ngoshawk

Headphoneus Supremus
Focal Stellia: Is this the closed-back version of the Utopia?
Pros: Focal build is amongst the best.
Quality, luxurious offering
Bass reaches deep and tight
Soundstage among the best closed-backs out there
Smooth character, with excellent detail as well
Gorgeous looks & cable
Cons: Fit can be hard for some
Cable microphonics
Cost compared to alternatives?
Sound will not fit all
Focal Stellia ($2990): Is this the closed-back version of the Utopia?

Stellia

*A version of this will be posted on eCoustics

d1vCa9G.jpg


Intro:

Between Will and myself, we have reviewed pretty much all of the models Focal has produced. Will stated, “the Utopia walked out carrying the bag against the other top tier headphones,” which I think means he liked it and the Utopia performed admirably (review here). Those are high words indeed for a model pushing the envelope of $5000. We both appreciated the Liric as a top tier closed-back headphone, but at that price, it faced stiff competition. We liked it, but others performed as well, or nearly so.

The Stellia came out about 2020, to very good accolades. Marketed not necessarily as a closed-back version of the Utopia, but rather Focal’s vision of what a top tier closed-back SHOULD sound like. Especially if you are going to pony up $3k. Also labeled with the following, “very high-end circum-aural headphones…for home and on-the-go use,” the Stellia hopes to be your only headphone. Not that I would dare take this out in public, unless it was to someone’s home. Striving for a wider soundstage than closed-backs are known for, along with detail that would make a world class chef blush, the goals were obvious: make the world’s best sounding closed-back headphone. If you have looked recently at Focal’s speaker lineup, you know that they not only sound good, but look gorgeous as well. The Stellia, easily falls into that category.

Luckily, I have another of what both Will and I think is a top tier closed-back on hand in the superb Kennerton Rögnir. This was a comparison I was giddily looking forward to...

vRqQkQm.jpg


The Beginning:

Focal began making headphones in 2012, with the first Utopia coming along in 2016. Sprinkled in between were models such as the Elear (my introduction to them, and I bought a pair, here & here), the Clear and Elegia. All decent to quite good models. The Stellia came about as a result of these headphones. With the desire to make a top tier closed-back, naturally Focal raised their game (but the design stays mostly the same thankfully) with the Stellia.

Sharing the same 40mm M-shaped dome, pure Beryllium driver as the Utopia, the Stellia is already set for the top end. The gorgeous looks also carry over, with the mocha & cognac colors along with full-grain leather and combinations of plastic, aluminum & stainless steel, the look is simply sumptuous.


Specs:

Type Circum-aural closed-back headphones
Impedance 35 Ohms
Sensitivity 106dB SPL / 1mW @ 1kHz
THD 0.1% @ 1kHz / 100 dB SPL
Frequency response 5Hz–40kHz
Loudspeaker 1.6" (40mm) pure Beryllium "M" shape dome
Weight 0.96lb (435g)
Cables provided
• 1 x 4ft OFC 24 AWG cable with 1/8" (3.5mm) TRS Jack connector
• 1 x 10ft OFC 24 AWG cable with 4-pin XLR connector
• 1 x Jack adapter,
1/8" (3.5mm) female – 1/4" (6.35mm) male
Carrying case provided 9.8"x9.4"x4.7" (250x240x120mm)

mVKi0h2.jpg

k4Tibli.jpg

PkBBIgJ.jpg


Unboxing:

The opening presentation from Focal is always tops and this goes beyond that. Think of taking possession of your Lamborghini, but right from the factory, instead of a mere dealer. This is the best unboxing of anything I have reviewed. Ever.

The box itself is large and rectangular, colored in a mocha faux leather. Imprinted with the words “Stellia” & “Focal” on the front, you find branches of Focal production on the back. Small half-moon cutouts on the short sides act as the lift area, which requires some force to counter the vacuum effect along with the tightness due to being lined in dark mocha suede.

Inside the front has an oblong cutout showcasing the Focal logo on the semi-hard case along with the woven mixed cognac/mocha coloration. I know I keep mentioning the colors, but this combination is the best I have witnessed on a Focal headphone. Classy, without being garish. Superb. I also find the reason for the additional heft to the box, from what I am used to: the back 1/4ish from top to bottom contains another leather case, which houses the cables. A whole presentation box for the cables. Seriously. Inside you find a hard foam insert where one of the cables is mounted for viewing, while the other half hosts a leather pouch, which carries the paperwork. Included is the owner’s manual, warranty card, informational pamphlet and an excellent small Focal brochure explaining the marque. You also get a “congratulations” card to top it off. Under the pouch is the second cable. Yes, Focal includes a second cable. You can use either the 4-pin XLR cable or a 6.35mm (1/4”) jacked cable for use. The 6.35mm cable jack also unscrews to provide the user with the typical 3.5mm (1/8”).

The semi-hard case is gorgeous, and functional at the same time. With a serious zipper in silver, you know the case means business. I do wonder what a soft bronzish color would have looked like, with patina of course. Inside the case, you find a form fitting area for the headphone itself, and two stretchy straps in center opening (one on top, one on bottom), which can be used for each cable. The headphones cannot be stored with the cable on. The larger open port is for the XLR (bottom), while the top is used for the “regular” cable. Focal has always had their cases together, and the Stellia continues that fine tradition.

Inside the semi-hard case is what we came for, the headphones, themselves.

BdO7Awv.jpg


A graceful mix of aluminum, stainless steel and leather make the Stellia look highly elegant. Some have mentioned that the color combination is too showy, but I tend to think the opposite. I think the combination looks understated and sophisticated, worthy of the price range. From the cognac-colored aluminum yoke to the mocha leather inserts used to “close” the circular cup backing off, the color palette & mix is exquisite. For those familiar with Focal, the shape remains the same, and I find it quite good, while fitting to my head as well. The black perforated leather on the bottom provides cushioning and air flow relief, while the mocha leather headband feels soft and luxurious. This is two-fold: good looks, and a firm grip are had with the choice. And the last thing anyone would want is to drop these gems.

As mentioned, the mocha leather on the inside of the cups acts to close the increasing diameter holes of the skeleton stainless steel cup, which helps to control resonation, allow the Focal tuning to reflect according to their tuning and provide the closed-back aspect desired. There is also plastic under the leather, which does the hard job.

Precise clicks on the stanchion (yoke top) affords nine spots for proper fit. I usually do six on most headphones, and that is no different here. There is some rotational spring to the stanchion, which is normal. This affords some movement, further accommodating fit. The cups also have springs, which aid in clamping pressure, which I found to be on the tighter side, but good. Since the ear pads are leather, the whole unit could get warm after long sessions, but I found no bother.

The whole ear pad pops off, held by five pop spots, so changing the pads can be done easily enough. The two-tone color scheme carries over here as well, adding to the look. Those pads, while slightly thin to me, provide some of the finest coddling and fit on my head of any headphone I have tried. Some are too thick and cushy. The Stellia pads are just right with excellent feel and give. The drivers can be seen under a protective screen, and orient themselves slightly forward of mid ear fore & aft. They are also angled slightly toward the back to accommodate this slight shift forward. Fit is quite nice on my head as a result of all the technology involved in the build.

The two provided cables gave me mixed reactions. I used the 10-foot (yes, 10 feet) XLR cable for the majority of the time through either my Geshelli Labs E2/J2 combo or my iFi Pro iCAN/iDSD combination. Both have an XLR jack, and I wanted the full balanced sound option. I even used this cable on my newly acquired Sony MDR-Z7 with good results. The only faults I have with this wonderfully flat-braided cable are the microphonics of it (above the Y-splitter); the tangling of it, which quite often wrapped onto itself; and the length. Another reviewer posited that this was due to the bends and shape in which the cable is stored, and I agree. 10-feet is very long, but this would be a good cable for sitting on your couch or at your office. I would simply be careful getting up. The other cable worked just fine, and had slightly less microphonics to it, and tangling. Plus, having the interchangeable jack helps across multiple sources. I do find that one on the short side, and it is definitely meant for portability.

d1vCa9G.jpg


The cables are really quite good, but correcting those niggling attributes would make them just about perfect.

The build of the Stellia is as expected, at or near the top of the tier. The mix of plastic, leather, aluminum, and stainless steel makes for a luxurious product; which provides the user with excellent ergonomics and quality feel. I had a small amount of creaking on the cups, but that was only with concerted pressure; something a user would most likely not do while wearing.

sZC8iOy.jpg


Technology:

Driver technology as mentioned is the 40mm M-shaped Beryllium dome, similar to Focal’s other effort in the Utopia. The reasoning is that this dome shape helps to control any unwanted resonation produced from the driver/sound combination, before hitting your ears. It works, and keeps a tight control on the production of the sound signature.

The Stellia has a newly redesigned driver, modeled off the Utopia as mentioned. The 40mm size Beryllium M-shaped diaphragm of the original (Utopia) have been retained but the suspension has been tweaked with a voice-coil upgrade as well. The new voice-coil is a 30% copper and 70% aluminum hybrid for improved performance while retaining low weight. According to Focal, it’s actually a touch heavier than the original and the weight was offset with the introduction of carbon fiber to keep the overall weight roughly equal.

The Stellia is slightly more sensitive than the Utopia (106dB’s to 104 dB’s), and with an impedance of 35 ohms vs 80ohms is easier to drive.

EYqYAum.jpg


Sound:

Coming off the highlights of Will’s new Utopia (Newtopia) review, we had high hopes for the Stellia. Those hopes were met and exceeded. The Stellia provides details as good as any closed-back I have heard; including my personal Kennerton Rögnir. A closed-back headphone is not supposed to have this much clarity and detail to it. But the Stellia does.

Spatial awareness it seems is always compromised by having a closed-back. But whatever magic Focal has done here has worked. While not on par with the best open-backs with regard to soundstage, the Stellia is admirable and I never felt myself wishing for more. Especially knowing it was closed. There is a reason that this cost right at $3k, and it becomes evident very early in the listening that most of that went into the tuning and presentation mentioned above.

Clarity and detail are one thing, but when the rest does not match that you can be left with a thinner signatured headphone. And yes, some design their headphones that way for a purpose. The Stellia exhibit a full sound that does not become bloated or overly abundant when called upon. Bass reaches well into the sub-bass region, with a taut control to it as opposed to overall depth of reach. That is all right, and I kicked the Bass Boost up on my iFi Pro iCAN/iDSD duo to accommodate my taste in the lower region. The Stellia handled the added input with aplomb. That tautness also carries a note of slightly slower decay that attack, which aids in a fullness to it that helps “hide” the lack of deep reach.

Mids come across as sumptuous without becoming drippy or slow. Speed is just right and the saxophone of Sonny Clark comes to the front without becoming garish or showy on “Cool Struttin’.” There is also a depth to the mids, which aid in that full sound, but the detail with which this comes across is quite frankly, astounding. On the warmer side as well, the richness pervades my senses, but without that ballooning lack of character.

Cymbal hits come across as articulate and accurate. No digital sense here, only realism. Trumpet notes provide a nice Segway into the top end, which hits with authority, but not overwhelming. A sense of smoothness lends itself to the transition between the mids and treble, as exonerated “L-O-V-E” by Nat King Coles. His vocal melancholy is so powerful that the exuding of character lends perfectly as he moves up the scale. His reach makes for a thoroughly enjoyable listen. Adele’s raspy voice sounds wonderful on “Oh My God,” which leads me into “Hello” of course to gauge that upper vocal range of a simply fantastic female voice. While not extending as others, the fullness with which she projects her song here makes for a brilliant listen, and ties off the sound signature of the Stellia perfectly.

Some headphones posit themselves for specific genre. The Stellia does not. As witnessed, it carries across male & female vocals as easily as jazz and pop in Taylor Swift’s superb song, “Question...?” This song also allows for the rumble of the song to come through as well. Again, while not reaching too high in the vocal range, the way her voice comes across is simply lavish.

ABG0nmr.jpg



Comparison:

I would be remiss if I did not compare the Stellia to the Rögnir for they fall into the same category and are both closed-back. Kennerton is much less known that Focal in the headphone world it seems, but they carry a devout, almost rabid base of fans. Will and I concur, rating the Rögnir as one of the absolute best closed-backs we have heard. It is a much more polarizing headphone though than the Stellia. Many do not like it (based upon graphs...) but you really cannot deny its appeal, what with the use of 2000 year old Bog Oak (https://www.antiquesage.com/bog-oak-rarest-wood-world/) the look is stunning. It also has 80mm planar driver technology, so the sound is a bit different.

The Rögnir has a bit “less full” sound to it, with more of a push into the upper mids than the Stellia. Still with a smooth character, the sound is quite good. Bass also reaches a bit deeper than the Stellia, but with slightly less control to it. As a result, there is a slight bleed into the lower mids from that characteristic. But, to me this is part of the character of the Rögnir, a melding of the sound into a nearly seamless smooth character, except for the upper mid push. Typically, planar driver bass reaches well in depth, and with good control. My feeling here is that the Kennerton was made to present an overall smoothness to it, with a bit of vibrant character where needed, the vocal region. And it works. Going back to “L-O-V-E,” I get a better sense of depth to the soundstage that was slightly missing in the Stellia. Even with that upper vocal push, the sound is so, so good to me. I did find myself reaching to turn the volume down on the Rögnir, something I did not do on the Stellia.

taryrlG.jpg



Conclusion:

As Focal’s second to top model and top closed-back model, the Stellia comes with high hopes. And after listening for the past six weeks along with reading numerous other reviews, we can all agree that Focal has hit the mark as a flagship headphone should. Superb construction, superb sound, and impeccable presentation in the unit and accessories. Some will state they could go without the luxurious presentation, but that to me is part of the flagship’s role, much like a Rolex doesn’t come in a box like a Timex. You pay for that expectation of excellence, and the Stellia meets those expectations with sophistication, class and luxury. And, sound to back it up.

The Stellia provides the listener with a smoothness one does not often get with this level of clarity and detail in song. Combining all of those traits in one headphone is a laudable goal, and one that Focal has met beyond expectations. So much so, that it could very well replace my Rögnir. I finish this listening to “Don’t You Forget About Me,” from Simple Minds and the seminal song from “Breakfast Club.” I certainly will not forget about the Stellia.

oBCY9Yq.jpg
ngoshawk
ngoshawk
Anytime you can get an Elegia for what you mention as the price, sounds like a good deal to me! Thank you for the kind words as well. cheers.
S
salgado
"(...) Soundstage among the best closed-backs out there" - wow, sir! With all due respect, this is way too exaggerated statement.

As much as I like stellia, their biggest drawback to my ears is the claustrophobic soundstage - nowhere close to the best even within closed back performers.

Cheers.
ngoshawk
ngoshawk
Not exaggerated at all. It is what I heard. Is it source dependent? Obviously, but it is among the best I have heard. I stand by that statement.

WaveTheory

100+ Head-Fier
Focal Stellia Review - by WaveTheory
Pros: One of the best sounding closed-backs on the market; resolution; macrodynamic punch/slam; imaging & separation; build quality; comfort; isolation
Cons: a bit too much energy in upper-mids/lower treble, timbre suffers as a result; stock cables are typical Focal cable garbage; carrying case is a bit big to just stick in most backpacks/suitcases for traveling
1632692910609.png


INTRODUCTION

The Focal Stellia – a closed-back, dynamic-driver, over-the-ear, $3000US headphone – is the latest headphone loan to come across my desk. Thanks, @sa11297 for the loan! I’ve given it a good listen, and it’s time to dive in.

TL;DR

The Stellia is one of the best sounding closed-back headphones on the market with excellent resolution, impressive spatial presentation for closed-back, fantastic macrodynamics and physicality, and well-textured bass in a well-built, easy-to-drive, comfortable package. Its carrying case might be a bit too big for some travel situations and its biggest sonic drawback is that it can be a bit too forward in the upper-mids, breaking timbre and leading to some shout/honk. Even so, it brings a lot to the table and finds a nice niche for itself in its portion of the headphone market.

KNOW YOUR REVIEWER

My preferred genres are rock/metal and classical/orchestral music. I’m getting to know jazz more and enjoying quite a bit. I also listen to some EDM and hip-hop. My hearing quirks include a high sensitivity to midrange frequencies from just under 1KHz to around 3Khz, give or take. My ears are thus quick to perceive “shoutiness” in headphones in particular. I describe “shoutiness” as an emphasis on the ‘ou’ sound of ‘shout.’ It’s a forwardness in the neighborhood of 1KHz and/or on the first one or two harmonics above it (when I make the sound ‘ooooowwwww’ into a spectrum analyzer the dominant frequency on the vowel sound is around 930Hz, which also means harmonic spikes occur again at around 1860Hz and 2790Hz). In the extreme, it can have the tonal effect of sounding like a vocalist is speaking or singing through a toilet paper tube or cupping their hands over their mouth. It can also give instruments like piano, but especially brass instruments, an added ‘honk’ to their sound. I also get distracted by sibilance, or sharp ‘s’ and ‘t’ sounds that can make ssssingers sssssound like they’re forssssssing esssss ssssssounds aggresssssssively. Sibilance does not physically hurt my ears nearly as quickly as shout, though. It’s distracting because it’s annoying and unnatural. Finally, I’m discovering that I have a preference for more subtle detail. I like good detail retrieval and hearing what a recording has to offer, but I prefer what many would consider relaxed and subtle rather than aggressive or detail-forward. To my ear, more subtle detail-retrieval sounds more realistic and natural than aggressive, detail-forwardness. There is a balance here, though, because detail retrieval can get too relaxed and that can sound unnatural, as well, or simply leave out important aspects of the recording. Readers should keep these hearing quirks and preferences in mind as they read my descriptions of sound.

FEATURES & BUILD

The Stellia has the look of Focal. They all share the same chassis and mostly change in the color and quality of materials. All of the normal Focal stuff is here – the slightly wider-than-average relaxed size, the vertically-swiveling cups on spring-loaded hinges, and the geometric pattern on the back of the ear cups. The Stellia comes in a very unique and attractive cognac color.

1632692940868.png


The drivers in the Stellia are dynamic “M-shaped” domes, a uniquely Focal feature, and made of pure beryllium. They’re easy to drive with a rated impedance of 35Ω and sensitivity of 106dB/mW. Indeed, I had no trouble driving them with the E02 module on my Cayin N6ii DAP. The ability to drive the Stellia with mobile devices is clearly one of Focal’s goals, as they mention portability a number of times on their Stellia webpage (https://www.focal.com/us/headphones/for-home/stellia#documentation). I have a few quibbles with this, however. The Stellia’s frame and chassis are not at all collapsible, and the carrying case they ship with, while luxurious, is not particularly travel friendly. Both the headphone and the case take up some room in a bag or suitcase. The Stellia stays on the head quite well, though, so if you’re heading to coffee shop there’s very little risk they will slip off. They also isolate very well. They’re not noise-cancelling, but they do a solid job of blocking out external noise and also don’t leak a ton. This isolation bit is a trait that has trickled down into Focal’s cheaper closed-back models (Elegia, Radiance, Celestee) as they all isolate well.

The Stellia, like all of Focal’s line, uses a detachable dual-entry cable system with the very common 3.5mm jack size in each cup. The jacks are recessed into the cup some but the diameter of the recess is bigger than most other headphones that have these recesses, and will accommodate many of the larger plugs that are often found on aftermarket cables. That’s important as Focal’s stock cables have become a bit of a joke, and deservedly so. They are stiff, cumbersome, and not particularly nice to use. Stellia suffers from that same problem.

SOUND

Test Gear

I split my listening time with Stellia mostly between two systems. The first is my desktop system with a Singxer SU-2 DDC connected via USB to a Windows 10 desktop PC, a Berkeley Audio Designs Alpha S2 DAC, and a Violectric HPA-V281 headphone amp. I also used the Stellia in my transportable rig with a Cayin N6ii DAP used as a digital transport and connected to a Chord Hugo 2 DAC/amp via Cayin’s USB-C-to-coaxial digital interconnect cable. I mentioned testing the Stellia directly from the E02 module output of the N6ii. That was mostly checking to make sure the Stellia are easy to drive with a mobile amp like that. They are. I didn’t do much listening beyond that on that device.

Sound Signature

The overall sound signature is mid-forward. There is a slight forwardness in the upper mid-range that stands out from what is otherwise very close to perceptually neutral. There is very good bass and treble extension. Both the bass and treble sound appropriate present without being forward or calling attention to themselves either through being too much or too little. The overall presentation is also very dynamic, being lively and snappy in the mids and treble and very punchy and physical in the bass. That’s also a Focal trait. The Stellia is now the fourth Focal headphone I’ve gotten on my head and they have all had very punchy macrodynamics and high physicality.

The bass is tight, tuneful, and extended. It’s not elevated with respect to the rest of the frequency spectrum but it digs deep and hits hard. It’s also well textured, with the slight wavers of the waves on the string being resolved in addition to rich, accurate tone. The Stellia gave me a “wow, that’s cool” moment when listening to Dvorak’s 9th Symphony with my Hugo 2. I could hear the resinousness – that ‘zizzy’ sound of bows being dragged across strings – on the string basses, which no other headphone has really pointed out to me before, at least not that I’ve noticed. Stellia also resolves the upper harmonics and overtones of bass guitars very well. Bass players like Flea, John Entwistle, and Geddy Lee, who are all vigorous players known for being violent with the strings, sound wonderful on Stellia with those aggressive plucks and strums leading to rich and realistic overtones, and sometimes fret buzz, in the midbass. Those little sounds go surprisingly far in the direction of reproducing a realistic, believable listening experience.

The upper treble is also airy and extended but rarely ever harsh or sibilant. It’s one of those somewhat cliché cases where the Stellia is only sibilant if the recording is sibilant. It doesn’t add much in on its own. There was another wow moment when listening to The Who’s Who Are You album where Keith Moon was riding a crash cymbal and it sounded startingly realistic.

The midrange is biggest area where the Stellia’s performance gets a bit dicey. There is a forwardness to the upper midrange that can make female vocals and some higher-pitched male vocals (hello, Geddy Lee again) sound shouty and some horns, strings, pianos, and guitar sounds sound hollow or honky. There’s still lots of detail and resolution in the mids, but this forwardness causes the overall sound to get a bit wonky. The extent to which this happens does vary some with signal chain. I thought the effect was less on my Alpha S2 + V281 than with the Hugo 2, but it was noticeable and timbre-breaking on each chain. That’s unfortunate because outside of that range the timbre on the Stellia is fantastic, but that range is critically important to the overall presentation of most music so it’s difficult to say the Stellia is a headphone with a natural timbre.

Detail Retrieval

I’ve mentioned the Stellia’s resolution capabilities a bit already with the bass texture. Room reverbs, echoes, the sounds of fingers rubbing across strings, are all there. What I like about its detail retrieval is that it’s not forward or aggressive. Some headphones announce how resolving they are by assaulting the listener with constant, non-stop, in-their-face detail. The Stellia is more subdued in that regard by producing the subtle details, well, subtly. There isn’t much of consequence missing, but it’s not forced either. In fact, it took me some time to realize just how resolving the Stellia is as it took quite awhile to see what it was doing better than its siblings the Clear MG and the Radiance. But, rest assured, in time its resolution chops were audible. I’ll leave a more thorough comparison with the MG and Radiance to another post.

Macrodynamics

It bears repeating that a key feature of the presentation for the Stellia is its physicality. It’s a Focal trait but the Stellia brings it with authority. There is lots of punch, hard-hitting attacks, and plenty of dynamic range. I never found the punch to be over the top, but I like the physicality, particularly in the bass, as it draws me into most of the music I listen to. However, some listeners will likely object and find it distracting.

Spatial Presentation

Here the closed-back nature of the Stellia is a bit limiting. You should not expect an expansive soundstage. The Stellia is more on the intimate side. It’s not claustrophobic at all, and not as intimate as the Sennheiser HD6?? series, but nor is it big. The Focal “bubble around the head” staging is also present, sometimes feeling like it’s placing you in the band rather than in the audience. I’ve described this elsewhere as like being at a symphony performance and the Stellia placing you on the Maestro’s stand rather than in the 3rd or 4th row of the auditorium. This trait is neither good nor bad, just different than other approaches where the music is more out in front. Within that staging though there can be some very good imaging and separation. The live recording of Eagles’ Seven Bridges Road was really fun because it sounded like I was in the crowd and could make out several individual cheers and claps all around me. Cool. That said, the spatial presentation lags behind other headphones I’ve heard around $3000. But, that’s most likely due to all of those being open back and the Stellia being closed. What the Stellia is able to accomplish with the spatial presentation while being closed is genuinely impressive, though.

COMPARISONS WITH OTHER HEADPHONES

Comparing the Stellia with similar products is very difficult because there simply are not very many similar products. The most closely priced closed-back is probably the ZMF Verite Closed, and unfortunately I’ve not heard that one. Dan Clark Audio just realized the Stealth. I’ve not heard that yet either but it’s also $1000 more than Stellia. Putting Lawton chambers on a Fostex TH-900 can run upward of $2200-ish. I have a TH-900 with Lawton Purpleheart chambers on it. The TH-900 Lawton is definitely more v-shaped in its signature than Stellia, having more bass and treble presence. It also punches like and has similar dynamic qualities to the Stellia. The TH-900 Lawton is not as resolving as Stellia though and can be sharp and sibilant in the treble about as often as the Stellia is shouty or honky in the mid-range. Another key difference is the Stellia isolates much better, holding sound both in and out more effectively, and also fitting on the head more securely. These traits make Stellia more mobile friendly.

I had the opportunity to compare the Stellia directly against its sibling models the Radiance and Clear MG. I’ll have a more thorough report on that in the near future. For now, suffice it to say that the Stellia is easily the most resolving of the three and presents the most realistic spatial presentation of the three. Where it can stumble a bit in comparison is in the timbre as Stellia’s upper-mid presence is just too-forward. Radiance easily has the more natural, realistic timbre through that range and the Clear MG is right there with Stellia, and may even be a bit more natural in timbre on some signal chains. But again, I’ll have a more complete report of this comparison soon.

FINAL THOUGHTS

There is a lot to like about Focal Stellia. It puts excellent resolution, punchy and fun dynamics, excellent isolation, and world-class build quality in an easy-to-drive and comfortable package. For a closed-back headphone its spatial presentation is also impressive. Its resolution is also well-presented by being present enough to be noticed but also relaxed enough to not become distracting. The one aspect of sonic performance where it gets iffy is in timbre, and that is due to the upper-midrange and lower treble region being a bit too forward. Shoutiness, honk, and hollowness are frequent results. Still, some like that sound and even for me, who is someone who perceives shoutiness and honk quite quickly, I rarely found it a deal-breaker. If you’re in the market for a high-end headphone that can be driven by your portable device, put the Stellia on your short list for audition.

Thanks for reading, all. Enjoy the music!
Back
Top