Canpur CP54e

o0genesis0o

Headphoneus Supremus
Canpur CP54E - Refined V-shaped experience
Pros: + TOTL-class technical performance, particularly detail retrieval
+ Snappy, dynamic presentation
+ Refined V-shaped tuning that is energetic but not harsh
Cons: - The whole midrange could be brought forward a bit
- I wish the instrument separation to be stronger
Today we look at CP54E, one of the high-end offering from the Dutch boutique CANPUR.

Canpur_CP54E_14.png


Forewords​

  • What I look for in an IEM is immersion. I want to feel the orchestra around my head, track individual instruments, and hear all of their textures and details. I’m not picky about tonality, as long as it is not make the orchestra, violin, cellos, and pianos sound wrong.
  • I rate IEMs within with a consistent scale from 1 (Poor) to 3 (Good) to 5 (Outstanding). An overall ranking of 3/5 or above is considered positive.
  • Ranking list and measurement database are on my IEM review blog.
  • The terminology for subjective impressions in this review is based on the Audio Wheel for reproduced sound defined in the technical report ITU-R BS.2399-0
  • This review is possible thanks to the Audio Geek Australia and Lanstar (Thank you!). I have no affiliation with or financial interest in CANPUR and Lanstar.
  • The unit retails for SGD$2379 at the time this review was published. Unaffiliated link: Lanstar Asia Webstore


General Information​

First and foremost, I applause Canpur for their easy-to-understand naming scheme. Let me demonstrate this point by breaking down the model name of CP54E:

  • CP: Canpur Performance series.
  • 5: 5 balanced armature (BA) drivers.
  • 4E: 4 Sonion electrostatic drivers
9 drivers of CP54E are controlled via a 4-way electrical crossover and fed into 4 separate tubes. Another tricks that CP54E packs is something CANPUR dubbed as “micro-inverter” tube design that aid the BA woofers to extend the subbass response.

Canpur_CP54E_8.png
Canpur_CP54E_9.png
Canpur_CP54E_10.png


The earpieces themselves are quite big but surprisingly light. The positioning of the nozzles is rather interesting as it makes the body of the IEM sit further to the back of my ears, somewhat similar to the the design of Vision Ears EXT, though not as extreme. Despite the large design, I find CP54E fit quite comfortable in my ears. The only problem is pressure build up in longer listening session.

Canpur_CP54E_1.png
Canpur_CP54E_2.png
Canpur_CP54E_3.png
Canpur_CP54E_4.png


Regarding accessories, my tour sample contains only a rather nice carrying case, which holds a cleaning tool, polishing cloth, the stock cable and a box of stock silicone eartips.

Sonic Performance​

Testing setup:

  • Sources: iBasso DX300, HiBy R3II, L&P W4
  • Cable: Stock cable with 4.4mm termination
  • Ear tips: stock silicone eartips
The subjective impression is captured using the lexicon in the Sound Wheel below. I’ll clarify the terminology as I use them. If you want to see more details of the lexicon and related reference, please have a look at the technical report ITU-R BS.2399-0.

sound-wheel.png


Timbre: Figure shows the frequency response of CP54E against the Harman in-ear target. Measurements were done with an IEC-711-compliant coupler and might only be compared with other measurements from this same coupler. Above 8kHz, the measurement likely does not match the response at the ear drum. Visit my graph database for more comparisons.

Canpur_CP54E_graph.png


The tonal signature of CP54E can be described as “V-shaped”, but leaning more towards the lower frequencies. Across a variety of recordings in my library, I found that bass instruments like kick drums, bass guitars, cellos, and doublebasses are more highlighted and thus sit closer to me in the mix than other instruments. Treble instruments like cymbals, hats, and high brass instruments are also emphasised, though not as forward as the bass. Midrange instruments and vocals sit further back in the mix. Even though the midrange is not offensively recessed across my library, there were a few tracks when I wanted to turn the volume higher to hear the midrange but I couldn’t because the entire mix would become uncomfortably loud. On the plus side, this recessed midrange tuning tends to improve the illusion of depth in recordings, which can suit your preference.

Canpur_CP54E_5.png


The midrange tonality of CP54E carries the expected characteristics of a V-shaped tuning. Vocals would have more “oomph” in the lower notes and some higher notes also stand out more. The extra energy in the lower midrange can be beneficial with some male vocals but can cast a “veil” that smother other vocal types. One could say that CP54E sounds boomy with some tracks where bass and lower-midrange are also prominent. However, credit where credit dues, CANPUR does a great job at refining the V-shape signature of CP54E to avoid making it offensive. I did not hear shoutiness or harshness that usually accompany V-shaped tuning, even with more energetic recording.

Canpur_CP54E_6.png


The treble of CP54E is also nicely done. In my tests, I did not find any instance where the treble of this IEM sounds harsh or piercing. At the same time, it does not sacrifice treble articulation and energy to get that inoffensive tuning. The treble extension is also quite nice. This IEM really flexes its 4 EST supertweeters in sparse recordings with a lot of ambience, where I can focus on details.

Bass and perceived dynamic:

The bass of CP54E is handled by, I assume, a pair of Sonion woofers. Now, I know BA woofers do not have the best reputation in our hobby, but these modern BA woofer designs are not like the old one that sounds hollow and tinny. One of the defining factor of CP54E is the precision and power of its transients. It means if I listen to a repeated bass line, I find that every beat is cleanly reproduced with a proper tactile physical sensation accompanying it. When there is bit dynamic swing, when a SLAM suddenly happens after a quiet passage, CP54E can scale that dynamic rollercoaster, which I find rather impressive. At the same time, CP54E does not skim on subbass rumble or bass texture either. Bass guitars, lower strings of cellos, doublebasses sound very nice with this IEM.

Canpur_CP54E_7.png


My only complaint about bass and dynamic of CP54E is more about its intangible aspects that, I admit, are rather difficult to put into words. Simply put, the bass of CP54E feels … “stiff.” Great dynamic driver woofers and some BA woofers can convey a sense of elasticity or “bounciness” to the bass notes, whilst CP54E just does not do that for me. It mean, I would still take the snappy and dynamic bass of CP54E over most average DD woofers, but there is something artificial that keeps pulling my attention towards the bass of CP54E in a not-so-good way.

Resolution:

resolution.jpg


CP54E is quite resolving IEM. I would say it performs within the upper echelons of IEMs and in line with my expectations given its price tag. Note definition is sharp. Micro detailing is strong. Where CP54E flexes is sparse recordings such as Bach’s violin sonatas and partitas, where I can pay full attention to micro details in the violin and the reverberation of the recording hall. These 4EST supertweeters can squeeze out a lot of information, such as in the decay end of the note and the treble “air”.

Canpur_CP54E_14.png


However, the perceived resolution of CP54E takes a hit in most recordings that are more busy with more overlapping elements. Yes, if I pay more attention, I can still hear a similar level of micro detail. However, the separation of the elements in the mix are not exceedingly strong, so instruments tend to overlap a bit, making it harder for me to track and trace individual parts of the mix. Before moving on, I would like to noted that the phrase “not exceedingly strong” is not just to be wordy. It means that it means: whilst I think the instrument separation of CP54E could be improved further to match its excellent detail retrieval, it’s still quite a step ahead of most average and good IEMs in my collection in A/B tests.

Stereo imaging and soundstage:

soundstage.png


With strong treble extension, great treble resolution, and a V-shaped tuning, the soundstage and stereo imaging of CP54E is expectedly good. The V-shaped tuning enhances the illusion of depth by creating a strong contrast between the bass, which sits upfront or even further to the back of my head, and other elements which sit further to the front of my head. The great treble makes instrument positioning precise and makes background elements in the mix convincingly distant. The treble air information also helps to make most mixes sound spacious. Together, these aspects helps CP54E shape a nice 3D soundstage illusion across most recordings, especially well produced soundtracks from modern AAA games. I particularly like how sound elements pop up at various places, in different direction and distance within and around my head with interesting recordings. Needless to say, CP54E also does a great job in FPS games.

Canpur_CP54E_12.png


Driveability: CP54E is a moderately sensitive IEM, clocking at 105.5dB/100mV @ 1kHz with an impedance of 8.6ohm @ 1kHz. In real world listening, it’s slightly more sensitive than my AFUL Cantor but noticeably less sensitive than most average IEMs out there. I find the IEM sound good directly from a modest source such as HiBy R3II, but it does sound a bit better with my DX300 and my desktop amplifier FiiO K7.



Selected Comparisons​

Vs AFUL Cantor: Cantor is a 14BA behemoth from the Chinese boutique AFUL. The calling card of this IEM is a rather even “W-shape” tuning, superb resolution, and surprisingly capable BA bass. The biggest difference between these IEMs in A/B tests is the tonality. When I switch to CP54E after listening to Cantor, I waas pretty annoyed by the recessed mid. After getting used to the sound of CP54E and switching back to Cantor, I was immediately shocked by how upfront the midrange is. Ultimately, my preference leans towards Cantor as I did not need to adjust volume to hear the midrange clearly as often as with CP54E.

Canpur_CP54E_15.png


Regarding technical performance, these IEMs are very close. Cantor has an edge when it comes to instrument separation in busy tracks with its ability to peals apart complex mixes. On the other hand, in sparse recordings, the 4EST supertweeters of CP54E slightly edge out the 6BA tweeter array of Cantor in terms of detail retrieval, particularly the details of the treble air. The bass is quite close. CP54E has an obvious edge in terms of the amount of bass, whilst I find the “bounciness” of the bass that I missed in CP54E can be found in Cantor. Still, I wouldn’t bat an eye if you find the sheer amount of bass of CP54E makes its a better bass performer.



Conclusions​

What do I think about CP54E? I admit I feel a bit conflicted. On the one hand, this IEM does great on almost every aspect I index for. On the other hand, the whole made from these individual aspects, somehow, failed to move me as much as I expected. That said, CP54E is still a highly technical IEM with a refined V-shaped tuning. If that sounds like what you want when you splurge for your next “end game”, I would say CP54E is worth an audition.

What I like about this IEM:

  • TOTL-class technical performance, particularly detail retrieval
  • Snappy, dynamic presentation
  • Refined V-shaped tuning that is energetic but not harsh
What could be improved:

  • The whole midrange could be brought forward a bit
  • I wish the instrument separation to be stronger
Absolute Sonic Quality Rating: 4.5/5 - Great
  • Timbre and Tonality: 4/5 - Great
  • Bass and dynamic: 4/5 - Great
  • Resolution: 5/5 - Outstanding
  • Soundstage and imaging: 5/5 - Outstanding
Bias Score: 3/5 - I am lukewarm about this IEM

Canpur_CP54E_summary.png


Updated: October 8, 2024

GiullianSN

Headphoneus Supremus
An Almost Flagship That Just Misses the Mark
Pros: + Sub-bass
+ Treble Extension
+ Design
Cons: - Mid Range timbre
- Peaky upper end
- Price/performance ratio
Disclamer

This IEM is part of the Audio Geek Tours and Joseph from Lanstar with no influence in my honest opinion. These impressions are my subjective experiences and, as always, as it was my daily driver not as I’m doing a surgery into the frequency response. Your experience may vary, so always consider auditioning the gear yourself. Respect your fellow forum members and have fun.



1727671885737.png

Introduction

The CP54E is part of Canpur’s Performance Series, enters the market with a promising hybrid configuration, which on paper looks the next step for the basic full BA configuration. Priced at $1999, it’s aimed at people looking for high-level performance, technicality, and detail retrieval. A more professional tuning use, per se. At this price and configuration, I can easily point that Canpur is targeting IEMS like 64a 12t and QDC VX.

While it excels in certain aspects, especially in treble extension and soundstage, the CP54E falls short in the crucial area of tuning, leaving some key elements, particularly in the upper mids, feeling less refined than they should be. I will compare this to some classics like the 64 Audio U12t and Empire Ears Legend X, two well-known and well-seasoned IEMs in the same price range and get some cable rolling to play around with the timbre.

The whole listening was done through:
  • Sony WM-1Z High Gain, volume 10-15
  • Hiby R3 II, volume 10-15
  • Spin-fit W1 (Pictured Tips are stock. I compared with Divinus, Eletech Baroque and others, SF W1 is the best fit/performance ratio for me)
  • Stock cable unless compared to others.

1727671936950.png

Tangibles: Build and Driver Configuration

The CP54E’s driver configuration combination of BA and EST drivers feels like a natural evolution in the high-end IEM landscape from those full BA ones. With its 9 drivers working in harmony through a 4-way crossover, the IEM is designed to deliver clarity across the frequency range. The BA and EST setup should theoretically provide fast transients, high detail retrieval, and expansive treble, and while it succeeds in many of these areas, the tuning leaves a bit to be desired, particularly in the upper mids.

Comparatively, the 64 Audio U12t, which uses a full BA configuration, strikes a more balanced and organic tonal profile, while the Empire Ears LX, though bass-heavy due to its dynamic driver, delivers a richer and more natural timbre in the mids.

The Canpur CP54E has a sophisticated, well-crafted build that follows general resin design. The faceplate follows Canpur’s signature design, featuring a sleek aesthetic with something like galaxies accents that exude luxury. While the faceplate design is elegant and visually appealing, the overall shell size is on the larger side, which could lead to fit and comfort issues for some users over extended listening periods. For those with smaller ears, testing a variety of tips to ensure a proper fit balance with sound performance will be essential.

Sound Signature: BA “V” with a twist

Bass


The bass on the CP54E is well-extended and provides good impact, well impressive for a full BA bass. But it lacks the visceral quality you get from dynamic driver IEMs like the Empire Ears LX, if that is your gig. The LX’s dynamic driver produces a more textured and fuller bass response, giving sub-bass lines a depth that the CP54E push hard, but can’t meet. However, within the realm of BA and EST drivers, the CP54E’s bass is articulate and clean, more in line with the U12t, which has a similarly fast and detailed bass response but without the added weight and slam of a dynamic driver.

Listening to Insomnium’s "Pale Morning Star," the CP54E keeps pace with the fast double-bass drum work, with a good and deep physical presence to the low end. On the other hand, the U12t offers a similar and well known accurate yet slightly less impactful low end. CP54E offers very distinctive separation of notes in the low end.

Mids

The midrange is where the CP54E stumbles a bit. The tuning of the upper mids, in particular, feels a bit off, leading to a slightly pushed back and metallic timbre that detracts from the naturalness of vocals and instruments. This issue becomes more pronounced when paired with its stock silver-plated copper (SPC) cable, which tends to emphasize treble and further accentuates this bit of unnatural character. Tracks like Katatonia’s "My Twin" reveal this downside, as Jonas Renkse’s vocals sound a bit hollow in the mids, lacking the energy and body that I was expecting coming from other IEMs.

In contrast, the 64 Audio U12t handles midrange tones with greater naturality, providing a more neutral, well-balanced presentation. The U12t’s mids are neither recessed nor overly forward, striking an excellent balance. Similarly, the Empire Ears LX offers a thicker, richer midrange that complements its bass-heavy signature, though its mids can sometimes feel overshadowed by the low-end emphasis.

But not all is bad in the mids for this great IEM. Switching the CP54E to a copper cable like the Effect Audio Ares S II or Code 24C helps to bring life to the mids, bringing warmth and smoothness to the upper mids and making vocals and instruments sound more natural. This pairing brings the CP54E closer to what I’d expect in terms of midrange realism, particularly on more vocal-centric tracks. If you prefer a forward presentation, a better SPC like Eletech Euclid will do a great job.

1727672030761.png

Treble

The CP54E treble region is something to keep an eye on, or an ear in this case, thanks to its 4 EST drivers. The high frequencies are crisp, airy, and well-extended, making the CP54E good for genres that demand high treble clarity. Listening to "Atoma" by Dark Tranquillity, the high-pitched synths and cymbals shimmer beautifully without sounding overly bright or harsh. The EST drivers provide excellent treble separation and detail retrieval, creating an airy top end that contributes to the IEM’s spacious soundstage.

Going back to our well known 12t, the treble airiness and extension is on par with CP45E with that extra spark from the EST drivers compared to BA and even the great TIA driver. The Empire Ears LX, on the other hand, has a more subdued treble response, making it more suitable for those sensitive to high frequencies, but at the cost of losing some of the sparkle and shimmer that the CP54E offers.

Soundstage and Imaging

The Canpur CP54E’s open-back design offers a spacious and expansive soundstage. The width and depth are particularly good, giving tracks a sense of space that’s ideal for staging and atmospheric music like Katatonia's "Fields of Sand." The openness allows instruments and vocals to be fairly separated and positioned across a wide plane. This enhanced imaging works especially well for high-frequency details, making it easy to pick out cymbals, synths, or guitar plucks in more sparse arrangements.

However, when the music gets more complex — especially with dense, multi-layered compositions like Insomnium’s "While We Sleep" — the imaging starts to lose precision. In busier passages, where multiple instruments and layers overlap, the CP54E’s imaging can become slightly blurred, making it harder to maintain the same level of instrument separation as in simpler tracks. While the overall soundstage remains large and expansive, the IEMs struggle with maintaining clarity in the thick of more complex arrangements. In comparison, the 64 Audio U12t offers more precise imaging in these scenarios, though at the cost of having a more intimate soundstage.

1727672077646.png

Some Random Cable Synergy

The stock SPC cable of the CP54E doesn’t do it many favors, particularly in the mid-range. Which I would suggest to account for an upgraded cable when considering a CP54E purchase.

The silver-plated copper emphasizes treble clarity but makes the already slightly metallic timbre in the upper mids more apparent and forward, if you like it, that will be pleasantly well done. For users looking to smooth out the mids and bring the timbre to a more natural place, switching to a copper cable like the Effect Audio Ares S II, Effect Audio 24C or Eletech Aristotle is highly recommended. These cables add warmth and smoothness, boosting the upper mids and delivering a more cohesive and realistic sound. This makes the CP54E feel more balanced overall and more up my alley for my library synergy.

1727672139252.png

Conclusion (TL;DR)

The Canpur CP54E is a technically impressive IEM with strong bass performance, stellar treble extension, and a spacious soundstage. However, its tuning, particularly in the mids, leaves room for improvement. The slightly off timbre in this region can detract from an otherwise enjoyable experience, especially when using the stock SPC cable. Pairing the CP54E with a copper cable helps to smooth out the mids and bring the timbre to a more natural and balanced place, making it a more versatile IEM. But have in mind that with such upgrades you can be reaching better IEM package options in the price range.

Compared to the 64 Audio U12t and Empire Ears LX, the CP54E stands out for its treble performance and soundstage but falls short in overall tonal balance, specially if one likes forward mids. Unfortunately, I don’t have a CP622B with me here, but from memory it is a big step up which I would recommend to consider if an Upgrade Cable is needed to bring CP54E to your taste.

For those looking for an airy treble, detailed IEM and are willing to experiment with cable pairings, the CP54E offers plenty of potential. However, if a more natural and cohesive tuning is your priority, there are other options in the market.

1727672121801.png



Neweymatt

Headphoneus Supremus
Canpur CP54E
Pros: Fantastic sub-bass, lots of fun.
Lively, engaging overall presentation
Decent resolution
Cons: Peaky upper mids and treble
Treble is poor quality
I recently had the pleasure to spend some time with the Canpur CP54E as part of a tour, many thanks to AudioGeek, Canpur and Lanstar for providing the tour kit!

Canpur CP54E has an RRP of $1,999, but I’ve seen it discounted recently at various outlets.

The CP54E comes with good packaging, and a nice case. The included tips look good, I’m not sure what brand they are, They look very similar to Final E tips, however I used my other go-to tip with these, the Azla Sedna EarFits. The included cable is decent, a nice soft, supple 4-wire, that appears to be silver-plated copper.

CP54E-1.jpg


The shells are very well made, and have a custom-like shape to them with a longer stem for deep insertion that I thought worked well for getting a good seal. I did not observe any venting, and I did notice a bit of discomfort on longer listening sessions, over 90 minutes or so. But for shorter-term sessions they were great.

CP54E-2.jpg



As far as the frequency response goes, bass digs very satisfyingly deep with pretty good texture, and I have to say this is among the very best BA sub-bass I've heard. Midbass has a moderate amount of warmth to it, but is at times hiding a bit behind the sub-bass. Any less midbass or lower midrange, and this IEM might veer into sounding too “sterile”, but fortunately that is avoided. Upper midrange and treble is peaky, and on some tracks I definitely heard it. While this gives CP54E a lively and engaging “fun” sort of sound that I enjoyed most of the time, I did at times find it a bit too much. Over longer listening sessions, coupled with the lack of venting, it was a bit fatiguing.

On the technical front, I think CP54E is pretty good for where it sits price-wise. Stage is nicely shaped, with perhaps a bit more height than depth, and details are well presented most of the time. My issue with the peaky treble here is that it lost resolution on some instruments and vocals could be a bit sibilant. Instrument separation and placement are decent, although because of the relative narrow-ness of the stage, could feel a bit cramped and lacking air.


A couple of tracks I listened to:

Everything goes along nicely on CP54E up to about the 5:00 mark when an additional layer of percussion comes in. The extra treble energy from CP54E is just too much and blows that percussion into a sibilant mess.




Here is another track where CP54E is mostly pretty great. However, there is a broken-chord synth pattern in the upper frequencies that CP54E loses control over on the highest note, and the percussion that starts around 2:30 is also just a bit loose and lacking precision.



A couple of comparisons:
Noble Spartacus ($1,799)
Spartacus uses 2xBA drivers for bass, one BA for midrange, and one BA for treble, plus 2x Bone conduction drivers that cover the entire frequency range. Spartacus sacrifices a little bit of sub-bass extension vs the CP54E, but its upper mids and treble are much better balanced, and the quality is also much better, without any hint of the CP54E's peaks. While the stage of CP54E is good, with nice height, Spartacus feels rather notably wider and deeper, which has the corollary effect of better instrument separation and a grander sense of space between notes & instruments. With Spartacus I feel like I can focus in on specific elements much more easily than CP54E if I want to, or just enjoy the entire presentation in a more relaxing manner.


64 Audio U/A12t ($1,999)
The U12t has been the $2k benchmark for many years, and is another good comparison point with the CP54E. The tuning between these two is rather different, with the 12t going for a much more neutral “correct” approach vs the CP54E’s fun V-shape. While the 12t’s bass doesn't dig quite as deep, likewise its upper midrange is also not near as hot, so you get a more balanced presentation of the entire FR. Where 12t really pulls ahead is in the technical areas, its stage is larger in all dimensions, and forms a near perfect sphere in shape, and it's detail resolution is far more accurate with never any hint of messiness. Again, like Spartacus, the 12t seems to have more room to breathe than CP54E. Another advantage 12t has is 64 Audio’s ATOM modules that allow you to increase/decrease isolation and bass response, while at the same time providing pressure relief to let you listen for many long hours with zero fatigue.


My bottom line on the Canpur CP54E is that it is a fun lively IEM that is quite enjoyable in smaller doses. I personally would struggle to justify its price tag over the longer term, but if you can forgive some of its technical shortcomings it’s not a bad guilty pleasure. I am left wondering about Canpur’s other offerings and look forward for a chance to spend some time with CP74E and CP622B.
Last edited:

David Haworth

Previously known as J Weiner
Canpur CP54E Performance is its middle name.
Pros: TOTL sound wise
Easy to drive
Comfortable to wear.
Cons: None.
PXL_20240523_054353274.MP.jpg

The Canpur CP54E has been provided to me for assessment by AudioGeeks IEM tours as part of the Australian arm of a worldwide tour.

The IEM is a 5BA and 4 EST driver earphone with a resin shell. It is easy to drive. It is supplied with a leather carry case, two sets of ear tips in all sizes and a 4.4mm balanced cable.

PXL_20240527_011429211.MP.jpg


This is my first time with a set that retails well above one thousand usd and I was unsure what to expect from an all BA & EST set. From first listen I was captivated by what I was hearing. Acoustic guitars sound completely natural and real! You can hear fingers on fretboards and tone and timbre are natural. Instrument separation is pinpoint and it's as if you were standing at front of stage in front of players. Both male and female vocals sound realistic, with no alteration of timbre. You can hear subtleties of breathing and intonation, as if you are next to them at the microphone. Vocals are positioned perfectly within the mix.

Bass guitar is felt as well as heard. As are drums. Cymbals are crystalline, splashy, and lifelike. One of rocks better drumming powerhouse songs "Change" from the War on Drugs, hits hard and slams deep and low. Snare drums are snappy and punchy with a realistic and natural tone. Sub bass is present in good quantities,

where the track requires it, and proves a good Sonion BA set can reproduce the low range accurately. It does not have a boosted or overwhelming presence. “Cream" by Prince rocks hard with deep bass and rumbly sub bass and sharp snares. Drum sounds are full and felt as well as heard. I'm not missing a DD driver with the 54's. This BA bass is up with some of the best bass I have heard of any origin.

PXL_20240523_054832481.PORTRAIT~2.jpg


Highs are extended and cut through the mix surgically without damage. Indeed, the treble is like a laser, bathing your eardrums with scintillating sounds but never erring on the harsh or sibilant side. I'm constantly hearing new subtleties in tracks I am very familiar with. Additionally, because of the driver's fidelity, my attention is constantly drawn to the tones of individual instruments. The breathiness of a woodwind, the reverberation of a guitar. The soundstage is another triumph. While not the widest, I'm hearing good width but great depth and height. They recreate a large space for the elements of the song to occupy.



PXL_20240523_011520445.MP.jpg


The Canpur 54 sets the standard for balanced sound to my ears, with no emphasis anywhere in the frequency range, just detailed and enjoyable fidelity. Listening to this is analogous to sitting in the engineer’s chair in a studio with 32 discrete tracks available to hear and marvel at.





It can be viewed and ordered at Lanstar at the following link. https://lanstar.asia/collections/new-arrival/products/cp54e?variant=42504635220141
Last edited:

F700

Headphoneus Supremus
An Ode to Musicality and Tuning Expertise
Pros: A true TOTL fun-allrounder set…
…worth saving or skipping some other purchases to put your hands on this secret weapon.
Professionally tuned IEMs by a musician and a skilled engineer.
Easy to drive, and…
…presenting an astonishing ability to scale up within a high-quality source.
Liquid and intoxicating sound, music flows in a sovereign effortlessness manner.
The CP54e bury the misleading definition of “BA-bass”, once for all.
Wide yet not unrealistic soundstage.
Stunning vocal and overall mids performance, even considering the slightly elevated bass.
Higher frequencies are flawlessly tuned. Air, detail retrieval, extension, and absence of unwelcomed spice in your sound.
Great built quality and superb work on the faceplate design.
Excellent package overall, with a decent stock cable and a suitable set of eartips.
Fit like CIEM into my ears.
Cons: Elevated bass for neutral sound aficionados.
Not the very last word in terms of sound depth and height.
I would have preferred open bores instead of a grill on the nozzle.
Introduction
Hello everyone. Today, I am happy to share with you my concise impressions about the Canpur CP54e after 3 months of intense listening.

The CP54e sport 5BA and 4EST drivers pro side under pretty small shells, which are beautiful to look at and very comfortable to wear. The CP54e are one of my favorite IEMs as per today. They tick all my boxes in terms of sound, fit and versatility. I can only applaud Canpur for having tuned the CP54e in such a mature and fun sounding way. The CP54e embody the concept of musicality in the IEM’s world from my perspective, adding just a twist of energy on top, thus making them one of the most enjoyable sets I came across in the hobby so far, at any price point.

IMG_0101.jpg


Disclaimer & Courtesy
I purchased the Canpur CP54e via Musicteck in January 2024. Andrew was kind enough to grant me an appropriate discount for a review unit. Nevertheless, I was not asked to publish any dishonest/positive impressions as a compensation. All pictures taken are mine. Keep in mind there is no absolute objectivity possible in the review/impression exercise. The reader is welcomed to cope with the writer’s potential (un)conscious biases and to try trusting him for the self-honesty he puts into his effort.

Fact & Figures
All information about the Canpur CP54e can be found here: Canpur Performance series: CP54E — MusicTeck. Please note that the CP54e also are available as CIEM.

Packaging & Accessories
Canpur did a serious job about the packaging and understand what a satisfying unboxing experience means to audio enthusiasts. Without going into too many details, let’s say that you will find a great selection of tips and a high-quality leather case with more than enough place to store your CP54e. The stock cable, most likely a SPC or silver one (no information found so far), does its job. My impressions are based with this cable alone plugged to the CP54e and not the aftermarket ones (pure copper or gold-plated silver) I am regularly using.

Graph (courtesy of Musicteck)
Before going a bit deeper into sound impressions, let’s have a look at the FR-graph below, which give you a first idea about the overall tuning and why the CP54e might be appealing (or not) to you.
CP54E.jpg


I personally can exactly “hear” that graph, even if many sound aspects cannot be covered and represented on a FR-graph.

The 8kHz peak is not here to frighten you, but to let the vocal/instrument shine beyond the medium section. Overall, the higher frequencies are smooth yet with the right amount of sparkle and energy that are mandatory for an engaging but fatigue-free listen.

The subbass is clean, impactful, with great contours and digs deep. Fortunately, the CP54e avoid the trap of having their subbass being set 5-10db higher than it is and to quickly drop into the lower mids, forgetting the meaning and importance of a midbass presence.

Finally, the tuning of the mediums finishes the amazing job done by the sound engineer of Canpur. The compromise found in the vocals and instruments department is not something you end up with by chance. Clarity, texture, balanced note weight and a secret sauce making them neither too forward nor too recessed is a tour de force masterfully implemented.

You might have guessed it by now, the CP54e have conquered my ears and my musical heart.

IMG_0099.jpg


Sound & Sources
The Canpur CP54e is one of those very special IEMs, which make you turn up the volume by small incrementation until you notice that you actually are listening to your music pretty loud, or way louder than you should. I am not experiencing this behavior of mine with many sets. This definitely speaks in favor of the CP54e.

The CP54e are not completely source agnostic, but they are less capricious than most of my IEMs. Is it partially due to their very low impedance (10ohm)? However, they do scale up with a high-quality source, but don’t necessarily require external amping. You perfectly can enjoy the CP54e to 95% of their potential with a neutral/warm DAP like the Hiby R8 II or LPGT, which I am using with them. Adding my trusty Romi BX2-Pro amp into the mix and I am extracting the very last drops of awesomeness the CP54e have to offer.

I would describe the CP54e as a balanced sounding set of IEMs, with a surprisingly impactful and textured low-end. This is the most realistic and textured BA bass experience I came across, period. The bass performance is outstanding and some fellow audio enthusiasts who have tried the CP54e without knowing the driver’s structure could not believe there was no DD behind the shells. I am a bit of a basshead, but I must admit that my obsession with hard-hitting/cavernous bass is not what it used to be 2-3 years ago.

Comparisons
CP54e vs. CP32e
PHOTO-2024-03-04-21-26-16.jpg

Graph – Courtesy of Musicteck

I don’t have any other IEMs with a BA/EST hybrid structure like the CP54e at hand. However, I was offered the opportunity to listen to the little brother of the CP54e a few weeks before starting to write the present impressions. I took some notes in prevision of this short review, and I am happy to share them with you now.

In fact, reducing the CP32e (3BA/2EST) as the “little” brother of the CP54e is not fair. They share a similar DNA, it’s incontestable, but they also differ from each other by their respective overall signature and tuning. The graph above is spot on and displays where those differences can be heard and felt. The CP54e basically are the CP32e on soft steroids, meaning that the whole bass section and lower mids region are a bit more elevated, but still letting vocals and instruments expressing themselves with absolute freedom and impressive clarity. The CP32e are not bass shy but prefer to let vocals being the star of the show. I see the CP54e being more of an allrounder set than the CP32e. Indeed, vocals are for me the strong focus of the CP32e. Instrumental pieces sound livelier and just more engaging through the CP54e. I am splitting hairs, but this difference, as slight as it is, does exist anyway and make me prefer the CP54e over the CP32e.

What the graph is not showing is how both the CP54e and the CP32e sound in reality. Both have a wide stage and a very decent sense of width and height. Finally, the absence of glare or rough edges on both sets makes the listening experience extremely pleasant and fatigue-free.

The CP32e retail for approx. USD 800.- and I think that this price is quite crazy for what you get in return. Honestly, I think that the CP32e is one of the best deal around below the USD 1K mark. It goes the same way for the CP54e under USD 2K, even if the CP32e ultimately represent the very best value in terms of price/performance ratio.

CP54e vs. CP622b
CP54_CP622.png

Graph – Courtesy of TGX78

The CP622b were very high on my shortlist right after I got the CP54e. Sure, you always want/need to hear or even to own the flagship of a given brand. Flagship means “better” by definition. Well, not always. First, flagship means “more expensive” and, secondly, what the manufacturers consider their best possible IEM offering at a given time. Finally, the technical aspect or the complexity of the onboarded driver structure plays a role, too.

I had the opportunity to put the CP54e and the CP622b in a head-to-head session a few days ago, and I honestly was a bit underwhelmed by Canpur’s flagship soundwise at first. I admit I had very high expectations, especially because we are in a whole different price category. The shells are about of the same size, with another colour pattern on the faceplates.

My CP54e have quite a mileage already, so I know them very well and the honeymoon phase is still ongoing. The CP622e stood no chance in the beginning of the comparison because of a brain burn-in phase to happen. A few minutes later, I still thought that the CP54e was more up my alley. The CP622b is a bit too warm sounding for me and lack the excitement the CP54e are able to distillate into my ears. The BC drivers properly do their work, but even with tips rolling, I wished I experienced something like the Kinera Verdandi offer in terms of BC technology. The vocals on the CP622b are beautifully rendered and tuned, but this applies to the CP54e and CP32e to the same extent. The 8khz peak is lower set on the CP662b, but the high treble has more energy. You distinctly can hear that, and my preference goes to the CP54e. Overall, it’s really a matter of taste at the end of the day. Some will take the CP54e over the CP622b and some won’t. The respective tunings are very well implemented and in my opinion both are co-flagships.

Accident in Paradise
Ok, I have been praising the CP54e quite a bit now, but what could have been improved? Well, not much to be honest. The sense of depth and height is decent, and I understand that some demanding audiophiles or audio enthusiasts focusing on pure technical prowess might find the CP54e limited in that regard, wishing for extra headroom. Moreover, I am not a big fan of a grill on the nozzle, I prefer open bores, even if it requires additional work to clean them up from time to time. Finally, I personally have no issue with the very comfortable high-quality resin shells, but I can get that investing USD 2K in a pair of IEMs might raise some expectations in terms of material used for the making of the shells. I don’t want to come up as a shill (which I am not) or someone abusing of superlatives, but I have a hard time finding issues or flawed aspects to the CP54e.

Jukebox (Local library, Bandcamp, Streaming Apps or YT)
I have selected some tracks below, which accurately reflect my listening habits of the last weeks with the CP54e. I am an Electronic child by definition, but I love many musical genres and have a sweet spot for Female and Male vocalists, OST, Hip-Hop, Classic Rock, 80’s pop and a bit of Jazz.

Black Sabbath – Planet Caravan

Planet Caravan is not the first track that comes to mind thinking about Black Sabbath’s discography. The CP54e render the atmosphere of this moody track with excellence. From the percussions to be distinctly heard in the background to the haunting vocals, this track and its strange ambiance are beautifully rendered via the CP54e. The recording quality, even in the remastered version of the LP, is averagely good. The CP54e know how to show some forgiveness with such digital files and manage to make the listen of this track highly enjoyable.

Joho McCleery – Dream Letter

Big fan of Joho here. I love his voice and most of the songs as well as covers he has been releasing since his debut. Great recording quality allows to enjoy every change of voice’s intonation and to capture the emotion emanating from this song. The CP54e excel in the vocal department and there is no exception here. Towards the end of the track, the pace accelerates and there are many instruments building up the tension. It’s a short session, less than one minute long, and the CP54e remain sovereign in their ability to manage busy or complex instrumental passages. It’s difficult to fault them, with calm or high-paced music.

Genesis – Domino pt. 1 & 2

From to time to time, I revisit the Pop/Rock classic tracks from my teenager age. Genesis belongs to my favorite band, but I admit I much prefer their later works under Phil Collins’ leadership. Like some other tracks produced by Phil in the late 80’s and early 90’s, this song is divided in two different parts, being rightfully tagged as pt.1 (0m00s-4m29s) and pt. 2 (4m30s-10m44s). During these 10-minutes of bliss, Genesis plays at another level and Domino transports you in the best of what Pop/Rock music has ever offered to mankind. The final segment (from the 9m00s mark) is phenomenal, it moves me at every listen. The CP54e handle the inherent energetic nature of the track with Maestria. Back in the 90’s, many recordings were intentionally arranged a bit on the brighter side of things. This could be an issue depending on the transducers you are using to listen to them. Fortunately, the CP54e retain the good things here, but shave off some of the unwelcomed peaks and can appropriately tame Phil’s powerful voice. A fantastic listen.

Dominique Fils-Aimé – Birds

I recently discovered this artist, shuffling Bandcamp on a lazy Sunday. This is a pure vocal test track. The gentle jazzy rhythmic session in the background is greatly executed and a pleasure to listen to, but the singer and her beautiful voice are where your attention should be focused on. This is goosebumps material. The CP54e dig for every detail in this musical piece and succeed in portraying all the nuances of Dominique’s voice. Vocals lovers should consider adding the CP54e at the top of their shortlist.

Zaho de Sagazan – Tristesse

This is another example on how the CP54e are bluffing at presenting instruments and vocals with aplomb and richness of tone. The track slowly starts with clear and detailed vocals before a change of pace, where the CP54e once more get the opportunity to show their ability to cope with modern music infused with vocals. The bass is clean and impactful while not “bleeding” into the mids, the vocals have weight, matter and presence, perfectly contoured and rightly placed into the mix. Finally, the higher frequencies are handled with smoothness and controlled energy. The CP54e might not be the most technical IEMs on the market, but their technicalities are more than sufficient considering how musical and natural they sound.

Skiclub Toggenburg – Rona II (Alci Remix)

Micro-house release from my home country with a zest of minimalism. The CP54e have no issue playing back refined and multi-layered Electronics. The extended soundstage does wonder here, creating an enveloping sound experience, with every little detail in the track being fired at you with surgical precision. Once more, the low end is nicely textured and weighty enough to fully enjoy that kind of music style.

Quelza – What If They’re Wrong

Fasten your seatbelts, you are about to be taken into a seismic electronic trip reaching a solid 9 on the Richter scale. This track is much more complex than it seems. All begins right after the 2 minutes mark. There are many micro-sounds and unrelenting changes of pace and dynamics behind the monstrous and evil bass at play. Collision and superposition of soundscapes that are super difficult to be properly played back by other IEMs I own or have demoed lately. The CP54e handle the above-mentioned complexity in an effortless and spacious manner. It’s like they are disappearing into your ears, letting the intoxicating sound just flowing into your brain, tickling and shaking up your synapses. This track is the proof that the CP54e most likely will please many bassheads.

Il Quadro di Troisi – I Buchi Neri

Donato Dozzy and Eva Geist being signed on the avant-garde and long-lasting German Label “Raster” is a great surprise for me and their last LP is a sweet combination of Italian synth-pop and vocal-electronics. The CP54e feel at home with such track. The low-end is punchy, tight and full, while Eva’s Italian chant emerges from the background and dictates the pace of the song until the end. The CP54e manage once more to impress with a natural and romantic way of playing back that kind of music. Repeat button material.

End Words
The CP54e retail for USD 1’999.-. Even if we can argue about the fact that any IEMs above USD 200.- are overpriced (kiddin’ a bit), I think that the CP54e are well-worth your hard-earned cash, provided you find this kind of tuning and sound signature appealing. I have listened to many Totl IEMs recently. This experience made me aware about two things: 1) Many people still don’t know or are not familiar with the Canpur product range and 2) The CP54e have absolutely no problem to sound as good as or even better than other IEMs being much more expensive. This is my very own appreciation, of course.

I have very little to complain about the CP54, especially considering their price, what they are capable of and how they perform vs. higher priced IEMs. An improved headroom is the only thing I am missing a bit on certain tracks, but that’s about it. Some might point out that the resin shells could have been replaced by a more premium material, but the work on the shells is truly excellent and the resin of superior quality.

The CP54e get an easy and fully deserved 5 stars rating from me. Their tuning, sound signature, technical abilities, musicality, and finally the excellent price/performance ratio offered by Canpur justify the maximal score.

The CP54e was a semi-blind purchase in my case, and I must thank Andrew and the Musicteck crew for their top-notch advisory service. Listening to music through IEMs has never been so satisfying…so far 😉

F700’s goosebumps score = 98%
Last edited:
R
RazorItoh
@Jacobal I owned both Ronin and these. Imo these were better for me. The ronin's I felt were a bit boring. Nothing sticks out. It's an alright "do everything" kinda iem. At that price the RN6 or 622B do that role much better while each being special.
  • Like
Reactions: F700
F700
F700
Special mention about the RN6, which are very nice sounding indeed. The CP54e still have my preference soundwise, but it’s a close call. Price wise, no need to discuss it…
C
Codename john
Great review ! They seem similar in many ways to the Noble audio Spartacus. Nothing better than a bassy set with great technicalities
Back
Top