MeElectronics Air-Fi® Matrix² AF62 Stereo Bluetooth Wireless Headphones with Headset Functionality review
+ a little comparison with the Shure SRH440
First of all, I want to thank Mike from MeElectronics for providing me with a free sample for my review, as well as the friendly and quick E-Mail correspondence.
I remember trying to get into wireless audio transfer via Bluetooth some years ago, but have to admit that it was quite a remarkable catastrophe as sound quality lacked clearly behind wired audio transfer and was full of artefacts, audible compression and far from good sound, wherefore I gave up this idea and stuck to wired audio transfer therefore.
Years have passed and Bluetooth audio development has advanced, so let’s see how the Air-Fi Matrix² asserts itself in general and against the wired Shure SRH440 which is about in the same price range.
Before I start with my review, I want to tell you a little about myself and my preferences, so you get a better perception of who you are dealing with. I’ve gotten into higher-end audio some years ago and have expanded my collection of gear, especially headphones, since then (you can see my current inventory by clicking on my profile). Having developed a good knowledge, I started writing multiple in-depth reviews (in German) as I love writing, and gave purchase advice.
Though I am listening to higher-end headphones most of the time, especially when concentrating more on the music, I also like purchasing cheap stuff from time to time, just as the Brainwavz R1, as I love to evaluate how well they handle and I even like using the rather inexpensive stuff when being on the go with less concentration on the music or just sometimes in-between.
The main genres I listen to at home are jazz, elder rock and pop music, some classical, instrumental and acoustic music with a preference towards neutral headphones and IEMs.
On the go and in-between, I prefer listening to more modern pop and rock music, as well as electronica, some metal, very little hip-hop/rap and some acoustic and chamber music, with a preference of neutral-ish or balanced headphones that tend to have either a slightly v-shaped or darkish sound signature (from time to time, I also find myself desiring a more “extreme” sound signature on the go). Most of the time, I listen at rather low volume levels.
Let’s go on with the actual review:
The Air-Fi Matrix² comes in a surprisingly slim package with the typical MeElectronics design I already know from their A151 IEMs I bought many months ago. On the inside, you find a nice carrying case with carbon fibre design which contains the headphone, as well as a short manual where the most important operations and features are nicely described, along with a cable with straight 3.5 mm connectors to use the headphone in wired mode, plus a short micro USB charging cable.
I was quite surprised about the headphone being quite lightweight and producing only little clamping pressure and being rather small in size, though my rather big ears fit pretty well into the very soft ear cups, except from my earlobes, which are yet just about covered by the soft ear pads (though, there could be just a bit more depth as my ears are touching the inside of the cups resulting in a little pain when listening for a long time). Even the headband is made out of very soft material, making the Matrix² extremely comfy to wear.
Though at close sight the headphone looks a bit cheapish, it lacks of any flaws in build quality, with all stitches being even and all screws being tight. At further Glance the Matrix² looks even quite stylish and modern with the nice and soft carbon fibre imitation being surrounded by the glossy silver plastic ring and the matte-black finish.
The headband’s size adjustment mechanism and the rotary ear cups appear to be quite stiff and the left/right marks are barely visible being in a rush, with the left side also lacking of the typical three vertical dots, making it less easy to put them on the right way when you are in a hurry.
The media buttons need a certain amount of force to be pressed and are accompanied by a rather loud mechanical “click” when on the head, but it’s not too bothering when music is played.
Speaking of the media buttons: there are three on each side, providing you with all of the functions you probably know from an extended in-line remote control.
Starting on the left ear cup, you have the on/off button next to the “+” and “-“ buttons for raising or lowering the volume, next to a small LED indicator that flashes blue when the headphone is turned on and starts shining continuously when it is connected wirelessly, as well as the built-in microphone (its voice quality could have been better though it is quite okay) which is covered by a black metal mesh.
On the right ear cup, you find the play/pause button which is surrounded by the two buttons that are responsible for skipping to the next/previous track.
What I found somehow illogical was that both the “+” and “>>I” buttons are located on the back instead of the front, but I got used to it real quick.
Noise isolation is rather poor, especially in the lower frequencies, so traffic noise won’t really be blocked as much as with the Shure which isolates mid and low frequencies quite well. In terms of high frequency isolations, I found both to be quite equal.
Usage in noisy environment isn’t the best field of application for the Matrix², therefore I think they are better in less noisy areas such as at home, when hiking or in the office, though they will leak some sound to the outside when listening at higher volume levels.
Packing, accessories and details:
Let’s get them connected:
Pairing the headphone with your Bluetooth device is quite easy as you just have to turn on BT on the transmitting device (make sure it is set to be visible), press the power button to turn on the headphone and keep it pressed for a couple of more seconds to enter pairing mode which is indicated by the status LED flashing red and blue and a female voice (which is also present during turning the headphones on and off) giving you the necessary information you need to pair your device.
With all of the three tested audio sources (BlackBerry Q10, iPhone 4, Windows 7 laptop), pairing and connecting didn’t take long.
Once the headphone has been paired, it will be saved in your mobile’s Bluetooth settings and will most likely allow you an automatic connection for the next time you turn on the headphone (it is depending on your device and settings).
With the iPhone and PC, you kind of set the "volume pre gain" on the device’s media player and control the volume on the headphones, whereas with the BlackBerry there was no such thing as a separate volume control, resulting in a button press on the headphone and the mobile itself regulating the same volume with a negative side effect of the lowest possible volume being above my usual listening levels (this is a "normal" behavior of Bluetooth devices when being connected to BT sources, so it is not the headphone's fault).
A cool feature the Matrix² has aboard is multipoint connectivity, which means that two Bluetooth devices can be connected simultaneously, with one of them acting as media player and the other as telephone. Once a call is incoming, music playback is paused automatically and resumes just as the call is being hung up (the Matrix² also allows call controls, which are described in the manual). It can also be used to play a song with device A, then pause its playback to play another song on device B. Switching devices takes only a few seconds most of the time, but sometimes the latency is longer.
Bluetooth range is pretty astonishing with a minimum of eight meters with the PC (one wall in between) and 15 meters with the BlackBerry (two walls in between) before connection gets partly lost. I remember that years ago, five to eight meters were about the maximum distance I could achieve, but there were much more interruptions involved.
Battery life is pretty amazing – MeElectronics states the battery to last for up to 22 hours, but I got a nice amount of 25+ hours out of continuous playback with volume levels being a bit above average (PC, no aptX, high quality MP3s).
Another neat feature the Matrix² offers is that with most iOS and Android devices you get a small battery indicator next to the Bluetooth symbol, so you approximately know when you have to “fuel up” your cans the next time, but for the case that you run out of battery and don’t have access to an electrical socket, there is a standard 3.5 mm connector located on the back of the left ear cup (yeah, that’s probably not the best position but wasn’t bothering me at all) to connect it to your device via cable.
Media buttons, connections and the microphone:
Let’s get on with the probably most interesting part, the tonality and sound quality:
Before listening, the Matrix² got about 50 hours of burn-in, just in case if there are any effects of burn-in (which I personally doubt in general when it is about headphones, but as this is a review and Head-Fi, I wanted to clarify it).
Tested music files were mainly lossless CD-rips (FLAC), some high quality MP3 files and a minority of AAC files from iTunes.
By the way, hiss is very low with Bluetooth and inaudible with music playback being started.
Tonality-wise, the Matrix² is balanced sounding, but rather on the bassy and slightly dark side of balanced.
Extension on the lower end isn’t bad at all, though I could hear the bass declining below 40 Hz. 30 Hz are yet loud enough though audibly quieter, but below 25 Hz, there wasn’t really much going on, which doesn’t bother me at all as this area doesn’t include much relevant tonal information anyway.
Upper bass and mid bass are moderately emphasised; I’d say about 3 or 4 dB. From mid bass towards lower bass, the level decreases. Ground tone area is free of any emphasis as far as I could tell.
Mids are neither recessed nor emphasised but just right.
The Shure SRH440 has got an overall more neutral bass but doesn’t extend as low as the Matrix², with a quite steep decrease below 50 Hz.
Upper mids and lower highs are audibly recessed, giving voices a slightly darkish timbre.
The Shure’s mids and therefore voices are, to my ears, tonally correct.
At 3.1 kHz I could hear a pretty steep dip when sweeping with a sine generator.
Level increases from mid highs to upper highs, though they still are a tad below neutral, giving the Matrix² a slightly “smooth” and “laid back” signature along with the recessed presence area.
Treble extension is quite good and reaches up to 15 kHz without too much decrease.
The Shure has got more level in the lower highs and an overall brighter treble.
Sweeping didn’t show any annoying peaks in the Matrix²’s frequency response.
As I prefer a neutral-ish or slightly dark/bassy sound signature on the go most of the time, the Matrix² fits in quite well with its balanced yet darkish-bassy tonality.
Let’s continue with resolution and bass quality:
Overall, the Matrix²’s resolution is on a good level, albeit it is settled a bit below the Shure’s which outperforms the MeElec a bit, especially in the bass and also slightly in the treble and carves out some more details.
The only real flaw I can attest the MeElectronics is the bass quality below 100 Hz. The upper bass is, regarding the price, yet pretty dry and clean, just as the Shure’s, but the lower the bass extends, the slower and spongier it gets, with a somehow dull and undifferentiated feeling towards it, also sometimes making the lows appear to be thicker than they actually are – that’s when being connected wirelessly.
As soon as I used the Matrix² in wired mode, lows gained more control and lost the spongy response, albeit still falling behind the Shure’s in terms of dryness and precision and couldn’t get rid of the dull and slightly undifferentiated feeling.
Let’s talk about the differences in highs reproduction in comparison between wired mode, wireless mode with aptX and wireless mode without aptX.
There is a very tiny difference between wireless connection with and without aptX, but the biggest, yet still rather little difference is between wired and wireless mode, with the wired mode reproducing more refined highs with slightly more details.
Again, the Shure is a bit above the MeElec, but way less than I had expected.
Soundstage:
Soundstage is pretty good for a closed-back headphone and gives a pretty balanced expansion both in width and depth. The Shure, which provides a pretty good soundstage for a closed-back headphone, too, isn’t better than the MeElec in this regard, though it provides the more refined instrument separation.
Size comparison with the Shure SRH440:
Conclusion:
Bluetooth audio has clearly developed within the past few years and doesn’t lack much behind wired audio transport anymore.
Regarding the price, the Air-Fi Matrix² AF62 delivers a coherent performance with a great price-quality ratio and doesn’t lack that much behind the Shure SRH440 which is about $10 more expensive, though the MeElec has got less space in the shells due to the wireless audio transport electronics, the built-in battery and the fact that you also pay for the wireless transport, including the fees for the audio codecs and the price for the electronics themselves.
I’d even say that the qualitative difference between the Matrix² and the SRH440 is a bit less than a subjectively perceived half of a class.
This shows that for less than $100, there are halfway good sounding wireless headphones that don’t lack super much behind fully wired headphones.
Furthermore, I am pretty certain that within the next few years, portable wireless audio transport will develop even further, coming closer to filling the yet existing gap between wired and wireless headphones, though it so much smaller than some years ago.
Kudos, MeElectronics, you have developed a pretty balanced and relatively decent sounding headphone offering an audio performance you wouldn’t expect from a Bluetooth headphone this inexpensive.