 100$ is a bit saturated now, meaning that the Dynabirds have to face a lot of other fierce competitors out there that can perform better at the same price point, or perform the same for less money.

Other more famous offerings like the Kefine Delci or the Simgot EA500LM does make the Dynabird having a hard time coming on top.

I’d say if you love Oriveti and want to support them, of an iem with an energetic V-shaped tuning, I'd encourage you to get it.

That’s it for my review and thank you for reading.

Disclaimer: This iem was provided by HIFIGO for review to AudioPhile Alliance BD. Big shout out to them. Regardless, all of my thoughts and opinions are my own.

Inside The Box​

Dynabird Earphone body - 1 pair
2 Pin Detachable Cable - 1pc
Carrying Case - 1pc
Bullet Shape S, M, L Silicone Tips - 1 pair per size
Bowl Shape S, M, L, XL Silicone Tips - 2 pairs per size

Nothing special in the packaging. The case should be better for the price.

Specs​

9.2mm Beryllium Coated Dynamic Driver (16 Ohm impedance)
2 pin detachable cable with 3.5mm termination

Build and Comfort​

They have put a lot of effort while designing this iem. Kudos to designers. The design language basically depicts trapezoid, triangle and circle shapes. IEM has an aluminum shell body. Solid build, didn’t cut any corners. Build 10/10
The nozzle is wide and they did some tuning adjustments in the nozzle. Those who prefer deeper insertion may have a hard time. They just sit right outside your ear canals. You can't sleep wearing them, that’s a minus for me. Not made for hours after hours for sure. I could wear them for an hour. Comfort 7/10.

Source​

Ibasso DX170
Cayin IHA-6
You can drive this iem with a dongle as well. It scales as you provide power. Specially bass and micro details get more prominent as you provide power.

Sound​

signature / graph : It felt to me like a U shaped sound signature. (emphasis on bass and treble, boosted mids )​

Bass: It has a textured, faster bass response considering it has a dynamic driver. That means no deep bass. The same goes for sub-bass as well. You will hear every detail in bass and sub-bass but the slam is not bass head level. For example: In the “Girls” and “Not like us” tracks you will hear details in the bass,sub-bass but not high impact slam.​

Mids: To simply put this iem is King of Mids in 100$ price bracket. Everything sounds natural. It covers the whole frequency range quite beautifully. Natural tonality across the mids.​

Both male and female vocals sound engaging and intimate. No sibilant even in the busiest tracks.​

Instruments sound natural, well bodied. Most of the dynamics drivers can’t handle bass guitar and drum together. But it does that quite well.​

Treble: It has a good treble extension. High pitch vocals “tss” sound and high hat sounds are a bit irritating to my taste using this iem.​

Soundstage and imaging: It has a wide soundstage, wrapped around your head. Gives you holographic imaging. You can distinctly hear the instruments being played separately.​

Technicalities : It has high resolution, you will hear micro details. But also making it non fatiguing like some of the planar iems does.​

Eartips play a significant role in the sonic performance. I used divinus velvet eartips. My logic is this has a big nozzle plus deep insertion is not possible. So divinus velvet will sit just outside your ear canals and provide you a better seal.
Sound 8/10.

Verdict​

This iem has a mature tuning. This iem is not for newbies in the hobby. If you love your vocals and prefer natural tuning then this iem is for you. It's something that grows on you over time.

Kudos to Oriveti for creating such a unique iem.

Purchase Link : https://hifigo.com/products/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird

TONALITY: 7.5/10
TECHNICALITIES: 7.5/10
TIMBRE: 8/10
SOUNDSTAGE: 8/10
IMAGING: 7.2/10
MUSICALITY (subjective): 8/10
CONSTRUCTION: 8.5/10
ACCESSORIES: 8/10
SOUND VALUE: 7.5/10

INTRO

Oriveti is a well established IEM company from Hong Kong, China. It was founded in 2015 and since then they have launched launched hybrid IEM like the OH700VB I’ve reviewed and tremendously enjoy, as well as single dynamic driver IEM too with their OD series, OD100 and OD200 receiving quite good praise among the audiophile community (haven’t tried this one though).

Today I will review their latest single dynamic driver earphones, the Bleqk Dynabird which is first release for Bleqk budget minded IEM serie.

Priced 99$, the Dynabird uses a beryllium coated 9.2mm dynamic driver and promises ‘’engaging sound that captures the full emotional range of music’’.

Let's see in this review what type of musicality these deliver.

CONSTRUCTION&ACCESSORIES



The craftsmanship of Dynamird is fabulous, it’s all made of metal and has an elegant industrial look to it. Despite its angular shape, these are light and comfortable, no metal edge pokes my ear, these are thinked to be fitted with a shallow insertion, so this explains why metal edges rub on the ears.



The included cable is decent but comes only with single ended 3.5mm termination, which is a con for my personal use, especially considering the fact dynamic drivers enjoy powerful balanced output.



Then for other accessories we have a nice carrying case with enough space to fit more than one pair of IEM. The included ear tips are appropriate too, it’s 2 models of wide bore silicone eartips coming in 3 sizes for a total of 6 ear tips. Nothing to complaint about accessories, and the construction is above average in quality for a sub-100$ IEM.

SOUND IMPRESSIONS


The Bleqk offer a warmish balanced V shape tonality that isn't intensely bassy with thick vibrant concentrated sub bass rumble, warm mellow mid bass punch, bright forwards mids and extra treble crispness, sparkle and snap. It can be perceived as W shape due to this 3 intensity boost, this is a clash of warm bass meet bright mids and treble and the focus is on vocals.

This type of tuning favors vocals presence and fullness without going all warm or mid centric in balance, it has proper lower mids to fully feed both male and female singers and wide vocal range and style.

The bass is thick with mellow but weighty punch that is warmed-darkened sub-bass sustain that can mix with kick drum and make both bassline and kick sticked together, it’s not a clean nor transparent bass response, it doesn't have big headroom is release nor a lot of resonance which feel compressed and concentrated in sub bass sustain, which is vibrant and can deliver proper grunt.
The texture is dark and euphonic, there not alot of bite for bass line like double bass will feel scooped in attack lead, making it hazy in overall definition but physical in density.
Some will find this type of bass performance muddy, it sure has background masking when it comes to limpidity of silence, this affects the spatiality readability negatively.
It’s rare I consider slightly boosted bass as guilty pleasure, but this is what I conclude, the quality is average, the control is lacking agility, the definition is dark and the fun factor is low, it’s a safe bass turn of guilty pleasure.

The mid range is lush and energetic without going sibilant or plain shouty, it’s thick and opaque in timbre, not very transparent nor very airy and open. It seems to favor vocals first and foremost, both male and female vocals are fully bodied and loud, it tends to over shadow background instruments with a more dynamic presence. The timbre isn’t very detailed and intelligibility is decent without being very clean or sharp in word spelling, this avoids this infamous sibilance yet stole some edge to definition.
We have some lower mids warmth and fullness, this stole air around instrument but color timbre pleasantly, it had note weight too which is well felt here.

The treble is the most vivid and lively part of tonal balance, it adds a notch of air on top without clean silence around the instrument, it extracts crisply the percussions and has good crunchiness to it too that benefits more electric than acoustic guitar due to sparkle release limitation.
We have a minimal amount of brilliance but it doesn’t shine a lot.
Even if crunchy and abrasive enough, the highs don’t have well felt attack lead nor clean micro details, it’s tamed in shrillness, extension is thick as a whole apart higher range metallic percussions that add some extra macro dynamic with a bit of struggle due to overall thickness and lack of air.
It’s a well rounded treble that doesn't feel too dark nor too bright, extra upper treble spike is welcome, without it highs would sound rather dull and overshadowed by the main instrument and vocal that have more corpulent and wider presence.

The soundstage is just above average in terms of wideness, it’s tall enough too but lacks a lot of proper depth so it feels like a wall of sound, near mono if it wasn’t this extra percussion separation we get sometimes.

The imaging is mediocre, macro dynamic is sticky and foggy as a whole, there is no proper clean space in lateral separation nor proper transparency for perceiving deeper layers. For simple music, like minimalist folk or chamber classical, this isn’t an issue but anyway with more than 3 or 4 instruments will go a bit abstract in positioning.


COMPARISONS



VS SIMGOT EA500LM

The LM is more technical, analytical, brighter, crisper and W shaped, it’s thinner sounding too and sharper in every region.

Let’s begin by underlining that Lm is from another league in terms of resolution, imaging, transparency, attack control and treble extension.

The bass is faster and more textured but less meaty and heavy in impact, the sub bass is more resonant and thin while it’s muddier, more vibrant and dense and compressed in rumble with the Bleqk.

The mids are crisper, more open and well resolve with LM, it’s shouting too and more prompt to sibilance, it’s colder and attack is edgier so it sound less lush and laid back, a bit more recessed too though intensity of attack make instrument coming towards listener with more immediacy, it’s more concert hall like for LM while intimate and sticky with Bleqk which offer more natural and full bodied vocals but darker instrument presence and poorer clarity and imaging.

The treble is cleaner, crisper and more vivid with LM, attack is faster, sharper and more snappy, micro details are plenty superior and we have more air on top. Bleak offers thicker fuller highs, lusher timbre for violin and guitar but not as sharp and energetic in its attack accent. Percussions while forwards and energetic with Blqek aren’t as splashy and aggressive, they feel rounder but not as clear, energy feels damper with Bleqk and more boosted and aggressive with LM.

The Soundstage is wider with Bleqk, while Simgot is way deeper, with center stage being a bit more far away too.

Imaging as said can’t be compared, with Bleqk their lot of inter phasing of instruments crumbling on each other while layering of LM is pristine and clean.

All in all, their no doubt the Simgot EA500LM is far superior technically while for musicality the Bleqk feel warmer and more mid centric, less thin, spicy and less prompt to hearing fatigue.

VS SOUND RHYME SP01
The Bleqk are brighter and more mid centric, it has warmer muddier thicker bass, more forwards upper mids and vocal and darker dryer treble that isn’t as snappy and sparkly and airy.

The basis sloppier and less well rounded in punch which feel pillowy and lack proper definition so transition in lower mids is more sticky than bigger and cleaner slam of SP01, which has deeper sub bass, more resonant and transparent, rounder less euphonic mid bass punch and more tactile dynamic and layering.

Mids are more vocal specialist with Bleqk cause male vocal are lusher and thicker than crisper mids of SP01 which offer cleaner and as lush female vocal but sharper and less natural male vocal, everything for imaging to clarity to air around instrument is superior with SP01, timbre is a notch thinner yet notably more transparent.

Treble is from another league with SP01, faster, sharper, snappier and more extended and airy, it feels grainy and dry with Bleqk.

Soundstage is wider and deeper with SP01, and notch taller with Bleqk.

Imaging is from another league with SP01, macro dynamic is more articulated, sound layers have better separation and there is less bleed in mids so space between instruments is cleaner and positioning readability is way easier.

ALl in all, SP01 is again an easy winner here, but for a plain male vocal lover I think Bleqk is a better choice.

CONCLUSION



The Dynabird is a decent sounding IEM that enter an extremely competitive market where we have plenty of incredible sound value offering, especialy in single dynamic driver models.

This mean this IEM doesn't feel very competitive in term of technical performance, yet the refreshing tonal balance is it's main asset. Mid centric and vocal lover audio enthusiast might find the musicality of Dynabird very appealing and it does worth a check.

Yet treble head, neutral head or those seeking highest sound value possible in sub-100$ market should look some where else.

---------------------------------------


PS: I want to thanks Oriveti for sending me this review sample.

You can order the Dynabird for 99$ here: https://www.oriveti.com/product-page/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird-single-dynamic-driver-hifi-iem

DISCLAIMER

I would like to thank HIFIGO for providing this review unit.

The Oriveti Dynabird can be gotten here: https://hifigo.com/products/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird (no affiliate links).




SPECIFICATIONS

• Driver configuration: 9.2 mm beryllium-coated dynamic driver
• Frequency response: 10 Hz - 20 kHz
• Impedance: 16 Ω
• Sensitivity: 105 dB/mW
• Cable: 2-pin 0.78 mm; 3.5 mm. No information on cable materials
• Tested at: $99.99 USD

ACCESSORIES

Other than the IEM, these are included:
- 3 pairs of wide-bore silicone eartips (S/M/L)
- 3 pairs of narrow-bore silicone eartips (S/M/L)
- Carrying case
- Cable

The accessories are decent for a sub-$100 USD IEM, but perhaps the addition of foam tips or a modular cable would have been appreciated.




We have a selection of 2 variants of silicone tips. The wide-bore ones boost treble and open up the soundstage, whereas the narrow-bore ones increase bass with some damping of soundstage.




We have no information on the cable materials, but this stock 2-pin cable is pretty well-braided and tangle-free. It has minimal microphonics, with a chin cinch to add stability during usage.




Lastly, we have a semi-rigid ovoid carrying case. This has a soft velvety interior with webbing, whereas the externals are crush-resistant.

The rest of this review was done with the stock narrow-bore silicone tips. No aftermarket accessories were used, so as not to add any confounders to the sound.


BUILD/COMFORT



The Dynabird sports a steampunk aesthetic, and is fashioned from CNC-milled aluminum alloy. It is literally built like a tank, yet is light weight. It has the BLEQK word (haha it is not BLEAK!) stenciled on the shell, which stands for “Basic Line Exquisite Quality Kept”, according to their marketing materials.



Ergonomics are a mixed bag though, as the housings do have some sharp edges, coupled with a longish chassis in a barrel-shaped design.

Being a vented IEM, isolation is bang average, though there is no driver flex as a result.




INTERNALS

The Dynabird uses a 9.2 mm beryllium-coated dynamic driver with a dual chamber acoustic design.


DRIVABILITY

I tested the Dynabird with the following sources:
- Apple dongle
- Cayin RU7
- Chord Mojo 2
- Fiio KA11 dongle
- Fiio KA17 dongle
- Khadas Tone Board -> Schiit Asgard 3 amp
- Onix Alpha XI1 dongle
- Questyle M15 DAC/AMP dongle
- Sony Walkman NW A-55 DAP (Walkman One WM1Z Plus v2 Mod)
- Sony Walkman NW A-55 DAP (Walkman One Neutral Mod)
- Sony Walkman NW WM1A DAP (Walkman One WM1Z Plus v2 Mod)
- Smartphone

This IEM is easily driven, with no hard amplification requirements.


SOUND & TECHNICALITIES


Graph of the Oriveti Dynabird via IEC711 coupler. The 8 kHz area is a coupler artefact peak.

Tonally, the Dynabird showcases an old-school V-shaped profile, something that was considered commonplace a few years back (since then, the Harmanish sidegrades have now overtaken the budget segment though).

This IEM is sub-bass focused. There is good descent of sub-bass to 20 Hz, with an adequate rumble, though we are not talking about basshead levels. In terms of quality, it is fast and clean, with above average texturing and minimal mid-bass bleed.

The V-shaped profile confers some depression in the lower mids. The upper mids thereafter converge in a 10 dB ear gain - thus vocals are quite forwards, and can veer to shoutiness, especially at louder volumes (Fletcher Munson curve).

The lower treble continues on from the upper mids peak, furnishing good resolution and sparkle. However, the dreaded S word of sibilance rears its ugly head on occasions, and high-hats and cymbals may be overly splashy and emphasized. This set is not for the treble-sensitive as such.

Sadly, the Dynabird has a metallic timbre for acoustic instruments, and vocals are nasal-sounding. It is arguably one of the least natural sounding single DDs I have come across.

This IEM redeems itself in technicalities. While soundstage is above average in all 3 dimensions, there is a good rendering of micro-details and acceptable instrument separation and imaging. In fact, the Dynabird beats most other sub-$100 single DD rivals in the area of resolution.


COMPARISONS

The Dynabird will be compared against other single DDs at just below the $100 price point. Hybrids, multi-BAs, and planars, which have their own pros and cons, are left out of the comparisons.




Tanchjim 4U

The 4U has 4 tuning options - as per its namesake - via a bass dial, and is hence more versatile. All tuning options are however, less bassy with a reduced pinna gain, so the 4U is more neutral compared to the V-shaped Dynabird, and the former sounds less shouty and fatiguing than the Dynabird.

The 4U has a smaller soundstage with worse imaging and micro-detailing, though the 4U bests the Dynabird in timbre.


Simgot EA500LM

The EA500LM is another versatile beast, with 3 tuning nozzles to confer variations along a bright Harmanish soundscape (this is Simgot's signature house sound).

The EA500LM is less bassy, but has a bit of a tamer upper mids compared to the Dynabird. Timbre is also slightly more natural on the EA500LM.

In technicalities, the EA500LM has a bigger soundstage, with improved imaging, though the Dynabird is a hair better in micro-detailing.


Moondrop Aria 2

The Aria 2 follows the virtual diffuse sound field (VDSF) signature - which is essentially Moondrop's in-house variant of the Harman curve.

The Aria 2 is not as bassy, with a less pronounced upper midrange. The Aria 2 has a smaller soundstage, with weaker imaging and micro-details. The Aria 2 however, is less sibilant, with a thicker note weight and a more natural timbre.


CONCLUSIONS

I have mixed feelings about the Oriveti Dynabird. On one hand, it is competent technically for a sub-$100 USD single DD set - with a fast and clean bass greeting listeners - and micro-detailing can actually beat some competitors.

However, on the other hand, tonal flaws are present. The upper mids fall in shouty territory - with a 10 dB ear gain - and sibilance means this IEM is not one for the treble-sensitive. Uncommonly for a single DD set, the Dynabird's timbre is also unnatural.

While this IEM is decently accessorized and easy to drive, there are some angular edges on the steampunk chassis.

Considering the gatekeeper single DD Simgot EA500LM is cheaper but more versatile - with 3 tuning nozzles - yet also has better technicalities overall, the Dynabird wouldn't be my first recommendation amongst the highly competitive sub-$100 single DD pool.

Preface:

I would like to thank @gadgetgod and HiFiGo for sending this unit as part of the review tour.

You can purchase Dynabird at the following link (not an affiliate link):
https://hifigo.com/products/oriveti-bleqk-dynabird

Also, I’m not a seasoned reviewer or a seasoned audiophile, so whatever I say is purely my observations and your results may vary.

I’m not the one to usually focus on specifications and numbers. I focus more on how happy I am with the equipment’s sound and that’s it.

Sources used:

• Dita Navigator
• D16 Taipan
• RME ADI-2 Pro FS R

Introduction​

Oriveti is a well-regarded brand in the community, known for producing high-quality IEMs with thoughtful designs and excellent sound. Previous releases like the OD200 and the OH700VB have set high standards, making Oriveti a go-to for folks seeking reliable and impressive audio performance.

Design of the IEM and Cable​

The Oriveti Dynabird boasts a sleek and compact design, featuring a CNC-machined aluminum shell with a gunmetal finish. It offers a minimalist aesthetic that many will appreciate. The nozzle is slightly larger than average, which might affect fit for some users. The cable is a supple, black two-pin connector that feels decent and durable. Overall, the design and build quality are excellent for the price.

Fit and Comfort of the IEM​

Fit and comfort are crucial for any IEM, and the Dynabird presents a mixed experience. Its small, bullet-style design allows for an easy fit, but the larger nozzle and slightly rough edges can dig into the ears for some (which was the case for me), potentially causing discomfort during extended listening sessions. However, those who find a good fit will enjoy a relatively secure and pressure-free experience.

Sound​

Sub Bass​

The sub-bass on the Dynabird is well-extended and provides a satisfying rumble without overwhelming the overall sound signature. It's deep and authoritative, making it a good choice for genres that benefit from a robust low-end presence.

Mid Bass​

Mid-bass is punchy and energetic, delivering a solid slam that adds excitement to tracks. It avoids bleeding into the mids, maintaining clarity and definition. Fans of impactful bass will find the Dynabird's mid-bass performance appealing.

Mid Range​

The midrange is clean and forward, with a slight emphasis that brings vocals and instruments to the forefront. This tuning choice adds a sense of intimacy and immediacy to the listening experience. However, it can sometimes border on shouty, particularly in the upper mids.

Treble​

Treble is detailed and extends well, providing ample sparkle and air. The presence of a peak around 5-6kHz adds brightness but can also introduce some harshness, especially at higher volumes. Listeners sensitive to treble peaks might need to adjust their listening habits accordingly.

Tone and Timbre​

The tone and timbre of the Dynabird are generally natural, though the emphasis in the upper mids and treble can make some instruments and vocals sound slightly artificial. Despite this, the overall tonality is pleasing and engaging for a wide range of music genres.

Staging, Instrument Separation, and Layering​

The soundstage is moderately wide, offering a decent sense of space without feeling too expansive. Instrument separation and layering are impressive, allowing individual elements within a track to be easily discernible. This makes the Dynabird suitable for complex compositions and critical listening.

Detail Retrieval​

Detail retrieval is one of the Dynabird's strong suits, capturing fine nuances and subtle elements in recordings. This characteristic enhances the overall listening experience, particularly for those who appreciate the intricacies of their favorite tracks.

Technicalities​

The Dynabird excels in technical performance, with its well-controlled bass, articulate mids, and extended treble. Its dual-chamber dynamic driver design contributes to its dynamic and resolving sound, making it a versatile option for various music styles.

Conclusion​

The Oriveti Dynabird is a compelling IEM under $100. While its design might not be perfect for everyone in terms of fit and comfort, its sonic performance is good. It's a well-rounded IEM that can cater to bass enthusiasts and detail lovers alike.

Introduction​

Oriveti is not a new brand on the market but they have recently become more popular thanks to a few models such as the OD100 and OH700VB.
The bleqk Dynabird (simply Dynabird from now on) is their latest single DD IEM, and it’s the set that we’re gonna discuss in this review.

Disclaimer: the Oriveti Dynabird were sent to me by HiFiGO so that I could write an honest review. This review represents my personal opinion on the set, it isn't promotional or paid content and I don’t get any revenue from the sales of this product.
At the time of the review, the Oriveti Dynabird were on sale for about 99$ at HiFiGO.

Click to expand...

Technical Specifications​

• Driver Configuration → 1 x DD (9.2mm, beryllium-coated)
• Impedance → 16Ω
• Sensitivity → 105±3dB
• Frequency Response → 10Hz-30kHz
• Cable → copper cable with 0.78mm 2-PIN connectors
• Plug Type → straight gold plated 3.5mm jack

Packaging​

I really don't care about packagings as I usually open them and keep them for some time before throwing them in the trashcan, but there are also some boxes that I keep because of their awesome design.
Well, the box in which Oriveti Dynabird are shipped is somehow "anonymous", and even though I get that the company just wants a minimalistic and elegant packaging, it really looks like they didn't put a lot of effort while designing it.
In any case, this is what you'll find in the box:

• The Oriveti Dynabird
• The detachable cable
• 2 sets of silicone tips in S, M, L sizes (narrow bore set + wide bore set)
• A carry case
• User manual

Design, Build Quality, Comfort and Isolation​

The Dynabird look and feel excellent in the hands, and if I didn’t know the price I would have guessed around 200$-250$. In fact, the shells are of very high quality and the overall design is very good, with very elegant faceplates and no fancy paintings.
There are two pressure vents: one on the upper side of the shell (near the 2-PIN connector) and one near the nozzle lip (and yes, the nozzle filter design is pretty interesting).

The comfort is not the best due to the shells having a few sharp edges here and there. After some minutes of usage, I start feeling some discomfort near my tragus and since comfort is among my priorities, I won’t be daily driving these anytime soon.
The isolation is nothing to write home about but I was expecting it to be worse so really not much to complain about.

Cable​

The cable is of good quality, but it’s it doesn’t scream “I am upper class” since there are already some brands that include better cable for lower prices. It’s still a very good looking cable with a chin slider, it’s not prone to tangling and it feels solid.

Sound​

GEAR USED FOR THE TEST

• DAC: Topping E30
• AMP: Topping L30, Fiio A3
• Mobile phones: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Xiaomi Mi A3, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
• Moondrop May’s DSP cable with PEQ=0
• Dongle: Apple Type-C dongle, Fosi DS2, Hidizs XO
• Portable DAPs: Benjie S8/AGPTEK M30B
• Bluetooth Adapters: KBEAR S1, KZ AZ10
• Other sources: Presonus AudioBox iONE, Elgato Wave XLR

Do they need an amplifier?
They don’t strictly need an amplifier, but some amplification may benefit. They scale a bit and it seems like the note weight slightly improves (very subtle differences though).

Sound signature
V-shaped.

Lows
The sub-bass is visceral, it has a very good extension, it digs deep and also provides a pleasant yet controlled rumble. The bass has nice speed and punch, it’s tight and never becomes muddy. The texturing capabilities are also decent and everything that I’ve just said kinda makes up for an enjoyable low-end. I wanna point out, though, that despite having some low-end emphasis, the Dynabird are not something I would suggest to bassheads.

Mids
The midrange is recessed but not in an annoying way. Male vocals are not generally lacking, but a bit more warmth would have been the icing on the cake in terms of presence in the mix, while female vocals are very forward and energetic. The overall timbre of vocals isn’t perfect though and there are some hints of sibilance, but overall the female vocals presentation, for example, is pretty enjoyable unless one is sensitive to the upper midrange and treble sparkle.
Instruments sound metallic at times, probably because of the combination between the linear lower-midrange and the 6k-7k peak, but overall they’re well separated.

Highs
The highs are emphasized, they sound open and are generally airy. The problem is that the there is peak around 6k-7k that will be fatiguing for some people, and even though I understand the point of this tuning choice, it’s also true that it’s not the most easy-going approach and many will discard the Dynabird in favor of other IEMs that have a smoother upper range.
The detail retrieval is very good overall but too many times the cymbals kinda become splashy/unnatural with a metallic tinge.

The soundstage is spacious, pretty wide with decent height and average depth, but the imaging is lacking some sharpness and in fact the pinpointing of the instruments inside this big space is a bit vague.

Some comparisons:​

Oriveti Dynabird vs Simgot EM6L
The EM6L perform better in terms of tuning, being smoother and less aggressive and with slightly superior instrument separation, resolution, imaging (not that the EM6L is an imaging champion, though) and overall timbre of vocals and instruments. The Dynabird play in a bigger stage.
The EM6L have more natural female and male vocals.
The Dynabird have better quality low-end that is tighter, more controlled and digs deeper.
Fit and comfort are better on the EM6L (even though there is no nozzle lip on them so using very tight tips is mandatory), isolation is not that different.
Build quality and design go to the Dynabird and the same applies for accessories.



Oriveti Dynabird vs KBEAR Ink MKII
Both are V-Shaped but the Ink MKII are warmer with slightly more midrange recession and smoother upper-end. The Dynabird instead excel in low-end quality in comparison, with slightly worse vocals’ timbre. The Dynabird have superior resolution and detail retrieval.
The soundstage is better on the Dynabird, whereas imaging is comparable.
Comfort-wise the KBEAR Ink MKII are better than the Dynabird and the same applies for the isolation.
The build quality and the design of the Dynabird are more than a notch above with respect to the Ink MKII, whereas the included cable is very similar.



Oriveti Dynabird vs Kefine Delci
They are VERY different, especially in terms of timbre: the Kefine Delci go all-in for a very warm signature, with a very rich lower midrange, great note weight and smooth highs except for a small treble peak that adds some spice on top. The Dynabird, instead, start with some sub-bass focus, followed by a linear lower midrange, an emphasized upper midrange and a bright treble response. Male vocals are better on the Delci, female vocals are more energetic and detailed on the Dynabird even though some sibilance can occur.
In terms of technical ability, the Dynabird are faster with a bass response that is of higher quality, a more resolving and detailed sound overall, and they also play in a bigger stage although the imaging isn’t really spot-on. The Delci have better note weight and low-end density, but speed and tightness are superior on the Dynabird. Overall, though, the Delci are more coherent along the spectrum, they are a lot smoother and this makes up for a set that is very easy to recommend.
Comfort-wise, the Delci win hands down. Isolation is not that different.
Design and build quality are an easy win for the Dynabird, even though the Delci look very elegant and minimal, too. The included cables are not very different, maybe Dynabird’s black cable is a tad better in terms of overall feel.



Oriveti Dynabird vs EPZ Q5
Let’s spoil the biggest difference: technical performance. The Q5 are technically proficient, but the Dynabird are some notches above, winning at everything that contemplates sub-bass extension, resolution, staging and so on.
The Q5, though, sound less fatiguing to my ears thanks to their less pronounced and intense upper midrange and slightly smoother lower treble to mid treble transition, which lead to less sibilance and unnatural peaks.
None of the two sound “natural” and both target those who want to get some fun rather than folks who want a smooth, warm and natural experience, but they are somehow enjoyable.
In terms of comfort, the EPZ Q5 completely destroy the Dynabird, even though the design and build quality are an easy win for Oriveti’s newest IEMs. The isolation of the Q5 is also better thanks to the easier fit, which is crucial in order to get a comfortable deep insertion.
The EPZ Q5 come with a more complete set of accessories, even though the Dynabird are also well accessorized and I also prefer their detachable connectors (0.78mm 2-PIN instead of Q5’s MMCX).

Final Thoughts​

The Oriveti Dynabird show that Oriveti is preparing the masses for some good things that they’re going to release in the future, but as for now they seem to be on the hunt for the correct formula.
The Dynabird have surprised me with a superb low-end, characterized by nice extension, depth and energy, while still keeping everything clean and under control, very good resolution and above average soundstage capabilities. However, there are lots of things that still need to be addressed, such as the unnatural timbre and the “metallic” tinge of vocals and instruments, the unwanted sibilance (which is not a major issue but still something to report) and the vague imaging.

If Oriveti had set a slightly lower price, I think that the Dynabird could have been very competitive thanks to the nice technical performance and the great build quality, but their listing price is kind-of throwing them on a wrestling ring where the other opponent are sets like the EA500LM and similar stuff. Being average, nowadays, is not enough, especially considering what you can get with less money (i.e. Simgot EW200, ARTTI T10) and taking into account that some sets have been already labelled as golden standards (a brand gotta make a real killer set in order to dethrone established stuff, which is a doable yet not easy task).

My thumb is not really up for the Dynabird, but I think it’s a sufficiently compelling set and doesn’t deserve a “bad” review, hence why I am giving it a 3.5/5 score (which means that the product is still “approved” but it’s only another option that will be forgotten in a couple weeks).
What’s sure is that these could have been scored higher with some tuning and fitting refinement and a slightly lower price, factors that would have led to a more interesting and unique option in a market that is already saturated by so many different and valuable alternatives.