E1DA 9038S Gen 3

General Information

>Black Sandblasted Anodized CNC Aluminium Body.

>New USB Bridge.

>ES9028Q2M DAC Setup with AD8397 Chip.

>USB Type C Input.

>PCM Decoding up to 32-Bit/384kHz, DSD up to DSD256 natively.

>2.5mm Balanced Output.

>E1DA Tweak App on Android Systems.

>Output Impedance: 0.05 Ohms.

>Frequency Response: 10Hz-100kHz.

>Standby Mode.

Latest reviews

darmanastartes

500+ Head-Fier
Crucible
Pros: powerful and transparent sound, compact size, USB-C
Cons: None
Saturday Soundtracks.jpg

INTRODUCTION, DISCLAIMERS, AND PRODUCT LINKS:

The E1DA 9038S Gen 3 is a compact digital-to-analog converter (DAC) and amplifier combination unit with a female USB-C connection and a single 2.5mm balanced audio jack.

The 9038S was provided to me for review by HiFiGo, where it is available for purchase for as low as $88: https://hifigo.com/collections/head...-3-usb-dac-headphone-amplifier-amp-and-cables

This review is also available on my blog: https://medium.com/bedrock-reviews/e1da-9038s-gen-3-review-b94e0216f268

PACKAGING, ACCESSORIES, AND FUNCTIONALITY:

The E1DA 9038S Gen 3 comes in a small rectangular white box featuring a diagram of the device on the lid. My review package included a Y-split USB OTG cable. This cable features one male USB-C connector, one male USB-A connector, and one female USB-A connector. The USB-C connector plugs into the transport device, the male USB-A connector plugs into a power source such as a portable power bank, and the female USB-A connector connects to the 9038S via a male USB-A to male USB-C cable. The 9038S can also connect directly to the transport device with a standard USB-C to USB-C cable, or via a male USB-C to male USB-A cable connected to a female USB-A to Micro USB OTG cable.

I did run into issues using the 9038S with certain USB-A ports. I experienced occasional signal dropouts and stuttering when the 9038S was connected to the USB-A ports on my laptop and on the front of my desktop via a USB-C to USB-A cable. I also had these issues using the 9038S with the included Y-split USB OTG cable. I did not experience any issues when connected to the USB-A ports on my desktop’s motherboard using the same USB-A cable, or when connected via a USB-C to USB-C cable to my phone.

Note: E1DA fixed this issue with a firmware update in November 2020.

The 9038S is more than powerful enough to drive any of the portable headphones I have in my inventory to dangerous volumes. I did hear hiss with the Moondrop S8 in certain circumstances, such as powering the 9038S with an external power bank using the Y-split USB OTG cable.

SOUND:

My readers are likely familiar with my long-stated belief that if a playback device is coloring the sound, something is wrong with the source device. My initial listening experience using the 9038S challenged that conviction. I could not shake the sense of improved clarity and detail retrieval offered by the 9038S over the sources I originally used to review the Smabat ST-10S. I decided to evaluate these impressions under more controlled circumstances.

I connected one earbud to The Element and the other to the 9038S and volume matched the two sources using my Dayton iMM-6 microphone to 1/10th of a dB. To do this, I aligned the center of the earbud face with the center of the tube coupler bore and secured the earbud to the coupler using micropore tape around the earbud circumference. I then played a Redbook copy of “Archetype” by Fear Factory and switched back and forth between the two sources.

To my surprise and in the face of my long-held conviction that all well-designed sources should sound identical, the earbud playing from the 9038S sounded tighter, more detailed, and more spacious, with better definition of and separation between notes, while the earbud playing from The Element sounded slightly smoother and warmer in tonality.

I repeated this test using the same track with the Moondrop S8. This time I took care to ensure that both The Element and the 9038S were set to 24 bit /44.1kHz in shared mode in addition to volume matching, which I had not done in my initial comparison using the ST-10S. My differing perceptions of the two sources remained audible.

I will note that this is a sighted comparison and not a double-blind test. However, I will also note my predisposition towards dismissing claims of audible differences between sources coming into this comparison, an attitude I have held since early in my audio journey. Additionally, I am mostly confident that I would not have been able to distinguish between the two sources examined here without the benefit of instantaneous switching.

ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS AND FREQUENCY RESPONSE MEASUREMENTS:

There are two alternative explanations for the conclusion I have reached. One is that channel imbalance can explain my perception. To assess this possibility, I measured both channels with both sources. My results are below:
Both.jpg

9038S Gen 3 (Left) vs The Element (Right) [As Compared]
E1Da.jpg

9038S Gen 3 (Left and Right)

Element.jpg

The Element (Left and Right)
I am skeptical of this alternative explanation given the minute differences in matching between the left and right channels of the S8.

There are minute variations in my measurements between the two sources in the upper-treble region but I am inclined to believe these are a result of tiny differences in insertion depth and bore angle during the measurement process as opposed to frequency response differences inherent to the hardware:


Right.jpg

9038S Gen 3 (Right) vs The Element (Right)

Left.jpg

9038S Gen 3 (Left) vs The Element (Left)
The other alternative explanation is that I hear better in my left ear than my right ear. While my hearing range is indeed around 200 Hz higher in my left ear than in my right ear, I can perceive sounds above 19 kHz in both ears. Again, I am skeptical that this explains the audible differences between the two sources.

The explanation for the audible difference between the two sources may be that The Element uses a minimum phase digital filter, while the 9038S uses a linear phase filter by default. I flashed the minimum phase slow roll-off filter firmware to the E1DA and recompared the two, and I no longer heard a clear difference. I have reached out to JDS Labs to confirm that the filter used on pre-V1.53 Elements is a minimum phase filter. Thanks to /u/rynoweiss on Reddit for pointing me in this direction.

POWER CONSUMPTION:

The following power consumption reading was taken while the device was in use:
1_Ypez8fx95GZ1FSGn13SrwQ.jpeg

E1DA 9038S Gen 3

For comparison, here are power consumption readings for several other USB audio peripherals:

0_Imedb0aEZhSqBQmF.png
xDuoo Link

0_2aXX-YkaMgR0-SiJ.png
Meizu HiFi Pro

0_pq6bmJpIxnbTIgtY.png
Apple Dongle

CLOSING WORDS:

There is a lot of snake oil in the audio enthusiast marketplace, and it should be incumbent upon individuals who claim that different pieces of hardware sound audibly distinct to make sincere attempts to disprove alternative explanations to their claims, as I have done here. This is especially true for reviewers and others in positions of influence. I certainly benefited from my training in the physical sciences as I set up the experiments I detailed in this review, but these experiments are far from exotic or complex and could be easily replicated by others.

I am extremely pleased with the E1DA 9038S’ sound quality and ability to drive all manner of headphones. It is worth a look if you are in the market for a compact DAC/Amp combo.
Last edited:
darmanastartes
darmanastartes
I haven't tried with the driver installed on my laptop but I'll give that a shot.
darmanastartes
darmanastartes
Unfortunately, I'm still getting dropouts after installing the driver. Discussion on the E1DA discord indicates the issue is related to poor quality USB hardware.
Lacas
Lacas
I encountered this dropout issue in case the USB port could not provide enough power (when I used the 9038S together with iFi usb filters) - I could handle this with external power supply connected with Y usb cable. Hope it helps.

Comments

Top