General Information

Cayin RU7 dongle Dac/AMP


Specs:
  1. Fully Balanced 1-Bit Discrete Resistor Network DAC
    • 1/1000 ultra-high precision TCR25 low-temperature coefficient thin film resistors
    • Native decode DESD64/128/256, support PCM up to 384kHz.
  2. User-selectable All-to-DSD
    • Users can specify DSD64/128/256 DSD output formats through menu setting
    • Different DSD output settings might sound slightly different and drain more power when a higher-resolution output format is selected.
  3. 100 steps 3-segment High Precision Resistor Array Volume Control
  4. Hardware Volume +/- button
  5. TWO 6-layer PCB, digital and analog circuits on separate boards
  6. 3.5mm single-ended phone output delivers 160mW per channel at 32Ω loading
  7. 4.4mm balanced phone output delivers 400mW per channel at 32Ω loading
  8. Compatible with Android, iOS, macOS, Windows 7/8/8,1/10, and DAP with USB Audio output
  9. Type-C USB Audio, Shield USB-C to USB-C cable bundled
  10. High/Low gain control
  11. Compact and seamless CNC aluminum chassis with 1” 128x64 OLED screen
  12. 66mm x 24mm x 12mm, ~25g net weight.
  13. Green Leather cases bundled
  14. Optional USB-C to lightning cable CS-L2C (purchased separately)

RU7-6.jpg
RU7_Poster.jpg

Cayin_RU7_Specification.jpg
RU7_Functional_Diagram.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_02_DAC.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_03_Amp.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_04_Line-Out.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_12_package.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_05_Vol_Control.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_06_All2DSD.jpg

RU7_Sales_Guide_07_PCB.jpg

Latest reviews

Bosk

1000+ Head-Fier
Cayin RU7 - Groundbreaking 1Bit trailblazer
Pros: Superb tonality
Capable feature list
4.4mm Line Out
Cons: Expensive by dongle standards

Cayin RU7 Review

Dongles5.webp


Last year Cayin announced their new N7 player, the first on the market to utilise a 1bit DSD DAC. Rather than employ an off-the-shelf DAC chip from AKM, Cirrus Logic or ESS, the N7 uses 128 precision resistors to convert PCM data into DSD format, in a manner reminiscent of, yet distinct from R2R players.

I’ve yet to try the N7 but have read positive reports of its’ tonality in particular, so when Cayin announced their new RU7 dongle would also feature the same 1bit approach I was intrigued.

The problem with dongles is there’s so little available space to innovate that most of them use lower-end DAC chips and end up sounding fairly similar. Whereas the RU7 takes a different approach, and even uses two PCB’s sandwiched together to facilitate a more complex circuit.

My expectations for RU7 were fairly high, and as you’ll discover they’ve not been let down!



Packaging

Dongles12.webp


The USD $289 Cayin RU7 arrives in a small cardboard box which contains a manual, USB-C to USB-C cable, and a USB-A to USB-C adapter.

Cayin have also included a leather case which does a great job of protecting the RU7 during use. The leather is surprisingly supple though green wouldn’t be my preferred colour of choice, but it’s nice having a case right out of the box.



Features & Ergonomics

Dongles6.webp


The RU7 is the first dongle on the market to utilise a 1bit DAC, which essentially uses precision-matched resistors rather than a DAC chip to process sound. It features two gain levels, a small screen that displays the current volume level & sample rate, and lets you to automatically convert PCM content into your choice of DSD64, 128 or 256. It supports PCM to 384 kHz and DSD up to DSD256, with 400mW of output power to its’ 4.4mm jack.

At 24.1 grams the RU7 is extremely light but feels very well-finished, with two physical buttons to control volume and another to activate & scroll through the menu system.

It’s worth mentioning the RU7 is the only dongle in this shootout to include a fully-fledged Line Out which functions from both the 4.4mm & 3.5mm jacks, bypassing the internal amplifier for when you choose to pair it with an external amp.



Sound Performance

I tested the RU7 with a USB-C iPhone 15 Pro & M1 Macbook Air, using Noble Audio Spartacus IEMs.

The RU7 sports a terrific balance of tonality & technicality, and there’s something particularly special about the flavour of its’ 1bit DAC which no other dongle I’ve tried has captured.

This is best demonstrated in the midrange, where vocals on the RU7 are very forward – really grabbing your attention with rich sense of warm fullness and effortless resolution that’s at least on par with any other dongle out there.

Bass is biased more towards midbass and is impressive by dongle standards, though kept in check to avoid overshadowing the midrange. Treble is similarly impressive but again not so forward as to take any spotlight away from the midrange.

The RU7’s soundstage is wide and deep, dynamics are superb and imaging is very solid but this is not a dongle in which more treble-energy has been added purely to increase technical performance – instead my attention drifts back to the midrange thanks its’ superb tonality & resolution.



Dongle Comparisons

Dongles7.webp


iFi Go Bar 10th Anniversary (USD $499)

After you notice the 10th Anniversary’s much higher noise floor, what jumps out is its’ bottom-up presentation with greater bass thump & more midbass quantity. Surprisingly the RU7’s bass feels a little more dynamic however, and despite its’ warmer tonality the RU7 retrieves more detail.

The RU7 midrange is undoubtedly richer and more resolving, leaving the 10th Anniversary sounding flatter & less dynamic by comparison.



Luxury & Precision W4 (USD $449)

The W4’s tonality is cooler and more neutral but this can come across as less organic & more “hi-fi” at times. The advantage of that approach is W4’s higher level of technical performance across the board, with a slightly deeper & taller soundstage, more precise imaging and more prominent treble that resolves details slightly better.

By contrast the RU7’s midrange is richer and more impressive, and it may be more dynamic overall. W4’s bass is tighter & better textured, though the RU7 has a little more bass quantity to compensate.

I find these two dongles complement one another, with the W4 pulling ahead on technical performance but the RU7 delivering a more special tonality especially in the midrange.



Penon Tail (USD $74)

The Tail has been tuned with a more bottom-up approach with greater bass quantity, and tends to sound more musical & groovy though this could be partly due to greater note-smearing.

Where the RU7 pulls ahead is with its’ larger & more spacious soundtage, improved dynamics, treble that feels a bit more sophisticated in its’ articulation, and midrange richness & resolution.



Conclusion

Dongles5.webp


The easiest way to explain my feelings toward the Cayin RU7 is to reveal that I purchased one.

Does that mean it’s the best-sounding USB-C dongle to date? I think it sits alongside the L&P W4 which occupies a slightly higher rung of technical performance, but what the W4 lacks is the RU7’s amazing midrange tonality which is really something special.

Nor is the RU7 so far behind the W4 in terms of soundstage, resolution & imaging that these areas feel deficient, and the RU7’s 4.4mm Line Out is invaluable if you ever want to use an external amp.

As always in audio things are rarely clear-cut so I strongly recommend demoing both dongles to see which fits your preferences, but suspect you won’t be disappointed with either if they fit your budget.

In the meantime the RU7 has convinced me 1bit DAC technology has merit, so I can’t wait to try Cayin’s next 1bit DAP or dongle release.
C
chris0815
Question is: which full size dac delivers that tonality and timbre with better bass?

vandung2510

100+ Head-Fier
Cayin RU7
Pros: Neutral and analog sounding
Wide AF sound stage with clear imaging
Powerful
Has a viewing screen and volume management buttons
Can change between low/high gain and DSD64/128/256
Has dedicated Lineout mode
Cons: Expensive
Hot
Battery consumption
Clicky, zappy noise during quiet sessions
Introduction: RU7 is the latest flagship dongle released by Cayin as a successor to their previous flagship, the Cayin RU6. While the RU6 features a 24-bit Discrete R-2R Resistor Ladder DAC, the RU7 uses 1-Bit Discrete Resistor Network DAC, a different type of technology trickle down from their flagship N7 DAP, instead. This dongle has a MSRP of 290$.

Disclaimer: I bought the Cayin RU7 with my own money. Everything i said in this review is my subjective opinion only.

Unboxing:
PXL_20240115_001032416.jpg

The box was quite smaller than i thought. It’s only as big as my Poco F3 phone.

Inside the box, we have a few things: The C-C OTG cable, C-A adapter, a green leather case, a user manual and 2 magnets (sadly i lost it)

The green case itself fit the RU7 very snuggly. I won’t need to worry about the case coming loose anytime soon, unlike some previously known cases of the RU6.

Design
PXL_20240115_001555285.jpg
PXL_20240115_001925120.jpg


The RU7 has a small rectangular form factor. Its chasis is made out of aluminum with a matte black finish and glass panel with a built-in OLED screen on top.

PXL_20240115_001745112.jpg
PXL_20240115_001643973.jpg

On the side is the 3 buttons, 2 of which let you controlled the volume and the “mode” button to control the settings of the RU7. Click the “mode” button once to turn the screen on/off. By holding it in a few seconds, it let me go into a setting menu. I can change between Low gain and high gain, switch between the 3 DSD modes and the output of the RU7 (Phoneout or Lineout).
PXL_20240115_012226443.jpg



User experience:

The Cayin RU7 is small, light weight, has a protective case so i dont have to worry about scratching. The setup was relatively smooth when i wanted to use my RU7 with Window 10 laptop. I just need to plug and play and that’s done.

With 2 levels of gain, 3DSD mode and 2 output types, the RU7 gives me a lot of flexibility on how i’d want to use it on a daily basis.

Overall, my time with the Cayin RU7 was quite enjoyable. However, it’s not without its quirks.

First thing i’d like to note is how much the Cayin RU7 battery consumption. It drains my Poco F3 faster compared to every dongle that i’ve own. It only took me more than 4 hours to drop my battery percentage from 100% to 0%. Not to mention that even without playing music, the RU7 keeps draining the battery of the phone.

The second thing i’d like to note is the clicky, zappy sounds while using the RU7. This sound is very different from the usual humming noise floor when i use my Ibasso DC04 Pro and 7hz 71 with a powered laptop. These audible noises appear when i’m switching songs, when fast forwarding music and worst of all, it’s even appeared during some quiet session of the songs or videos. This is due to the resistor working inside. Andy from Cayin has already commented about this on the Cayin RU7 thread, so this behaviour is normal to the RU7. Some can live with it, but honestly after i noticed this sounds, the existence of it is quite...annoying.

Last thing i want to talk it how much heat the RU7 generated during use, especially in DSD256 and LO mode. I don’t know the exact temperature, but i’m pretty sure it’s over 50 degree Celsius after 30 minutes of listening.

Sound impression:

I’d describe the sound of Cayin RU7 as neutral and analog sounding.

Bass has this more rounded and fullbody sound to it with very light midbass emphasize. You can say the RU7 sounds a bit warm to it due to this discription, but i’d still say the RU7 is on a neutral side of things.

Midrange wise, the RU7 just do it just right. Neither too forward nor backward. The midrange of RU7 just sounds natural as is.

Treble is detailed smooth with no digital glare. There’s a subtle lower treble boost in the RU7, in a way that it makes the percussion instruments’s attack just sound a bit more crisp.

Technicalities wise, RU7 is the most technical sounding i’ve heard. Only after 10s of using RU7 that i know this dongle is quite something else. The soundstage is really wide with clear imaging and layering.

For a more relative context of how RU7 performs compared to others, please continue reading for the comparison parts.

Synergy: RU7 can synergize with a lot of gears, but i don’t think it’s suitable for the overly colored or warm sounding sounds tranducer.

For people that want most fast sounding bass, highest detail, clearest, more hi-fi sound rather than analog sound, the RU7 would not be for them.

RU7 in LO mode: I want to test how the RU7 would sound in LO mode without having to use an additional amplifier, so i tested the LO mode directly with the TGXear Totem, since i think having an ỉmpedance of 700ohms would somewhat keep it safe and not making it too loud. After thorough testing, i think the the sound from LO mode is slightly better than PO mode. Compared to the PO mode, LO mode sounds like it has a better impact subbass and a bit more transparent.

Word of caution if people want to test LO mode with other more sensitive gear: If you’re using a laptop or PC, please lower the volume of the software you’re using to listen to music, not the OS themself. For some reason, even if i turn my laptop vol from 100 to 1, the loudness of LO mode remains the same. Only when i turn down the volume of foobar2000 app or youtube’s video that the volume did come down. Also, it seems like the RU7 does not let you change between the modes rapidly, where you’d need to wait around 10 secs for the mode to be changed again. (the screen may show that you’ve already changed the output mode, but you’d need to wait for 10 secs for it to take effect)

Differences between DSD64, DSD128, DSD256

Truth be told, it was really hard for me to do comparison for these 3, as i feel like the differences was too small between them. Switching between the modes for every 10-15 seconds of the same songs did not really help me. So in order to make this comparison, i have to listen to each mode for around a few days then switch to another. After thorough testing, here’s what i think about the 3 DSD modes.

DSD64: Slightly more warmth and full. More analog sounding

DSD128 Jack of all trade. Most balance sounding, loose a bit of detail for naturalness

DSD256: Highest detail and clarity. A bit more digital sounding

Driving power: The Cayin RU7 is no doubt a very powerful dongle. At high gain and 100/100 level, it can drive my Shuoer S12 to a deafening level of 90db. It can also drive my 700ohms of impedance TGXear Totem earbuds to a comfortably loud level (around 80-85db) without sacrificing much, if any, bass texture and overall dynamic, so power is definitely not an issue here

Sound comparison:
PXL_20240115_013244066.jpg

1/ Ibasso DC04 Pro

I know i know, the DC04 Pro is not really in the same realm as the Cayin RU7. Its price is not even half of the RU7. However, the DC04 Pro was one of the most famous dongle in 2023, ranking 1st in the Best bang for buck category by DongleMadness. Many people were able to afford this. It was also my previously EDC dongle, so comparing these 2 against each other is something i should do.
Both dongle in my opinion has a neutral and analog-ish tonality, but right of the bat, there’re 3 differences that i noticed: the bass, the treble and the imaging.

The bass has more thump and better texture to it, compared to the DC04 Pro. Using Penon Serial to test, the bass on the DC04 Pro feels like it got cut of at the end of the notes. Those “strings plucking” moments in some of my jazz tracks just feels a bit incompleted, whereas it sounds more completed on the RU7. The bass there feels more lifelike, i can virtually imagine the instruments being played

As for treble, i feel like the treble of the RU7 is crisper than the DC04 Pro. However, due to this right here, the synergy of the RU7 would be a little different from the DC04 Pro. Some iem that has too much treble would not be able to synergize well with the RU7, whereas the DC04 Pro would be a better option between the 2, cue the TGXears Serratus and Hifri’s Barcelona. The treble there just feel a bit more pronounce with shaper, crisper transient.

Imaging. Coming from the DC04 Pro to the RU7, my first thought was “man, has the layering always been this crisp and distinct?”. I thought i was being paranoid due to “new toy syndrome”, so i listen to RU7 for a while longer then switching back to the DC04 Pro, the sentiment was still the same. The Cayin RU7 sounds wider, with better instruments separation and a more distinct layering between the instruments compared to the DC04 Pro

That being said, the RU7 did not completely kill the DC04 Pro. The DC04 Pro has a better battery consumption rate, it drained my phone’s battery way less. Even without listening to music, RU7 drains the battery of my phone. The DC04 Pro also generate less heat. It doesn’t have that usual clicky, zappy sounds from the resistor of the RU7. On Android phones, there's an app from Ibasso that let you adjust some settings of the DC04 Pro. Another thing i’d like to note is the noise floor when using the RU7 with my plugged in laptop is virtually zero, compared to a small amount of noise when using with the DC04 Pro. Although in my opinion, that would just like changing from another devil to another: The humming noise (due to the plugged in laptop) of the DC04 Pro vs the clicky sound of RU7 in those silent moments like during songs transition.

Is the Cayin RU7 an upgrade to the Ibasso DC04 Pro? In a sense, yes. It improves upon many things of the Ibasso DC04 Pro like the overall tone and the technicalites, despite it already is a good dongle in and of itself. If you’re looking for a do-it-all, only-keep-one dongle, then yes, buy the RU7 as an upgrade to the DC04 Pro. Is it worth it? Depend on your wallet. But if you already have the DC04 Pro and you’re looking for a dongle to diversify your dac/amp collection, i’d advise you to look for something else like the Cayin RU6 or the Hiby FC6 and keep the DC04 Pro. Despite me describing the differenes of these 2 for this long, the DC04 Pro is more similar to the Cayin RU7 than they are different. Both have i’d call a neutral and analog sounding.

2/ Chord Mojo.
IMG_6257.jpg

Now i’ll reverse the scenario. Here i’ll compare the the Cayin RU7 against something that has more than double the msrp of it: The Chord Mojo. It was sold for 599$ the moment of its release. The reason why i’m picking the Mojo is that the Mojo are being sold in a very competitive pricing in the 2nd hand market (around 150$-160$ in Vietnam and Chinese), so good sound is very affordable there. The Mojo was arguably one of, if not the best sounding dac/amp during its time.

So here, we’d have a battle between the top of the dongle world in 2023, against the previous top of the portable dac/amp world in 2015. New vs old, how would they fair against another?

Both of these are wildly different. The Mojo has a battery and the RU7 does not. The Mojo has a custom FPGA DAC technology, whereas the RU7 has a 1-bit DAC technology. The Mojo has 2 3.5 phoneout ports rather than a 3.5mm SE and a 4.4mm balance of the RU7. Despite being SE only, Chord Mojo has more power to tap into compared to the RU7.

The differences in sound reproduction between the 2 were immediately perceiveable. Compared to the more neutral sounding RU7, the Mojo definitely has a more colored sounding. It’s more “romantic” in a sense. It’s warm, but also analytical.

Using the Penon Serial to listen to these 2, i definitely like the sound of the Mojo more. The Serial has a better bass texture, with more depth to its sound. The treble is also softer, yet the detail was around the same level. Imaging, i would hand it to the crisper imaging of the RU7. The Cayin RU7 has a touch wider soundstage compared to the Mojo. Synergy wise, i like to use the Serial on the Mojo more despite the Serial already warm sounding. The Serial just sounds more musical to my ear in this combo. Part of it was also due to me being a mild basshead.

Using the TGXear buds, the story was still the same. The Chord Mojo also colored the whole sound of the earbuds. The Serratus has a more natural bass tone with a better treble decay. The Totem was sort of brought to life more when pairing with the Chord Mojo. The Totem has a 700ohms Berylium driver which just screams for power, which the Mojo has. The neutral, reference-ness of Totem just synergize well with a more colorful and romantic sounding Mojo.

The Sunniva on the other hand. Sunniva is the one that the RU7 synergize well with due to the Sunniva already warm and thick sounding. The Sunniva sounds more balance, the treble becomes crisper with better imaging and layering when using with the RU7.

All in all, it’s all depends on taste. Personally, since i’d rather my music to be more musical and colorful and because i have many more colored sounding iem and earbuds (as opposed to a more neutral set like the Etymotic’s), i’d pick the Chord Mojo over the Cayin RU7 in many cases, despite its cons like the using of micro usb, 3.5mm port only and i have to charge it to use it.

3/ Cayin RU6

Brother from the same mother, the Cayin RU6. The Cayin RU6 uses an R-2R DAC technology inside its body. It’s been a while since i last used it, but judging from memory, the RU6 also has an analog type of sounding, however it feels warmer compared to the RU7. The bass on the RU7 has more authority compared to a more soft sounding bass on the RU6. Midrange and vocal wise, the RU6 is better than the RU7 in my opinion. I’d describe the RU6’s midrange and vocal as romantic, emotional and velvety. The RU6 used to be my go to dongle when ever i want to listen to some lyrical music or when i just want to vibe with the music, not analyzed it. Treble sounds crisper and shaper on the RU7. Techinicalities wise, especially the soundstage, the RU7 is definitely better than the RU6. The RU7 has more details, wider sense of stage and a more distinct imaging. Synergy wise, i’d say the RU7 is easier to synergize with a lot of stuff more than the RU6.

Conclusion:
With the price of 290$, is Cayin RU7 worthy of its price? Yes
The Cayin RU7 is one heck of a beast. It has become a benchmark in the dongle world, where future to-be-released flagship dongle would surely be compared against this. The RU7 gives people to have a chance to try what a 1-bit DAC would sounds like without hurting their wallet too much. The form factor maybe small, but what it brings to the table is not. Despite some of it quirks, being a neutral, analog sounding dongle with an impressive technicality, i’m confident that many people will like this powerful dongle if they can get their hands on it.

That’s it for my review and thank you for reading.
Lohb
Lohb
Same as with cable rolling/testing unless you blind test it - there is a visual expectation bias before its even switched on.
sofastreamer
sofastreamer
awesome review, specially the epic comparison part. Thank you!
vandung2510
vandung2510
Thank you for the compliment

littlenezt

100+ Head-Fier
Sounds superb... but...
Pros: +Timbre
+Technicalities
+Power
+Tonality
Cons: -Some QC issues on my sample
-HOT DURING USE
-Battery Consumption
Hi there, at this opportunity I would like to make review for the Cayin RU7 dongle.
The RU7 is purchased with my own money and all of this are 100% my opinion.
Unboxing
1697674366897.jpg1697674366890.jpg1697674366892.jpg1697674366877.jpg1697674366875.jpg1697674366872.jpg1697674366863.jpg1697674366838.jpg
Inside the box you get :
  • Dongle
  • Leather Case
  • Manual
  • Hi-Res Stickers
  • 2 Steel plate
  • C to C Cable
  • C to A Adapter

Build Quality
I had some problem with my samples of the RU7.
1697674366825.jpg1697674366819.jpg1697674366809.jpg1697674366813.jpg1697674366816.jpg
My first sample had a tilted screen that looks really ugly and triggered my OCD for real.
It also has a rattly 3.5mm port.
1698234303978.jpg
While my 2nd sample screen is pretty much perfect, it still also has a rattly 3.5mm port.

There are some people that has this rattle on the port, but some are perfect without rattle at all.
Andy from Cayin has explain it to me it is rather normal to have some rattle on the RU7 because of how the 3.5mm made and used on the RU7.

but be warned, do not ever shake your dongle, I have been warned very strictly that It is counted as an abuse to the dongle and it can void and jeopardized your warranty.

Power Consumption
It consumed around 12 - 15% / hour of my Xiaomi 13T phone and is super hot during use using all to dsd 256.

Sound
The RU7 to my ears is sounding a bit warm, musical and analogue, with very good technicalities.
well.. it depends on the all to dsd configuration, the all to dsd 64 is the most warm, 128 in between, 256 is the most neutral of all, also the technicality is better with larger number.

I will mostly do my review on the all to dsd 256 configuration.

RU7 has one of the nicest timbre I've ever heard in a dongle dac.
Especially the bass, ooft it has a superb impact and slam with very good control and bass sounds grand if that makes any sense to you.

I really love how the RU7 presents bass with very good control and authority and bold presentation and also sounds very natural and has proper lingering decays.

While for the midrange, it has a very natural and organic and analogue-ish timbre that makes vocal and instruments sounds very realistic and "wet" or I should say it has a correct decay that makes things sounds really natural.

The midrange presentation I found it to be a bit pushed back a little, not the most forward and intimate, but thanks to that, it creates a very good soundstage and separation for all instruments and vocal.

Treble here I found it to be smooth but VERY EXTENDED, it has superb extension and airy representation that I can describe it again as "wet" sounding because of the rather long decay.

Technicality wise, the RU7 is one of the most technically capable dongle that I ever heard, and is pretty much a steal for its price.

For context, previously myself use the Luxury Precision W2-131, and the RU7 absolutely destroys the W2-131 in terms of tonal, timbre, and technicality.

It has one of the largest stage that I've ever heard from a dongle, very open sounding and has a lot of space between all instruments and vocal.

Imaging is also top notch, I try to plug the RU7 with Moondrop CHU2, and it has holographical presentation that makes me wondering how is that even possible.

Separation and positioning is top notch, thanks to its very large soundstage and very spacious presentation of how the sound is rendered.

3.5mm SE vs 4.4mm
Has a minimal different, the 4.4mm has more power and a bit more separated or room between sounds.

HISS?
With Hidizs MS3 and MS5, I got a slight white noise from the 4.4mm balanced output but the MS3 and MS5 is known to be very sensitive to the source.
All of my other IEM have no hiss at all on both 3.5mm and 4.4mm balanced output.

Comparation

Hiby FC6

The FC6 is also one of the most pleasing timbre dongle that I've ever heard, for timbre wise I pick the FC6 all day, it suits my taste more than the RU7, the FC6 has less output power but more efficient battery consumption (8-10% / hour compared to the 12-15% / hour of the RU7)
Sound wise, the FC6 has more intimate stage, a bit more warmer than RU7, but still wide and open.
It depends on what you're searching for in sound representation really...

If you like more intimate and more mid focused stage like the vocal is the main spotlight on your music, then maybe,, maybe the FC6 is the one for you.
But if you like your sound to be more separated and, OR use OR need to drive headphones, well, the RU7 is the one more suitable for you.

Luxury Precision W2-131
The W2-131 is using your traditional DAC / delta sigma DAC, it has more neutral presentation compared to the RU7.
for technicality wise, the RU7 pretty much superior in all categories, that I don't even need to explain.


Conclusion
Is the RU7 worth it?
well yes of course despites I had bad luck with my RU7 sample, myself as a reviewer try to be objective all the time for the review.

so what's up with only 4*?
well... -1/2* for the super hot dongle during usage like my 4.4mm steel jack is piping hot to touch, and -1/2* for the power consumption on all to dsd256.

It is easily has the best timbre and technicality for $300USD and probably you can compare it to more expensive DAC / AMP and the RU7 will not embarrassed itself.

It just needs more tighter QC tolerance, that's all and it would be the perfect $300 USD dongle at least for now.


Thanks for reading this far !

Just in case you're Indonesian or you understand Bahasa Indonesia, you can watch this review here


-littlenezt
Last edited:
Syan25
Syan25
I fart too often. The RU7 can't handle the vibrations....
Orfik
Orfik
Take the case off to stop overheating so much, and the sound will improve. It's a bad design but it works.
E
Elecroestatico
That's crazy, I never knew R2R based technology was so suseptible to vibrations, let alone farts

Comments

baskingshark

Headphoneus Supremus
I really want to audition this thing. I want to see how it compares to a delta/sigma DAC that does the same thing, but on an integrated circuit vs. the RU7's discrete components.

By chance, have u tried the RU6, which is an R2R dongle?

The RU6 isn't as proficient technically in resolution/micro-detailing as a similarly priced delta sigma DAC, but it is kind of like a tube/vinyl sound, adding an analoguish and organic tone to the sound.

I'm trying to buy an RU7 and hope to drop some impressions if it arrives!
 

o0genesis0o

Headphoneus Supremus
By chance, have u tried the RU6, which is an R2R dongle?

The RU6 isn't as proficient technically in resolution/micro-detailing as a similarly priced delta sigma DAC, but it is kind of like a tube/vinyl sound, adding an analoguish and organic tone to the sound.

I'm trying to buy an RU7 and hope to drop some impressions if it arrives!
Looking forward for your impressions. I imagine feeding this DAC into a portable amp would yield TOTL Dap sound.
 
Back
Top