Link to my review and measurement index thread where one can also find a full review overview, more information about myself as well as my general-ish audio and review manifesto: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/956208/
I only give full stars. My ranking/scoring system does not necessarily follow the norm and is about as follows:
5 stars: The product is very good and received the "highly recommended" award from me.
4 stars: The product is very good and received the "recommended" award from me.
3 stars: The product is good/very good, but not outstanding/special enough to get any of my two awards. ["Thumbs Up"]
2 stars: The product is only about average or even somewhat below that and somewhat flawed/flawed in some areas. [neither "Thumbs Up" nor "Thumbs Down"]
1 star: The product is bad/severely flawed to outright bad. ["Thumbs Down"]
MEE audio Pinnacle P1
Source:
Review sample.
Miscellaneous:
Excellent unboxing experience with many premium accessories.
The included carrying case with magnetically closed lid and serial number looks nice but is less dust- and moisture-proof than regular ones. It offers a sufficient amount of internal space, though.
Both included cables have got twisted conductors and appear of really high quality.
Unique and beautiful design that I personally really like. Shells made of metal.
Good build quality
One dynamic driver per side.
Sound:
Largest included single-flange silicone ear tips.
Tonality:
“Balanced”/unique.
Unfortunately not as natural and realistic as one might expect at the price point.
Ca. 8 dB of bass boost compared to in-ears with diffuse-field flat oriented lows (Etymotic ER4SR/ER-4S). Starts around 750 Hz and increases with a hump. Rather warm fundamental range and lower midrange. Starts to lose some quantity below 45 Hz, so more midbass- than sub-bass-oriented.
The midrange timbre and tuning just doesn’t sound realistic. The area between 1.5 and 3 kHz is recessed while the rest above 3 kHz is on a more or less normal level again (actually somewhat elevated around 5 kHz), which results in voices to sound somewhat strange and confused; at the same time relaxed and close as well as at the same time dark and bright. This makes especially male voices appear rather intimate whereas mainly female voices sound distant while mainly bright female voices appear rather intimate again.
Therefore the midrange appears to sound off in terms of timbre and proximity.
Between 9 and 11 kHz, the P1 form an emphasis that makes cymbal crashes appear splashy. Therefore, they don’t sound realistic all the time and can be a bit sharp at times, too, as well as sometimes a little sibilant.
Frequency Response:
ER-4S-Compensation
ProPhile 8-Compensation
Resolution:
Decent but definitely not great. Slightly above that of my Sennheiser IE 80, probably slightly above the RHA T20 as well (the latter, however, at least judging from the three sets that I have had, are not really consistent and seem to have undergone some tuning changes over time). That’s not a big achievement though as the former are quite soft and slow sounding while the latter are not the most technically convincing dynamic driver in-ears either (but a bit above my Sennheiser) and have got an uneven treble response.
Around the same price, the Lear LHF-AE1d resolve audibly better and are tuned much more realistically (their bass is softer and slower than the P1s’, though), and the iBasso IT01, Fostex TE-02, DUNU Falcon-C, iBasso IT01s, Etymotic’s ER2 in-ears and DUNU’s Titan models (except for the Titan 6), along with the Fidue A65, perform better on the technical level and are more realistically tuned in the midrange (most are more realistic in the treble, too).
The bass is relatively tight for a dynamic driver implementation and decays pretty fast, however it doesn’t seem to have the fastest attack, resulting in it sounding somewhat undifferentiated. In terms of details, it sounds somewhat dull, too, but is overall still okay, yet I would expect better performance at the 199.99$ retail price.
Towards the sub-bass, the lows soften somewhat more while muddiness is just yet avoided.
The lows and lower mids appear generally somewhat veiled.
Otherwise, the mids and especially highs resolve pretty well and feature good note separation.
Soundstage:
An aspect that is fairly nice about these in-ears is their soundstage that appears spacious, open and three-dimensional.
As it is wide and features a good forward projection, the sensation is quite spherical, with generally good layering, and something that can definitely be enjoyed.
Instrument separation, imaging precision and placement are fairly precise and clean as well, although there is ultimately still some room for improvements.
Conclusion:
Definitely not bad but clearly with some shortcomings when it comes to tuning/tonality. Rather decent resolution for a dynamic driver implementation, however not among the better/best ones at the price point.
Large, open, enjoyable soundstage.
I only give full stars. My ranking/scoring system does not necessarily follow the norm and is about as follows:
5 stars: The product is very good and received the "highly recommended" award from me.
4 stars: The product is very good and received the "recommended" award from me.
3 stars: The product is good/very good, but not outstanding/special enough to get any of my two awards. ["Thumbs Up"]
2 stars: The product is only about average or even somewhat below that and somewhat flawed/flawed in some areas. [neither "Thumbs Up" nor "Thumbs Down"]
1 star: The product is bad/severely flawed to outright bad. ["Thumbs Down"]
MEE audio Pinnacle P1
Source:
Review sample.
Miscellaneous:
Excellent unboxing experience with many premium accessories.
The included carrying case with magnetically closed lid and serial number looks nice but is less dust- and moisture-proof than regular ones. It offers a sufficient amount of internal space, though.
Both included cables have got twisted conductors and appear of really high quality.
Unique and beautiful design that I personally really like. Shells made of metal.
Good build quality
One dynamic driver per side.
Sound:
Largest included single-flange silicone ear tips.
Tonality:
“Balanced”/unique.
Unfortunately not as natural and realistic as one might expect at the price point.
Ca. 8 dB of bass boost compared to in-ears with diffuse-field flat oriented lows (Etymotic ER4SR/ER-4S). Starts around 750 Hz and increases with a hump. Rather warm fundamental range and lower midrange. Starts to lose some quantity below 45 Hz, so more midbass- than sub-bass-oriented.
The midrange timbre and tuning just doesn’t sound realistic. The area between 1.5 and 3 kHz is recessed while the rest above 3 kHz is on a more or less normal level again (actually somewhat elevated around 5 kHz), which results in voices to sound somewhat strange and confused; at the same time relaxed and close as well as at the same time dark and bright. This makes especially male voices appear rather intimate whereas mainly female voices sound distant while mainly bright female voices appear rather intimate again.
Therefore the midrange appears to sound off in terms of timbre and proximity.
Between 9 and 11 kHz, the P1 form an emphasis that makes cymbal crashes appear splashy. Therefore, they don’t sound realistic all the time and can be a bit sharp at times, too, as well as sometimes a little sibilant.
Frequency Response:
ER-4S-Compensation
ProPhile 8-Compensation
Resolution:
Decent but definitely not great. Slightly above that of my Sennheiser IE 80, probably slightly above the RHA T20 as well (the latter, however, at least judging from the three sets that I have had, are not really consistent and seem to have undergone some tuning changes over time). That’s not a big achievement though as the former are quite soft and slow sounding while the latter are not the most technically convincing dynamic driver in-ears either (but a bit above my Sennheiser) and have got an uneven treble response.
Around the same price, the Lear LHF-AE1d resolve audibly better and are tuned much more realistically (their bass is softer and slower than the P1s’, though), and the iBasso IT01, Fostex TE-02, DUNU Falcon-C, iBasso IT01s, Etymotic’s ER2 in-ears and DUNU’s Titan models (except for the Titan 6), along with the Fidue A65, perform better on the technical level and are more realistically tuned in the midrange (most are more realistic in the treble, too).
The bass is relatively tight for a dynamic driver implementation and decays pretty fast, however it doesn’t seem to have the fastest attack, resulting in it sounding somewhat undifferentiated. In terms of details, it sounds somewhat dull, too, but is overall still okay, yet I would expect better performance at the 199.99$ retail price.
Towards the sub-bass, the lows soften somewhat more while muddiness is just yet avoided.
The lows and lower mids appear generally somewhat veiled.
Otherwise, the mids and especially highs resolve pretty well and feature good note separation.
Soundstage:
An aspect that is fairly nice about these in-ears is their soundstage that appears spacious, open and three-dimensional.
As it is wide and features a good forward projection, the sensation is quite spherical, with generally good layering, and something that can definitely be enjoyed.
Instrument separation, imaging precision and placement are fairly precise and clean as well, although there is ultimately still some room for improvements.
Conclusion:
Definitely not bad but clearly with some shortcomings when it comes to tuning/tonality. Rather decent resolution for a dynamic driver implementation, however not among the better/best ones at the price point.
Large, open, enjoyable soundstage.
Nice review!