As you can see, the BTR11 has no features in the app, the only thing you can do is check for available firmware updates via OTA. This first screenshot is all that is available in the FiiO Control App for the BTR11, the other two images are from the Android systems (Samsung Android 14 and Motorola Android 9). The FiiO Control App is available for Android and iOS.
Unlike the BTR13, the BTR11 has no display or information in the App, so in order to identify which Bluetooth codec the product is using, FiiO created a diagram with the LED:
Volume control: From my tests here, the BTR11 offers 16 steps. In other words, it doesn’t offer independent volume control, that is, increase or decrease the volume using the BTR11 or your smartphone, the volume scale will be the same. Paired with the Windows, when controlling the volume by the BTR11, there were also 16 levels, which are: 6, 13, 19, 25, 31, 38, 44, 50, 56, 62, 69, 75, 81, 87, 94, 100. If you control the volume scale using the computer with the mouse, you can change it to 1 by 1, however… this fine adjustment doesn’t work, from what I saw here, if you set the volume to 10, it will be the same volume – “sound” – corresponding to 7 to 13.
Heating test: Positive point. The product didn’t heat up. I left it playing for 1 hour and didn’t notice any excessive heating of the surface.
The BTR11 battery seemed to be good to me, it has a very interesting duration. Here I think the BTR13 managed to last longer during my tests, but also, the product has almost 4 times more mAh. It’s true, I didn’t completely discharge the battery just to test the product… I used it over the days and noticed its performance. The battery status information is provided by Android, which shows the percentage every 10%. The product also emits an sound alert when the battery is low, like: “low battery”. These alerts are quite annoying, they could have the option to remove this through the App.
Accessories: Basically just the USB-A to USB-C cable. In my opinion, they should have included a USB-C to USB-C cable and an USB-A adapter. And as I said before, the product has space to attach a support lanyard, but they didn’t include the lanyard in the product kit.
The BTR11 comes equipped with an omnidirectional microphone on the right side. According to FiiO, the BTR11 supports calls by Bluetooth. I used an AI voice – Natalie – to narrate the text and placed the BTR11 in front of my computer’s speaker. Here is the result:
>>sample available on
https://iemsandmusic.com/fiio-btr11-review/<<
I found the quality to be good, although I found the quality of the BTR13’s mic to be a little better. Basically, there was a little less noise on the BTR13. Both audios were a bit low and slightly “boxy”. The test was exactly the same on both products. Okay, the method I used wasn’t the best, so don’t put too much credibility in it.
Finally, the BTR11 can also be used as an audio device in cars, just pair it with the car’s Bluetooth. Honestly, I haven’t tested this function.
SOUND ASPECTS:
It is important to remember that this review is subjective, based on my experience with the product and also on its synergy with other equipment I have used. I must also point out that the more objectivist side of the hobby isn’t really my beach, so some information may be limited, as I’m not an expert on the technical side of this type of product.
First of all, I would like to say that the BTR11 is an entry-level product, and it’s only intended for use via Bluetooth. The DAC chip used in the product was the BES Technic
BES2700IHC, and the amplifier was the Heroic
HT97220. For me, the product’s biggest differentiator is having the LDAC codec. There are several devices like the BTR11 on the market, but it’s very difficult to find one that has the capacity to have this codec developed by Sony.
Why did I mention LDAC as something very positive about the product? Because here I identified two situations: one using the SBC codec, and the other using LDAC. When connected with SBC, I noticed that there was a slight addition of noise while listening to music/audio. With LDAC, however, the presentation was noise-free. And even when I tested it by connecting it to different sources, with SBC codec the presentation continued in the same way as I mentioned before.
I found it strange, because I usually use the SBC codec and I never noticed this issue. In fact, you need a good earphone and a well-trained ear to hear this noise… most people won’t notice it, and not all the songs I tested had the noise. So, for me, the LDAC codec is the best option with the BTR11. We know that not all Bluetooth devices have the LDAC codec, so this is a warning: in this case, you will need a transmitter with LDAC. FiiO recently launched the
FiiO BT11, which is a very small transmitter that has the aforementioned codec. May be an option.
When connected to LDAC, I can guarantee that the audio quality of the BTR11 was perfect, with completely transparent and pure sound, free of any distortion.
Amplification: I used the
Quintet and the
NM20 during this review, both IEMs are very easy to push, the NM20 is even easier. There’s no secret, the BTR11 played both IEMs in an exemplary manner, I set it to 50% of the BTR11’s volume, which is equivalent to volume level 8 (it’s half the volume offered by the BTR11, which has 16 levels). For me it was already loud enough, I can go up to 9 steps, at 10 I think it’s already too loud (for my ears).
Comparison: FiiO BTR11 vs
FiiO BTR13
It’s even a little complicated to make a comparison like this, the products are very different… Practically the BTR11 only manages to be better in just 3 aspects: Weight, size, and price. In everything else the BTR13 manages to be better. The BTR13 is much more complete, it has more functions in the equipment… For example, you can customize some functions in the App, it has more BT codecs, two headphone outputs, it can be used as a DAC/AMP via cable, it has EQ, it has a display, it has more power, etc, etc, etc. Today, the BTR13 is really my recommendation for this type of Bluetooth receiver. It’s very versatile and the price is also very attractive. Now, if your intention is to have maximum portability and spend very few just to have a Bluetooth receiver, then I think the BTR11 can serve you very well… but that’s it, otherwise, go for the BTR13 because it’s more wide, it’s almost a Swiss army knife of audiophilia.
In terms of sound performance, the BTR13 also comes out on top… even due to the amplification… it was even difficult to establish an “equality” between the two to make this type of comparison. Connecting them with LDAC and listening to the same songs, I could see that the BTR13 would have a more “neutral” sound, and the BTR11 a “warmer” sound. In my opinion, the BTR13 presented a better soundstage, as well as a feeling of greater transparency and definition.
Thank you so much for being here!
Follow us on
Instagram to get all the news!
And follow our
YouTube channel.
Muito obrigado!
