Final Audio A3000


New Head-Fier
Something is just missing
Pros: Clinical and accurate
Cons: Lacks musicality, off sounding mids downgrade to a4000 and most of previous e series
Final a3000
Incredibly fast dd, bass is slightly above neutral but fast and speedy with less quality than the e3000 and rolls off sooner. Clean and detailed mids and bright treble but usually not fatiguing.
Slight dark sounding in mids
Extremely accurate, sounds like sealed box woofer.
Almost clinical and perfect in their sound reproduction at the cost of losing some musicality and sounding sterile at times
Sound stage to me sounds small , Imaging is very precise but narrow.
Sounds like sitting in the sweet spot of a pair of small bookshelf monitors but no holographic sound or imaging like the a4000.

Great tips included , cable is satisfactory.
Weird notch inside 2 pin that doesn’t work with every 2 pin cable. Very comfy, excellent build and fit.

Can be bright to the point of fatiguing with some high power amps and mqa on

I prefer listening to the e3000 and a4000
Something is just missing from this , emotion , pleasure , I can’t put my finger on it.
Don’t recommend over other final products or less expensive iems.


100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Phenomenal imaging on a 3D soundstage.
Even more phenomenal masterful treble tuning offering countless and superbly polished details.
Scales well with source quality, up to a really stunning level.
Full bilateral extension.
Super-snappy transients, in the same league of a planar driver.
Recessed shaped 2pin female connector guarantees stability and polarity.
Pairs wonderfully with inherently unplugged genres e.g. classical, jazz and some prog rock
Very high value for the money
Cons: Not recommended for musical genres requiring strong, pulpy & loud presentations e.g. hard rock, EDM etc.
Requires at least some amp power, can’t pair with most phones and lowend dongles.
Uncommon (although not proprietary) cable connector format.
Here’s my consolidated experience with the first of the two most recently released final IEMs – A3000 and A4000

As always, final puts a significant research effort in its product in the first place. A3000 has been developed as an evolution of their A series, which started last year with flagship model A8000. Always last year, the B range was also introduced. Both these IEM lines are different stems off a single base-concept: instead of trying to develop a mythical (read inexistant) “perfect all rounder” earphone, final considered how different types of music call for different presentation features, and developed from there.

Sound design for these models has been undertaken with attention to the relationship between spatial impression and dynamic range of music, and the physical characteristics of earphones and headphones.
We have categorized sound creation on music recording onto these two axes: spatial impression and dynamic range.
One way of thinking regards the distance perception. Classical and jazz recordings are thought to be performed with emphasis on aspects of spaciousness, such as sense of distance, broadness and reverberation. On the other hand, rock, pops and many of the recent animation soundtrack recordings, spaciousness is not as highly emphasized. There is thought to be greater emphasis on clarity, which brings the various instruments and vocals to the front.
Another approach is dynamic range – in other words, changes in loudness over time. If the dynamic range is wide, naturally it is possible to use the change in loudness over time to achieve a more dynamic expression of music. But, there are some types of music for which narrower dynamic range recordings are preferable to allow each of the instruments and vocals to ordinarily appear before the listener’s eyes.
The difference between these two ways of thinking pertains not to which is superior but rather differences in how music is composed and what is demanded of it. With regard to classical music, and that played by orchestra in particular, the spatial orientation of instruments is particularly important. Stringed instruments are positioned nearest to the audience with wind and percussion placed behind them. Should the balance between the spatial orientation and volume of each group of instruments collapse, the music would disintegrate. For that reason, uniform clarity of sound that allows each instrument to appear before the eyes of the listener is not demanded of this type of music. Even for classical music, a string quartet, for example, would have a narrow dynamic range and the clarity of each instrument would be more prominent. For rock and pops on the other hand, spaciousness is not as necessary as for classical music, and so there is greater emphasis on clarity than spaciousness.
These preconditions are very important, particularly for earphone and headphone listening, and it has become apparent that the implementation of appropriate target curves and driver design result in deeper enjoyment of music.

TL;DR – Simply put: for classical and jazz music soundstage and imaging are more important than single sounds definition; the opposite is true for pop & rock.

Moving ahead:
The development of the A series began with the establishment of a new evaluation method by analyzing the relationship between sound quality and physical characteristics, and the result was the A8000. The A3000 has further evolved that evaluation method. We listen to music recorded in different qualities at different volumes. However, in the conventional evaluation method, it is common to perform subjective evaluation under the condition that the sound pressure that presents the sound is fixed, and it is difficult to judge a good sound that matches the actual product audition. Therefore, as a result of a new research targeting an evaluation method that matches the actual music listening situation, we believe that we were able to produce a product that can be said to be the definitive edition in this price range.
Less elegantly but possibly more vulgarly explained: you like listening to AC/DC? You’ll surely want huge loudness similar to what you experience during one of their concerts. Now tell me: when did you ever encouter deafening high sound volumes (a.k.a. SPL) at a jazz club? A3000 is not for extraloud, supermeaty, iron-strong AC/DC sound. Hard rock lovers: you can quit the page now :)

With A3000 …
Each note is localized so that it emerges with a contour in the low range that spreads slowly, and you can vividly hear the fine touch of the guitar and the delicate vibrato of vocals. Since you can notice the detailed nuances of the music, new impressions will be created from the playlists you are familiar with.
Quite poetic. Is it exactly like that? Well not “precisely” like that at least for my ungolden ears, or maybe for my unplatinum gear, or both. But one thing is sure for me and is that A3000 is a superb natural-clear-flavoured proposition in the market of classical / jazz / unplugged specialized drivers, easily until twice its price – where the first big contender comes in (Tanchjim Oxygen) although bearing not the “exact” same flavour – and I need to look up until 4 times its price, where final B3 kicks in, to say OK, here’s something “obviously” better.

Let me try to explain why I’m saying so.

Oh before I forget ... A3000 like all of the other final IEMs I own and use are a direct purchase. I did not receive those as sample units, I am not a final reviewer, I have no commercial relations with them (other than being a paying customer of course).

Involved gear setup

Apogee Groove / Questyle QP1R / Sony NW-A55 mrWalkman – JVC SpiralDot tips – Stock OFC cable – lossless 16-24/44.1-192 FLAC tracks.

Signature analysis

Tonality The tonality is neutral with a bump in the mids, let’s say a centrally accented W shape. Trebles are amongst the stars of the show yet tonality is not bright. Timbre is clear & clean (which might be mistaken for brightness). Transients are lightning fast all accross the spectrum, we are in the same speed league as a planar driver.

Sub-Bass Fully extended, very fast and totally un-enhanced. Sub bass notes are all there where they belong, yet nothing is pushing them to take a millimiter more of space on the scene. Coming from another “less flat bass” driver sub-bass may sound missing but it’s not at all.

Mid Bass Flat, very fast transients, moderately punchy, nicely textured and detailed

Mids Forward, detailed, lean, transparent/uncolored. Highmids in particular are incredibly well managed for how present and sparkly they are, yet an amp with glaring control is recommended here especially if high volume listening is appreciated.
Male and female vocals are very good on A3000, although I would personally choose other drivers as “specialists” for vocal jazz or songwriters, e.g. final E4000 or Heaven IV, or Penon Sphere.
A3000 were never designed for those genres that are typically most appreciated at “overwhelming loudness levels”. In other words: if with a good source you hear A3000 glaring… you are very possibly bringing it beyond its intended scope!

Male Vocals Detailed, lean and quite transparent. They sound natural, might even say “too natural”, “naked”, as there’s no concessions to enhancement, which might come out a bit punishing on baritones for example, depending on personal tastes of course.

Female Vocals Similarly to males, females are also clean and clear and I can’t call them thin, although they’re certainly not lush, let alone “flowered”, either. How did they suceeded in keeping them unsibilant is probably a well kept secret, given all the vividness and clarity, but that’s it.

Highs Superbly present while at the same time you never can call them artificially enhanced as they are not. They come out giving an absolute “natural” sensation, and you suddenly realise that other IEMs either tame them – which is fine when you want a less-trebly overall presentation – or make them reach you with many sorts of different added bright flavours, ending up in plastic, metallic or other colorations. A3000 trebles sound “natural”, complete, clean, brilliant, while lacking all of the usual “treble shortcomings” e.g. sibilance, screeches, sharpness, metallic zings, you name it and forget it all here. They sound so natural and true that you tend to wonder “how comes not all other iems are like this? it ‘sounds so easy’…”. Extension into the high octave is also very “clever”: it is there big time, but no resort to obnoxious 8-16-18K peaks has been made that would screw the magic. A3000 is up to now the single most trebly driver I hear which I would not call “bright” (which I personally don’t like).


Soundstage Very extensive in width and height and just a bit less in depth. This and imaging are the 2 aspects which will scale most with source quality, yet A3000 already offers good stage delivery even on quite entry level amps.

Imaging It’s from another world, especially if your source is also of good quality – but like soundstage it’s already very good on “common” medium-power sources. The entire space around you is blossoming with instruments and voices, each one presenting a host of details that – depending on which other drivers you are accustomed to – you might easily happen to never have noticed before.

Details Yet another masteful calibration result: details are so many, so precise and blossoming everywhere, while at the same time “not too thin, and not too many”, which is one of the typical shortcomings on “highly detailed drivers” appearing mesmerizing at first but quickly overwhelming you with information which are paradoxycally distracting from following the musical story.

Instrument separation Separation and layering also is superb. Might get fuzzier at high volumes, on the high-mids only, where depending on amp quality glaring may start to happen. See above for comments.

Driveability Although impedance is OK, sensitivity is very low and this calls for an at least “somewhat powerful” source. Usual phones are off, so are entry level dongles and such. Power apart, A3000 is quite forgiving in terms of source quality: its presentation results in good output even on relatively entry level sources, which might only risk to engage some highmids glaring that’s about it. A3000 on Hiby R3Pro is nice and ok on the musical genres it was designed for – it’s nothing short of breathtaking on Apogee Groove.


Build The ABS resin material appears fully resistant to “normal” solicitations. Recessed and notched cable connectors are on one hand a great choice to guarantee solid grip and correct polarity insertion as well, on the other hand most budget-bracket 3d-party 2pin cables won’t fit.

Fit A 3-contact-point fit between the housing and the concha has been designed by final aiming at offering the best compromise between wearing firmness and light stress accumulation over time. I would say that works as intended. What I find sub-ideal is the nozzle length which is a tad too short and make tip selection even pickier than it already is especially for me (ymmv)

Comfort Housings’ size, final’s 3-point-fit design and their external “silky smooth lightly gummy” finish all contribute to a great comfort once the right “personal” position is found. For the very first time for me a final driver doesnt fit me best with its bundled eartips (E-series): my best pair on A3000 are JVC SpiralDots, 1 half-size larger than my usual size.

Isolation Good passive isolation once housings are properly fitted

Cable Much similar to E4000’s stock cable, it “looks” underwhelming at first but I frankly can’t say anything bad about it both mechanically and sound wise. Due to the aforementioned “recessed 2pin receptacles” issue I could only try just one alternative cable (Nicehck 23AWG High Purity OFC) which is sound wise a worse pair (modestly enhances highmids which is not good on A3000). I’m planning to order a 3rd party high purity copper with the right plugs soon and test that. Regardless, stock one is 100% decent at the very least.

Specifications (declared)

Housing ABS resin
Driver(s) Single 6mm “f-Core DU” proprietary-design Dynamic Driver.
“The material of the driver front housing is brass, which is less affected by magnetic force and has a higher specific gravity than general aluminum. In order to improve the time response performance of the diaphragm, the voice coil uses an ultra-fine CCAW of 30μ, and the moving parts are thoroughly reduced in weight by assembling with the minimum amount of adhesive. Furthermore, the diaphragm is carefully pressed in a small lot of about 1/3 of the normal size to minimize pressure bias and realize uniform diaphragm molding without distortion.“
Connector 2pin 0.78mm, recessed connectors. A notch is present to guarantee plugging terminals following correct polarity
Cable 1.2m Oxygen Free Copper, single-ended 3.5mm termination
Sensitivity 98 dB
Impedance 18 Ω
Frequency Range Undeclared
Package & accessories Silicon carry case, E-series black eartips (full series of 5 sizes), type-B final earhooks
MSRP at this post time JPY 12.800,00 ($ 125,00)
Last edited:
Hi Mytherion

I own both e3000 and a3000 and btr5. I dont know how shozy form sounds. I bought e3000 years ago but it still works perfectly and great with the cable. But both e3000 and a3000 are single dynamic driver only. It can't give the feeling of hybrid to u. Beware.

What is your mainly place of listening with btr5? If u are listening at a quiet place, i would prefer a3000/4000 for u. If u are listening in transport or street, then i would recommend e3000 for u. Both earphones' isolation are not very good because they are not universal fit iem.

E3000 warm earphone with great and heavy bass warm mid not much high
A3000 more neutral much less bass ok mid not much high much more extension and space

Comparing the two, for genres with voice especially pop, i recommend e3000 over a3000. But if u prefer a more neutral and less full sound and bright and more spacious sound, a3000a4000 would be great.
Hi sssskenny

Thanks for the opinion and recommendation. Honestly, I don't know what you mean with Hybrid feeling (or maybe I know but can't describe it), since I only have Shozy Form 1.1 and Soundmagic E10C to listen to my music so far. But as far, as I compare them, Soundmagic E10C is very comfortable to listen to, since I don't get any sibilance from any songs when paired with BTR5, maybe it's counted as single dynamic driver too? But I don't have problem with it though.

I mainly listening in family room and bedroom, I use above average sound and L size spinfit tips for the isolation.

So, from your recommendation, it seems that I'm more fit to V shaped type but should find lower high to avoid sibilance like e3000, since a3000 doesn't have much bass, but I might lose some clarity and vocal quality since e3000 is a warm tuning type, cmiiw.
For me when listening to pop songs with vocal especially girl voice. I want the voice to be put in the first layer and others in background is more backward. But i find that a3000 is not doing a great job in this kind of songs. Its just ok, somehow background music is higher than other earphone that i cannot enjoy the vocal happily and not impressed. For jazz and classical, it did a great job by not emphasizing certain amount of hz to produce a rather balance sound. So u can feel more soundstage and the position of different instrument . For detail and clarity, i heard lots of discussion in different areas saying a4000 have done a rather better job. The position of different voice is more clear in a4000 so i think for v-shape sound a4000 maybe a better choice for u. I think the tunning of final is usually a smooth highs which i think it won't cause sibilance. This is just my personal reference so feel free to have other opinions.