# Intro/disclaimer :
- Bought myself, no relation to any dealer/brand. The product is nearing its 2 year anniversary, and this market has been shaken up a lot during these years. It's interesting to compare it against the pack and see how it fares !
# First Impressions :
- Unboxing : I really, really like final's approach to boxing. The stuff is simple, but much sturdier than the chi-fi stuff I get to review. The years of experience really do stand out.
- The case for it is highly usable and pocketable, which is still rare these days, no matter the price bracket. So a real plus for me.
- The cable is awesome, although I see people online complaning because of it's flimsiness. Coming from multi braided, rubberized cables that are way too heavy and common in cheap & expensive IEMs, I find it a breeze of fresh air. It's light. It doesn't tangle. It doesnt catch on any fabric, doesn't twist on itself. It's perfection. However I agree that it's not the most confidence inducing piece of kit ever, being plain plastic and quite thin.
- The eartips provided enjoy so much popularity, I need not to expand on them. Great material, does not make your ear sweat exceedingly like an S&S will, no pressure buildup in the ear canal (compared to foams, or again the S&S for that matter), tonality wise it of course matches perfectly with the A4000. I don't like them so much on other IEMs, but that's outside the topic of this review.
You get 5 pairs of the Final Type E, from much too small to decently large.
- I've been used these since June of 2022, for multiple hours per day. The comfort while wearing the A4k is unmatched in the IEM world, it's that simple. They're lighter than any conventional IEM you've ever seen, and their shape makes it so you don't feel the body of the earpiece at all. Even bullet style IEMs aren't as comforrtable, because of the deep insertion of the tip required with them.
# Sound :
- Stock tuning is quite good, approaching excellent even. There is a lot to like for a lot of people, in all regions. It seems the set was tuned more for Jpop and electronic music though, as suggested by the similarity to the Blessing2 Dusk in their graphs (you can compare both frequency responses on timmyc.squig.link). I find the mids too recessed in relation to the ample amounts of energy both in the bass and the high mids & treble (a 13dB difference between the lowest point @700Hz versus the higheest @8000Hz) which leads to some instruments lacking balance in their replay, otherwise the rest of the experience is very enjoyable. You might find this treble peak (which is preceeded by a high mids peak @3kHz) too much with certain genres of music, otherwise for movies and multimedia it's a perfectly useable set, just a very contrasty one at that.
- The value of this IEM is in my opinion very good, you get a lot of resolution, sound isolation, and comfort for the 150$ it's asking. Compared to the very crowded market of IEMs nowadays though, especially with the latest wave of planars out now in April 2023, it's not the obvious choice anymore. Sets like the TangZu Heyday, for instance, are better tuned and more resolving for the same amount of money. So it's up the the rest of the technicalities to keep up for this set to remain relevant against the fierce Chinese competition. Fortunately, I 'm happy to say that the A4k delivers.
- The bass is so enjoyable on the A4000. No matter how busy your track might be, the bass amount is sufficient and precise enough for you to hear everything happening. It's not the fastest transient response ever in the lows, even compared to other dynamics drivers, but the sense of authority it can produce is very rare, and the rumble it very convincing. The moments you're going to notice it's "slower" characteristic is when listening to synth bass, manipulated samples and other instant midi kicks.
- The midrange is among the most natural you can find, and by far the best at its price point. Although relaxed, it's an incredibly rich and faithful to instruments replay. Orchestrals and chamber music are a pleasure to listen to with this set.
- The treble is kind of the wrench thrown in the engine, there's no better way to describe it. It throws the balance of the set out of whack, and even though the A4k has a lot of qualities up to its upper mids the excess energy makes the lows and the mids appear thin in contrast to the treble. When playing rock, electric guitars will sound much too shrill because of the relaxed mids and the ferocious high mids. It's also too much even when listening to the target genres of pop and electronic music (to my tatstes anyways) as the treble energy overtakes the rest and fatigues the listener after a short while. A shame considering how well extended, well resolved and capable it is.
# Technicalities :
- Soundstage. I managed to write this whole review without mentioning it once. Kind of stupid when it's the ONE thing the A4k is known for, even nicknamed "the baby 800S" on forums. I happen to have an 800S at my desk, and it's my day to day headset for everything. I know its soundstage damn well.
Well this reputation is kinda deserved, but at the same time it's not. The 800S sounds much wider than other headpones, even some twice or thrice the price (the Utopia comes to mind). The A4k sounds much wider than other IEMs, even some 10x the price (use the A8000 as a comparison). But this similarity doesn't mean the A4k has anywhere near the soundstage of the 800S, we're far from it.
It's nonetheless the best experience you can currently get, maybe at the exception of the A5000 (that I have yet to try)
- Detail retrieval was impressive at first with the A4k, and it sure is very capable in this domain, just not to the very-top level anymore. Things like the S12, the Heyday and many others have joined the fray and are giving the A4k a tough battle to fight. In my opinion the A4000 still manages to win out the others because it has many pros and almost no cons where the chinese planars always represent some compromise in their replay, be it closed stage like the Tangzu or the off timbre on the S12.
- Imaging is also top notch. This IEM has earned a reputation among gamers because of its ability to help you during competitive play thanks to the accurate audio spatialisation. And I can definitely attest to that. Discerning the stage when listening to music, placing the instruments, or having objects move around you and accurately track them in games, it excels in these departments. It's not even in the same league as offferings in it's market and you gotta look at IEMs twice as expensive to find something comparable or better, like a Blessing2 or a TSMR Sands.
# final words :
- The standard against which everything should be measured. I think it deserves that strong of a statement, because realistically it's what I always end up doing. "Is it as comfortable as my A4000 ?" If not, then I'm not going to grab that next IEM as much as the A4k I already have. "Is it as light as my A4000 ?" If not, I'm not going to wear it for long, and end up not touching that next thing because of that. "Does it sound as good as my A4000 ?" If yes, then that IEM is certainly special and deserves a review. While far from cheap the A4000 sits at a reachable price point for many and challenges products twice as expensive in many ways (weight, practicality, ease of use) or even any IEM on the market in others (soundstage, imaging, comfort)
- This is not the best sounding IEM in the world. I'm somewhat enthusiastic in this review and I'm aware of it, because during the year I've been using I've never lost the excitement I felt when first using it. But I'm also aware of the competition, of everything I've heard since and the reality is that it's not the most detailed IEM you can get. Not by a long shot. However it's far more detailed than the cheaper alternatives, and significantly so. To the point that I feel the price is totally justified. So it gets a 4 star review, not 4.5 or 5
# EQ :
Preamp: -2.36 dB
LSQ 300 Hz Gain -1 dB Q 1.04
PK 840 Hz Gain 0.7 dB Q 1.6
PK 1200 Hz Gain 1 dB Q 0.8
PK 3400 Hz Gain 5 dB Q 0.8
PK 3400 Hz Gain -7.1 dB Q 2.48
HSQ 7000Hz Gain 1.2 dB Q 0.7
PK 7700 Hz Gain -5.5 dB Q 1.41
This is an optional step as I think the stock tuning is enjoyable by itself, but I've come to love EQ and I now use it on pretty much anything. The goal is just to get things to sound "right" to me, as in the most natural sounding version of whatever device I'm using.
So here it is, a toned down version of the A4k.
Slightly lowered the bass, as I found subbass could get overwhelming pretty fast on genres that didn't benefit from the push in that region.
Slightly raised the mids, so that guitars and voices would sound more even.
Lowered the energy in the high mids and the treble, to enjoy the A4k with balance to its sound.
# Conclusion :
Posting a review on an IEM fallen out of fashion in a market dominated by reviews of Chi-fi is sure to not get me any more visibility, but I think this product is still a worthy choice in the current market, the same way the OH10 from 2019 remains a valid choice today.
If you're after natural timbres, immersive soundstage & imaging, and the best comfort found on any IEM (why would you not ?) then this is a perfectly valid choice for you. If you're after detail/$ only, there are options for you (the Heyday is very good). If you're only after smooth tunings, there are options for you (the Galileo is pretty much unbeatable, but you could argue for the IE200 paired with the right tips). But the A4000 has strong arguments that you will never find anywhere else.